RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Utilization of autologous parenchymal flaps aims to attain enduringly favourable outcomes and uphold volume in the upper breast pole after mastopexy procedures. The objective of this study was to juxtapose and scrutinize postoperative upper pole fullness, upper/lower pole ratios, occurrences of bottoming-out deformity, and complication rates between two patient cohorts: those who underwent the wise-pattern superior pedicle mastopexy with the LIFT technique and those who underwent the conventional wise-pattern superior pedicle mastopexy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the patients in this study were appropriately categorized as primary patients, signifying their lack of any prior breast surgery history. These individuals presented with grades II and III breast ptosis on both breasts, ranging from moderate to severe deformities per the Regnault classification. Importantly, all patients uniformly expressed their desire to achieve a firmer breast appearance without recourse to using breast implants. The patients' ages and preoperative breast measurements were recorded for analysis. Measurements, including the distance from the NAC to the inframammary fold and from the sternal notch to the NAC, were systematically measured both before the surgery and at the 1-year postoperative mark. RESULTS: The upper and lower pole ratios, defined by Mallucci and Branford, were found to be 45.22% ± 2.20% and 54.88% ± 2.20%, respectively, within the LIFT group. In 13 instances, a lower pole distance exceeding 55% indicated a potential bottoming-out deformity (value lower than 45%/55% ratio or 0.818). Conversely, within the control group, the upper and lower pole ratios were determined as 43.22% ± 2.80% and 56.88% ± 2.80%, respectively. These findings demonstrated statistical significance. Notably, in 39 cases within the superior pedicle wise-pattern mastopexy group, a lower pole distance surpassing 55% (value lower than 45%/55% ratio or 0.818) suggested a leaning towards a bottoming-out deformity (p: 0.003). A postoperative period of at least 12 months was essential to discern the emergence of upper pole fullness and the potential development of bottoming-out deformities. Among the cases within the LIFT group, 93% exhibited successful attainment of upper pole fullness, while in the control group, this outcome was achieved in 82% of cases (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementing the LIFT technique alongside the wise-pattern superior pedicle mastopexy decreases the occurrence of bottoming-out deformity after 1 year. Although there is no statistically significant difference, the LIFT flap technique has contributed to some extent to upper pole fullness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: After massive weight loss, breast changes dramatically becoming ptotic, flat in the upper pole, with significant skin excess. After mastoplasty, often ptosis can recur and the upper pole can lose its fullness again. The technique described in this study treats breast deformities ensuring stable results and avoiding ptosis recurrence. AIM: To analyze a new modality of breast reshaping after massive weight loss, evaluating outcomes and complications as well as patient satisfaction. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a case series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients (all women, average age, 43.1 years) with bilateral breast ptosis after massive weight loss underwent mastoplasty: the technique included the creation of an inferior pedicle flap that was placed as a prosthesis under the pectoralis muscle and a superomedial pedicle flap containing the nipple-areola complex (NAC). Patients were followed up for at least 6 months, reporting any complications, and measuring the jugulum-NAC distance. Patients' satisfaction was also reported. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Nil. RESULTS: All patients were extremely satisfied with the breast volume, shape, symmetry, and ptosis correction. The new mammary contour and the distance between the jugular fossa and the nipple were stable during the follow-up and the upper pole maintained its fullness. No major complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Mastoplasty with submuscular autoprosthesis proved to be a safe and effective technique to treat breast deformities after massive weight loss because removed redundant tissue repositioned the NAC and filled the upper pole with stable results over time. A similar technique has not been described yet.

RESUMEN

Postbariatric, cosmetic, and circumferential body lift patients seek to avoid a flattened buttock contour. Gluteal implants have been described with various rates of complications and difficulties. Lipografting moderately increases buttock volume; neither procedure directly addresses ptosis. The procedure described in this article addresses the volume deficit and ptosis. Most adipocutaneous flaps originate within the superior gluteal region and maintain volume in the top half of the buttocks, lacking the ability to reach the midportion of the buttocks. The ideal flap should be versatile, result in a superior gluteal concavity, and give the maximum projection at the midlevel of the buttocks.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many techniques have been described for mastopexy, with several types of skin incisions and parenchymal rearrangements. We present a parenchymal rearrangement technique allowing better upper pole fullness and nipple-areola-complex (NAC) projection when performing a mastopexy, with a combination of a superior pedicle for the NAC and an inferiorly-based parenchymal flap, the so-called "autoprosthesis". METHODS: From January 2008 to June 2015, 184 patients underwent "autoprosthesis" mastopexy. Patients' mean ages was 42 years. The mean follow-up period was 39 months. RESULTS: We reported no major complications. All the patients were satisfied with their post-operative unclothed and clothed appearance and overall body image as reported by our questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The autoprosthesis technique for mastopexy is a simple and safe, technique, allowing long-lasting results for breast projection and upper pole fullness.