RESUMEN

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant type of glial tumor associated with a very unfavorable prognosis. Typical radiological features of GBM include the presence of a tumor with irregular contrast-enhancing margins and central necrosis surrounded by a wide area of vasogenic edema. Here, we presented an atypical clinical presentation of GBM mimicking autoimmune meningitis. A 69-years-old previously healthy male was admitted to the emergency room due to signs of increasing cognitive impairment, weight loss, changes in behavior, difficulty in walking, and prolonged episodes of nausea over the past month. An magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scan revealed hyperintense changes of the periventricular area surrounding brain ventricles in T2 and FLAIR, and post-contrast leptomeningeal enhancement and thickening of meninges involving cerebellar sulci. An additional MRI scan of the cervical spine showed an in-core contrastenhancing lesion on the C7-Th1 level as well as leptomeningeal thickening and post-contrast-enhancement around the spinal cord. Various laboratory tests and two stereotactic biopsies were performed with no essential to diagnosis clinical findings. A couple of months after first hospital admission, the patient died. Post-mortem examination of the brain revealed numerous foci of abnormal tissue inside the subarachnoid space, lateral ventricles, and cerebral aqueduct. Histological examination showed diffuse malignant astroglial neoplasm, and diagnosis of glioblastoma NOS WHO G IV was established. Even though the appearance of usual GBM is widely recognizable, one must bear in mind the possibility of unusual presentation. The presented case highlights the diagnostic difficulties of diffuse glioblastoma with atypical clinical presentation.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Meningitis and encephalitis are inflammatory syndromes of the meninges and brain parenchyma, respectively, and may be identified either by finding definitive evidence of inflammation on tissue pathology or by cerebrocpinal fluid (CSF) analysis showing pleocytosis or intrathecal antibody synthesis. Clinicians evaluating undifferentiated meningitis or encephalitis should simultaneously consider autoimmune, infectious, and neoplastic causes, using patient risk factors, clinical syndrome, and diagnostic results including CSF and MRI findings to narrow the differential diagnosis. If an autoimmune cause is favored, an important early diagnostic question is whether a specific neural autoantibody is likely to be identified.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Along with the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors comes a surge in immune-related toxicity. Here, we review the currently available data regarding neurological immune adverse events, and more specifically aseptic meningitis and encephalitis, and present treatment and diagnostic recommendations. Furthermore, we present five cases of immunotherapy-induced aseptic meningitis and encephalitis treated at our institution. RECENT FINDINGS: Neurological immune-related adverse events, including aseptic meningitis and encephalitis, secondary to checkpoint inhibitors are a rare but complex and clinically relevant entity, comprising a wide range of diseases, most often presenting with symptoms with a wide range of differential diagnoses. Our case-series highlights the challenges of such entities and the importance of properly identifying and managing aseptic meningitis and encephalitis. SUMMARY: Checkpoint inhibitor-induced meningoencephalitis warrants prompt investigations and treatment. Properly diagnosing aseptic meningitis, encephalitis, or mixed presentations may guide the treatment decision, as highlighted by our case-series. After rapid exclusion of alternative diagnoses, urgent corticosteroids are the therapeutic backbone but this could change in favour of highly specific cytokine-directed treatment options. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Aseptic meningitis and encephalitis with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a single centre case-series and review of the literature Over the course of the past decade, checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care. With their favourable toxicity profile and potential for durable and deep responses, they have become ubiquitous across the field of oncology. Furthermore, combination checkpoint inhibitors are also gaining ground, with increased efficacy and, unfortunately, immune-related toxicity. While there are guidelines based on extensive clinical experience for frequent adverse events, uncommon entities are less readily identified and treated. Neurological immune-related adverse events secondary to checkpoint inhibitors are a rare but complex entity, comprising a wide range of diseases, most often presenting with aspecific symptoms. In this paper, we discuss a single institution case-series of patients with autoimmune aseptic meningitis and encephalitis, and we perform a narrative literature review on this subject. We conclude with our treatment recommendations based on available evidence.

RESUMEN

To treat intractable cases of autoimmune encephalitis, the need for novel immunotherapy that penetrates the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is increasing. Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor used to treat refractory immune-mediated diseases that effectively penetrates the BBB. Accordingly, tofacitinib could be a new option for patients with refractory autoimmune encephalitis. Patients treated with tofacitinib were selected from Seoul National University Hospital cohort for autoimmune encephalitis from April 2019 until July 2020. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with autoimmune encephalitis who showed insufficient responses to multimodal conventional immunotherapies. Tofacitinib was administered orally at a dose of 5 mg twice daily. A total of eight patients were treated with tofacitinib; two had good responses (clinical global impression-improvement score [CGI-I] = 1 or 2), three had partial responses (CGI-I = 3), and three showed no significant improvements (CGI-I = 4) in response to tofacitinib. The two good responders showed the improvement of chronic autoimmune meningoencephalitis and the cessation of the new-onset refractory status epilepticus in anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-associated disorder, which was previously intractable to anesthetics and the other immunotherapies. No patients had serious side effects. Our findings suggest the potential of tofacitinib as a therapeutic option for central nervous system autoimmune diseases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Hypertrophic pachymeningitis (HP) is a rare disorder that causes thickening of the dura mater. Inflammatory lesions may be located in the cerebral or spinal dura mater or, less frequently, in both locations simultaneously. Numerous clinico-pathological entities cause thickening of the pachymeninges. Indeed, HP is a potential manifestation of many different diseases, but the diagnosis often remains uncertain. Cases in which the pachymeningitis has no known aetiology are termed "idiopathic" HP (IHP). Recently, it has been suggested that IgG4-related disease represents a subset of cases previously diagnosed as idiopathic hypertrophic pachymeningitis. Little is known regarding the pathogenic events of IHP. In a general theory, the inflammatory infiltrate, mainly consisting of B and T lymphocytes, activates fibroblasts and induces collagen deposition, leading to tissue hypertrophy and increased dural thickness. Clinical manifestations of IHP depend upon the location of the inflammatory lesions and compression of the adjacent nervous structures. Three central pathological features are lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, obliterative phlebitis, and storiform fibrosis. MRI is the examination of choice for the preliminary diagnosis of IHP. Histopathological examination of a biopsy specimen of the dura mater would finally confirm the diagnosis. The differential diagnosis for HP is broad and includes infections, autoimmune disorders, and neoplasia. Currently, there is no consensus about treatment for patients with IHP. There is a preference for glucocorticoid treatment on diagnosis followed by the addition of other immunosuppressive agents in the event of a recurrence. Rituximab is used in patients who did not respond to glucocorticoids or to conventional steroid-sparing agents.

Asunto(s)