RESUMEN
People experiencing homelessness are at increased risk for serious burn injuries and face additional barriers to care such as inability to perform wound care and difficulty with follow-up. Although not burn-specific, street medicine programs provide direct medical care to people experiencing unsheltered homelessness in their own environment and may be well positioned to bridge this gap in burn care for this population. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to characterize the burn care experience of street medicine teams with providing burn care for people experiencing homelessness. The 60 respondents included 18 (30%) physicians, 15 (25%) nurse practitioners or physician assistants, 15 (25%) registered nurses, and 6 (10%) medical students, and 6 (10%) other team members. The most common reported barriers to care were prior negative experiences with emergency departments, and transportation to burn centers. There was regional variability in frequency of providing burn care, which was reflected in respondent comfort with assessing and treating burns. Burns were most often dressed with daily dressings such as a non-adherent dressing over silver sulfadiazine or bacitracin. Silver-based contact dressings were rarely used. Street medicine teams in the United States are treating burn injuries among people experiencing homelessness, though management practices and experience treating burns was variable. As street medicine programs continue to grow, burn-related education, training, and connections to local burn centers for team members is important. Through strengthened partnerships between burn centers and street medicine teams, these programs may be well positioned to bridge the gap in burn care for people experiencing homelessness.
RESUMEN
This study evaluated the prevalence characteristics of advanced practice providers, including nurse practitioners and physician assistants, who provide care related to burns in the United States from 2013 to 2022 using national claims data. Our analysis was a retrospective, large cohort study evaluating debridement, wound care, and office-based services provided by advanced practice providers from 2013 to 2022 using the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data Public Use Files from the CMS. The reported provider type and billing codes were used to identify healthcare professionals providing burn care. Trends over the study period and available data about care provided were analyzed. From 2013 to 2022, burn care providers included 6,918 (43.3%) surgeons, 4,264 (26.7%) other physicians, and 4,783 (30.0%) advanced practice providers. Overall, the number of advanced practice providers who billed for burn care increased by 250.4% from 714 in 2013 to 2,502 in 2022. Compared with physicians, advanced practice providers were more likely to be female and provide care in micropolitan areas with less than 50,000 people. Based on these trends, we project that the number of APPs providing services related to burns will increase by 56.7% from 2,502 in 2022 to 3,921 (95% CI, 3,541-4,303; R2=0.97) in 2030. With a growing need for burn care and predicted shortages in the surgeon workforce, the scope of practice and integration of advanced practice providers merits further discussion and evaluation.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Managing burn patients is a challenge requiring a multidisciplinary team with the ability to predict complications and act early to avoid them. There are few studies characterizing the population of critically ill burn patients in need of ventilatory support. This study aimed to describe the population of burn patients in need of invasive mechanical ventilation support and assess in-hospital mortality and the factors associated with it. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A longitudinal retrospective study was conducted, including burn patients admitted to a tertiary hospital burn unit over five consecutive years, who required invasive mechanical ventilation support during their hospitalization. Demographic data, comorbidities, characteristics of the injury scene, etiology, and characteristics of the burn were collected. Length of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization as well as mortality rate were evaluated. The determination of mortality predictors and the prognostic performance of mortality prediction scores were analyzed. A one-year follow-up was performed to evaluate the survival of discharged patients. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were included in this study; 68.1% patients were male with a median age of 58 years. The mean percentage of total body surface area (TBSA) burned was 24.5%. Home incidents were the most frequent, and fire was the most common cause of burns (80.9% of patients). The mean Abbreviated Burn Severity Index Score (ABSI) was 7.83, with an area under the curve in receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis (AUC_ROC) of 0.725; the mean Belgium Outcome of Burn Injury (BOBI) score was 3.45, with AUC_ROC of 0.740 and mean R-Baux of 89.1 and AUC_ROC of 0.834. The mean duration of invasive mechanical ventilation was 16.9±19.3 days. Age (p<0.001), length of mechanical ventilation (p<0.001), length of hospitalization (p<0.001), higher degree of burn (p=0.001), TBSA (p=0.040), and the presence of buttock burn (0.006) were associated with mortality in this sample. In-hospital mortality was 29.8%. The survival group had a 12% death rate at one-year follow-up, mostly in the first three months after discharge. CONCLUSION: Age, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospitalization, higher degree of burn, TBSA, and the presence of buttock burn were associated with mortality in this sample. R-Baux score was the most accurate test score to predict mortality in this challenging group of patients.
RESUMEN
When compared to standard surgical management, rapid enzymatic debridement of deep burns reduces the need for surgery while achieving similar long-term results. However, few studies have directly compared the costs of standard surgical and enzymatic burn care. We conducted a study comparing the care costs of 44 adult burn patients treated before (n=22) and after (n=22) introducing rapid bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (BED) of deep burns. Mean age was 59 years, 54% were male, and mean total body surface area (TBSA) was 23.5%. Burn etiology included flame and scalding burns (8). Groups treated with standard of care and enzymatic debridement were comparable in terms of age, sex and TBSA. Burn management with BED significantly reduced total debridement costs as well as grand total costs when compared with traditional surgical care. Such reduction was mostly related to lower costs associated with reduced surgical care and less facilities and resources consumption in the BED group.
Comparativement au traitement standard, l'excision enzymatique précoce (EEP) réduit la nécessité de chirurgie, à résultats égaux à long termes. Très peu d'études ont comparé les coûts de ces deux stratégies. Nous avons comparé 2 groupes de 22 patients profondément brûlés ayant pour l'un été pris en charge conventionnellement, l'autre ayant bénéficié d'une EEP. L'âge moyen était de 59 ans, 54% étaient des hommes, la surface brûlée moyenne de 23,5% (les 2 groupes étaient comparables). Seuls 8 patients avaient été ébouillantés, les autres étant brûlés par flamme. L'utilisation d'EEP réduisait significativement le coût de la prise en charge, en rapport avec la réduction de l'utilisation de locaux et de matériel consécutifs à la chirurgie.
RESUMEN
In recent decades, advances in surgical anatomy, burn pathophysiology, surgical techniques, and laser therapy have led to a paradigm shift in how we approach burn scars and contractures. Scar excision and replacement with uninjured tissue, which predominated burn scar treatment for much of the 20th century, is no longer appropriate in many patients. A scar's intrinsic ability to remodel can be induced by reducing tension on the scar using various techniques for local tissue rearrangement. Often in combination with laser therapy, local flaps can optimally camouflage a burn scar with adjacent normal tissue and restore a patient more closely to their preinjury condition.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Quemaduras/cirugía , Cicatriz/cirugía , Cicatriz/etiología , Contractura/cirugía , Contractura/etiología , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Trasplante de Piel/métodos , Colgajos QuirúrgicosRESUMEN
Regenerative therapies such as fat grafting and Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) have emerged as new options to tackle burn-related injuries and their long-term sequelae. Fat grafting is able to promote wound healing by regulating the inflammatory response, stimulating angiogenesis, favoring the remodeling of the extracellular matrix, and enhancing scar appearance. PRP can enhance wound healing by accelerating stages including hemostasis and re-epithelization. It can improve scar quality and complement fat grafting procedures. Their cost-effectiveness, minimal invasiveness, and promising results observed in the literature have made these tools as therapeutic candidates. The current evidence on fat grafting and PRP in acute and reconstructive burns is described and discussed in this study.
Asunto(s)
Tejido Adiposo , Quemaduras , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Tejido Adiposo/trasplante , Quemaduras/cirugía , Quemaduras/terapia , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Medicina Regenerativa/métodos , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Life-saving pediatric burn care is often initiated in hospitals that are not designated as a pediatric burn center. Therefore, familiarity with critical care of pediatric burn patients is crucial for physicians working in all healthcare settings equipped to care for children. Management of airway, mechanical ventilation, preservation of ideal circulatory status, and establishment of vascular access in pediatric burn patients requires many unique considerations. This article aims to summarize important principles of critical care of children with significant burn injuries for review by physicians and surgeons working in hospitals designated as a pediatric burn center and those that stabilize these patients prior to referral.
RESUMEN
Approximately 120,000 children in the United States are evaluated in the emergency department annually due to burn injuries. Studies have consistently documented that pediatric burns are among the most stressful events for caregivers, resulting in a wide range of emotions, including guilt, anxiety, grief, depression, and posttraumatic stress symptoms, as well as positive psychological changes, a phenomenon known as posttraumatic growth. The present pilot study aimed to explore the prevalence of elevated perceived stress as well as posttraumatic growth among caregivers of pediatric burn patients receiving outpatient burn care and using an mHealth burn platform to administer burn treatment. Our results demonstrated that, on average, caregivers endorsed similar or lower levels of perceived stress over the past 30 days compared to the general population of 30-44-year-old adults and only a third of caregivers reported elevated levels of perceived stress in the past 30 days. However, during the treatment phase, two-thirds of caregivers reported elevated levels of stress. Further, approximately half of the caregiver sample reported moderate to high levels of posttraumatic growth following their child's burn injury. This pilot study clarifies the level of the perceived stress that caregivers of burn-injured children experience, particularly during the treatment phase when they are responsible for their children's outpatient burn care (e.g., dressing changes). Additionally, the results shed light on the high prevalence of moderate to high posttraumatic growth in caregivers, with a prevalence rate similar to other trauma survivors.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Quemaduras , Cuidadores , Crecimiento Psicológico Postraumático , Estrés Psicológico , Telemedicina , Humanos , Quemaduras/psicología , Quemaduras/terapia , Quemaduras/enfermería , Proyectos Piloto , Cuidadores/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adulto , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Preescolar , Adolescente , Ansiedad/psicología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Depresión/psicología , Depresión/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Culpa , PesarRESUMEN
Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are immune-mediated skin reactions with high mortality as a result of severely compromised skin barrier function. Currently, there is no consensus on the topical management of these conditions. Some advocate for surgical debridement of affected skin as a means of preventing infection and facilitating reepithelialization with synthetic and biological wound coverage. Others prefer a conservative approach that relies on leaving the blistered skin in situ. A consensus is lacking, primarily due to the rarity of the disease and the lack of high-quality evidence supporting one particular form of management. The goal of this review is to explore and compare the two treatment approaches for SJS and TEN, namely conservative management and surgical debridement.
RESUMEN
Home oxygen therapy (HOT) is prescribed to patients with pulmonary dysfunction to improve survival and quality of life. However, ignition of oxygen can lead to burns with significant morbidity and mortality. Providers who routinely treat this patient population face an ethical issue: balancing the obligation to provide beneficial treatment to a patient with the responsibility to protect that patient from suffering avoidable burn injuries. A thorough review was conducted to assess the literature regarding ethical considerations involved in managing patients who have been burned while smoking on HOT and who continue to smoke. Various aspects of this problem and potential approaches to address it were analyzed with respect to 4 core ethical principles of health care: beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. For patients who repeatedly present with burns acquired secondary to smoking while on oxygen, the authors consider it ethically unacceptable to withhold standard-of-care intervention for acute burns because refusal to treat acute burns conflicts with all 4 ethical principles. A preventive strategy would encourage a more judicious prescription of HOT, supporting the principles of nonmaleficence and beneficence. Additional preventive strategies include upstream solutions such as longitudinal patient education about smoking cessation and the risks of smoking on HOT. Physicians are tasked with the responsibility of both providing optimal care for this patient population and preventing future burn injuries. They may be able to address this challenging situation by thinking more critically about potential solutions while bearing in mind key ethical considerations and obligations.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Humanos , Quemaduras/terapia , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/efectos adversos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/ética , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/ética , Fumar/efectos adversos , Beneficencia , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Burn injuries are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, affecting not only the patients but also their families. Family-based education and follow-up program are interventions that aim to improve the quality of life and psychosocial outcomes of patients with burns and their families. However, we find a lack of evidence on the effectiveness and feasibility of these programs in different settings and populations. This study aimed to evaluate the features of the family-based education and follow-up program (FBEFP), a pilot project that was developed and implemented at the Tabriz Sina Teaching Hospital in 2020 to improve its burn care system. DESIGN: A mixed-methods approach was used to collect and analyze both quantitative and qualitative data from various sources, such as, questionnaires, medical records, interviews and observation notes, to assess the content, process, and outcome of the program. The study followed the three steps of the CDC's framework for program evaluation: describing the program, measuring its effectiveness, and providing recommendations for improvement. RESULTS: The results of this study revealed the positive impacts of the FBEFP on the patients' physical, psychological, and social outcomes and quality of life. 4.8% of the people in the follow-up group were re-admitted, while this amount was 7.2% in the group without follow-up. Although the number of readmissions was less in the non-follow-up group, statistically no significant difference was observed between the two ratios before and after follow-up. In order to evaluate satisfaction rates, In the follow-up group, 72 patients and in the non-follow-up group, 38 patients were reached. After converting these data to normal distribution, using t-tests, it was determined that the difference between the two studied groups was highly significant. In other words, the follow-up process had favorable results on satisfaction of the studied people. However, the study also identified some challenges and barriers in implementing the program, such as lack of resources, staff training, and family involvement. CONCLUSION: FBEFP is a promising intervention that enhances the well-being of patients with burns and their families. However, more evidence is needed to support its effectiveness and feasibility in different contexts and populations. The study also provided valuable insights into the benefits and challenges of implementing a Family-Based Education and Follow-up Program for patients with burns in a low-resource setting. The study contributed to the development of guidelines and recommendations for future research and practice in this field.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Familia , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Quemaduras/terapia , Quemaduras/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Familia/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Niño , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , AncianoRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: The survival rate of patients with burn injuries has increased remarkably owing to the advancements in burn management which has resulted in improved survival rates, shorter hospital stays and decreases in morbidity and mortality rates due to the development of fluid resuscitation protocols, improved respiratory support, infection control etc. This study compares the parameters of burn patients admitted in a tertiary hospital from January 2012 to December 2016 and January 2017 to December 2021. Materials and Methods: This study was at the National Orthopaedic Hospital Enugu, NOHE. It was a retrospective study of patients who presented with burn injuries to the burn unit between the period of January 2012 and December 2021. Results: A total of 771 cases were analysed. Three hundred and twenty-three were seen between January 2012 to December 2016, 448 were seen between January 2017 and December 2021. Flame remained the major cause of burn injuries with 62% occurring in the first 5-year period while 72% occurred in the second 5 years. Adults had more injuries from flames than children, while children had more scald injuries than adults. The highest percentage of Total Burn Surface Area (TBSA) salvaged was 79% in the first 5-year period while 86% was salvaged in the second. Mortality rate in the first and second 5-year periods were 12% and 19%, respectively. Conclusions: Flame burn injuries are the most common cause of burn injuries in adults and children. Mortality was lower in the first 5-year period. A higher TBSA was salvaged in the second 5-year period.
RESUMEN
Burn care evolved slowly from primitive treatments depicted in cave drawings 3500 years ago to a vibrant medical specialty which has made remarkable progress over the past 200 years. This evolution involved all areas of burn care including superficial dressings, wound assessment, fluid resuscitation, infection control, pathophysiology, nutritional support, burn surgery, and inhalation injury. Major advances that contributed to current standards of care and improved outcomes are highlighted in this article. New innovations are making possible a future where severe burn injuries will require less morbid interventions for acute care and outcomes will restore patients more closely to their pre-injury condition.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Humanos , Quemaduras/terapia , Vendajes , Fluidoterapia , Control de InfeccionesRESUMEN
There is no consensus on the optimal management of diabetic foot burn injuries. Here, we systematically identify studies reporting on diabetic foot burns and evaluate outcomes among patients managed operatively vs nonoperatively. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched. Screening was performed by independent reviewers. Primary research studies with English full texts published between 1980 and 2023 that discussed outcomes of foot burns in adults with diabetes were included and critically appraised using validated tools. Results are presented using descriptive statistics of aggregated data. The search yielded 2402 nonduplicate papers, of which 35 met the inclusion criteria. Nine papers were included for meta-analysis, including 7 retrospective comparative analyses, 1 cross-sectional study, and 1 retrospective chart review. There were 1798 diabetic foot burn patients. The mean age was 58.2 years (SD 4.12), and 73.1% (n = 1314) were male. A total of 15.7% (n = 283) of patients were surgically managed, including debridement (3.7%, n = 66), grafting (8.2%, n = 147), flap (0.2%, n = 3), and primary amputation (7.1%, n = 127). The secondary amputation rate, defined as amputation following initial surgery, was 4.9% (n = 14). The overall amputation rate was 7.8% (n = 141). Other complications included infection (4.0%, n = 72), osteomyelitis (1.9%, n = 34), and graft failure (8.2%, n = 12). One study reported functional status at the last visit. Diabetic foot burns are highly morbid. The surgical management of these complex injuries is high risk, as amputation results in poorer quality of life and functional outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Pie Diabético , Humanos , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Quemaduras/cirugía , Desbridamiento , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , MasculinoRESUMEN
Burn mass casualty incident (BMCI) preparedness is lacking across Canada. A focused exploration of the current policies, protocols and practices in Alberta that address the response to a BMCI was conducted. In this case study, data were gathered from documents outlining the health system response to a mass casualty incident and health care professionals directly involved. Interviews were conducted online, recorded and transcribed. Qualitative description was used to code common themes across documents and transcripts. Fifteen documents and nine participant interviews were included in this study. Overall, the current policies, protocols and practices in place were limited to all-hazards mass casualty incident planning and did not address the specialized needs of burn patients. Deficiencies included no burn-specific plan at each of the two burn centres, a lack of provincial-level recognition of the unique challenges associated with a BMCI and no established Canadian burn disaster communication plan. Suggestions of strategies for a burn plan included forward triage, patient movement, use of telemedicine, partnering skilled and non-skilled staff, and procuring additional supplies. For best patient outcomes the provincial health authority needs to provide dedicated time for burn care experts to develop BMCI response plans to better address this unique hazard.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Planificación en Desastres , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa , Triaje , Humanos , Alberta , Quemaduras/terapia , Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Triaje/organización & administración , Unidades de Quemados/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
This study explored whether the use of virtual reality (VR) was a standard of care during burn care at burn verified facilities in the United States. Surveys were sent to American Burn Association verified burn centers to investigate if VR was being used as a standard of care, if protocols for using VR are in place and how they were developed, and what barriers these facilities are facing and several other topics investigated. Out of the 64 facilities surveyed, 21 responses were collected. Burn facilities reported 63.2% do not use and 36.8% do use VR while performing burn dressing changes and debridement. Only one out of seven respondents who reported they use VR considered it a standard of practice at their facility. Out of the seven hospitals currently using VR, two reported a decrease in opioid use with burn care with the use of VR. Although the current results indicate that VR is not frequently used clinically during burn care at most burn centers, 83.3% of burn centers reported they see themselves using VR in the future. As VR becomes more widely disseminated, future research should be conducted to continue to see if VR is becoming a standard of care and whether VR is making clinical impacts on pain, opioid use, and level of anxiety among burn patients.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Quemados , Quemaduras , Nivel de Atención , Realidad Virtual , Humanos , Unidades de Quemados/organización & administración , Quemaduras/terapia , Estados Unidos , Desbridamiento/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , VendajesRESUMEN
Rehabilitative care for burn patients in developing countries is often wrought with several issues. Post-discharge support is equally challenging as there is often limited rehabilitative care as the burn survivors and their families transition. To inform practice, this study sought to explore the perspectives of adult burn survivors and burn care staff regarding transitioning from the burn unit and the development of a transitional rehabilitation programme. We employed interpretive description for this study. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with adult burn survivors and burn care staff across two tertiary healthcare facilities in Lanzhou, Gansu Province of China, and Ghana. The thematic analytical approach was employed to analyse the data. Forty-six participants comprising 26 adult burn survivors and 20 burn care staff participated in this study. Two themes and five subthemes emerged from the data. Transitioning from the burn unit to the home was described as complex with varied biopsychosocial needs emerging. However, available support was not comprehensive to resolve these needs. Existing pre-discharge support is limited across both settings. Burn survivors expressed interest in taking on an active role in the rehabilitation process and being able to self-manage their post-burn symptoms following discharge. Transitional rehabilitative support should include an active follow-up system, ensure patient- and family-centred support, and offer a bundle of comprehensive rehabilitative services using locally available items which do not financially burden burn survivors and their families. In conclusion, transitioning from the burn unit is filled with varied health needs. Transitional rehabilitative care is required to bridge the pre-discharge and post-discharge periods.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Quemados , Quemaduras , Investigación Cualitativa , Sobrevivientes , Humanos , Ghana , Quemaduras/psicología , Quemaduras/rehabilitación , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , China , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Unidades de Quemados/organización & administración , Entrevistas como Asunto , Adulto Joven , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Personal de Salud/psicología , Alta del PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Burn injuries can be associated with prolonged healing, infection, a substantial inflammatory response, extensive scarring, and eventually death. In recent decades, both the mortality rates and long-term survival of severe burn victims have improved significantly, and burn care research has increasingly focused on a better quality of life post-trauma. However, delayed healing, infection, pain and extensive scar formation remain a major challenge in the treatment of burns. ADSCs, a distinct type of mesenchymal stem cells, have been shown to improve the healing process. The aim of this review is to evaluate the efficacy of ADSCs in the treatment of burn injuries. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. The basic research question was formulated with the PICO framework, whereby the usage of ADSCs in the treatment of burns in vivo was determined as the fundamental inclusion criterion. Additionally, pertinent journals focusing on burns and their treatment were screened manually for eligible studies. The review was registered in PROSPERO and reported according to the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Of the 599 publications screened, 21 were considered relevant to the key question and were included in the present review. The included studies were almost all conducted on rodents, with one exception, where pigs were investigated. 13 of the studies examined the treatment of full-thickness and eight of deep partial-thickness burn injuries. 57,1 percent of the relevant studies have demonstrated that ADSCs exhibit immunomodulatory effects during the inflammatory response. 16 studies have shown improved neovascularisation with the use of ADSCs. 14 studies report positive influences of ADSCs on granulation tissue formation, while 11 studies highlight their efficacy in promoting re-epithelialisation. 11 trials demonstrated an improvement in outcomes during the remodelling phase. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, it appears that adipose-derived stem cells demonstrate remarkable efficacy in the field of regenerative medicine. However, the usage of ADSCs in the treatment of burns is still at an early experimental stage, and further investigations are required in order to examine the potential usage of ADSCs in future clinical burn care.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas , Animales , Adipocitos , Quemaduras/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Porcinos , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
Specialized burn centers are critical to minimizing burn-associated morbidity and mortality. However, American Burn Association-verified burn centers are unequally distributed across the United States, and fewer centers are available for pediatric patients relative to adults. The economic burden of transporting patients to these centers contributes significantly to the high cost of burn care. This study quantifies inequitable burn care access in the contiguous United States due to age group and location as a function of physical proximity to a verified burn center and transportation cost. County-level distances to the nearest verified adult or pediatric burn center were determined and mapped. Distance calculations for each population were combined with transport cost data (2022 CMS Ambulance Fee Schedules) to estimate transportation costs for each population (adult vs pediatric, urban vs rural). Pediatric patients reside 30.5 miles further than adults from the nearest center, significantly increasing transportation costs. Ground and air transport costs also increased for rural versus urban patients. Notably, rural patients face almost double the cost of air transport. While physical proximity to burn care appears to differ only modestly across age and region, this marginal increase in distance is associated with significant economic impact. This study highlights physical and economic barriers to burn care access faced by rural and pediatric patients and underscores the critical need to improve equity in burn care access. Future studies should expand on this report's findings to more fully characterize the additional costs associated with inequitable burn care access.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Quemados , Quemaduras , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Niño , Quemaduras/terapia , Transporte de Pacientes , Población RuralRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic had widespread effects on the healthcare system due to public health regulations and restrictions. The following study shares trends observed during these extraordinary circumstances to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of pediatric burn care at an American-Burn-Association verified tertiary pediatric hospital in Ontario, Canada. Pediatric burn patient data for new burn patients between March 17th, 2019, and March 17th, 2021, was retrospectively extracted and two cohorts of patients were formed: pre-pandemic and pandemic, through which statistical analysis was performed. No significant changes in the number of admitted patients, age, and sex of patients were observed. However, a significant increase in fire/flame burns was observed during the pandemic period. Additionally, a decrease in follow-up care was observed while an increase in acute burn care (wound care and surgical interventions) was found for the pandemic cohort. Despite changes to hospital care facilities to maximize resources for COVID-19-related care, our findings demonstrate that burn care remained an essential service and significant reductions in patient volumes were not observed. Overall, this study will aid in future planning and management for the provision of pediatric burn resources during similar public health emergencies.