RESUMEN
RESUMEN Antecedentes: En las últimas décadas ha habido un cambio considerable hacia un enfoque más conservador en el tratamiento del traumatismocerrado de abdomen, con énfasis en la preservación de la función de órganos; actualmente, el tratamiento no operatorio (TNO) se ha convertido en la técnica de manejo estándar en pacientes hemodinámicamente estables con lesiones de órgano sólido. Objetivo: Describir las variables clínicas asociadas a la tasa de éxito en una serie de pacientes con TNO de trauma abdominal cerrado con lesión de órganos sólidos. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional, longitudinal, analítico entre enero de 2017 y diciembre de 2022, sobre pacientes admitidos con diagnóstico de traumatismo abdominal cerrado. Las variables evaluadas fueron: edad, sexo, estadía hospitalaria, complicaciones, requerimiento de transfusiones, tasa de éxito y mortalidad. Resultados: De 2590 pacientes ingresados por Guardia de Cirugía General, 24 pacientes se internaron con diagnóstico de traumatismo cerrado de abdomen. Fueron excluidos 15 pacientes por no cumplir con los criterios de inclusión. Los 9 pacientes seleccionados tuvieron un promedio de edad de 39 años (15-80) y 9 fueron varones. En el 36% presentaron lesiones esplénicas grados I-II, 27% presentó lesión renal grado II y el 18% restante con lesión hepática grado II. La tasa de éxito del tratamiento fue del 100% en nuestra serie sin evidenciar fallos en la terapéutica instaurada. Conclusión: Con los criterios empleados en TNO del traumatismo abdominal cerrado con lesión de órganos sólidos fue factible y permitió alcanzar una alta tasa de éxito, sin mortalidad.
ABSTRACT Background: In recent decades, there has been a significant shift toward a more conservative approach to the management of blunt abdominal trauma with an emphasis on preserving organ function; currently, non-operative management (NOM) has become the standard of care for hemodynamically stable patients with solid organ injury. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the different clinical variables associated with the success rate of NOM of blunt abdominal trauma with involving solid organs. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational, longitudinal, and analytical study of patients admitted for blunt abdominal trauma between January 1, 2017, and December 1, 2022. The variables evaluated were age, sex, length of hospital stay, complications, transfusion requirements, success rate and mortality. Results: Between January 2017 and December 2022, of 2590 patients seen in the emergency department, 24 were admitted with a diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma. Fifteen patients did not meet the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the 9 patients included was 39 years (15-80 years) and 6 were men. Thirty-six percent had grade I and II splenic lesions, 27% had grade II renal lesions, and 18% had grade II hepatic lesions. The success rate of our series was 100% and there were no failures. Conclusion: The variables analyzed allowed us to affirm that NOM of blunt abdominal trauma with solid organ injury was feasible and allowed us to achieve a high success rate, without deaths.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Blunt abdominal trauma is a common cause of emergency department admission. Computed tomography (CT) scanning is the gold standard method for identifying intra-abdominal injuries in patients experiencing blunt trauma, especially those with high-energy trauma. Although the diagnostic accuracy of this imaging technique is very high, patient admission and prolonged observation protocols are still common practices worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of intra-abdominal injury in hemodynamically stable patients with high-energy blunt trauma and a normal abdominal CT scan at a Level-1 Trauma Center in Colombia, South America, to assess the relevance of a prolonged observation period. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients admitted to the emergency department for blunt trauma between 2021 and 2022. All consecutive patients with high-energy mechanisms of trauma and a normal CT scan at admission were included. Our primary outcomes were the incidence of intra-abdominal injury identified during a 24-hour observation period or hospital stay, ICU admission, and death. RESULTS: We included 480 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 33 (IQR 25.5, 47), and 74.2% were male. The most common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle accidents (64.2%), falls from height (26%), and falls from bikes (3.1%). A total of 99.2% of patients had a Revised Trauma Score of 8. Only 1 patient (0.2%) (95% CI: 0.01-1.16) presented with an abdominal injury during the observation period. No ICU admissions or deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: The incidence of intra-abdominal injury in patients with hemodynamically stable blunt trauma and a negative abdominal CT scan is extremely low, and prolonged observation may not be justified in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Colombia/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemodinámica , Centros TraumatológicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Isolated perforations of hollow viscus (HV) represent less than 1% of injuries in blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). When they do present, they are generally due to high-impact mechanisms in the segments of the intestine that are fixed. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of major HV injuries in BAT at the "Dr. Domingo Luciani" General Hospital (HDL), and address the literature gap regarding updated HV perforations following BAT, especially in low-income settings. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients admitted to our trauma center with a diagnosis of complicated BAT with HV perforation over 14 years. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Seven hundred sixty-one patients were admitted under the diagnosis of BAT. Of them, 36.79% underwent emergency surgical resolution, and 6.04% had HV perforation as an operative finding. Almost half (44.44%) of these cases presented as a single isolated injury, while the remaining were associated with other intra-abdominal organ injuries. The most common lesions were Grade II-III jejunum and Grade I transverse colon, affecting an equal proportion of patients at 13.33%. In recent years, an increased incidence of HV injuries secondary to BAT has been observed. Despite this, in many cases, the diagnosis is delayed, so even in the presence of negative diagnostic studies, the surgical approach based on the trauma mechanism, hemodynamic status, and systematic reevaluation of the polytraumatized patient should prevail.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Perforación Intestinal , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Yeyuno , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Introducción: El traumatismo abdominal cerrado puede provocar lesiones orgánicas graves con hemorragias que demandan un tratamiento quirúrgico emergente y es la principal causa de muertes evitables en todos los grupos de edad. Objetivo: Evaluar las características clínico quirúrgicas de los pacientes con trauma cerrado de abdomen. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo y retrospectivo para evaluar el comportamiento del trauma cerrado de abdomen en 81 pacientes atendidos en el Hospital General Provincial Docente "Roberto Rodríguez Fernández" de Morón desde enero del 2014 hasta diciembre de 2019. Resultados: El adulto joven fue el grupo de edad predominante (34,6 por ciento) del sexo masculino (19,8 por ciento), el accidente de tránsito (48,1 por ciento) fue la causa principal. El cuadro hemorrágico (39,5 por ciento) seguidos del cuadro doloroso abdominal (38,3 por ciento) representaron los síntomas clínicos más relevantes. La positividad de los exámenes auxiliares estuvo representada por la ecografía abdominal (74,1 por ciento) seguida de la punción abdominal (9,9 por ciento. Las lesiones hepáticas (27,0 por ciento) seguidas de las esplénicas (19,0 percent) fueron las vísceras macizas más afectadas. El 77,8 por ciento fue intervenido quirúrgicamente y las técnicas quirúrgicas hepáticas fueron las más empleadas para un total de 17 casos (26,9 por ciento). El choque hipovolémico (12,7 por ciento) fue la complicación posoperatoria más encontrada. Se reportó un 12,3 por ciento de fallecidos. Conclusiones: El paciente con trauma cerrado de abdomen debe ser considerado siempre politraumatizado cuyo tratamiento inicial se dirige a la estabilización rápida e identificación de lesiones que amenacen la vida(AU)
Introduction: Blunt abdominal trauma can cause severe organ injury with hemorrhage demanding emergent surgical treatment. It is the leading cause of preventable death among all age groups. Objective: To assess the clinical-surgical characteristics of patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Methods: A descriptive and retrospective observational study was carried out to assess the characteristics of blunt abdominal trauma in 81 patients treated at Roberto Rodríguez Fernández General Provincial Teaching Hospital of Morón from January 2014 to December 2019. Results: Young adults represented the predominant age group (34.6 percent), together with the male sex (19.8 percent). Traffic accident (48.1 percent) was the main cause. Hemorrhagic symptoms (39.5 percent) was the most relevant clinical symptoms, followed by abdominal pain (38.3 percent). Positive results in complementary tests were represented by abdominal ultrasound (74.1 percent), followed by abdominal puncture (9.9 percent). Hepatic lesions (27.0 percent) was the most affected solid viscera, followed by splenic lesions (19.0 percent). 77.8 percent of cases were operated on and hepatic surgical techniques were the most frequently used, accounting for 17 cases (26.9 percent). Hypovolemic shock (12.7 percent) was the most frequent postoperative complication. A death rate of 12.3 percent was reported. Conclusions: The patient with blunt abdominal trauma should always be considered polytraumatized, in which case the initial treatment is aimed at rapid stabilization and identification of life-threatening injuries(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Accidentes de Tránsito , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Choque/complicaciones , Epidemiología Descriptiva , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Observacionales como AsuntoRESUMEN
Resumen El bazo es el órgano que se lesiona con más frecuencia en el trauma abdominal cerrado, presentándose en 30 a 50% de los casos, principalmente por su fragilidad y localización, su tratamiento ha estado en constante cambio a lo largo del tiempo, siendo hoy en día más utilizado el manejo conservador por sobre el intervencionista, considerando sobre todo el mayor riesgo de mortalidad y las condiciones fisiológicas posteriores a la esplenectomía principalmente en niños y adolescentes. Objetivo. Realizar una revisión actual del diagnóstico, clasificación y tratamiento del trauma esplénico. Metodología . Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica incluyendo los descriptores relacionados con trauma esplénico y su tratamiento. Resultados. La identificación del trauma esplénico es de vital importancia para la supervivencia del paciente, el diagnostico se puede realizar mediante estudios de imagen eco-FAST o tomografía en dependencia del estado hemodinámico del paciente, la clasificación depende de las características anatómicas de las lesiones y orienta el tratamiento adecuado. Conclusiones. Actualmente el tratamiento conservador está recomendado para lesiones I-III; los estadios mayores (IV y V) o cualquier grado siempre y cuando exista compromiso hemodinámico implican tratamiento intervencionista o quirúrgico, no existe una diferencia significativa entre la utilización de técnica abierta vs laparoscópica.
Abstract The spleen is the organ that is most frequently injured in blunt abdominal trauma, occurring in 30 to 50% of cases, mainly due to its fragility and location, its treatment has been in constant change over time, today the conservative management is more widely used than interventionist, considering above all the greater risk of mortality and the physiological conditions after splenectomy, mainly in children and adolescents. Objective . To carry out a current review of the diagnosis, classification and treatment of splenic trauma. Methodology . A bibliographic review was carried out including the descriptors related to splenic trauma and its treatment. Results .The identification of splenic trauma is of vital importance for the survival of the patient, the diagnosis can be made by imaging studies, FAST ultrasound or tomography depending on the hemodynamic status of the patient, the classification depends on the anatomical characteristics of the lesions and guides the appropriate treatment. Conclusions . Conservative treatment is currently recommended for lesions I-III; the major stages (IV and V) or any grade whit hemodynamic compromise imply interventional or surgical treatment, there is no significant difference between the use of open versus laparoscopic technique.
Resumo O baço é o órgão mais frequentemente lesado no trauma abdominal fechado, ocorrendo em 30 a 50% dos casos, principalmente devido à sua fragilidade e localização, seu tratamento tem mudado constantemente ao longo do tempo, sendo hoje o manejo conservador mais utilizado que o intervencionista, considerando sobretudo o maior risco de mortalidade e as condições fisiológicas após a esplenectomia, principalmente em crianças e adolescentes. Objetivo . Fazer uma revisão atual do diagnóstico, classificação e tratamento do trauma esplênico. Metodologia . Foi realizada uma revisão bibliográfica incluindo os descritores relacionados ao trauma esplênico e seu tratamento. Resultados . A identificação do trauma esplênico é de vital importância para a sobrevida do paciente, o diagnóstico pode ser feito por exames de imagem echo-FAST ou tomografia dependendo do estado hemodinâmico do paciente, a classificação depende das características anatômicas das lesões e orienta o tratamento adequado. Conclusões . O tratamento conservador é atualmente recomendado para lesões I-III; os estágios principais (IV e V) ou em qualquer grau, desde que haja comprometimento hemodinâmico, implicam em tratamento intervencionista ou cirúrgico, não havendo diferença significativa entre o uso da técnica aberta e laparoscópica.
RESUMEN
O trauma é a 5ª. causa de morte no mundo e, na população com menos de 40 anos, é a maior causa de óbitos. O abdome é região frequentemente lesada e requer tratamento cirúrgico com frequência. Em se tratando de trauma contuso, exames de imagem oferecem diagnóstico mais acurado conduzindo tratamento mais adequado. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a relação dos achados tomográficos, do exame físico e a prevalência das lesões. Foram selecionados 39 politraumatizados e vítimas de trauma abdominal contuso, através de um estudo prospectivo. Foram comparados exame físico e o achado tomográfico. Em conclusão, mostrou-se que a avaliação clínica isoladamente pode fazer com que lesões passem desapercebidas; a tomografia computadorizada teve boa sensibilidade e especificidade devendo ser realizada para diagnosticar e melhor guiar a terapêutica.
Trauma is the 5th cause of death in the world and, in the population under 40 years old, it is the biggest cause of death. The abdomen is a frequently injured region and often requires surgical treatment. In the case of blunt trauma, imaging tests offer a more accurate diagnosis leading to more appropriate treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between tomographic and physical examination findings and the prevalence of lesions. Thirty-nine polytraumatized and victims of blunt abdominal trauma were selected through a prospective study. Physical examination and tomographic findings were compared. In conclusion, it has been shown that clinical assessment alone can make lesions go unnoticed; computed tomography had good sensitivity and specificity and should be performed to diagnose and better guide therapy.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Terapéutica , Heridas y Lesiones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Abdomen , Traumatismos AbdominalesRESUMEN
INTRODUCCIÓN: Los accidentes en bicicleta son una causa frecuente de trauma abdominal contuso en pediatría. En Chile no existen publicaciones científicas que traten sobre las lesiones abdominales por manubrio de bicicleta, su presentación y manejo. OBJETIVO: Describir tres casos clínicos de trauma abdominal contuso provocados por manubrio de bicicleta en niños, ilustrar las distintas lesiones observadas, sus formas de presentación y manejo. CASOS CLÍNICOS: 1) Paciente masculino, 11 años, consulta tras golpe con manubrio de bicicleta en epigastrio; en la Tomografía Computada (TC) de abdomen y pelvis se describió neumoretroperitoneo. Se realizó laparotomía exploradora, reparándose una perforación duodenal. 2) Paciente masculino, 14 años, consulta tras golpe en el hipocondrio izquierdo con el manubrio de la bicicleta; en la TC se evidenció fractura esplénica con múltiples laceraciones. Por la presencia de sangrado activo se trató con angioembolización, lográndose resolución de la lesión y viabilidad del órgano luego de 6 semanas de seguimiento. 3) Paciente masculino, 9 años, ingresó tras sufrir golpe con manubrio de bicicleta en el hipocondrio derecho. En TC se observó una laceración hepática, que fue manejada de forma expectante, con resolución de la lesión luego de 8 semanas de seguimiento. Todos los pacientes tuvieron una evolución favorable. CONCLUSIÓN: El trauma abdominal contuso por golpe con manubrio de bicicleta puede ser potencialmente grave en pacientes pediátricos, pudiendo afectar órganos sólidos y vísceras huecas. El manejo no quirúrgico cada vez es más utilizado, logrando altas tasas de éxito en pacientes estables. Los pacientes inestables o en los que se sospeche perforación de víscera hueca, requerirán cirugía como primera aproximación.
INTRODUCTION: Bicycle accidents are a frequent cause of blunt abdominal trauma in children. In Chile, there are no scientific articles about such accidents, their presentation and management. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe three cases of blunt abdominal trauma due to handlebar injury in children, in order to illustrate the different kinds of lesions, their presentation, and management. CLINICAL CASES: 1) 11-year-old boy presented to Emergency Department (ED) after falling on a bi cycle handlebar, hitting his epigastric region. A CT scan showed signs of duodenal perforation. A la parotomy was performed and the duodenal perforation repaired. 2) 14-year-old boy seen at ED after a bicycle accident in which the handlebar hit him in the abdomen area. A CT scan showed a splenic injury with multiple lacerations and active bleeding that was treated with angioembolization. After 6 weeks of follow-up, he presented resolution of the lesion and viability of the spleen. 3) 9-year-old boy admitted due to a hit with the bicycle handlebar on the abdomen area. A CT scan showed a he patic injury that was managed with non-surgical procedures, achieving resolution of the lesion after 8 weeks of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Blunt abdominal trauma caused by handlebar can be potentially serious in pediatric patients, since it may affect solid and hollow abdominal viscera. Non-surgical ma nagement is becoming more used for stable patients, achieving high success rates. Unstable patients or those with suspicion of hollow viscera perforation will require surgery as first approach.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Adolescente , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Ciclismo/lesiones , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Heridas no Penetrantes/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Traumatismos Abdominales/etiologíaRESUMEN
Resumen Introducción La lesión de la vesícula biliar secundaria a trauma abdominal cerrado constituye un evento infrecuente de perforación traumática de ella, de presentación tardía. Objetivo Revisar la literatura científica actualmente disponible y además describimos un caso. Materiales y Método Utilizando la plataforma PubMed se buscan las siguientes palabras clave: " Blunt abdominal trauma ". Se seleccionan las series con lesiones de la vesícula biliar: " Traumatic gallbladder rupture". Se seleccionan los reportes de lesiones aisladas de la vesícula biliar: " Isolated gallbladder rupture ". Se seleccionan los reportes de presentación tardía de lesiones aisladas de la vesícula biliar: " Delayed presentation of isolated gallbladder rupture ". Resultados De todas estas publicaciones se seleccionan las que a criterio de los autores son relevantes para el presente caso. Discusión La mayoría de las perforaciones de la vesícula biliar se producen en vesículas sanas de paredes delgadas distendidas por el ayuno o el consumo de alcohol. No existe una presentación clínica clásica. Los estudios imagenológicos son inespecíficos y se llega al diagnóstico definitivo durante la exploración quirúrgica. El tratamiento de esta lesión es la colecistectomía. Conclusiones El diagnóstico no es fácil, pero la resolución es relativamente simple y el pronóstico es bueno. El presente caso ilustra este tipo de lesiones en pacientes con trauma abdominal cerrado.
Introduction Gallbladder injury secondary to blunt abdominal trauma is a rare event. Aim Review the current available scientific literature and describe a case. Materials and Method Using the PubMed platform, the following keywords were searched: "Blunt abdominal trauma". Series with gallbladder lesions were selected: "Traumatic gallbladder rupture". Reports of isolated lesions of the gallbladder were selected: "Isolated gallbladder rupture". Reports of late presentation of isolated lesions of the gallbladder were selected: "Delayed presentation of isolated gallbladder rupture". Of all these publications, those that were relevant to the present case were selected according to the criteria of the authors. Case report A 20 years-old male patient suffered an abdominal trauma two weeks before presentation at our Institution. He underwent an exploratory laparotomy showing bilious content and a gallbladder perforation over the peritoneal wall as an isolated injury. Discussion Most isolated gallbladder perforations occur in healthy gallbladders with thin walls and distended because fasting or alcohol consumption. There are no classical clinical features to diagnose this specific injury and radiologic studies are nonspecific. Definitive diagnosis is often reached during surgery as it was with our patient. Recommended treatment is cholecystectomy. Conclusions This case illustrates this unique kind of gallbladder injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. A clear diagnosis is not easy however, the treatment is simple and prognosis is good.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Colecistectomía/métodos , Vesícula Biliar/lesiones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between the serum levels of NLRP3 and HMGB-1 and the prognosis of patients with severe blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: In total, 299 patients were included in the current study from July 2014 to December 2015. All patients were divided into the mild/moderate blunt abdominal trauma group and the severe blunt abdominal trauma group according to their injury severity scores. Serum levels of NLRP3 and HMGB-1 were measured upon admission (0 h) and at 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 7 days after admission. RESULTS: Compared with the healthy controls, both the mild/moderate and severe blunt abdominal trauma groups had higher serum levels of NLRP3 and HMGB-1 at admission. At all points, the serum levels of NLRP3 and HMGB-1 were significantly higher in the severe group than in the mild/moderate group. The serum levels of both NLRP3 and HMGB-1 were significantly higher in the deceased patients than in the living patients. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that compared with patients with higher levels of NLRP3 or HMGB-1, those with lower levels had longer survival times. The serum levels of both NLRP3 and HMGB-1 were independent risk factors for 6-month mortality in severe blunt abdominal trauma patients. CONCLUSION: The serum levels of NLRP3 and HMGB-1 were significantly elevated in severe blunt abdominal trauma patients, and the serum levels of both NLRP3 and HMGB-1 were correlated with 6-month mortality in severe blunt abdominal trauma patients.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteína HMGB1/sangre , Proteína con Dominio Pirina 3 de la Familia NLR/sangre , Traumatismos Abdominales/sangre , Pronóstico , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , China/epidemiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/mortalidad , Traumatismos Abdominales/terapiaRESUMEN
Colonic perforation associated with blunt abdominal trauma is rare. Even more so is the formation of an inflammatory adhesion preventing leakage into the peritoneum. We present a case of the above in which the patient presented 1 month later with intestinal obstruction which required surgical intervention. A 38-year-old male, victim of a road traffic accident (RTA), presented with multiple fractures in his extremities which had to be operated on and was later discharged without complications. He was readmitted 1 month following the trauma with intestinal obstruction. During the operation, a stenosing colonic adhesion due to bowel perforation following blunt abdominal trauma was discovered. Resection of the transverse colon and a termino-terminal colo-colonic anastomosis was performed.
RESUMEN
Background: nonoperative treatment (TNO) is suggested in blunt abdominal trauma in stable patients without necessarily addressing surgical trauma injuries. Among the tools used, it has highlighted the angioembolization as a method of stopping bleeding or potentially bleeding lesions. The existence of more than one lesion may be possible to treat this way. Objectives: to show the experience of a hospital emergency department in the use of angioembolization in nonoperative management of more than one injured abdominal organ. Demonstrate utility of simultaneous angioembolization of more than one vascular territory or organ in the management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma who start a nonoperative treatmeant. Design: Retrospective observational study Methods: Between 2007 and 2014, patients with blunt abdominal trauma and active hemorrhage or potentially bleeding lesions demonstrated by computed tomography (CT) were evaluated. Those who underwent nonoperative treatment and embolized were included. Of these, those with more than one organ or vascular territory embolized were described. Results: 392 patients were admitted with blunt abdominal trauma. Of these, 281 (72 %) started TNO protocol. 225 with active bleeding on CT were found. 183 patients (80 %) underwent angiography and 166 need embolization. In 7 cases embolization of more than one organ or vascular territory was performed. Conclusion: angioembolization of organ with active bleeding is definitely accepted practice in trauma centers. The opportunity and need for more than one organ embolization or vascular territory is scarce, but it is doable when adjusted to existing protocols, respecting especially hemodynamic stability Objectives: to show the experience of a hospital emergency department in the use of angioembolization in nonoperative management of more than one injured abdominal organ. Demonstrate utility of simultaneous angioembolization of more than one vascular territory or organ in the management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma who start a nonoperative treatmeant. Design: Retrospective observational study Methods: Between 2007 and 2014, patients with blunt abdominal trauma and active hemorrhage or potentially bleeding lesions demonstrated by computed tomography (CT) were evaluated. Those who underwent nonoperative treatment and embolized were included. Of these, those with more than one organ or vascular territory embolized were described. Results: 392 patients were admitted with blunt abdominal trauma. Of these, 281 (72 %) started TNO protocol. 225 with active bleeding on CT were found. 183 patients (80 %) underwent angiography and 166 need embolization. In 7 cases embolization of more than one organ or vascular territory was performed. Conclusion: angioembolization of organ with active bleeding is definitely accepted practice in trauma centers. The opportunity and need for more than one organ embolization or vascular territory is scarce, but it is doable when adjusted to existing protocols, respecting especially hemodynamic stability Design: Retrospective observational study Methods: Between 2007 and 2014, patients with blunt abdominal trauma and active hemorrhage or potentially bleeding lesions demonstrated by computed tomography (CT) were evaluated. Those who underwent nonoperative treatment and embolized were included. Of these, those with more than one organ or vascular territory embolized were described. Results: 392 patients were admitted with blunt abdominal trauma. Of these, 281 (72 %) started TNO protocol. 225 with active bleeding on CT were found. 183 patients (80 %) underwent angiography and 166 need embolization. In 7 cases embolization of more than one organ or vascular territory was performed. Conclusion: angioembolization of organ with active bleeding is definitely accepted practice in trauma centers. The opportunity and need for more than one organ embolization or vascular territory is scarce, but it is doable when adjusted to existing protocols, respecting especially hemodynamic stability Methods: Between 2007 and 2014, patients with blunt abdominal trauma and active hemorrhage or potentially bleeding lesions demonstrated by computed tomography (CT) were evaluated. Those who underwent nonoperative treatment and embolized were included. Of these, those with more than one organ or vascular territory embolized were described. Results: 392 patients were admitted with blunt abdominal trauma. Of these, 281 (72 %) started TNO protocol. 225 with active bleeding on CT were found. 183 patients (80 %) underwent angiography and 166 need embolization. In 7 cases embolization of more than one organ or vascular territory was performed. Conclusion: angioembolization of organ with active bleeding is definitely accepted practice in trauma centers. The opportunity and need for more than one organ embolization or vascular territory is scarce, but it is doable when adjusted to existing protocols, respecting especially hemodynamic stability Results: 392 patients were admitted with blunt abdominal trauma. Of these, 281 (72 %) started TNO protocol. 225 with active bleeding on CT were found. 183 patients (80 %) underwent angiography and 166 need embolization. In 7 cases embolization of more than one organ or vascular territory was performed. Conclusion: angioembolization of organ with active bleeding is definitely accepted practice in trauma centers. The opportunity and need for more than one organ embolization or vascular territory is scarce, but it is doable when adjusted to existing protocols, respecting especially hemodynamic stability
Antecedentes: el tratamiento no operatorio (TNO) es el abordaje sugerido en el trauma cerrado de abdomen en pacientes estables sin lesiones necesariamente quirúrgicas.Entre las herramientas utilizadas, se ha destacado la angioembolizacion como método de detención de la hemorragia o en lesiones potencialmente sangrantes. La existencia de más de una lesión podría ser factible de tratar por esta vía. Objetivos: mostrar la experiencia de un hospital de urgencias en la utilización de angioembolización en el tratamiento no operatorio de más de un órgano abdominal lesionado.Diseño: estudio retrospectivo observacional.Material y métodos: entre 2007 y 2014 se evaluaron pacientes con trauma abdominal cerrado y lesiones hemorrágicas o potencialmente sangrantes demostradas por tomografía computada (TC). Se incluyeron aquellos que ingresaron a TNO y fueron angioembolizados. De estos, se describieron aquellos con más de un órgano o territorio vascular embolizado.Resultados: ingresaron 392 pacientes con trauma abdominal cerrado, de los cuales 281 (72%) iniciaron protocolo de TNO. Se encontraron 225 hemorragias activas en la TC y 183 pacientes (80%) fueron sometidos a angiografía, y embolizados 166 pacientes. En 7 casos se realizó embolización de más de un órgano o territorio vascular.Conclusión: la angioembolización de órganos con sangrado activo es una práctica definitivamente aceptada en centros de trauma. La oportunidad y necesidad de embolizar más de un órgano o territorio vascular es escasa, pero es factible cuando se ajusta a los lineamientos existentes, respetando sobre todo la estabilidad hemodinámica. Diseño: estudio retrospectivo observacional.Material y métodos: entre 2007 y 2014 se evaluaron pacientes con trauma abdominal cerrado y lesiones hemorrágicas o potencialmente sangrantes demostradas por tomografía computada (TC). Se incluyeron aquellos que ingresaron a TNO y fueron angioembolizados. De estos, se describieron aquellos con más de un órgano o territorio vascular embolizado.Resultados: ingresaron 392 pacientes con trauma abdominal cerrado, de los cuales 281 (72%) iniciaron protocolo de TNO. Se encontraron 225 hemorragias activas en la TC y 183 pacientes (80%) fueron sometidos a angiografía, y embolizados 166 pacientes. En 7 casos se realizó embolización de más de un órgano o territorio vascular.Conclusión: la angioembolización de órganos con sangrado activo es una práctica definitivamente aceptada en centros de trauma. La oportunidad y necesidad de embolizar más de un órgano o territorio vascular es escasa, pero es factible cuando se ajusta a los lineamientos existentes, respetando sobre todo la estabilidad hemodinámica. Material y métodos: entre 2007 y 2014 se evaluaron pacientes con trauma abdominal cerrado y lesiones hemorrágicas o potencialmente sangrantes demostradas por tomografía computada (TC). Se incluyeron aquellos que ingresaron a TNO y fueron angioembolizados. De estos, se describieron aquellos con más de un órgano o territorio vascular embolizado.Resultados: ingresaron 392 pacientes con trauma abdominal cerrado, de los cuales 281 (72%) iniciaron protocolo de TNO. Se encontraron 225 hemorragias activas en la TC y 183 pacientes (80%) fueron sometidos a angiografía, y embolizados 166 pacientes. En 7 casos se realizó embolización de más de un órgano o territorio vascular.Conclusión: la angioembolización de órganos con sangrado activo es una práctica definitivamente aceptada en centros de trauma. La oportunidad y necesidad de embolizar más de un órgano o territorio vascular es escasa, pero es factible cuando se ajusta a los lineamientos existentes, respetando sobre todo la estabilidad hemodinámica. Resultados: ingresaron 392 pacientes con trauma abdominal cerrado, de los cuales 281 (72%) iniciaron protocolo de TNO. Se encontraron 225 hemorragias activas en la TC y 183 pacientes (80%) fueron sometidos a angiografía, y embolizados 166 pacientes. En 7 casos se realizó embolización de más de un órgano o territorio vascular.Conclusión: la angioembolización de órganos con sangrado activo es una práctica definitivamente aceptada en centros de trauma. La oportunidad y necesidad de embolizar más de un órgano o territorio vascular es escasa, pero es factible cuando se ajusta a los lineamientos existentes, respetando sobre todo la estabilidad hemodinámica. Conclusión: la angioembolización de órganos con sangrado activo es una práctica definitivamente aceptada en centros de trauma. La oportunidad y necesidad de embolizar más de un órgano o territorio vascular es escasa, pero es factible cuando se ajusta a los lineamientos existentes, respetando sobre todo la estabilidad hemodinámica.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Traumatismo Múltiple/terapia , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Angiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismo Múltiple/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Introducción: El manejo no operatorio (MNO) es el manejo estándar del trauma cerrado esplénico y hepático en el paciente pediátrico. Se han identificado como fallas a este manejo inestabilidad hemodinámica y transfusiones masivas. Pocos trabajos evalúan si existen factores que permitan una anticipación a estos eventos. El objetivo fue determinar la existencia de factores asociados a la falla en MNO de las lesiones esplénicas y/o hepáticas secundarias al trauma abdominal cerrado. Pacientes y Método: Análisis retrospectivo 2007 a 2015 de los pacientes que ingresaron al servicio de Cirugía infantil del Hospital Universitario San Vicente Fundación con trauma hepático y/o esplénico cerrado. Resultados: Ingresaron 70 pacientes con trauma cerrado de abdomen, 3 fueron excluidos por cirugía inmediata (2 inestabilidad hemodinámica y 1 irritación peritoneal). De 67 pacientes que recibieron MNO, 58 tuvieron éxito y 9 presentaron falla (8 inestabilidad hemodinámica y 1 lesión de víscera hueca). Encontramos 3 factores asociados a la falla MNO: presión arterial (PAS) < 90 mmHg al ingreso (p=0,0126; RR =5,19), caída de la Hemoglobina (Hb) > 2 g/dl en las primeras 24 h (p=0,0009; RR= 15,3), y transfusión de 3 o más unidades de glóbulos rojos (UGR) (0,00001; RR= 17,1). Mecanismo del trauma, severidad e Índice de Trauma Pediátrico no se asociaron con fallo MNO. Conclusiones: Los niños con trauma cerrado hepático o esplénico responden al MNO. Los factores como PA menor de 90 al ingreso, caída de la Hb >2 g/dl en las primeras 24 h y la transfusión de 3 o más UGR pueden asociarse con la falla en el MNO.
Introduction: The non operative management (NOM) is the standard management of splenic and liver blunt trauma in pediatric patients.Hemodynamic instability and massive transfusions have been identified as management failures. Few studies evaluate whether there exist factors allowing anticipation of these events. The objective was to identify factors associated with the failure of NOM in splenic and liver injuries for blunt abdominal trauma. Patients and Method: Retrospective analysis between 2007-2015 of patients admitted to the pediatric surgery at University Hospital Saint Vincent Foundation with liver trauma and/or closed Spleen. Results: 70 patients were admitted with blunt abdominal trauma, 3 were excluded for immediate surgery (2 hemodynamic instability, 1 peritoneal irritation). Of 67 patients who received NOM, 58 were successful and 9 showed failure (8 hemodynamic instability, 1 hollow viscera injury). We found 3 factors associated with failure NOM: blood pressure (BP) < 90 mmHg at admission (p = 0.0126; RR = 5.19), drop in hemoglobin (Hb) > 2 g/dl in the first 24 hours (p = 0.0009; RR = 15.3), and transfusion of 3 or more units of red blood cells (RBC) (0.00001; RR = 17.1). Mechanism and severity of trauma and Pediatric Trauma Index were not associated with failure NOM. Conclusions: Children with blunted hepatic or splenic trauma respond to NOM. Factors such as BP < 90 mmHg at admission, an Hb fall > 2 g/dl in the first 24 hours and transfusion of 3 or more units of RBC were associated with the failure in NOM.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Bazo/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Tratamiento Conservador , Hígado/lesiones , Pronóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
Antecedentes: existe una tendencia creciente hacia el tratamiento no operatorio (TNO) en el trauma-tismo cerrado de abdomen (TCA), en pacientes estables hemodinámicamente, sin abdomen agudo peritoneal. No hay consenso sobre: momento de inicio de la dieta, deambulación, proflaxis anttrom-bótica, seguimiento y control, y reinicio de la actividad fisica. Objetivo: describir los resultados del manejo de pacientes con TCA, admitidos en nuestro Servicio de Cirugía. Material y métodos: incluimos pacientes mayores de 15 años internados desde enero de 2011 hasta septembre de 2014, con TCA sometidos a TNO. Se recabaron las variables analizadas de una base de datos electrónica de fichaje prospectivo. Resultados: del total de pacientes 31 TCA, 15 se intervinieron quirúrgicamente al ingreso y 16 pacientes se someteron a TNO. El 73,3% presentó lesiones asociadas extraabdominales. A todos se les realizó ecografa abdominal, donde se encontró líquido libre en el 80% y se identificó lesión de órgano sólido en el 60%. En 11 pacientes se realizó TC confrmando lesión objetivada en la ecografa e iden-tificando 3 no evidenciadas previamente. Se diagnosticaron 5 traumatismos hepáticos, 2 asociados a traumatismo renal; 6 traumatismos esplénicos, 4 renales y un paciente con hemoperitoneo. En 7 pacientes se utlizó tromboproflaxis. El TNO fue exitoso en todos los casos. Tres pacientes presentaron complicaciones. No se registró mortalidad. Conclusiones: los pacientes sometidos a TNO en nuestro hospital fueron tratados exitosamente en todos los casos. No se registró mortalidad en la serie analizada.
Background: there is a growing trend towards non-operative management (NOM) in the blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) in hemodynamically stable patentis without peritoneal acute abdomen. However, there is stll no consensus on: tme of onset of diet, ambulaton, antthrombotic prophylaxis, follow-up, and resumpton of physical activity. Objective: to describe the management of patentis with BAT, admited to the Department of Surgery of our insttuton. Material and methods: we included patentis age 15 and older admited from January 2011 to Sept-ember 2014, with BAT who underwent NOM. The variables analyzed were collected from an electronic database of prospective signing. Resultis: 31 TCA were identifed, 15 were operated on at admission and 16 patentis underwent NOM. 75% were men; mean age of 29 (range 18-58). In 100% abdominal ultrasound was performed, finding free fuid in 80% and identifying organ damage in 60% of the total. In 11 patentis CT scan was perfor-med confrming identifed organ injury on ultrasound and diagnosing three not evidenced previously. We included 5 patentis with liver trauma, 2 associated renal trauma; 6 splenic trauma; 4 kidney trauma and 1 patent with hemoperitoneum. Thromboprophylaxis was used in 7 patentis. NOM was successful in all cases. Three patentis presented complicatons, not associated with trauma. No mortality was recorded. Conclusions: patentis undergoing NOT in our hospital were successfully treated in all cases. There were no complicatons associated with management of the NOT. No mortality was recorded.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Argentina , Epidemiología Descriptiva , Estudios Transversales , Ultrasonografía , Riñón/lesiones , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/lesionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Splenic involvement secondary to blunt abdominal trauma is often treated by performing a splenectomy. The severity of the post-splenectomy syndrome is currently well known (blood loss, sepsis), so there is an increasing tendency to preserve the spleen. The case is presented of splenic preservation after blunt abdominal trauma with hilum involvement, emphasising the role of Floseal as a haemostatic agent, as well as the use of resorbable meshes to preserve the spleen. CLINICAL CASE: A 22-year-old woman presenting with a grade IV splenic lesion secondary to a blunt abdominal trauma after a traffic accident. Partial splenic resection was performed and bleeding was controlled with Floseal and use of a reinforcing polyglycolic acid mesh. No postoperative complications occurred, being discharged on day 5. The long-term follow-up has been uneventful. CONCLUSION: The use of haemostatic agents such as thrombin and the gelatine gel (FloSeal) and the use of polyglycolic acid meshes enable spleen-preserving surgery, making it a feasible and reproducible procedure and an alternative to classical splenectomy.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Bazo/cirugía , Esplenectomía/métodos , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Accidentes de Tránsito , Electrocoagulación , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Esponja de Gelatina Absorbible , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/cirugía , Hemostasis Quirúrgica , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Humanos , Laceraciones/cirugía , Ácido Poliglicólico , Bazo/lesiones , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Os hematomas parietais de alças intestinais por trauma abdominal fechado, determinando rápida obstrução luminal, são lesões raras e podem ser confundidas com afecções neoplásicas estenosantes (parietais ou por mecanismo de compressão extrínseca). Neste estudo é relatado um caso de obstrução intestinal por hematoma parietal da terceira porção duodenal pós-trauma e são discutidos o diagnóstico por imagem e o tratamento para tal obstrução.
Intramural duodenal hematomas secondary to blunt trauma, determining rapid luminal obstruction, are rare, benign lesions and may be confused with obstructive neoplastic conditions (either parietal or produced by extrinsic compression mechanisms). The present report describes a case of post‑traumatic intestinal obstruction by an intramural hematoma in the third duodenal segment. Imaging diagnosis and the conservative management of such obstruction are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Niño , Traumatismos Abdominales , Duodeno/lesiones , Duodeno/patología , Hematoma , Obstrucción Duodenal/diagnóstico , Obstrucción Duodenal/rehabilitación , Abdomen , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo , Radiografía Torácica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía DopplerRESUMEN
La hernia diafragmática traumática (HDT) es una complicación poco común en el trauma abdominal cerrado y puede no ser diagnosticada a menos de que se tenga un alto índice de sospecha. El mecanismo fisiopatológico consiste en un impacto de alta energía con aceleración y desaceleración que condiciona incremento súbito de la presión intraabdominal. El hemidiafragma izquierdo es afectado más comúnmente. El diagnóstico temprano y oportuno es fundamental debido a la elevada incidencia con la que se asocia a lesión a otros órganos y complicaciones. El objetivo de este artículo es presentar el caso de un paciente de 62 años que desarrolló hernia diafragmática secundaria a trauma abdominal cerrado y revisar la literatura relacionada a esta entidad.
Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia is an uncommon complication of abdominal blunt trauma and is easily overlooked unless high index of suspicion is maintained. The underlying mechanism for diaphragmatic rupture is due to a high-energy acceleration-deceleration impact that results in a sudden increase in the intra-abdominal pressure. The left diaphragm is more commonly involved. The diagnosis is important because of the high incidence of associated organ damage and complications. The aim of this paper is to present the case of 62 years old patient who developed traumatic diaphragmatic hernia and review the literature related to this entity.
RESUMEN
Blunt isolated pancreatic trauma is uncommon, accounting for 1%-4% of high impact abdominal injuries. In addition, its diagnosis can be difficult; physical signs may be poor and laboratory findings nonspecific, resulting in delayed treatment. Preserving the spleen during distal pancreatectomy (DP) is controversial. One of the spleen's functions regards immunity; complications following splenectomy include leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, overwhelming post splenectomy sepsis and some degree of immunodeficiency. This is why many authors favor its preservation. We describe a case of a young man with an isolated pancreatic trauma due to a blunt abdominal trauma with a delayed presentation who was treated with spleen-preserving DP and we discuss the value of this procedure with reference to the literature.
RESUMEN
Isolated gallbladder injury following abdominal blunt trauma is rare and early diagnosis is difficult to make, particularly when no other organ is injured. However, ultrasonography is valuable for investigating gallbladder injuries. We report a case of isolated gallbladder blunt trauma presented as acute cholecystitis with hemobilia. In isolated blunt traumatic injury to the gallbladder, treatment options vary depending on the specific injury. The characteristics of blunt trauma injuries to the gallbladder and their appropriate management are discussed.