RESUMEN

Bacterial and fungal superinfections are common in COVID-19, and early diagnosis can enable timely intervention. Serum calprotectin levels increase with bacterial, fungal, and viral infections. This study evaluated serum calprotectin as a diagnostic and prognostic tool for microbial superinfections in COVID-19. Serum samples from adult patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 were collected during hospitalization from 2020 to 2024. Calprotectin levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 63 patients with moderate COVID-19, 60 patients with severe COVID-19, and 34 healthy individuals. Calprotectin serum levels were elevated in patients with moderate COVID-19 compared with controls, and these levels were further increased in the severe cases. Patients with severe COVID-19 and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bacteremia had elevated calprotectin levels, but their C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels were not increased. Fungal superinfections and herpes simplex virus reactivation did not change the calprotectin levels. A calprotectin concentration of 31.29 µg/mL can be used to diagnose VRE bloodstream infection with 60% sensitivity and 96% specificity. These data suggest that serum calprotectin may be a promising biomarker for the early detection of VRE bloodstream infections in patients with COVID-19.

Asunto(s)

Biomarcadores , COVID-19 , Diagnóstico Precoz , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/complicaciones , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina , Bacteriemia/sangre , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Candidaemia is a potentially life-threatening emergency in the intensive care units (ICUs). Surveillance using common protocols in a large network of hospitals would give meaningful estimates of the burden of candidaemia and central line associated candidaemia in low resource settings. We undertook this study to understand the burden and epidemiology of candidaemia in multiple ICUs of India, leveraging the previously established healthcare-associated infections (HAI) surveillance network. Our aim was also to assess the impact that the pandemic of COVID-19 had on the rates and associated mortality of candidaemia. METHODS: This study included adult patients from 67 Indian ICUs in the AIIMS-HAI surveillance network that conducted BSI surveillance in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ICUs during and before the COVID-19 pandemic periods. Hospitals identified healthcare-associated candidaemia and central line associated candidaemia and reported clinical and microbiological data to the network as per established and previously published protocols. RESULTS: A total of 401,601 patient days and 126,051 central line days were reported during the study period. A total of 377 events of candidaemia were recorded. The overall rate of candidaemia in our network was 0.93/1000 patient days. The rate of candidaemia in COVID-19 ICUs (2.52/1000 patient days) was significantly higher than in non-COVID-19 ICUs (1.05/patient days) during the pandemic period. The rate of central line associated candidaemia in COVID-19 ICUs (4.53/1000 central line days) was also significantly higher than in non-COVID-19 ICUs (1.73/1000 central line days) during the pandemic period. Mortality in COVID-19 ICUs associated with candidaemia (61%) was higher than that in non-COVID-19 ICUs (41%). A total of 435 Candida spp. were isolated. C. tropicalis (26.7%) was the most common species. C. auris accounted for 17.5% of all isolates and had a high mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients in ICUs with COVID-19 infections have a much higher risk of candidaemia, CLAC and its associated mortality. Network level data helps in understanding the true burden of candidaemia and will help in framing infection control policies for the country.

Asunto(s)

COVID-19 , Candidemia , Infección Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Candidemia/epidemiología , India/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Adulto , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Pandemias

RESUMEN

The current manufacturing disruption of BACTEC blood culture bottles has drawn attention to diagnostic stewardship around blood culture utilization. In this perspective, we offer strategies for implementing blood culture stewardship using a graded approach based on a hospital's blood culture bottle supply. These strategies should inform plans to mitigate the impact of the shortage on patient care and reinforce fundamental principles of blood culture stewardship.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We analyze the effectiveness of short courses of adequate treatment in patients with episodes of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream-infections (CPE-BSI). METHODS: Patients with first monomicrobial CPE-BSI episodes who received ≥72h of appropriate treatment from 2014-2022 were selected. Detection of CPE was established on the basis of phenotypic antibiogram and confirmation by PCR and/or immunochromatographic methods. Patients were classified in short treatment group (STG) those who received 3-10 days of appropriate treatment, and long treatment (LTG) those receiving >10 days. Unfavorable outcome consisted in a composite of global 30-day mortality and/or persistent bacteremia and/or recurrent bacteremia. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to compare the outcome between the two study groups. RESULTS: We included 105 CPE-BSI episodes: 99 were caused by OXA-48-like, 4 VIM and 2 KPC carbapenemases. Thirty-nine patients (37.1%) were included in the STG and 66 (62.9%) in LTG. The STG group presented frequent treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam (43.6% vs. 24.2%, p=0.03) and lower in-hospital stay (21 days vs. 32 days, p=0.02). Overall, 28 patients (26.7%) presented unfavorable outcome: IPTW analysis showed no differences in the outcome between STG to LTG groups (24.2% vs. 30.8%, weighted-risk difference 6.6%, p=0.44). Patients with unfavorable outcome presented more frequently source other than urinary-biliary (46.4% vs. 23.4%, p=0.02), received less frequently ceftazidime-avibactam (14.3% vs. 37.7%, p=0.02) and presented frequently with absence of source control when indicated (28.6% vs. 13.0%, p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Short treatment durations for CPE-BSI episodes may be effective, as long as they are appropriate and source control is performed.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Catheter-related bloodstream infections are among the most critical issues associated with central venous catheters used for dialysis treatment. To reduce the incidence of this life-threatening complication, various strategies have been developed. Among these, Hub Devices have been introduced in clinical practice to prevent microbial growth at the hub of the catheter. METHODS: A review was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Hub Devices in reducing bloodstream infections in central venous catheters for dialysis, compared to solid caps. The review analyzed existing literature from three bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL) to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice. RESULTS: After a thorough review of the available data, it was found that out of the 873 records screened, only six trials met the inclusion criteria. Albeit the number of patients observed in these trials was more than 25,000, due to the differences in the mechanism of action of different Hub Devices and the lack of a standardized criterion to identify and measure the outcomes, it is difficult to draw a firm conclusion. It is worth noting, however, that in five out of six trials examined, the Hub Devices exhibited a protective effect when compared to solid caps. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Hub Devices appears to be associated with a reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infections in the central venous catheter dialysis population. However, the Hub Devices show interesting results that should be investigated with further well-designed prospective studies.

RESUMEN

Escherichia coli is one of the most important pathogens causing bloodstream infections (BSIs) throughout the world. We sought to characterize the phylogroup classification, major human sequence types (STs), antimicrobial resistance, presence of selected antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes, and genetic diversity of E. coli isolated from patients with BSIs at the University Hospital in Iran. A total of 100 E. coli bloodstream isolates were collected between December 2020 and June 2022. This study used PCR to investigate phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2, C, D, E, and F), four major STs (ST69, ST73, ST95, and ST131), antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), virulence-associated genes (VAGs), and pathogenicity islands (PAIs). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by disk diffusion method. Genetic diversity was analyzed by repetitive element sequence-based PCR (REP-PCR). The phylogenetic group B2 (32%) predominated, followed by phylogenetic group E (25%). ST131 (28%) was the most prevalent ST and the majority of these isolates (89.3%) were of serotype O25b. Most of E. coli isolates (75%) were categorized as multidrug resistant (MDR) with high rates of resistance (>55%) to ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, cefazolin, and ceftriaxone. The most frequent ARGs were bla TEM (66%), sul1 (57%), and sul2 (51%). The most prevalent VAGs and PAIs were fimH (type 1 fimbriae adhesin; 85%), aer (iucC) (aerobactin; 79%), traT (serum resistance; 77%), iutA (aerobactin siderophore receptor; 69%), and PAI IV536 (75%), respectively. The highest rate of ARGs and VAGs was observed in the ST131 isolates. REP-PCR analysis showed high diversity among the studied isolates. The high prevalence of MDR septicemic E. coli with different types of ARGs, VAGs and genotypes is an extremely worrisome sign of BSIs treatment and poses a major threat for hospitalized patients. Active surveillance, stringent prescribing policies, increasing the awareness of ARGs among clinicians and re-defining the infection control measures are essential to curb the dissemination of these strains.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Temporal trends of routinely obtained parameters may provide valuable information for predicting BSIs, but this association has not yet been established in LVAD patients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included data from 347 consecutive recipients of three rotary LVAD types. Study endpoints included the incidence of BSI, the association of temporal trends of routinely obtained blood biomarkers with the development of BSIs, the incidence of BSIs, and survival on LVAD support. RESULTS: During follow-up, 47.8% (n = 166) of the patients developed BSI. In multivariate analyses, the development of BSI was a significant predictor of mortality (HR 5.78, 95% CI 4.08-8.19, p < 0.0001). In univariate analyses, after adjusting for potential confounders, albumin (SHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97, p < 0.00010), creatinine (SHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.03-2.15, p = 0.033), and C-reactive protein (SHR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.32, p = 0.0007) significantly predicted the development of BSIs during LVAD support. Notably, the strength of the association of parameter changes with the prediction of BSIs demonstrated a time-dependent correlation in the cases of albumin (p = 0.045) and creatinine (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Bloodstream infections are highly prevalent among LVAD recipients and are independent predictors of mortality. Temporal biomarker trends significantly predict the development of BSIs. These findings suggest opportunities for interventions aiming to reduce the incidence of BSIs.

RESUMEN

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic increased catheter-related bloodstream infections (C-RBSI), but its subsequent impact has not been adequately described. Our hospital has already depicted the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in the first wave. However, we still do not know whether C-RBSI rates and aetiology are similar to those described before the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the evolution of C-RBSI in a large tertiary teaching hospital two years later. Material and methods: We prospectively collected all confirmed C-RBSI episodes in a clinical microbiology laboratory database by matching blood cultures and catheter tip cultures with the isolation of the same microorganism (s). We compared our C-RBSI incidence rates and aetiology from 2018 to 2023. C-RBSI was defined as bacteremia or fungemia in a patient with clinical manifestations of infection and no other apparent source except the catheter. Results: During the study period, we collected 556 C-RBSI episodes. C-RBSI incidence rate per 1000 admissions each year was as follows: 2018: 2.2; 2019: 1.7; 2020: 3.29; 2021: 2.92; 2022: 2.69. and 2023: 2.01. Mainly, C-RBSI episodes occurring in critical care units each year were, respectively: 2018: 57 (54.8 %), 2019: 38 (45.2 %), 2020: 89 (63.6 %), 2021: 69 (60.5 %), 2022: 58 (50.9 %) and 2023 (61.4 %). The distribution of microorganisms showed an increase in Gram-negative episodes after the pandemic. Conclusion: Our study shows an increase in the incidence rate of C-RBSI during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a discrete decrease after that. C-RBSI episodes were mainly caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococci but with a rise in Gram-negative bacilli.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic Stewardship Programs (ASP) have improved empirical and directed antibiotic treatment in Gram-negative bloodstream infections. A decrease in mortality, readmission, and length of hospitalization has been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pre-post-quasi-experimental study was conducted between November and April 2015-2016 (pre-intervention period), 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2018-2019 (post-intervention periods), to analyse the impact of ASP on empirical, directed, and entire treatment optimization, as well as mortality, readmission, and length of hospitalization, in hospitalized patients with Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four patients were included (41 in the pre-intervention group, 38 in the first-year post-intervention group, 50 in the second-year post-intervention group, and 45 in the third-year post-intervention group). There was a significant improvement in directed treatment optimization (43.9% in the pre-intervention group, 68.4% in the first-year post-intervention group, 74% in the second-year post-intervention group, and 88.9% in the third-year post-intervention group, P <0.001), as well as in entire treatment optimization (19.5%, 34.2%, 40.0%, and 46.7%, respectively, P=0.013), with increased optimal directed (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-8.58) and entire treatment (aOR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.27-8.58). Although a tendency toward improvement was observed in empirical treatment after ASP implementation, it did not reach statistical significance (41.5% vs. 57.9%, P=0.065). No changes in mortality, readmission, or length of hospitalization were detected. CONCLUSION: ASP implementation improved both directed and entire treatment optimization in patients with GNB bloodstream infections over time. Nevertheless, no improvement was found in clinical outcomes such as mortality, readmission, or length of hospitalization.

RESUMEN

The study aimed to describe the epidemiology of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria among solid cancer (SC) patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs), evaluating inappropriate empiric antibiotic treatment (IEAT) use and mortality trends over a 25-year period. All BSI occurrences in adult SC patients at a university hospital were analyzed across five distinct five-year intervals. MDR bacteria were classified as extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL)-producing and/or Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) resistant to at least three antibiotic classes, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci. A multivariate regression model identified the risk factors for MDR BSI. Of 6,117 BSI episodes, Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) constituted 60.4% (3,695/6,117), being the most common are Escherichia coli with 26.8% (1,637/6,117), Klebsiella spp. with 12.4% (760/6,117), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 8.6% (525/6,117). MDR-GNB accounted for 644 episodes (84.8% of MDR or 644/759), predominantly ESBL-producing strains (71.1% or 540/759), which escalated significantly over time. IEAT was administered in 24.8% of episodes, mainly in MDR BSI, and was associated with higher mortality (22.9% vs. 14%, P < 0.001). Independent factors for MDR BSI were prior antibiotic use [odds ratio (OR) 2.93, confidence interval (CI) 2.34-3.67], BSI during antibiotic treatment (OR 1.46, CI 1.18-1.81), biliary (OR 1.84, CI 1.34-2.52) or urinary source (OR 1.86, CI 1.43-2.43), admission period (OR) 1.28, CI 1.18-1.38, and community-acquired infection (OR 0.57, CI 0.39-0.82). The study showed an increase in MDR-GNB among SC patients with BSI. A quarter received IEAT, which was linked to increased mortality. Improving risk assessment for MDR infections and the judicious prescription of empiric antibiotics are crucial for better outcomes. IMPORTANCE: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria pose a global public health threat as they are more challenging to treat, and they are on the rise. Solid cancer patients are often immunocompromised due to their disease and cancer treatments, making them more susceptible to infections. Understanding the changes and trends in bloodstream infections in solid cancer patients is crucial, to help physicians make informed decisions about appropriate antibiotic therapies, manage infections in this vulnerable population, and prevent infection. Solid cancer patients often require intensive and prolonged treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Infections can complicate these treatments, leading to treatment delays, increased healthcare costs, and poorer patient outcomes. Investigating new strategies to combat MDR infections and researching novel antibiotics in these patients is of paramount importance to avoid these negative impacts.

RESUMEN

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major public health concern worldwide, requiring prompt and effective antibiotic therapy. Traditionally, intravenous (IV) antibiotics have been preferred for their rapid action and consistent absorption. However, interest is growing in transitioning to oral (PO) antibiotics when suitable, due to similar pharmacokinetics, improved patient outcomes, and reduced healthcare costs. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of switching from IV to PO antibiotics for both gram-negative and gram-positive BSIs. Scopus, Embase, and PubMed databases were comprehensively searched until March 2023. The review included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing continued IV therapy with early transition from IV to PO antibiotics within the first week of admission. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies involving adult patients (≥18 years) and reporting specific outcomes such as treatment success, mortality, and hospital readmissions. Meta-analysis of 17 studies comprising 11,245 patients demonstrated higher treatment success rates overall (OR: 1.40, P=0.04), particularly in gram-negative infections (OR: 1.42, P=0.05). However, this effect was not statistically significant in the gram-positive subgroup (OR: 1.41, P=0.036). Oral switch significantly reduced all-cause mortality overall (OR: 0.35, P=0.003), especially in gram-negative infections (OR: 0.22, P=0.008), but not significantly in gram-positive infections (OR: 0.60, P=0.09). Both gram-negative and gram-positive infections benefited from shorter hospital stays (P<0.0001), despite significant heterogeneity. Hospital readmission rates did not significantly differ between IV and oral switch groups (P=0.53). Our meta-analysis suggests potential benefits of early transition from IV to PO antibiotics for BSIs, including improved treatment outcomes and shorter hospital stays without an increased risk of readmission. However, these findings are subject to selection bias, and further standardized randomized trials are essential to validate these results.

RESUMEN

Background The objective of our investigation was to evaluate the mortality rate and predictor factors that are associated with bloodstream infections (BSIs) in elderly patients who are admitted to the internal medicine ward. Materials and methods A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted at a 550-bed tertiary care hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan, from January 2021 to June 2022. The study involved elderly inpatients aged 65 and older with positive culture results detected within two days of admission. Data collection involved demographic and patient-related risk variables, BSI-related risk factors, and environmental risk factors, with statistical analysis performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Version 26.0, Armonk, NY). Results Of the total study sample (n=186), 103 (55.4%) survived while 83 (44.6%) did not. The non-survivor group had a higher median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (6 vs. 2, p<0.0001) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (5 ± 2 vs. 3 ± 2, p<0.0001), with more frequent immunosuppression (25.3% vs. 8.7%, p=0.001). Additionally, gram-positive bacteria were more common in non-survivors (42% vs. 10%, p<0.0001), while gram-negative bacteria were more prevalent in survivors (73% vs. 36%, p=0.002). Conclusions Our research validates that BSI in older adults is a serious condition that is linked to a substantial death rate during hospitalization. The biggest determinant of death in older patients with BSI is the severity of clinical symptoms evaluated by the SOFA score upon admission. It is imperative to acknowledge that respiratory-induced BSIs are the most fatal, and patients who are hospitalized and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are at an elevated risk.

RESUMEN

In this editorial, we discuss the recent article by Zhao et al published in the World Journal of Diabetes, which highlights the importance of recognizing the risk indicators associated with diabetes mellitus (DM). Given the severe implications of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in hospitalized individuals- such as heightened mortality rates, prolonged hospitalizations, and increased costs- we focus on elucidating the connection between DM and nosocomial infections. Diabetic patients are susceptible to pathogenic bacterial invasion and subsequent infection, with some already harboring co-infections upon admission. Notably, DM is an important risk factor for nosocomial urinary tract infections and surgical site infections, which may indirectly affect the occurrence of nosocomial bloodstream infections, especially in patients with DM with poor glycemic control. Although evidence regarding the impact of DM on healthcare-associated pneumonias remains inconclusive, attention to this potential association is warranted. Hospitalized patients with DM should prioritize meticulous blood glucose management, adherence to standard operating procedures, hand hygiene pra-ctices, environmental disinfection, and rational use of drugs during hospitalization. Further studies are imperative to explore the main risk factors of HAIs in patients with DM, enabling the development of preventative measures and mitigating the occurrence of HAIs in these patients.

RESUMEN

Introduction: We aimed to conduct a systematic review of the epidemiology of Escherichia coli in bloodstream infections (BSI) of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. Methods: For a comprehensive search of studies that reported the prevalence of E. coli and antibiotic resistance in bloodstream infections from 2000 to January 1, 2024, databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. The main keywords used were: Escherichia coli, epidemiology, bloodstream infection, microbial resistance, antibiotic resistance, hematopoietic malignancy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. After applying eligibility criteria, and quality assessment of studies, data analysis was done by comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software. Results: The prevalence of bacterial bloodstream infections amongst different studies varied between 8-51%. Also, bloodstream infections caused by E. coli varied between 2.5-57%. Prevalence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) of Escherichia coli in bloodstream infections varied between 15-80%. As well, the mortality rate caused by Escherichia coli strains in bloodstream infection varied between 6.7-27.3%. Resistance to ciprofloxacin, cefepime, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, was reported to be the highest (prevalence of 100%), and the lowest was against amikacin, with a prevalence between 13-38%. Conclusions: The high prevalence of Escherichia coli-related BSI, and subsequent mortality, especially by multidrug resistance and ESBL strains, in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, requires essential measures to prevent the spread of microbial resistance.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) is the second most prevalent Gram-negative bacterium causing bloodstream infections (BSIs). In recent years, the management of BSIs caused by KP has become increasingly complex due to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP). Although numerous studies have explored the risk factors for the development of CRKP-BSIs, the mortality of patients with KP-BSIs, and the molecular epidemiological characteristics of CRKP, the variability in data across different populations, countries, and hospitals has led to inconsistent conclusions. In this single-center retrospective observational study, we utilized logistic regression analyses to identify independent risk factors for CRKP-BSIs and factors associated with mortality in KP-BSI patients. Furthermore, a risk factor-based prediction model was developed. CRKP isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS), followed by an evaluation of microbiological characteristics, including antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes, as well as epidemiological characteristics and phylogenetic analysis. RESULTS: Our study included a total of 134 patients with KP-BSIs, comprising 50 individuals infected with CRKP and 84 with carbapenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae (CSKP). The independent risk factors for CRKP-BSIs were identified as gastric catheterization (OR = 9.143; CI = 1.357-61.618; P = 0.023), prior ICU hospitalization (OR = 4.642; CI = 1.312-16.422; P = 0.017), and detection of CRKP in non-blood sites (OR = 8.112; CI = 2.130-30.894; P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that microbiologic eradication after 6 days (OR = 3.569; CI = 1.119-11.387; P = 0.032), high Pitt bacteremia score (OR = 1.609; CI = 1.226-2.111; P = 0.001), and inappropriate empirical treatment after BSIs (OR = 6.756; CI = 1.922-23.753; P = 0.003) were independent risk factors for the 28-day mortality in KP-BSIs. The prediction model confirmed that microbiologic eradication after 6.5 days and a Pitt bacteremia score of 4.5 or higher were significant predictors of the 28-day mortality. Bioinformatics analysis identified ST11 as the predominant CRKP sequence type, with blaKPC-2 as the most prevalent gene variant. CRKP stains carried multiple plasmid-mediated resistance genes along with some virulence genes. Phylogenetic analysis indicated the presence of nosocomial transmission of ST11 CRKP within the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of risk factors for developing CRKP-BSIs and the association between KP-BSIs and 28-day mortality, along with the development of a risk factor-based prediction model and the characterization of CRKP strains, enhances clinicians' understanding of the pathogens responsible for BSIs. This understanding may help in the timely administration of antibiotic therapy for patients with suspected KP-BSIs, potentially improving outcomes.

Asunto(s)

Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Carbapenémicos , Infecciones por Klebsiella , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/mortalidad , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Filogenia , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/genética , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/aislamiento & purificación , Factores de Virulencia/genética , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto

RESUMEN

Timely pathogen identification in bloodstream infections is crucial for patient care. A comparison is made between positive blood culture (BC) pellets from serum separator tubes using a direct identification (DI) method and colonies on agar plates from a short-term incubation (STI) method with a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization Biotyper for the evaluation of 354 monomicrobial BCs. Both the DI and STI methods exhibited similar identification rates for different types of bacteria, except for Gram-positive and anaerobic bacteria. The DI method's results aligned closely with the STI method's results for Enterobacterales, glucose-non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. The DI method exhibited high concordance with the conventional method for GNB identification, achieving 88.2 and 87.5% accuracy at the genus and species levels, respectively. Compared with the STI method, the DI method showed a less successful performance for Gram-positive bacterial identification (50.5 vs. 71.3%; p < 0.01). The DI method was useful for anaerobic bacterial identification of slow-growing microorganisms without any need for colony growth, unlike in the STI method (46.7 vs. 13.3%; p = 0.04). However, both methods could not identify yeast in positive BCs. Overall, the DI method provided reliable results for GNB identification, offering many advantages over the STI method by significantly reducing the turnaround time and enabling quicker pathogen identification in positive BCs.

RESUMEN

Clostridium perfingens bloodstream infections (BSIs) can be associated with high mortality rates. We performed a subanalysis of all C. perfringens BSIs enrolled during a multicentric retrospective observational study (ITANAEROBY). Data were collected from January 2016 to December 2020. C. perfringens BSIs were 134 (134/1960, 6.8 %). The highest resistance rate was observed for clindamycin (26/120, 21.6 %), penicillin (11/71, 15.4 %) and metronidazole (14/131, 10.7 %). In conclusion, C. perfringens reduced susceptibility phenotype to first-line therapy.

RESUMEN

Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the disease burden of BSIs caused by gram-negative bacteria (GNB-BSIs) in a Brazilian hospital from 2015 to 2019, measured in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients with GNB-BSI was conducted from April 01, 2015 to March 31, 2019. This study was carried out in a 356-bed private hospital with a 68-bed medical intensive care unit located in Salvador, Brazil. Demographic and clinical data were collected through a review of medical records. DALYs were estimated using Monte Carlo Simulations, using life tables for Brazilians estimated for 2020 and the Global Burden of Diseases 2010 (GBD 2010). Results: A total of 519 GNB-BSI episodes in 498 individuals were identified. The mean age was 59.92 ± 17.97 years, with 61.1% being male. The most common bacterial infections were Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli (66.5%), whereas carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) accounted for 32.7% of cases. The highest overall DALYs were observed in 2018 (752, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 520-1021 with Brazilian Life Tables and 782, 95% CI: 540-1062 with GBD 2010). Infections due to CR-GNB had the highest DALYs, particularly, in 2017, reaching 7050 (95% CI: 3200-12,150 with Brazilian Life Tables and 7350, 95% CI: 3350-12,700 with GBD 2010) DALYs per 1000 patient days and an estimated mortality rate of 40% per 1000 patient days. Conclusions: The persistently high DALYs associated with CR-GNB raise alarming concerns, potentially leading to over 300 deaths per 1000 patient days in the coming years. These findings underscore the urgency of addressing GNB-BSI as a significant public health issue in Brazil. These results are expected to provide helpful information for public health policymakers to prioritize interventions for infections due to antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A significant number of patients require non-tunneled haemodialysis catheters (NTHCs) in the event of an urgent need for immediate haemodialysis in developing countries. Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are a major concern in haemodialysis, but there is a lack of local epidemiological data. This study aimed to determine the incidence of CRBSI, causative agents and associated risk factors in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at the dialysis unit of Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Sri Lanka from December 2019 to August 2020. Adult patients who had haemodialysis for the first time with NTHCs were included. RESULTS: Of 149 dialysis patients (104-jugular vein and 45-femoral vein, mean age 58 ± 13.7 years, mean duration of catheterization 7.9 ± 3.4 days), the incidence of CRBSI was 13.58 per 1000 catheter days. Serum albumin levels, capillary blood sugar levels at admission, haemoglobin levels and duration of catheterization were significantly associated with CRBSI. Prescence of diabetes and patients with ESRD who started routine haemodialysis had a significantly higher risk of CRBSI. Gram-positive bacteria were the most common microorganisms associated with CRBSI (87.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show high rates of infection with temporary vascular catheters in Sri Lanka, mainly due to Gram-positive bacteria. Diabetes mellitus, duration of catheterisation, low serum albumin, haemoglobin level and CBS on admission were identified as significant risk factors for CRBSI. Management strategies tailored to specific centers should be established in the nation to optimise catheter care and to monitor local microbiology for appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment.

Asunto(s)

Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Diálisis Renal , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Sri Lanka/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/instrumentación , Femenino , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Factores de Riesgo , Incidencia , Anciano , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Adulto , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Albúmina Sérica/análisis , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología

RESUMEN

Severe intestinal mucositis (IM) increases the risk of bloodstream infections (BSI) and inflammatory toxicity during acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) induction treatment. However, the implications of IM in subsequent ALL therapy phases after achieving remission remain unknown. This study investigated the relationship between IM (measured by plasma citrulline and the chemokine CCL20) and the development of BSI and systemic inflammation (reflected by C-reactive protein, CRP) in children with ALL during high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) treatment, an important part of ALL consolidation therapy. The study compared patients treated according to the NOPHO ALL 2008 protocol (n = 52) and the ALLTogether1 protocol (n = 42), both with identical HDMTX procedures but different scheduling. One week post-HDMTX, citrulline dropped to median levels of 14.5 and 16.9 µM for patients treated according to the NOPHO ALL 2008 and ALLTogether1 protocols, respectively (p = 0.11). In a protocol and neutrophil count-adjusted analysis, hypocitrullinaemia (<10 µmol/L) was associated with increased odds of BSI within 3 weeks from HDMTX (OR = 26.2, p = 0.0074). Patients treated according to the NOPHO ALL 2008 protocol exhibited increased mucosal- and systemic inflammation post-HDMTX compared to patients treated according to ALLTogether1, with increased CCL20 (14.6 vs. 3.7 pg/mL, p < 0.0001) and CRP levels (10.0 vs. 1.0 mg/L, p < 0.0001). Both citrulline and CCL20 correlated with CRP for these patients (rs = -0.44, p = 0.0016 and rs = 0.35, p = 0.016, respectively). These results suggest that hypocitrullinaemia following HDMTX increases the risk of BSI, confirming previous observations from more intensive treatments. Moreover, these data indicate that the patients' vulnerability to mucositis and inflammatory toxicity after chemotherapy varies with treatment protocol.