RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impacts of tocolytic agents on maternal and neonatal blood glucose levels in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) who used tocolytics for preterm labor. METHODS: This multi-center, retrospective cohort study included women with GDM who were admitted for preterm labor from twelve hospitals in South Korea. We excluded women with multiple pregnancies, anomalies, overt DM diagnosed before pregnancy or 23 weeks of gestation, and women who received multiple tocolytics. The patients were divided according to the types of tocolytics; atosiban, ritodrine, and nifedipine group. We collected baseline maternal characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, maternal glucose levels during hospitalization, and neonatal glucose levels. We compared the frequency of maternal hyperglycemia and neonatal hypoglycemia among three groups. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the contributing factors to the occurrence of maternal hyperglycemia and neonatal hypoglycemia. RESULTS: A total of 128 women were included: 44 (34.4%), 51 (39.8%), and 33 (25.8%) women received atosiban, ritodrine, and nifedipine, respectively. Mean fasting blood glucose (FBG) (112.3, 109.6, and 89.5 mg/dL, P < 0.001) and 2-hour postprandial glucose (PPG2) levels (145.4, 148.3, and 116.5 mg/dL, P = 0.004) were significantly higher in atosiban and ritodrine group than those in nifedipine group. Even after adjusting for covariates including antenatal steroid use, gestational age at admission, and pre-pregnancy body mass index, there was an increased risk of high maternal mean FBG (≥ 95 mg/dL) and PPG2 (≥ 120 mg/dL) levels in the atosiban and ritodrine group than in nifedipine group. The atosiban and ritodrine groups are also at increased risk of neonatal hypoglycemia (< 47 mg/dL) compared to the nifedipine group with the odds ratio of 4.58 and 4.67, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There is an increased risk of maternal hyperglycemia and neonatal hypoglycemia in women with GDM using atosiban and ritodrine tocolytics for preterm labor compared to those using nifedipine.

Asunto(s)

Glucemia , Diabetes Gestacional , Hipoglucemia , Nifedipino , Ritodrina , Tocolíticos , Vasotocina , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Diabetes Gestacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Tocolíticos/uso terapéutico , Tocolíticos/efectos adversos , Glucemia/análisis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Nifedipino/uso terapéutico , Nifedipino/efectos adversos , Recién Nacido , Ritodrina/uso terapéutico , Ritodrina/efectos adversos , Vasotocina/análogos & derivados , Vasotocina/uso terapéutico , Vasotocina/efectos adversos , Modelos Logísticos , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Oportunidad Relativa , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Embarazo , República de Corea

RESUMEN

Although it is widely used, there is still no valid treatment for ototoxicity caused by the antineoplastic drug cisplatin. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of intratympanic resveratrol and intratympanic dexamethasone treatment in cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. We also compared intratympanic atosiban (oxytocin antagonist) and oxytocin in cisplatin ototoxicity. In this study, 30 rats (60 ears) were used by separating into 5 groups. Cisplatin, oxytocin, dexamethasone, atosiban and 0.9% NaCl were administered intraperitoneally to all groups separately. Auditory Brainstem Response and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission tests were performed on all groups before and 72 h after the procedure. Pre-treatment values were higher than post-treatment values in all groups (p < 0.001). There was no significant prolongation of the post-treatment Auditory Brainstem Response I-IV interval in the oxytocin and dexamethasone groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant decrease in the frequencies of 2832 and 4004 after treatment in the oxytocin and dexamethasone group compared to pre-treatment in Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission. As a result, it has been shown that intratympanic oxytocin may be an option that can be used in the treatment, although it is not as effective as dexamethasone in preventing cisplatin ototoxicity.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dysfunctional uterine peristalsis seems to play a pivotal role in hindering embryo implantation among women diagnosed with adenomyosis. This research aims to investigate whether administering an oxytocin receptor antagonist during a frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle using a hormone replacement therapy (HRT) protocol can enhance in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes for infertile women affected by adenomyosis. METHODS: Between January 2018 and June 2022, our reproductive center conducted IVF-FET HRT cycles for infertile women diagnosed with adenomyosis. Propensity score matching was employed to select matched subjects between the two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Following this, 168 women received an oxytocin receptor antagonist during FET, constituting the study group, while the matched 168 women underwent FET without this antagonist, forming the control group. We conducted comparative analyses of baseline and cycle characteristics between the two groups, along with additional subgroup analyses. RESULTS: The study group exhibited notably lower rates of early miscarriage compared to the control group, although there were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and live birth rates between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed a negative correlation between the use of oxytocin receptor antagonists and early miscarriage rates in women with adenomyosis. Subgroup analyses, categorized by age, infertility types, and embryo transfer day, showed a substantial decrease in early miscarriage rates within specific subgroups: women aged ≥ 37 years, those with secondary infertility, and individuals undergoing day 3 embryo transfers in the study group compared to the control group. Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on adenomyosis types indicated significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy rates and live birth rates in the study group compared to the control group among women with diffuse adenomyosis. CONCLUSIONS: Administering an oxytocin receptor antagonist during FET may reduce the early miscarriage rates in women with adenomyosis.

Asunto(s)

Aborto Espontáneo , Adenomiosis , Transferencia de Embrión , Fertilización In Vitro , Infertilidad Femenina , Índice de Embarazo , Puntaje de Propensión , Receptores de Oxitocina , Humanos , Femenino , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Adulto , Embarazo , Adenomiosis/complicaciones , Adenomiosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Aborto Espontáneo/prevención & control , Receptores de Oxitocina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Criopreservación , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/métodos , Antagonistas de Hormonas/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Hormonas/administración & dosificación

RESUMEN

Objective: To investigate the interaction between atosiban and growth hormone (GH) as adjuvants in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Method: A total of 11627 patients who underwent FET at Xiamen University Affiliated Chenggong Hospital between January 2018 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 482 patients received atosiban and 275 patients received GH. The interactions were estimated by comparing the odds ratio (OR) for pregnancy comparing patients with or without atosiban adjuvant in cohorts stratified according to the presence of GH use in either the overall cohort or a propensity score (PS) matched cohort. An interaction term (atosiban × GH) was introduced to a multivariate model to calculate the ratio of OR (ORR) adjusted for confounders. Results: For all patients receiving atosiban administration, no obvious effect on pregnancy was observed in comparison with either matched or unmatched controls. However, when the patients were stratified according to GH administration, atosiban showed a significant association with clinical pregnancy in comparison with either matched or unmatched controls among patients with GH treatment with rate ratios (RR) of 1.32 (95%CI: 1.05,1.67) and 1.35 (95%CI: 1,1.82), respectively. On the other hand, however, the association was absent among patients without GH treatment. The adjusted ORRs in both matched and unmatched cohorts were 2.44 (95%CI: 1.07,5.84) and 1.95 (95%CI: 1.05, 3.49) respectively. Conclusion: The combination use of atosiban and GH in FET cycles is potentially beneficial to the pregnancy. However, indications for the use of atosiban and GH may need further assessment.

Asunto(s)

Criopreservación , Transferencia de Embrión , Índice de Embarazo , Vasotocina , Humanos , Femenino , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Embarazo , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Criopreservación/métodos , Vasotocina/análogos & derivados , Vasotocina/administración & dosificación , Hormona del Crecimiento/administración & dosificación , Hormona de Crecimiento Humana/administración & dosificación , Hormona de Crecimiento Humana/uso terapéutico , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos

RESUMEN

Oxytocin is a peptide released into brain regions associated with the processing of aversive memory and threat responses. Given the expression of oxytocin receptors across this vigilance surveillance system of the brain, we investigated whether pharmacological antagonism of the receptor would impact contextual aversive conditioning and memory. Adult male rats were conditioned to form an aversive contextual memory. The effects of peripheral administration of either the competitive antagonist Atosiban or noncompetitive antagonist L-368,899 were compared to saline controls. Oxytocin receptor antagonism treatment did not significantly impact the consolidation of aversive contextual memory in any of the groups. We conclude that peripheral antagonism of oxytocin signalling did not impact the formation of aversive memory.

Asunto(s)

Consolidación de la Memoria , Receptores de Oxitocina , Ratas , Masculino , Animales , Oxitocina/farmacología , Miedo/fisiología , Condicionamiento Psicológico/fisiología

RESUMEN

Milk ejection disorders were induced by oxytocin receptor blockade. We tested the hypothesis that the degree of udder emptying at incomplete milk ejection can be estimated based on the concentration of various milk constituents in different milk fraction samples. To induce different levels of spontaneous udder emptying (SUE) 10 Holstein dairy cows were milked either with or without i.v. injection of the oxytocin receptor blocking agent atosiban (ATO). In ATOearly, 12 µg/kg BW ATO was injected immediately before and in ATOlate directly after a 1-min manual udder preparation. The normal milking routine served as the control treatment. In all 3 treatments the udder was completely emptied by the i.v. injection of 10 IU oxytocin (OT) at the end of spontaneous milk flow. During all experimental milkings 4 milk samples were taken in all treatments: at the start of udder preparation (foremilk; FM), immediately after cessation of spontaneous milk flow and cluster detachment by hand stripping (strip milk; SM), from spontaneous removed milk in bucket 1 (milk before OT; MBOT) and from the milk obtained after OT injection in bucket 2 (milk after OT; MAOT). Fat, protein, lactose, and electrolytes (Na, Cl, and K) were measured in each milk sample. In addition, electrical conductivity (EC) was determined in parallel to continuous milk flow recording. The treatments induced individual degrees of SUE; therefore, the final evaluations of data were based on SUE classes instead of treatments. The most pronounced differences of milk constituents at different degrees of SUE were found for the milk fat content. The fat content of SM and MBOT remained almost unchanged up to 60% SUE, but was considerably higher if >80% of the milk was spontaneously removed. The concentrations of Na and Cl were highest and of K lowest if less than 20% of milk was received in the different samples. The EC was higher in SM and MBOT if <20% of milk was received. In conclusion, the blockade of the OT effect influences primarily the fat content, which confirmed an OT-induced fat secretion during milking. Similar effects are likely found in situations of disturbed milk ejections, caused by a lack of or reduced release of OT in response to different degrees of tactile udder stimulation. Our results show that the measurement of fat content and the EC in SM samples collected after cluster detachment can be used to estimate the completeness of udder emptying.

Asunto(s)

Lactancia , Glándulas Mamarias Animales , Leche , Oxitocina , Animales , Leche/química , Femenino , Bovinos , Oxitocina/farmacología , Oxitocina/análisis , Eyección Láctea , Industria Lechera

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Myelomeningocele (MMC) is a neural tube defect disease. Antenatal repair of fetal MMC is an alternative to postnatal repair. Many agents can be used as tocolytics during the in utero fetal repair such as ß2-agonists and oxytocin receptor antagonists, with possible maternal and fetal repercussions. This study aims to compare maternal arterial blood gas analysis between terbutaline or atosiban, as tocolytic agents, during intrauterine MMC repair. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the main tocolytic agent used during intrauterine MMC repair: atosiban (16) or terbutaline (9). Maternal arterial blood gas samples were analyzed on three moments: post induction (baseline, before the start of tocolysis), before extubation, and two hours after the end of the surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included and assessed. Before extubation, the terbutaline group showed lower arterial pH (7.347 ± 0.05 vs. 7.396 ± 0.02 for atosiban, p = 0.006) and higher arterial lactate (28.33 ± 12.76 mg.dL-1 vs. 13.06 ± 6.35 mg.dL-1, for atosiban, p = 0.001) levels. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received terbutaline had more acidosis and higher levels of lactate, compared to those who received atosiban, during intrauterine fetal MMC repair.

Asunto(s)

Meningomielocele , Terbutalina , Tocolíticos , Vasotocina , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terbutalina/uso terapéutico , Terbutalina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Meningomielocele/cirugía , Adulto , Tocolíticos/administración & dosificación , Embarazo , Vasotocina/análogos & derivados , Vasotocina/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of atosiban on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer. METHODS: The clinical data of 1093 infertile patients who underwent frozen-thawed embryo transfer in our center from January 2019 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed (control, 418; atosiban, 675). Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis identified 400 matched pairs of patients. The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, abortion rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Before PSM, patients differed by infertility factors, number of transferred embryos, and endometrial preparation protocol (P < 0.05). After PSM, characteristics were similar in corresponding patients of the atosiban and control groups. After propensity score matching, we found that there was no significant difference in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, abortion rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate in atosiban and control group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Atosiban did not improve the clinical outcomes of infertile patients with frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Asunto(s)

Infertilidad , Embarazo Ectópico , Vasotocina/análogos & derivados , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntaje de Propensión , Criopreservación , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Implantación del Embrión , Índice de Embarazo

RESUMEN

Abstract Background: Myelomeningocele (MMC) is a neural tube defect disease. Antenatal repair of fetal MMC is an alternative to postnatal repair. Many agents can be used as tocolytics during the in utero fetal repair such as β2-agonists and oxytocin receptor antagonists, with possible maternal and fetal repercussions. This study aims to compare maternal arterial blood gas analysis between terbutaline or atosiban, as tocolytic agents, during intrauterine MMC repair. Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the main tocolytic agent used during intrauterine MMC repair: atosiban (16) or terbutaline (9). Maternal arterial blood gas samples were analyzed on three moments: post induction (baseline, before the start of tocolysis), before extubation, and two hours after the end of the surgery. Results: Twenty-five patients were included and assessed. Before extubation, the terbutaline group showed lower arterial pH (7.347 ± 0.05 vs. 7.396 ± 0.02 for atosiban, p = 0.006) and higher arterial lactate (28.33 ± 12.76 mg.dL-1 vs. 13.06 ± 6.35 mg.dL-1, for atosiban, p = 0.001) levels. Conclusions: Patients who received terbutaline had more acidosis and higher levels of lactate, compared to those who received atosiban, during intrauterine fetal MMC repair.

RESUMEN

With the advancements of high throughput computational screening procedures, drug repurposing became the privileged framework for drug discovery. The structure-based drug discovery is the widely used method of drug repurposing, consisting of computational screening of compounds and testing them in-vitro. This current method of repurposing leaves room for mechanistic insights into how these screened hits interact with and influence their targets. We addressed this gap in the current study by integrating highly sensitive biophysical methods into existing computational repurposing methods. We also corroborated our computational and biophysical findings on H37Rv for the anti-mycobacterial action of selected drugs in-vitro and ex-vivo conditions. Atosiban and Rutin were screened as highly interacting hits against HemD through multi-stage docking and were cross-validated in biophysical studies. The affinity of these drugs (K ~ 106 M-1) was quantified using fluorescence quenching studies. Differential Scanning Fluorimetry (DSF) and urea-based chemical denaturation studies revealed a destabilizing effect of these drugs on target which was further validated using MD simulations. Conformational rearrangements of secondary structures were established using CD spectra and intrinsic fluorescence. Furthermore, Atosiban and Rutin inhibited M.tb growth in-vitro and ex-vivo while remaining non-toxic to mice peritoneal macrophages.

Asunto(s)

Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Animales , Ratones , Reposicionamiento de Medicamentos , Antituberculosos/química , Rutina/farmacología , Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular

RESUMEN

There is a lack of FDA-approved tocolytics for the management of preterm labor (PL). In prior drug discovery efforts, we identified mundulone and mundulone acetate (MA) as inhibitors of in vitro intracellular Ca2+-regulated myometrial contractility. In this study, we probed the tocolytic potential of these compounds using human myometrial samples and a mouse model of preterm birth. In a phenotypic assay, mundulone displayed greater efficacy, while MA showed greater potency and uterine-selectivity in the inhibition of intracellular-Ca2+ mobilization. Cell viability assays revealed that MA was significantly less cytotoxic. Organ bath and vessel myography studies showed that only mundulone exerted inhibition of myometrial contractions and that neither compounds affected vasoreactivity of ductus arteriosus. A high-throughput combination screen identified that mundulone exhibits synergism with two clinical-tocolytics (atosiban and nifedipine), and MA displayed synergistic efficacy with nifedipine. Of these combinations, mundulone+atosiban demonstrated a significant improvement in the in vitro therapeutic index compared to mundulone alone. The ex vivo and in vivo synergism of mundulone+atosiban was substantiated, yielding greater tocolytic efficacy and potency on myometrial tissue and reduced preterm birth rates in a mouse model of PL compared to each single agent. Treatment with mundulone after mifepristone administration dose-dependently delayed the timing of delivery. Importantly, mundulone+atosiban permitted long-term management of PL, allowing 71% dams to deliver viable pups at term (>day 19, 4-5 days post-mifepristone exposure) without visible maternal and fetal consequences. Collectively, these studies provide a strong foundation for the development of mundulone as a single or combination tocolytic for management of PL.

Asunto(s)

Productos Biológicos , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro , Nacimiento Prematuro , Tocolíticos , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Ratones , Animales , Humanos , Tocolíticos/farmacología , Tocolíticos/uso terapéutico , Nacimiento Prematuro/tratamiento farmacológico , Nifedipino/farmacología , Nifedipino/uso terapéutico , Mifepristona/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro/tratamiento farmacológico

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect of atosiban on in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcome among women with both endometriosis and adenomyosis, and compared it to that of patients with endometriosis but without adenomyosis and that of patients with tubal factor only. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 106 infertile women (176 embryo transfers) from a medical center in Taiwan were included in the analysis, where 34 (54), 34 (66), and 38 (56) cases (embryo transfers) were endometriosis without adenomyosis, endometriosis with adenomyosis, and tubal infertility factor only, respectively. Adenomyosis morphologies were classified using an ultrasound-based classification system. The logistic generalized estimating equation model was used to analyze the association between atosiban use and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: The crude pregnancy rates for the endometriosis-only group were significantly higher than those for the endometriosis + adenomyosis group (i.e., biochemical pregnancy: 50.0% versus 29.7%, p = 0.041; ongoing pregnancy: 35.2% versus 16.9%, p = 0.038). Significantly higher chances of biochemical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy among endometriosis patients without adenomyosis versus those with both endometriosis and adenomyosis were found (odds ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 2.981 [1.307, 6.803]; p = 0.009, 2.694 [1.151, 6.304]; p = 0.022). A significant positive association between atosiban use and biochemical pregnancy existed among endometriosis cases without adenomyosis (a 2.43-fold [1.01, 5.89] increase in successful pregnancy; p<0.05), but not for the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Poor pregnancy outcomes among adenomyosis-affected women were confirmed. The use of atosiban significantly enhanced IVF pregnancy among endometriosis patients without adenomyosis.

Asunto(s)

Adenomiosis , Endometriosis , Infertilidad Femenina , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Resultado del Embarazo , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Adenomiosis/complicaciones , Fertilización In Vitro , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos

RESUMEN

Background: Atosiban is commonly used to delay premature labor in pregnant women and is thought to have few side effects. Objectives: To report a case of acute pulmonary edema (APE) following administration of atosiban and conduct a systematic review to identify common characteristics and risk factors of atosiban-associated APE. Methods: Searches were performed in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science using the keyword "Atosiban" combined with the terms "Pulmonary edema" or "Dyspnea" or "Hypoxia" on 9th July 2022. Only case reports of atosiban-associated APE were included without language restrictions. Data were extracted from the reports, and median, range, and percentages were calculated as applicable. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports. Results: Seven cases of atosiban-associated APE were included in the systematic review, including our case. APE occurred at a median gestational age of 32 + 6 weeks. Most patients were nulliparous (6/7, 85.7%) and were in multiple pregnancies (5/7, 71.4%). All patients were prescribed antenatal corticosteroids and tocolytics, with three (42.9%) receiving only atosiban and four (57.1%) receiving atosiban and other tocolytics. The median interval from starting atosiban administration to APE onset was about 40 h, and three patients (42.9%) showed symptoms 2-10 h after the end of atosiban treatment. Radiographic examinations (chest X-ray and/or computer tomography scan) confirmed APE in all patients and pleural effusion in four patients (57.1%). Five patients (71.4%) underwent emergency cesarean section, one patient (14.3%) with twin pregnancy had vaginal delivery with the help of suction cup and forceps, and another patient (14.3%) continued the pregnancy. All patients recovered well after administration of oxygen, diuresis, and other supportive therapy. Conclusion: Atosiban may cause acute pulmonary edema in patients with underlying risk factors. This complication remains rare, but caution during tocolytic treatment using atosiban is recommended.

RESUMEN

We report the case of a pregnant woman, treated with atosiban for premature labor, who developed non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema. She corresponded initially to oxygen supplementation and furosemide administration to induce diuresis but the onset of preterm contractions combined with aggravation of respiratory failure led the patient to a cesarean section, and subsequently to the intensive care unit where she remained intubated for 24 hours. In this case report, we emphasize the importance of distinguishing between two types of pulmonary edema: cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic. The instant separation between these two categories, most of the time with transthoracic echocardiography while the patient is on early support of ventilation, increases the optimum outcome for the patient.

RESUMEN

Background: Repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF) posed a significant challenge in assisted reproduction. Evidence of its therapeutic effectiveness including atosiban used around embryo transfer to improve pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) remained inconsistent. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of atosiban on pregnancy outcomes of patients with RIF who received IVF-ET. Methods: The research was designed using the PICOS format. A systematic search of four English databases, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and one Chinse database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) was conducted. The time range was from inception to December 10, 2022. Then trials comparing the efficacy of atosiban and control group on pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients who receive IVF-ET were included. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to reduce the influence of heterogeneity between included studies. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The main outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). For the analyses, StataMP 17.0 (Stata Corporation, USA) was used. Results: Two prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one prospective cohort study and four retrospective cohort studies were included. Our results showed that atosiban was associated with higher clinical pregnancy rate (RR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.365-1.735, P < 0.001, I2 = 0.0%). The results of subgroup analysis based on study types (prospective randomized controlled clinical trial, retrospective cohort study and prospective cohort study) showed that in all types of studies, CPR of atosiban group was significantly higher than controlled group. The results of subgroup analysis based upon the diagnostic criteria of number of previous embryo transfer failures showed that the intervention of atosiban improved the CPR whether in participants with 2 previous ET failures or in participants with 3 previous ET failures. Nevertheless, the incidence of ectopic pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, and miscarriages were not significantly different between the case and control groups. Conclusion: For women who are undergoing IVF-ET and have experienced repeated embryo implantation failure, atosiban may be an important factor in enhancing pregnancy outcomes. To confirm this conclusion, more thorough, prospective randomized controlled studies of sizable sample sizes with well design are required.

Asunto(s)

Fertilización In Vitro , Nacimiento Vivo , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Índice de Embarazo , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Implantación del Embrión , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE To establish evaluation criteria for rational drug use of atosiban in clinic， and to provide reference for rational drug use of atosiban in clinic. METHODS Based on the drug instructions of atosiban acetate injection and related guidelines， the experts of the Evaluation Group of Rational Drug Use formulated the evaluation criteria of rational drug use， including 5 primary indexes and 8 secondary indexes. The weight coefficients of secondary indexes were calculated by analytic hierarchy process （AHP）， and the use of atosiban acetate injection in 190 pregnant women from the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University （referred to as “our hospital”） was evaluated retrospectively by technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution （TOPSIS）. The evaluation results were divided into three levels including reasonable， basic reasonable and unreasonable application based on the relative approach degree. RESULTS Among 190 pregnant women， 49 （25.8%） were treated with atosiban reasonably， 39 （20.5%） were treated with atosiban basic reasonably， and 102 （53.7%） were treated with atosiban unreasonably. The evaluation results obtained by AHP-TOPSIS method were consistent with the actual situation in clinic. The main problems of the unreasonably use were super indications， unreasonable usage and dosage， over the course of treatment and the lack of proper economic consideration. CONCLUSIONS The rationality evaluation criteria of atosiban’s clinical application are established by AHP-TOPSIS method； the evaluation results obtained by this method are quantifiable， scientific and reliable. The unreasonable use of atosiban is common in our hospital， and the management should be strengthened in clinical application.

RESUMEN

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of using rituximab and atoxiban in the treatment of cervical incompetence after emergency cervical cerclage surgery.Methods Sixty patients with cervical incompetence admitted from May 2020 to February 2022 were selected as the study subjects.Divide into control group A,control group B,and trial group C using random number table method,with 20 cases in each group.All three groups underwent emergency cervical cerclage surgery.After the surgical treatment,control group A received treatment with rituximab hydrochloride,control group B received treatment with atoxiban,and experimental group C received treatment with atoxiban on the basis of rituximab hydrochloride.Analyze and compare the inhibitory effects of uterine contractions,incidence of adverse reactions,and neonatal outcomes among three groups.Results The inhibition rate of uterine contractions in control group A and test group C was higher than that in control group B(P<0.05);The incidence of postoperative complications in experimental group C was lower than that in control group A and control group B,with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05);Compared with control group A and control group B,the incidence of fetal loss,neonatal asphyxia,and low birth weight infant outcomes in experimental group C was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Compared with control group A and control group B,experimental group C had a longer gestational week extension and a higher Apgar score for newborns,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Conclusion The combination treatment of rituximab and atoxiban after emergency cervical cerclage surgery for this disease has good effects,can better inhibit uterine contractions,appropriately prolong gestational age,improve neonatal outcomes and prognosis,and reduce adverse drug reactions in pregnant women.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy of Atosiban combined with Ritodrine treatment on spontaneous threatened preterm birth and its effect on platelet-activating factor (PAF) and fetal fibronectin levels. METHODS: Medical records from 120 patients with threatened preterm birth admitted to Baoji Maternal and Child Health Hospital from October 2020 to December 2021 were collected for this retrospective analysis. A total of 56 patients treated with Ritodrine alone were taken as the control group (CG), and the other 64 patients given combined treatment of Atosiban and Ritodrine were seen as the observation group (OG). Indexes of uterine contraction inhibition rate, pregnancy prolongation time, onset time, adverse reactions and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups; in addition, the levels of inflammatory factors as well as PAF and fFN before and after treatment were detected and compared between two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the CG, the uterine contraction inhibition rate as well as the pregnancy prolongation time in the OG were evidently higher (all P<0.05); the time of the disappearance of uterine contraction in the OG was significantly shorter (P<0.05); the rate of full-term delivery and neonatal 1-min Apgar score in the OG were obviously higher (P<0.05); and the incidence of total adverse reactions in the OG was markedly lower (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference observed in the neonatal asphyxia rate and the number of fetuses between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the OG was observed with markedly lower level of inflammatory factors C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) than the CG (P<0.05); levels of PAF and fFN decreased significantly in both two groups (P<0.05), and the levels in the OG were comparatively lower as compared to the CG (P<0.05). The areas under the ROC curve for PAF and fFN to predict pregnancy outcome were 0.766 and 0.757, respectively. CONCLUSION: Atosiban combined with Ritodrine evidently improves the therapeutic efficacy in patients with threatened preterm labor, reduces the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes as well as the levels of PAF and fFN.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of atosiban combined with ritodrine in threatened preterm labor (TPL) treatment and analysis of related risk factors of different pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 127 patients with TPL who were hospitalized in the Children's Hospital of Shanxi and Women's Health Center of Shanxi from January 2020 to November 2021. There from, 58 patients treated with ritodrine were seen as the control group (CG), and 69 treated with atosiban and ritodrine were regarded as the joint group (JG). The inhibition rate after treatment was compared, and the changes of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), nitric oxide (NO), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in the amniotic fluid before and after treatment were assessed. The pregnancy outcomes of patients were recorded, and the risk factors of adverse pregnancy outcomes were analyzed. The full-term delivery rate, cesarean section rate and neonatal Apgar score >7 were compared, and their adverse reactions were evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with the JG, the improvement of uterine contraction in the CG was obviously lower, and so was the inhibition rate (P<0.05). The rates of full-term delivery and neonatal Apgar score >7 in the CG were lower than those in the JG, while that of cesarean section was higher (P<0.01). After treatment, the TIMP-1 level in the amniotic fluid in the CG was markedly lower (P<0.001), while the NO, IL-6 and PGE2 levels were higher (P<0.001) as compared with the joint group. The total incidence of adverse reactions in the JG was lower than that in the CG (P<0.05). Logistics regression analysis revealed that age<26 and use of Atosiban combined with Ritodrine are protective factors for pregnancy outcomes, while BMI≥20 before pregnancy is a risk factor for adverse pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Atosiban combined with ritodrine can improve the condition of TPL patients, enhance the treatment efficacy, and reduce the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

RESUMEN

Introduction Preterm birth is defined as a live birth before 37 weeks of gestation and is associated with increased neonatal morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of hexoprenaline and atosiban for short- and long-term tocolysis and their effects on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Methods This retrospective cohort study included women with threatened preterm labor between 24 + 0 and 34 + 0 weeks of gestation without premature rupture of membranes. The tocolytic efficacy of hexoprenaline and atosiban was compared in women receiving one of the two medications for short- and long-term tocolysis. Continuous variables were compared using t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Comparison of categorical variables between the two groups was done with χ 2 test after Pearson's and Fisher's exact test. Results 761 women were enrolled in this study; 387 women received atosiban and 374 women received hexoprenaline as their primary tocolytic agent. Atosiban showed a higher efficacy as a primary tocolytic agent (p = 0.000) within 48 hours. As regards long-term tocolysis, there were no differences between the treatment groups (p = 0.466). Maternal side effects such as tachycardia (p = 0.018) or palpitations (p = 0.000) occurred more frequently after the administration of hexoprenaline, while there were no differences between the two drugs administered with regard to any other maternal or neonatal outcome parameter. Conclusion Our retrospective study shows a significantly higher efficacy of atosiban in the first 48 hours, especially when administered at an early gestational age. There were no significant differences in terms of neonatal outcome but significantly more maternal adverse effects during the administration of hexoprenaline.