RESUMEN
Children and adolescents suffering from moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) face a significant disease burden that greatly impacts their quality of life. Treatment options for AD are currently limited. To assess the safety and efficacy of biologic drugs, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, or tralokinumab, in improving outcomes in patients with moderate to severe inadequately controlled AD. We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing dupilumab, lebrikizumab or tralokinumab to placebo in patients with AD. We computed odds ratios (ORs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), random effects model was used and a p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. We analysed data into Review Manager 5.4. A total of five RCTs and 973 patients were included, of whom 592 were prescribed a biologic drug. Compared with placebo, patients receiving a biologic drug had a greater improvement, achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (OR 5.05; 95% CI 3.08-8.29), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 75 (OR 6.87; 95% CI 4.71-10.02), EASI 50 (OR 8.89; 95% CI 6.18-12.78) and EASI 90 (8.30; 95% CI 4.81-14.31). The proportion of patients with 3 points or more (OR 6.56; 95% CI 4.34-9.90) or 4 points or more (OR 8.09; 95% CI 5.19-12.59) improvement from baseline in peak pruritus NRS was significantly higher with biologic drugs than placebo. There were no significant differences between groups regarding adverse events (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.58-1.07), and conjunctivitis (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.00-4.33). In this meta-analysis, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab have shown significant improvements in signs, symptoms and quality of life in children or adolescents with moderate to severe AD. Larger studies may be needed to continue evaluating the safety and efficacy of these biologic drugs in this patient population.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: To conduct a bibliographic review on tuberculosis (TB) disease in children and adolescents with rheumatic diseases, being managed with biologic therapy. Data source: An integrative review with a search in the U.S. National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health (PubMed) using the following descriptors and Boolean operators: (["tuberculosis"] AND (["children"] OR ["adolescent"]) AND ["rheumatic diseases"] AND (["tumor necrosis factor-alpha"] OR ["etanercept"] OR ["adalimumab"] OR ["infliximab"] OR ["biological drugs"] OR ["rituximab"] OR ["belimumab"] OR ["tocilizumab"] OR ["canakinumab"] OR ["golimumab"] OR ["secukinumab"] OR ["ustekinumab"] OR ["tofacitinib"] OR ["baricitinib"] OR ["anakinra"] OR ["rilonacept"] OR ["abatacept"]), between January 2010 and October 2021. Data synthesis: Thirty-seven articles were included, with the total number of 36,198 patients. There were 81 cases of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), 80 cases of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), and four of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). The main rheumatic disease was juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Among LTBI cases, most were diagnosed at screening and none progressed to TB disease during follow-up. Of the TB cases using biologics, most used tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (anti-TNFα) drugs. There was only one death. Conclusions: The study revealed a low rate of active TB in pediatric patients using biologic therapy. Screening for LTBI before initiating biologics should be done in all patients, and treatment, in cases of positive screening, plays a critical role in preventing progression to TB disease.
RESUMO Objetivo: Fazer um levantamento bibliográfico referente à tuberculose (TB) em crianças e adolescentes com doenças reumáticas, em uso de imunobiológicos. Fonte de dados: Revisão integrativa com busca na base United States National Library of Medicine (PubMed) utilizando os descritores e operadores booleanos: (["tuberculosis"] AND (["children"] OR ["adolescent"]) AND ["rheumatic diseases"] AND (["tumor necrosis fator-alpha"] OR ["etanercept"] OR ["adalimumab"] OR ["infliximab"] OR ["biological drugs"] OR ["rituximab"] OR ["belimumab"] OR ["tocilizumab"] OR ["canakinumab"] OR ["golimumab"] OR ["secukinumab"] OR ["ustekinumab"] OR ["tofacitinib"] OR ["baricitinib"] OR ["anakinra"] OR ["rilonacept"] OR ["abatacept"]), entre janeiro de 2010 e outubro de 2021. Síntese de dados: Trinta e sete artigos foram incluídos, com o total de 36.198 pacientes. Houve 81 casos de tuberculose latente (ILTB), 80 casos de tuberculose pulmonar (TBP) e quatro casos de tuberculose extrapulmonar (TBEP). A principal doença reumática foi a artrite idiopática juvenil. Entre os casos de ILTB, a maioria foi diagnosticada no rastreio e nenhum evoluiu para a TB. Dos casos de TB em uso de imunobiológicos, a maioria utilizava fármacos antiTNFα. Houve somente um caso de óbito. Conclusões: O estudo demonstrou baixa taxa de TB nos pacientes pediátricos em uso de imunobiológicos. O rastreio para ILTB antes do início da terapia com agentes biológicos deve ser realizado em todos os pacientes, e o tratamento, nos casos de rastreio positivo, é importante para evitar a progressão para TB doença.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: To conduct a bibliographic review on tuberculosis (TB) disease in children and adolescents with rheumatic diseases, being managed with biologic therapy. Data source: An integrative review with a search in the U.S. National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health (PubMed) using the following descriptors and Boolean operators: (["tuberculosis"] AND (["children"] OR ["adolescent"]) AND ["rheumatic diseases"] AND (["tumor necrosis factor-alpha"] OR ["etanercept"] OR ["adalimumab"] OR ["infliximab"] OR ["biological drugs"] OR ["rituximab"] OR ["belimumab"] OR ["tocilizumab"] OR ["canakinumab"] OR ["golimumab"] OR ["secukinumab"] OR ["ustekinumab"] OR ["tofacitinib"] OR ["baricitinib"] OR ["anakinra"] OR ["rilonacept"] OR ["abatacept"]), between January 2010 and October 2021. Data synthesis: Thirty-seven articles were included, with the total number of 36,198 patients. There were 81 cases of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), 80 cases of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), and four of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). The main rheumatic disease was juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Among LTBI cases, most were diagnosed at screening and none progressed to TB disease during follow-up. Of the TB cases using biologics, most used tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (anti-TNFα) drugs. There was only one death. Conclusions: The study revealed a low rate of active TB in pediatric patients using biologic therapy. Screening for LTBI before initiating biologics should be done in all patients, and treatment, in cases of positive screening, plays a critical role in preventing progression to TB disease.
RESUMO Objetivo: Fazer um levantamento bibliográfico referente à tuberculose (TB) em crianças e adolescentes com doenças reumáticas, em uso de imunobiológicos. Fonte de dados: Revisão integrativa com busca na base United States National Library of Medicine (PubMed) utilizando os descritores e operadores booleanos: (["tuberculosis"] AND (["children"] OR ["adolescent"]) AND ["rheumatic diseases"] AND (["tumor necrosis fator-alpha"] OR ["etanercept"] OR ["adalimumab"] OR ["infliximab"] OR ["biological drugs"] OR ["rituximab"] OR ["belimumab"] OR ["tocilizumab"] OR ["canakinumab"] OR ["golimumab"] OR ["secukinumab"] OR ["ustekinumab"] OR ["tofacitinib"] OR ["baricitinib"] OR ["anakinra"] OR ["rilonacept"] OR ["abatacept"]), entre janeiro de 2010 e outubro de 2021. Síntese de dados: Trinta e sete artigos foram incluídos, com o total de 36.198 pacientes. Houve 81 casos de tuberculose latente (ILTB), 80 casos de tuberculose pulmonar (TBP) e quatro casos de tuberculose extrapulmonar (TBEP). A principal doença reumática foi a artrite idiopática juvenil. Entre os casos de ILTB, a maioria foi diagnosticada no rastreio e nenhum evoluiu para a TB. Dos casos de TB em uso de imunobiológicos, a maioria utilizava fármacos antiTNFα. Houve somente um caso de óbito. Conclusões: O estudo demonstrou baixa taxa de TB nos pacientes pediátricos em uso de imunobiológicos. O rastreio para ILTB antes do início da terapia com agentes biológicos deve ser realizado em todos os pacientes, e o tratamento, nos casos de rastreio positivo, é importante para evitar a progressão para TB doença.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with a significant negative impact on the quality of life of patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to assess current treatment for HS, with a special focus on therapies approved or used in Brazil. We used the PICO framework to improve the research process. The systematic review was reported in line with the PRISMA statement checklist. The search was conducted with clinical questions on two global databases (PubMed (MEDLINE) and Google Scholar) and three databases especially selected to retrieve Brazilian outcomes (BVS, SCIELO and REDALYC). RESULTS: Overall, 4640 articles were screened, 182 articles were analysed and 70 were used in a thematic qualitative analysis. Of these, 12 articles were from Brazil. The evidence-based literature was largely limited to case reports, case series, observational studies and expert opinion. Topical therapy, lifestyle interventions and oral antibiotics appeared as effective measures for mild HS. However, moderate-to-severe HS remains refractory to conventional treatments. CONCLUSION: Some biologic agents, such as adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab and secukinumab, have been shown to be effective in the management of moderate-to-severe HS that failed conventional treatment and demonstrated a good tolerability and safety profile.
RESUMEN
Com o início do programa de vacinação contra a COVID-19 no Brasil, surgiu uma série de questionamentos relacionados ao uso dos imunizantes. Neste documento, o grupo de estudo da COVID-19 da Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI) avalia as evidências científicas e se posiciona em relação aos intervalos preconizados entre a administração das vacinas contra o SARS-CoV-2 e dos imunobiológicos.
With the beginning of the COVID-19 vaccination program in Brazil, a series of questions related to the use of vaccines arose. In this document, the COVID-19 study group of the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (ASBAI) assesses the scientific evidence and takes a stand for the recommended intervals between the administration of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and that of immunobiological drugs.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Inmunoglobulinas , Toxoide Tetánico , Vacunas Antirrábicas , Vacunación , Alergia e InmunologíaRESUMEN
La persistencia en el tratamiento es un marcador subrogante de éxito de tratamiento a largo plazo. Objetivo: Evaluar la persistencia de los agentes biológicos utilizados para el tratamiento de pacientes con artritis reumatoidea (AR) a un tiempo de 5 años y determinar las principales causas asociadas a persistencia o discontinuación. Material y métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura (RSL), según las recomendaciones PRISMA, en las bases de datos Pubmed, Cochrane y Lilacs, y estudios presentados en los congresos ACR, EULAR, PANLAR (2018/2019) hasta Enero 2020. Dos revisoras independientes, evaluaron todas las publicaciones identificadas, por título y abstract y por full text, de acuerdo a la metodología PICO. Los criterios de elegibilidad fueron estudios de pacientes ≥ 18 años con diagnóstico de AR, en tratamiento con agentes biológicos, que midieran persistencia/discontinuación en un período de tiempo igual o superior a 5 años y que estuvieran en idioma inglés o español. En el caso de falta de acuerdo entre las dos revisoras, un tercer revisor fue consultado. La información extraída fue analizada mediante estadística descriptiva, se calculó el porcentaje promedio de persistencia de cada agente biológico a los 5 años. Resultados: Se seleccionaron 56 artículos luego de la remoción de los duplicados y de la exclusión por título/abstract, y por full text. De ellos 13, eran fase de extensión a largo plazo de estudios randomizados controlados, 15 cohortes retrospectivas, 18 cohortes prospectivas y 10 cohortes retro-prospectivas y correspondían a un total de 72177 (rango: 79-10396) pacientes con AR, con una edad media 53.8 años ± 12.1, 78.2% de sexo femenino y un tiempo promedio de evolución de la AR de 9.7 años ± 8.4. En 33.9% de los estudios, la terapia biológica estaba combinada con drogas modificadoras de la AR convencionales (DMARs-c), en 3.6% en monoterapia, 48.2% ambas modalidades y en 14.3% no informaba. Un estudio fue realizado en 1° línea (metotrexato näive), 29 estudios en 2° línea (respuesta inadecuada a MTX y/o DMARs-c), 5 en 3° línea (respuesta inadecuada a DMARs biológicas-b-), 12 en ≥2° línea terapéutica y en 9 no especificaban. En 30 estudios que evaluaron 2° línea terapéutica, la mayor persistencia correspondió a tocilizumab (TCZ) 66.41% (IC95% 57.8-79.94), abatacept (ABA) 57.91% (IC95% 50.96-64.87) y golimumab (GOL) 54.38% (IC95% 48.58-60.19). Y 10 estudios, en los cuales el DMAR-b había sido analizado en 3° línea terapéutica, las mayores tasas de retención correspondieron a rituximab (RTX) 61.19% (IC95% 57.53-66.22) y TCZ 61.1% (IC95% 58.81-63.32). Entre los estudios que evaluaron predictores, los más frecuentemente asociados a mayor sobrevida fueron: tratamiento combinado con DMAR-c, etanercept versus infliximab y adalimumab y 2° línea de tratamiento vs 3° o 4° línea y los asociados a menor sobrevida fueron: mayor uso de esteroides, mayor actividad basal de la enfermedad y sexo femenino. Conclusiones: En esta RSL, la persistencia de los DMAR-b a 5 años en pacientes con respuesta inadecuada a DMARs-c y DMARs-b fue numéricamente mayor para los agentes no TNFi. Y entre los TNFi, GOL presentó mayor retención en 2° línea terapéutica.
Treatment persistence is a surrogate marker for long-term treatment success. Objective: To assess the persistence of the biological agents used for treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over 5 years period and to determine the main causes associated with persistence or discontinuation. Material and methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out, according to PRISMA recommendations, including Pubmed, Cochrane and Lilacs databases, and studies presented at the ACR, EULAR, PANLAR congresses (2018/2019) until January 2020. Two independent reviewers evaluated the identified publications, by title and abstract and full text, according to PICO methodology. Eligibility criteria were: studies including RA patients ≥ 18 years, treated with biological agents, which measured persistence/ discontinuation for a period of time equal to or greater than 5 years and who were in English or Spanish language. In the case of lack of agreement between the two reviewers, a third reviewer was consulted. The extracted information was analyzed using descriptive statistics, an average percentage of persistence for each biological agent at 5 years was calculated. Results: 56 articles were selected after removal of duplicates and exclusion by title/abstract, and by full text. Long-term extension phase of randomized controlled studies were 13, another 15 retrospective cohorts, 18 prospective cohorts and 10 retro-prospective cohorts and corresponded to a total of 72177 (range: 79-10396) patients with RA, with a mean age of 53.8 years ± 12.1, 78.2% female and an average RA disease duration of 9.7 years ± 8.4. In 33.9% of the studies, biological therapy was combined with conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (c-DMARDs), in 3.6% monotherapy, 48.2% both modalities, and in 14.3% not reported. One study was in the 1st line (methotrexate näive), 29 studies in 2nd line (inadequate response to MTX and/or c-DMARDs), 5 in 3rd line (inadequate response to biological b-DMARDs), 12 in ≥2nd therapeutic line and in 9 studies did not specify this condition. In 30 studies which evaluated the 2nd therapeutic line, the highest persistence corresponded to tocilizumab (TCZ) 66.41% (95% CI 57.8-79.94), abatacept (ABA) 57.91% (95% CI 50.96-64.87) and golimumab (GOL) 54.38% (95% CI 48.58-60.19). In 10 studies, in which b-DMARD had been analyzed in 3rd therapeutic line, highest retention rates corresponded to rituximab (RTX) 61.19% (95% CI 57.53-66.22) and TCZ 61.1% (95% CI 58.81-63.32). Among studies that evaluated predictors, the most frequently associated with higher survival were: combined treatment with c-DMARD, etanercept versus infliximab and adalimumab and 2nd line of treatment vs. 3rd or 4th line whereas those associated with lower survival rates were: greater use of steroids, higher baseline disease activity, and female gender. Conclusions: In this SLR, the 5-year persistence of b-DMARD in patients with inadequate response to DMARs-c and DMARs-b was numerically greater for non-TNFi agents. And among TNFi, GOL presented a higher retention in 2nd therapeutic line.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide , Terapia Biológica , Factores BiológicosRESUMEN
Background: Biological agents used for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are associated with serious adverse effects (SAEs). Although several biologics have demonstrated good efficacy and tolerability in short-term trials, treatment guidelines recommend them as third line therapies due to a relative lack of long-term safety data. Objective: To determine the frequency and severity of adverse effects associated with the long-term use of biologics in the treatment of PsA and RA, and possible risk factors for such events in a real-life setting. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal study in PsA and RA patients only taking long-term biological agents from 2003 to 2011. Sources of information included dispensing pharmacy data and interviews with patients. Research staff conducted telephone interviews with patients inquiring about any apparent medication-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) or SAEs. ADR/SAE's data was based on pharmacy reports. We conducted a multivariate analysis to identify the factors associated with the risk of ADRs. Results: Of the 305 patients identified, we interviewed 268 patients. Most of these were taking adalimumab 127 (47.4%), 52 (19.4%) etanercept, 42 (15.7%) infliximab, 25 (9.3%) rituximab, 10 (3.7%) abatacept, 9 (3.4%) efalizumab, and 3 (1.1%) tocilizumab. Of the 268 patients, 116 (43.3%) experienced one or more adverse events related to biological agents with 1.6 events per patient, and of these 29 (25%) experienced one or more SAEs, with majority subjected to hospitalizations. The most frequently reported ADRs were administration site reactions as observed in 73 patients (27.2%), infections in 30 patients (11.2%), effects on nervous system in 22 patients (8.2%), and 15 (5.6%) patients withdrew due to ADRs. The use of rituximab was related with less risk of ADR [PR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.96; p = 0.04] than other agents. No other predisposing factors were associated with risk of ADR. The monitoring of patients (medical consultation and laboratory test) was only completed by 48 patients (30.4%). Conclusion: These data showed the early biological experience in Brazil that were associated with ADRs, withdrawals due to ADRs and SAEs. The quantification of adverse effects (serious or nonserious) considering close monitoring and patients' perceptions are increasingly important for future decision-making.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of immunobiologics for the management of oral disease in Sjögren's syndrome (SS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE® , Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for evidence on the use of immunobiologics for management of glandular disease in SS. Primary outcomes were xerostomia and salivary gland dysfunction, assessed via visual analogue scales, disease-specific scales for SS, measurement of salivary flow, ultrasound data, and quality of life measures. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (11 randomized controlled trials and 6 observational studies) met inclusion criteria. Rituximab showed efficacy in improving salivary gland function but not xerostomia. Abatacept showed promise in improving both xerostomia and salivary flow. Belimumab exhibited long-term improvement of salivary flow and subjective measures. The novel agent CFZ533 improved both disease activity and patient-reported indexes. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence pointing to the efficacy of rituximab in the management of oral disease in SS. Future controlled trials may elucidate the efficacy of belimumab and abatacept. The new drug CFZ533 is a promising alternative for the management of SS and its salivary gland involvement. In considering these agents, the promise of efficacy must be balanced against the harmful effects associated with biologic agents.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Factores Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de las Glándulas Salivales/terapia , Glándulas Salivales/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Sjögren/tratamiento farmacológico , Xerostomía/fisiopatología , Congresos como Asunto , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Saliva/química , Saliva/metabolismo , Enfermedades de las Glándulas Salivales/patología , Síndrome de Sjögren/fisiopatología , Escala Visual AnalógicaRESUMEN
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory, relapsing disease of the skin, characterized by intense pruritus, maculopapular or vesicular erythematous lesions and scaling, sometimes accompanied by oozing, crusts and/or lichenification that has a negative impact on patients' quality of life. Prevalence is higher in children, around 15%, and approximately 5% in adults. Before introducing systemic therapy, it is mandatory to review patients' adherence to the correct use of topical treatments (corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors or cresoborole) and/or phototherapy. Ensure that environmental measures are being taken care of, irritant or proven allergic substances are not in use and even if the diagnostic is correct. If all is being done and topical treatment with corticosteroid, emollients and phototherapy have not been sufficient to achieve a good control in AD of adults or children patients, it is time to consider systemic agents. Up to now, most of systemic treatments were based on immunosuppressive therapies, being cyclosporine A, the usually first choice for moderate-to-severe AD. Recently, biologic drugs have been developed and approved for AD, as dupilumab, and a whole new group of drugs is giving much hope for patients to have a better control of the disease with less side effects.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Piel/patología , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Niño , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Receptores de Interleucina-4/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Psoriasis is a T-cell mediated disease that involves IL-23/Th17 and IL-12/Th1 axes. Ustekinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the p40 subunit of both IL-12 and IL-23, has proven to be efficient and safe for treating patients with psoriasis. Yet, there have been no reports with human skin/blood samples that would elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which ustekinumab calms psoriasis skin lesions. To investigate the efficacy and molecular pathway (RORC, t-BOX and GATA) of ustekinumab in treating patients with psoriasis skin lesions. A total of 30 patients with psoriasis were randomized into placebo group and treatment group. PASI of each patient was calculated at 0, 12 and 24 weeks post-treatment. The mRNA levels of RORC, t-BOX and GATA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells separated from patients' whole blood were analyzed using qPCR. Decreased mRNA of RORC, t-BOX and GATA were observed after continuous injections, indicating that ustekinumab exerts its effect by interacting with these molecules; while no significant difference in foxp3 mRNA levels were found between placebo group and treatment group.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Eficacia/clasificación , Ustekinumab/análisis , Linfocitos T , Factores de Transcripción GATA/farmacologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment, ocular complications and outcomes of children with pediatric uveitis not associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review of pediatric uveitis in children under 16 years of age, recruited from the pediatric rheumatology department at Bicêtre Hospital from 2005 to 2015. Patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated and infectious uveitis were excluded. We used the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Working Group to classify uveitis, disease activity, and treatment end points. RESULTS: We enrolled 56 patients and 102 affected eyes. The mean age at diagnosis was 10 ± 3.5 years (range 3-15), and the mean follow-up 4.2 ± 3.3 years (1-15). The main diagnoses were idiopathic (55%), Behçet disease (15%), and sarcoidosis (5%). The main localization was panuveitis in 44 of 102 eyes (43%). Corticosteroid sparing treatment was needed in 62 of 102 eyes (60%). Second-line therapies included methotrexate and azathioprine, and the third-line therapy was a biologic agent, mainly infliximab, in 33 of 102 eyes (32%). Infliximab achieved uveitis inactivity in 14 of 18 eyes (80%), in all etiologies. Severe complications were present in 68 of 102 eyes (67%). The most common were synechiae 33% of eyes, cataract (20%), and macular edema (25%). Of these, 37% were present at diagnosis. Remission was achieved in 22 of 102 eyes (21%). CONCLUSIONS: Conventional therapies were insufficient to treat many of the cases of posterior or panuveitis. This study underlines the need for earlier and more aggressive treatment and antitumor necrosis factor-α therapy was rapidly efficient in most cases of refractory uveitis.
Asunto(s)
Uveítis/etiología , Uveítis/terapia , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Artritis Juvenil , Niño , Preescolar , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uveítis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
The juvenile spondyloarthropathies (JSpA) are a group of related rheumatic diseases characterized by involvement of peripheral large joints, axial joints, and entheses (enthesitis) that begin in the early years of life (prior to 16(th) birthday).The nomenclature and concept of spondyloarthropathies has changed during the last few decades. Although there is not any specific classification of JSpA, diseases under the spondyloarthropathy nomenclature umbrella in the younger patients include: the seronegative enthesitis and arthropathy (SEA) syndrome, juvenile ankylosing spondylitis, reactive arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease-associated arthritis. Moreover, the ILAR criteria for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis includes two categories closely related to spondyloarthritis: Enthesitis-related arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.We review the pathophysiology and the use of biological agents in JSpA. JSpA are idiopathic inflammatory diseases driven by an altered balance in the proinflammatory cytokines. There is ample evidence on the role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin-17 in the physiopathology of these entities. Several non-biologic and biologic agents have been used with conflicting results in the treatment of these complex diseases. The efficacy and safety of anti-TNF agents, such as etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab, have been analysed in controlled and uncontrolled trials, usually showing satisfactory outcomes. Other biologic agents, such as abatacept, tocilizumab and rituximab, have been insufficiently studied and their role in the therapy of SpA is uncertain. Interleukin-17-blocking agents are promising alternatives for the treatment of JSpA patients in the near future. Recommendations for the treatment of patients with JSpA have recently been proposed and are discussed in the present review.
Asunto(s)
Factores Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Inmunidad Innata , Espondiloartropatías/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Humanos , Espondiloartropatías/inmunologíaRESUMEN
El uso de plantas con fines terapéuticos en la atención primaria en salud, es una práctica común en la zona del Eje Cafetero colombiano. Nuestra Línea de Investigación ha realizado varios estudios etnofarmacológicos en esta zona, seleccionando algunas especies vegetales para evaluar la posible actividad antibacteriana, hipoglicemiante e inmunomoduladora. El presente trabajo describe las nueve especies estudiadas, con una breve descripción botánica, nombres comunes, usos empíricos tradicionales, fitoquímica y enfatizando en la actividad biológica hallada en la literatura o encontrada por nosotros. Los hallazgos de esta revisión muestran que -en nuestro medio- el uso medicinal de plantas es una práctica habitual, con varias indicaciones para una misma especie vegetal (muchas de ellas no validadas científicamente), no siempre coinciden los usos en diferentes regiones de ancestro étnico o cultural común y menos aún en las más dispersas; a veces el resultado experimental no valida la indicación terapéutica tradicional y empírica, pero antes de declarar dicha indicación como inválida, deben hacerse varios ensayos preclínicos y clínicos indagando eficacia y seguridad. Debido a la enorme biodiversidad de la flora colombiana se pensaría que existe una amplia investigación en su farmacología y fitoquímica, pero la realidad es que existen pocas especies que se hayan validado mediante estudios químicos y biológicos; por ello, son muy bajos el aprovechamiento medicinal más generalizado y la explotación económica de dicha flora. En nuestro país solo unas pocas universidades estimulan las investigaciones en este campo y no se observa apoyo de la industria farmacéutica o de otras entidades gubernamentales o privadas. Por razones políticas y culturales, las comunidades indígenas se muestran renuentes a compartir sus conocimientos ancestrales etnofarmacológicos empíricos con otros grupos sociales. Cinco especies mostraron una promisoria actividad inmunoestimulante, aumentando el recuento leucocitario: Alternanthera williamsii (Standley) Standley var. purpurea, familia Amaranthaceae, Ludwigia polygonoides H.B.K., familia Onagraceae, Phenax rugosus (Poir.) Wedd, familia Urticaceae, Solanum dolichosepalum Bitter, familia Solanaceae y Tabebuia chrysantha (Jacq) Nichols, familia Bignoniaceae; cinco plantas: Alternanthera williamsii (Standley) Standley var. purpurea, Ludwigia polygonoides H.B.K., Austroeupatorium inulaefolium (H.B.K.) R. M. King & H. Rob., Senna reticulata (Willd) H. Irwin y Solanum dolichosepalum Bitter, tienen algún efecto antibacteriano importante particularmente sobre Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli y Pseudomona aeruginosa.
The use of medicinal herbage plants with therapeutic purposes in the primary health careattention of the health, is a frequent practice in the Colombian coffee zonetriangle. Our research line group has done carried out some ethnopharmacologic studies in this zone, selecting some vegetal species to evaluate the possible antimicrobial, immunomodulating and hypoglycemic activity. The present review describes the nine species studied, with a short brief botanic description, common names, traditional empiric uses, phytochemistry, and emphasizing in on the biological activity found in the literature or in our assaysresearch. The findings of this review establish that, in this region environment, the medical use of plants is a habitual usual practice, with different indications for a the same vegetal species (a lot of them do notnot even validated scientifically), not always match the uses in different regions of common ethnic or culture cultural common ancestry not always match and even less in dispersewhen there are different ancestry regions; sometimes the experimental result does not validate the tradicional and empiric therapeutic indication but before to stablishestablishing such this indication as invalid, several pre-clinic and clinic trials must be carried out in order toshould be done some preclinical and clinical assays to search for the efficacy and safety. Due to the enormous biodiversity of Colombian flora it would be thought that there is have an extensive research about their its pharmacology and phytochemistry, but really there are a very few species validated by chemical and biological studies.; forFor this reason, there are very low medical and economic exploitation of this flora. In our country only a few Universities promote the research in this field and have not support of the pharmaceutical industry or of the government or private agencies is not observed. By Because of political and cultural reasons, the Indian indigenous communities are reluctant to share his their ancestral empiric ethnopharmacologic knowledgment knowledge with other social groups. Five species shown showed promissory immunostimulant activity by increasing leukocyte counts:. Alternanthera williamsii (Standley) Standley var. purpurea, Amaranthaceae family, Ludwigia polygonoides H.B.K., Onagraceae family, Phenax rugosus (Poir.) Wedd, Urticaceae family, Solanum dolichosepalum Bitter, Solanaceae family and Tabebuia chrysantha (Jacq) Nichols, Bignoniaceae family; five species: Alternanthera williamsii (Standley) Standley var. purpurea, Ludwigia polygonoides H.B.K., Austroeupatorium inulaefolium (H.B.K.) R. M. King & H. Rob., Senna reticulata (Willd) H. Irwin and Solanum dolichosepalum Bitter, have some important antibacterial effect on Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli y Pseudomona aeruginosa.
RESUMEN
Os autores discutem a terapêutica para a artrite reumatoide (AR), com foco no tratamento biológico. Novos conhecimentos dos mecanismos patogênicos da AR mais a aplicação de biotecnologia propiciaram o desenvolvimento de tratamentos específicos contra moléculas envolvidas na inflamação da doença, os chamados tratamentos biológicos. Estes fármacos representam o maior avanço no controle da AR nesta última década. 0s agentes biológicos habitualmente aprovados para uso na AR são: etanercepte, receptor solúvel do TNE infliximabe e adalimumabe, ambos anticorpos monoclonais contra TNF. Todos estão disponíveis para uso pela secretaria de saúde. Outros aprovados para uso e não disponibilizados pela secretaria são o rituximabe e o abatacepte. Neste artigo discutimos cada um destes biológicos.
Authors discuss the therapies for rheumatoid arthritis focused on biological therapies. Biological therapies are the result of new insights into the pathogenic mechanisms of RA and the application of biotechnology on the development of therapies directed specifically against molecules involved with the inflammatory process of the disease. These agents represent the greatest advance in the control of RA during the last decade. Biological agents currently approved and accessible by government for the treatment of RA include: etanercept, a soluble recombinant anti-TNF receptor construct, in fliximab and adalimumab, both monoclonal antibodies against TNF. The others biologic, rituximab and abatacept, are also approved for treatment of RA but not available by government. In this essay authors study each one of these biologics agents.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Artritis Reumatoide/etiología , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Artritis Reumatoide/terapia , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos , Antirreumáticos , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Terapia Biológica/tendencias , Terapia Combinada/tendenciasRESUMEN
A artrite reumatóide (AR) é uma doença crônica, sistêmica, auto-imune, de etiologia desconhecida, que envolve, predominantemente, as pequenas articulações das mãos e dos pés. Punhos, articulações metacarpofalangeanas, interfalangeanas proximais e metatarsofalangeanas são as articulações mais envolvidas. A patogênese é complexa e multifatorial, com participação de fatores genéticos, ambientais e hormonais. A realização do diagnóstico o mais rápido possível e o estabelecimento imediato de terapia adequada nas fases mais iniciais da doença são de fundamental importância para o prognóstico do paciente. O diagnóstico da AR é realizado através da avaliação das manifestações clínicas, achados laboratoriais e de imagem. O paciente apresenta, na maioria das vezes, um quadro de poliartrite tendendo a evoluir para deformidades articulares, com importante perda funcional devido à característica crônica e progressiva da doença. O fator reumatóide (FR) se encontra positivo em 70% a 80% dos pacientes com AR. Corresponde a um auto-anticorpo, geralmente classe IgM, dirigido contra a porção Fc da imunoglobulina IgG. Quando presente em títulos elevados, a doença é, geralmente, mais agressiva e tem maiores chances de apresentar manifestações extra-articulares. O início da terapêutica o mais rápido possível é baseado em dados de estudos clínicos, que demonstraram o benefício no curso evolutivo, prevenindo o dano articular, a perda da função e a redução da dor. O principal objetivo do tratamento é o de atingir a remissão. A base do tratamento da AR é a utilização das drogas modificadoras do curso da doença (DMCD), associadas a antiinflamatórios não hormonais (AINH) e antiinflamatórios hormonais (AIH). Os agentes biológicos são novas drogas que têm indicação nos pacientes que não responderam adequadamente ao uso dos DMCD.