RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Boerhaave's syndrome, an effort rupture of the esophagus, is a rare but serious condition. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is a new therapeutic approach for gastrointestinal perforation. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at five tertiary hospitals in southern Germany. All patients treated for Boerhaave's syndrome since 2010 were identified and included. Treatment success and outcomes were assessed and compared between the different modes of primary treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients with Boerhaave's syndrome were identified (median age 68 years; n = 16 female). The primary treatment was EVT in 25 cases, surgery in 14, and endoscopic stenting in 15. Primary EVT was successful in 20 of the 25 patients (80.0%). Two patients were switched to surgical treatment and one was switched to esophageal stenting and two died. The mortality rate was lower (P = 0.160) in patients treated primarily with EVT (n = 2, 8.0%) than in comparison to patients of the non-EVT group (n = 8, 25.0%). Treatment success was significantly higher (P = 0.007) for primary EVT (80.0%) than for non-EVT (43.8%). Primary EVT was associated with treatment success in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: EVT showed a high success rate for treatment of Boerhaave's syndrome and was associated with treatment success.

RESUMEN

Esophageal perforation, a rare and serious condition, has seen a reduction in mortality from 30% to 15% over the last three decades due to advancements such as gastrointestinal stents, minimally invasive surgeries, and improved interventional radiology techniques. This review analyzes management strategies for esophageal perforation based on 14 English-language articles published from 2009 to 2024, primarily utilizing surveys and national database analyses. The management of esophageal perforation is complex, with challenges in diagnosis and treatment strategy. Despite surgery being the traditional treatment, the role of less invasive methods is growing. Effective management of esophageal perforation involves advanced imaging for diagnosis, hemodynamic stabilization, and a multidisciplinary approach to treatment, including surgical and non-surgical interventions. The evidence for different treatment outcomes remains limited, highlighting the need for comprehensive care involving thoracic surgery, interventional radiology, gastroenterology, and critical care in an intensive care unit setting.

RESUMEN

Esophageal perforation is a serious medical condition characterized by a tear or hole in the muscular layer. This case report details the presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of a patient with missed esophageal perforation at an emergency department. The report highlights treatment options, missed findings from the chest X-ray, and relevant case details. Management primarily depends on prompt detection and intervention through conservative measures or surgical repair. Identifying the issue within the initial hours after presentation can significantly decrease the mortality rate, which can be as high as 30%.

RESUMEN

Boerhaave syndrome, an esophageal perforation due to increased intraesophageal pressure, may mimic other cardiovascular conditions including acute coronary syndrome. In this report, we present a case of a 63-year-old man who presented with chest pain and ischemic electrocardiogram abnormalities, prompting an initial diagnosis of ST elevation myocardial infarction. After coronary stenting, the patient continued to have chest pain, ST segment elevations, and newly elevated cardiac enzymes. A computed tomography scan showed esophageal perforation, requiring endoscopic stenting. This case underscores the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of Boerhaave syndrome and the importance of considering this condition in adults with chest pain and ischemic electrocardiogram changes.

RESUMEN

We present the case of a 46-year-old patient who arrived at the emergency department with chest pain following an episode of vomiting. The diagnosis was Boerhaave syndrome and acute mediastinitis. Due to the prompt presentation and the location of the rupture in the lower esophagus, emergency surgical intervention was performed, including esophageal suturing, mediastinal drainage, and jejunostomy for feeding. Postoperatively, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit for advanced monitoring and support. The patient's condition improved favorably in the intensive care unit, allowing for extubation. Progress continued positively, and the patient was discharged 12 days postoperatively with a functional jejunostomy. At regular follow-ups, the patient's recovery remained favorable, and the jejunostomy was removed 30 days after the surgery. This case highlights the importance of rapid diagnosis and early surgical intervention in Boerhaave syndrome, demonstrating the successful management of a severe condition through a multidisciplinary effort.

RESUMEN

Boerhaave syndrome (BS) is a rare clinical diagnosis associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Diagnosis of this condition is usually delayed which can lead to a very poor outcome. The timing of presentation and time to management plays a very important role in the prognosis and selection of the management method. With the advances seen in therapeutic endoscopy, many authors have been exploring the possibility of shifting the focus of management from surgery to interventional endoscopy. We present a case report of a patient presenting with BS that was successfully managed endoscopically. We also reviewed the literature on how surgical management compares to endoscopic management and attempted to establish general recommendations from available literature on management of BS.

RESUMEN

Background: A rare complication of oesophageal rupture or Boerhaave syndrome is myopericarditis due to leakage of oesophageal contents. This presentation can mimic a myocardial infarction, making diagnosis and management challenging. Case summary: We present the case of a middle-aged man presenting with chest pain, who was diagnosed with Boerhaave syndrome complicated by myopericarditis, although the presentation was concerning for acute coronary syndrome. Discussion: Through this case, we aim to highlight an unusual alternative aetiology of findings classically seen in myocardial infarction.

RESUMEN

Boerhaave's syndrome is a life-threatening spontaneous esophageal rupture, usually in its distal part. It generally develops after situations that suddenly increase the intraesophageal pressure, such as, during or after persistent vomiting. Despite it being a rare condition in clinical practice, it has a high mortality rate (18-39%). Treatment can be approached conservatively, endoscopically, or surgically. The more invasive the treatment, the worse the prognosis. This paper presents a healthy 62-year-old man who resorted to the emergency department complaining of lower back and left scapular pain, after two non-bilious episodes of vomiting. There was no history of any trauma, vigorous physical exercise or previous similar episodes. He was alert, hemodynamically stable, and without any airway compromise or respiratory distress. At the physical exam, non-painful subcutaneous crepitations were palpable in the left cervical region without palpable masses. Chest examination finds reduced air entry on the left pulmonary base. Hence, Boerhaave's syndrome was suspected. CT scan revealed a pneumomediastinum and a left pulmonary collection. Oxygen therapy, blood cultures, empirical antibiotic therapy, and thoracic tube drainage were performed. The upper digestive endoscopy revealed the perforation in the distal esophagus, and an over-the-scope clip, a covered endoprosthesis and nasojejunal tube feeding were placed. The patient was admitted to the Intermediate Care Unit for stabilization. He was discharged home on the 33rd day and remains well at two months of follow-up. Delayed diagnosis and treatment are the principal causes of high mortality in Boerhaave's syndrome. There is no standard treatment option. In this case report, given the patient's stable clinical condition, the authors used a non-surgical conservative treatment, allowing for a delayed esophageal repair.

RESUMEN

Boerhaave syndrome is an esophagal perforation due to a rupture of the esophagus wall caused by intense vomiting with mediastinitis and subcutaneous emphysema. It is a relatively rare and potentially life-threatening ailment that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. This case presents an overview of the syndrome, including morbidity, mortality, and treatment strategy. In this case, a 56-year-old male presented to the hospital during emergency hours with shortness of breath, chest pain, and dullness in the neck and a history of binge alcohol abuse seven days ago, followed by a severe bout of vomiting. The patient was managed conservatively, requiring another hospitalization for surgery, and was later discharged from the hospital postoperatively without any complications.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Boerhaave syndrome is a rare clinical entity associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Early recognition of the symptoms, and identification of the site and extension of the injury are key in improving the prognosis. METHODS: This study presents data on the mortality, morbidity and length of hospital stay in patients diagnosed with Boerhaave syndrome. The data were retrieved from a prospectively collected database in a single surgical unit between 2012 and 2022. The study makes a comparison with the surgical outcomes of the previous decade. RESULTS: Some 33 patients were diagnosed with Boerhaave syndrome and were treated surgically between 2012 and 2022 in a specialist upper gastrointestinal surgical unit. All patients underwent standard surgical repair (in-theatre diagnostic endoscopy, T-tube placement through thoracotomy and feeding jejunostomy through laparotomy). The mean size of the defects in the oesophageal lumen was 3.3cm. Delayed presentation was noted for 13 patients (39%); 8 patients (24%) died in hospital, and 19 patients (58%) developed postoperative complications. Mortality was similar to the rate recorded for the 20 patients from the previous decade (24% vs 20%, respectively). The mean length of hospital stay was 41 days, and was comparable to the 35.7 days reported between 1997 and 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Early and aggressive management of spontaneous oesophageal rupture ameliorates the postoperative recovery and prognosis. The surgical results of our unit were found comparable to the previous decade in the population of patients who were treated surgically.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Spontaneous esophageal rupture is an uncommon medical phenomenon that involves a sudden increase in intraesophageal pressure with negative intrathoracic pressure. Here, a 21-year-old female with no history of medical illness was admitted to our accident and emergency department with a one-day history of sudden retrosternal chest pain with other symptoms. There was no foreign body ingestion, vomiting, fever, cough, trauma, or recent procedures. Physical examination revealed a soft abdomen with epigastric tenderness and normal respiratory and cardiovascular examinations. The patient underwent a chest X-ray and a computed tomography scan of the neck and chest, which revealed retropharyngeal air extending to the mediastinum with anterior chest surgical emphysema. Oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy revealed mild gastritis with no evidence of foreign body or esophagus injury. The patient was prescribed paracetamol, pantoprazole, and clindamycin. On follow-up, the patient was doing well with no active complaints. Conservative management of spontaneous esophageal rupture can result in good clinical outcomes with no requirement for additional interventions.

RESUMEN

Background: Spontaneous esophageal perforation traditionally mandates urgent surgical treatment. Lately, esophageal stents have been used to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality. The current systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of stents as a primary treatment option in this scenario. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library for studies published in the English language between 2000 and 2023. We included observational studies reporting on the use of stents, alongside conservative measures and drainage procedures, in patients with spontaneous esophageal perforations. Primary outcomes were sealing rate (persistent leak occlusion) and failure rate (mortality or conversion to a major surgical operation). Secondary outcomes included patients' presentation, sepsis, drainage procedures, and reinterventions. Results for primary outcomes were presented as pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using a random-effects model. Methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS score. Results: Eighteen studies involving 171 patients were included. Sealing rate was 86% (95%CI 77-93%) and failure rate was 14% (95%CI 7-22%). Weighted mortality rate was 6% (95%CI 2-13%), while conversion to surgical treatment was 2% (95%CI 0-9%). Late presentation was not related to a statistically significant increase in treatment failure (odds ratio 1.85, 95%CI 0.37-9.30; P=0.72). Drainage procedures were required for the majority of patients, with a high rate of surgical and endoscopic reinterventions. Conclusions: Our results imply that stents may offer an effective and safe alternative treatment for patients with spontaneous esophageal perforations. Additional endoscopic and surgical drainage procedures are frequently needed.

RESUMEN

Boerhaave's syndrome is a potentially fatal emergency, typically induced by forceful retching, which leads to increased intra-esophageal pressure. It commonly presents with vague symptoms such as chest pain or more classic symptoms like subcutaneous emphysema and vomiting. We present an unusual case of Boerhaave syndrome secondary to rapid and excessive intake of carbonated drinks in a 22-year-old male, who presented to our emergency department with atypical symptoms of fever and shortness of breath. Imaging studies showed left-sided hydropneumothorax with an esophageal pleural fistula, and multidisciplinary teams were involved in the patient's management.

RESUMEN

Oesophageal perforation (OP) is a life-threatening condition and refers to a tear or disruption in the oesophageal wall. It is considered a medical emergency due to its significant implications, often related to its various causes, such as iatrogenic perforation during endoscopy, Boerhaave syndrome, traumatic injury, foreign body ingestion, and tumour perforation. Early interventions, diagnosis, and a thorough physical examination are essential for better clinical outcomes. Diagnostic procedures and imaging techniques, play a crucial role in confirming OP. The diagnostic workup, based on the index of suspicion, may involve barium oesophagram or contrast-enhanced CT. Once diagnosed, classification of severity using the Pittsburgh clinical severity score guides treatment decisions. Management can be non-surgical or surgical and focuses on a multi-disciplinary approach combining conservative, surgical, or endoscopic methods. Surgical control remains crucial, with the approach dependent on the location of the leak. Improved knowledge of this life-threatening condition is important among healthcare professionals. The objective of this review is to provide information about oesophageal perforation and its early detection, management, and multidisciplinary interventions for optimal patient outcomes.

RESUMEN

Colonoscopy is widely acknowledged as a prevalent and efficacious approach for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. In order to guarantee an effective colonoscopy, it is imperative for patients to undergo an optimal bowel preparation regimen. This entails the consumption of a substantial volume of a non-absorbable solution to comprehensively purge the colon of any fecal residue. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy to acknowledge that the bowel preparation procedure may occasionally elicit adverse symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. In exceptional instances, the occurrence of excessive vomiting may lead to the rupture of the distal esophagus, a grave medical condition referred to as Boerhaave syndrome (BS). Timely identification and efficient intervention are imperative for the management of this infrequent yet potentially perilous ailment. This investigation presents a case study of a patient who developed BS subsequent to the ingestion of mannitol during bowel preparation. Furthermore, an exhaustive examination of extant case reports and pertinent literature on esophageal perforation linked to colonoscopy has been conducted. This analysis provides valuable insights into the prevention, reduction, and treatment of such serious complications.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Boerhaave Syndrome (BS) is rare but life-threatening condition caused by a sudden increase in the intraluminal pressure due to vomiting. We present a case of BS manifesting as a posterior mediastinal hematoma, indicative of a potentially fatal condition. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 51-year-old man presented with acute chest pain after vomiting. Enhanced Computed Tomography revealed mediastinal fluid with a left pleural effusion, leading to a diagnosis of BS. Emergency surgery revealed a posterior mediastinal hematoma with active bleeding due to a torn proper esophageal artery. Hemostasis and a wall repair were performed, and the patient was discharged uneventfully. DISCUSSION: This case highlights two important aspects. Firstly, a spontaneous esophageal perforation can manifest as a mediastinal hematoma due to the subpleural arterial injury, delaying bacterial spillage. While preoperative thoracentesis may not always diagnose BS accurately, bloody thoracic drainage can serve as an alternative diagnostic sign. Secondly, the mediastinal hematoma itself poses a serious risk, as it can lead to a catastrophic outcome even before bacterial contamination occurs, emphasizing the necessity of a timely surgical intervention in BS cases. CONCLUSION: BS can manifest as a mediastinal hematoma, and the absence of gastrointestinal content in the thoracic drainage does not rule out the possibility of BS. Prompt surgical intervention remains essential, as a mediastinal hematoma alone can result in a catastrophic outcome. This case highlights the significance of a comprehensive diagnostic assessment for BS.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Boerhaave's syndrome, or the spontaneous transmural perforation of the esophagus, is typically thought to be due to an increase in esophageal pressure such as that which occurs during vomiting or retching. Another common etiology of esophageal perforation is esophageal instrumentation, such as during esophagogastroduodenoscopy or transesophageal echocardiography. This life-threatening condition requires prompt diagnosis and treatment to prevent patient demise. While a history of vomiting can aid in diagnosis, this history can be difficult to elicit in an unconscious patient or may be altogether absent. Additionally, Boerhaave's syndrome can present similarly to more common upper gastrointestinal or cardiac conditions. Since mortality increases with delays in diagnosis and treatment, it is imperative that clinicians maintain a high level of suspicion for Boerhaave's syndrome and initiate treatment urgently. Case Description: This report presents a 76-year-old man who presented to the emergency department after a history of several syncopal episodes and was found to be in complete heart block. Two days later, he acutely developed abdominal distention and coffee ground emesis. As the medical team was able to gather more history from the patient and his family, it was revealed that he had associated vomiting with his episodes of syncope. CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated pneumomediastinum concerning for esophageal perforation. His clinical status subsequently deteriorated. He was intubated and a temporary transvenous pacer was placed before being transferred to our facility for emergent surgery. Discussion: Complete heart block in the setting of Boerhaave's syndrome is exceptionally rare, with only 2 cases reported in the literature. The decision to place a pacemaker in the setting of esophageal perforation/sepsis is complicated and depends on the patient's bacteremia status related to noncardiac comorbidities. Clearly this case represents the need for excellent multidisciplinary decision-making processes with excellent communication between hospital staff and all caretakers. Expeditious diagnosis and treatment of esophageal perforation is essential to prevent leaking of gastric contents into the mediastinum and worsening of cardiac complications and sepsis. Additionally, critical timing of various surgical procedures, especially the need for a permanent pacemaker implant with bacteremia is a complicated process not well described in the surgical literature.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) and open surgery for esophageal perforations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 60 patients with esophageal perforations between 2010 and 2022. The main group included 29 patients who underwent minimally invasive treatment with EVT, the control group - 31 patients after open surgical interventions. RESULTS: Pneumonia occurred in 21 (72%) and 14 (45%) patients (p=0.04), esophageal stenosis within the perforation zone - in 4 (13.8%) and 1 (3.2%) patient, respectively (p=0.188). Chronic esophageal fistulas were significantly more common in the control group (6 (20.7%) versus 15 (48.4%) patients, p=0.032). The overall duration of treatment (median) among survivors was significantly shorter in the main group: 33 (23; 48) versus 71.5 (59; 93.7) days (p=0.5). However, length of ICU-stay was slightly higher (11 (6; 16) versus 8.5 (5; 12.75) days, p=0.32). Mortality rate was 13.8% (n=4) and 29% (n=9), respectively (p=0.213). Minimally invasive technologies decreased the risk of fatal outcome by 10 times (OR 10.123, 95% CI 1.491-124.97, p=0.035) compared to traditional surgery. CONCLUSION: EVT in complex minimally invasive treatment of patients with mechanical esophageal injuries is an effective method significantly reducing mortality and duration of inpatient treatment compared to traditional surgical approach.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Extent of surgical repair of spontaneous esophageal effort rupture (Boerhaave syndrome) has gradually decreased by the emergence of minimal invasive treatment based on endoscopic stent sealing of the perforation. However, for this diagnosis, use of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is still in its beginning. We present our results after 7-years with both stent and/or EVT-based treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 17 consecutive patients with Boerhaave syndrome from June 2015 to May 2022 were retrospectively registered in a database. The perforation was sealed by stent and/or EVT, and gastric effluent was drained transthoracically by a chest tube or pigtail catheter. Eight out of 14 patients responded to questions on fatigue and dysphagia (Ogilvie's score). RESULTS: Seventeen patients aged median 67 years (range 34-88), had a primary hospital stay of 38 days (7-68). Ninety-day mortality was 6% (n = 1). Perforations were sealed with stent (n = 10), EVT (n = 3) or stent and EVT (n = 4). One patient (6%) needed laparoscopic lavage and transhiatal drainage. Eight patients (47%) were re-stented due to persistent leakage (n = 4) and stent migration (n = 4). Fifteen patients (88%) had complications, including multi-organ failure (n = 9), pleural empyema (n = 8) and esophageal stricture (n = 3). The perforations healed. After 35.5 months (range 2-62) fourteen patients were alive. Eight that responded had no dysphagia and total fatigue score comparable to an age-matched reference population. CONCLUSION: Mortality rate was low after initial stent and EVT-based treatment of Boerhaave syndrome, combined with adequate transthoracic drainage of gastric effluent. Patients required repeated minimal invasive procedures, but with no apparent negative effect on functional outcome.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We first described the technique of transgastric drainage of esophageal injuries in 2008. The method establishes vacuum drainage of the lumen of the esophagus, while maintaining patency, effectively exteriorizing the perforation to allow healing. We summarize this technique and present our experiences from the largest published series of patients. Our unit has treated selected esophageal injuries with transgastric drainage for 10 years. Indications include perforations not amenable to primary repair and treatment failure following prior surgical intervention. A 36 French silastic chest drain is pulled through the abdominal and stomach wall and introduced into the esophagus so that it crosses the perforation. Gastropexy is performed. Mediastinal decontamination and drainage are performed as needed. Continuous suction of -10 cm water is applied. Leak resolution is assessed with weekly water-soluble swallows. For this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data for patients with esophageal perforation, between 2012 and 2022. Inpatient mortality and time to leak resolution were set as primary and secondary outcomes. Esophageal perforations were treated with transgastric drain in 35 patients, of whom 68% (n = 24) were men. Median age was 67 (26-84). Spontaneous perforations accounted for 60% (n = 21), 31% (n = 11) were iatrogenic and 6% (n = 2) were ischemic. Inpatient and 30-day mortality was 14% (n = 5). Among successful treatments, the median length to resolution of leak on imaging was 34.5 days (6-80). Transgastric drainage can successfully treat esophageal perforations, where primary repair is not feasible. The mortality rate of 14% and reduced morbidity compares favorably with other traditional methods of management for esophageal perforation.

Asunto(s)