RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare the radiological parameters, clinical outcomes, and long-term effects of the posterior osteosynthesis with polyaxial screw-rod system and the monoaxial screw-rod system in the treatment of unstable atlas fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 33 patients with posterior ORIF for unstable atlas fractures in our hospital from August 2013 to June 2020, with a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Polyaxial screws (group A) were used in 12 patients and monoaxial screws (group B) in 21 patients. Perioperative data, radiological parameters, and clinical outcomes were collected and compared between the 2 surgical approaches. RESULTS: The operative time, blood loss, time of screw-rod system placement, and hospital stay were significantly lower in group A than in group B. At the last follow-up, the visual analog scale (VAS) score and anterior arch reduction rate of the atlas in group A were lower than those in group B, while the lateral mass displacement (LMD) in group A was higher than that in group B. There was no significant difference between Group A and Group B in terms of the anterior atlantodental interval (AADI), posterior arch reduction rate of the atlas, range of motion (ROM), and neck disability index (NDI). CONCLUSIONS: Monoaxial screws can achieve better reduction results for unstable atlas fractures, especially for the anterior arch of atlas. However, the surgical operation of monoaxial screws is more complicated than that of polyaxial screws and has more complications. Appropriate implants should be selected for the treatment of unstable atlas fractures based on the type of atlas fracture, the experience of surgeons, and the demands of patients.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The treatment of unstable atlas fractures remains a controversial topic. The study aims at assessing the prognosis and efficacy of osteosynthesis for unstable atlas fractures through a review of the current literature and additionally aims to compare outcomes between the transoral and posterior approaches. METHODS: A systematic review of databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang was conducted. Titles and abstracts were screened by two reviewers to identify studies meeting pre-defined inclusion criteria for comprehensive analysis. RESULTS: The systematic review included 28 articles, 19 employing the posterior approach and 9 utilizing the transoral approach. It covered osteosynthesis in 297 patients with unstable atlas fractures, comprising 169 treated via the posterior approach and 128 via the transoral approach. Analysis revealed high healing rates and clinical improvement in both approaches, evidenced by improvements in the visual analog scale, range of motion, atlantodens interval, and lateral displacement distance post-surgery. CONCLUSION: Osteosynthesis offers effective treatment for unstable atlas fractures. Both transoral and posterior approaches can achieve good clinical outcomes for fracture, and biomechanical studies have confirmed that osteosynthesis can maintain the stability of the occipitocervical region, preserve the motor function of the atlantoaxial and occipito-atlantoaxial joints, and greatly improve the quality of life of patients. However, variations exist in the indications and surgical risks associated with each method, necessitating their selection based on a thorough clinical evaluation of the patient's condition.

Asunto(s)

Atlas Cervical , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Atlas Cervical/cirugía , Atlas Cervical/lesiones , Atlas Cervical/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of transoral anterior Jefferson-fracture reduction plate (JeRP) and posterior screw rod (PSR) surgery for unstable atlas fractures via C1-ring osteosynthesis. METHODS: From June 2009 to June 2022, 49 consecutive patients with unstable atlas fractures were treated by transoral anterior JeRP fixation (JeRP group) or PSR fixation (PSR group) and followed up at General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA; 30 males and 19 females were included. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), distance to anterior arch fracture (DAAF), distance to posterior arch fracture (DPAF), lateral mass displacement (LMD), Redlund-Johnell value, postoperative complications, and fracture healing rate were retrospectively collected and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with that in the PSR group, the bleeding volume in the JeRP group was lower, and the length of hospital stay was longer. The VAS scores and NDIs of both groups were significantly improved after surgery. The postoperative DAAF and DPAF were significantly smaller after surgery in both groups. Compared with the significantly shorter DPAF in the PSR group, the JeRP group had a smaller DAAF, shorter LMDs and larger Redlund-Johnell value postoperatively and at the final follow-up. The fracture healing rate at 3 months after surgery was significantly greater in the JeRP group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both C1-ring osteosynthesis procedures for treating unstable atlas fractures yield satisfactory clinical outcomes. Transoral anterior JeRP fixation is more effective than PSR fixation for holistic fracture reduction and short-term fracture healing, but the hospital stay is longer.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND:At present,there is a lack of an internal fixation system with good reduction and simple operation for the treatment of atlas burst fracture by posterior single-segment fixation. OBJECTIVE:Based on the atlas CT measurement data,a new posterior atlas fracture reduction and internal fixation system was designed and optimized,which was in line with the characteristics of human local anatomical structure,easy to operate and with good reduction. METHODS:CT images of 347 adults were analyzed retrospectively.In the images,the length of pedicle screw track with a medial inclination of 0°,the angle of the maximum medial inclination angle and the length of pedicle screw track at this time,the height of vertebral artery groove,the distance between the entry points of bilateral pedicle screws and the midline,the radius of the posterior arch of atlas,the distance between the posterior tubercle of the atlas and the posterior edge of the foramen magnum,and the distance between the posterior tubercle of the atlas and the upper surface of the axial arch were measured.The imaging data were analyzed and a reduction and internal fixation system was designed and optimized for atlas fracture in line with human anatomical characteristics. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)There was no statistically significant difference in the the length of pedicle screw track with a medial inclination of 0°,the maximum medial inclination angle and the length of pedicle screw track at this time,the height of vertebral artery groove,the distance between the entry points of bilateral pedicle screws and the midline,the radius of the posterior arch of atlas,the distance between the posterior tubercle of the atlas and the posterior edge of the foramen magnum,and the distance between the posterior tubercle of the atlas and the upper surface of the axial arch measured on the left and right sides of all subjects(P>0.05).There were statistically significant differences in each index measured between the male and female groups(P<0.05).(2)The new posterior atlas fracture reduction and internal fixation system has been successfully designed and obtained the national patent.The internal fixation system is suitable for the anatomical characteristics of the posterior arch of the atlas.It can not only effectively treat the atlas burst fracture,but also retain the movement function of the occipital atlantoaxial joint.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Atlas ring fractures, which account for 1.3% of all spinal fractures, are predominantly managed conservatively. However, in certain cases, surgical treatment may be necessary depending on the type of fracture, degree of comminution, fracture location, and associated ligamentous injuries. Surgical stabilization frequently results in a posterior C1-2 or C0-2 fusion, which restricts movement, particularly craniocervical rotation. Coronal split fractures of the lateral mass need to be reduced and fixed due to dislocation, instability and secondary osteoarthritis. The preferred treatment approach involves internal fixation of the reduced fracture fragments, while avoiding restriction of the upper cervical spine's range of motion (ROM). Research question: Is unilateral anterior transoral lag screw for treatment of unstable coronal split fracture of lateral mass of the atlas feasible and a safe treatment option? Case Report Material and Methods: We report on a 55-year-old female suffering from polytrauma with multiple spinal and extremity injuries. Results: A coronal split fracture of the lateral mass of the atlas was treated minimally invasive with a transoral lag screw technique to reduce and fix the fracture that has a tendency for fracture gap widening. Stable fixation and fracture union and thus restoration of function was achieved. Discussion and conclusion: Transoral lag screw osteosynthesis for coronal split fracture of the lateral mass of the atlas is a potential treatment option in selected cases to preserve mobility in the upper cervical spine after spinal trauma.

RESUMEN

Jefferson fracture is a C1 fracture, which happens when an axial load is from the occiput downward to the C1 ring. Usually, it causes outward displacement of the C1 arch, which can injure the vertebral artery. We present a Jefferson fracture with vertebral artery injury, resulting in an asymptomatic ischemic stroke of the left cerebellum. Usually, vertebral artery injuries are asymptomatic since the contralateral vertebral artery and the collateral arteries will adequately supply the cerebellum. Vertebral artery injury (VAI) is typically treated with conservative management with anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy.

RESUMEN

Background: Transoral anterior C1-ring osteosynthesis has been reported as an effective treatment for unstable atlas fracture, which aims to preserve important C1-C2 motion. However, previous studies have shown that the anterior fixation plates used in this technique were not suitable for the anterior anatomy of the atlas and lacked an intraoperative reduction mechanism. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical effects of a novel reduction plate used in transoral anterior C1-ring osteosynthesis for unstable atlas fractures. Methods: 30 patients with unstable atlas fractures treated by this technique from June 2011 to June 2016 were included in this study. The patients' clinical data and radiographs were reviewed, and the reduction of the fracture, internal fixation placement, and bone fusion were assessed using pre- and postoperative images. The patients' neurological function, rotatory range of motion, and pain levels were evaluated clinically during follow-up. Results: All 30 surgeries were successfully performed, and the average follow-up duration was 23.5 ± 9.5 months (range 9-48 months). One patient suffered atlantoaxial instability during the follow-up and was treated with posterior atlantoaxial fusion. The remaining 29 patients had satisfactory clinical outcomes, with ideal fracture reduction, good screw and plate placement, well-preserved range of motion, neck pain alleviation and solid bone fusion. There were no vascular or neurological complications during the operation or follow-up. Conclusions: The use of this novel reduction plate in transoral anterior C1-ring osteosynthesis is a safe and effective surgical option in the treatment of unstable atlas fractures. This technique offers an immediate intraoperative reduction mechanism, which provides satisfactory fracture reduction, bone fusion, and preservation of C1-C2 motion.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of unstable atlas fractures using the combined anterior-posterior approach or the posterior monoaxial screw-rod system, factors such as severe trauma or complex surgical procedures still need to be improved despite the favourable reduction effect. This research described and evaluated a new technique for the treatment of unstable atlas fracture using a self-designed lateral mass screw-plate system. METHODS: A total of 10 patients with unstable atlas fractures using this new screw-plate system from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent posterior open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a self-designed screw-plate system. The medical records and radiographs before and after surgery were noted. Preoperative and postoperative CT scans were used to determine the type of fracture and evaluate the reduction of fracture. RESULTS: All 10 patients were successfully operated with this new system, with an average follow-up of 16.7 ± 9.6 months. A total of 10 plates were placed, and all 20 screws were inserted into the atlas lateral masses. The mean operating time was 108.7 ± 20.1 min and the average estimated blood loss was 98.0 ± 41.3 ml. The lateral mass displacement (LMD) averaged 7.1 ± 1.9 mm before surgery and almost achieved satisfactory reduction after surgery. All the fractures achieved bony healing without reduction loss or implant failure. No complications (vertebral artery injury, neurologic deficit, or wound infection) occurred in these 10 patients. At the final follow-up, the anterior atlantodens interval (AADI) was 2.3 ± 0.8 mm and the visual analog scale (VAS) was 0.6 ± 0.7 on average. All patients preserved almost full range of motion of the upper cervical spine and achieved a good clinical outcome at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior osteosynthesis with this new screw-plate system can provide a new therapeutic strategy for unstable atlas fractures with simple and almost satisfactory reduction.

Asunto(s)

Atlas Cervical , Fracturas Óseas , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Atlas Cervical/diagnóstico por imagen , Atlas Cervical/cirugía , Atlas Cervical/lesiones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Tornillos Óseos , Resultado del Tratamiento

Asunto(s)

Vértebras Cervicales , Fracturas Óseas , Humanos , Mano , Extremidad Inferior

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This multicenter study compared radiological parameters and clinical outcomes between surgical and nonsurgical management and investigated treatment characteristics associated with the successful management of unstable atlas fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 53 consecutive patients with unstable atlas fracture who underwent halo-vest immobilization (HVI) or surgical fixation. Clinical outcomes were assessed using neck visual analogue scale and disability index. The radiological assessment included total lateral mass displacement (LMD) and the anterior atlantodental interval (AADI). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent surgical fixation and 21 received HVI (mean follow-up, 24.9 months). In the surgical fixation, but not in the HVI, LMD, and AADI showed statistically significant improvements at the last follow-up. The osseous healing rate and time-to-healing were 100% and 14.3 weeks with surgical fixation, compared with 71.43% and 20.0 weeks with HVI, respectively. Patients treated with HVI showed poorer neck pain and neck disability outcomes than those who received surgical treatment. LMD showed an association with osseous healing outcomes in nonoperative management. Clinical outcomes and osseous healing showed no significant differences according to Dickman's classification of transverse atlantal ligament injuries. CONCLUSION: Surgical internal fixation had a higher fusion rate, shorter fracture healing time, more favorable clinical outcomes, and a more significant reduction in LMD and AADI compared to nonoperative management. The pitfalls of external immobilization are inadequate maintenance and a lower probability of reducing fractured lateral masses. Stabilization by surgical reduction with interconnected fixation proved to be a more practical management strategy than nonoperative treatment for unstable atlas fractures.

RESUMEN

Objective: Atlas fractures are a common craniocervical injury, often resulting from trauma. However, diagnosis and management of atlas fractures continues to be the subject of controversy. We aimed to characterize the factors related to diagnosis of atlas fractures, delineate important considerations in selecting the optimal management for a patient with an atlas fracture, and compare outcomes of surgical and conservative management. Methods: We performed a systematic review using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify articles that analyzed diagnosis and management of isolated atlas fractures published between 2013 and 2020. Titles and abstracts were screened. Studies meeting prespecified inclusion criteria were reviewed in full. Results: Of 305 resultant articles, 13 were included. C1:C2 ratio and lateral mass displacement (LMD) were used to predict transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) injury. Surgery promoted high fusion rates overall. Stable atlas fractures achieved high fusion rates with conservative management, while spinal fusion promoted greater fusion rates than halo vest immobilization management for unstable fractures. Visual Analog Scale scores, range of motion, and/or LMD improved after surgery. LMD increased for unilateral sagittal split fractures with TAL injury after conservative treatment. Conclusion: Stable atlas fractures can be sufficiently treated conservatively. Unstable atlas fractures can be managed both conservatively and surgically, while surgery is associated with favorable outcomes for unstable isolated atlas fractures. Future studies are necessary to further guide risk stratification and treatment approaches in management of the patients with isolated atlas fractures.

RESUMEN

Determination of the optimal approach to traumatic atlas fractures with or without transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) injury requires a nuanced understanding of the biomechanics of the atlantoaxial complex. The "rule of Spence" (ROS) was created in 1970 in a landmark effort to streamline management of burst-type atlas fractures. The ROS states that radiographic evidence of lateral mass displacement (LMD) (i.e., the distance that the C1 lateral masses extend beyond the C2 superior articular processes) greater than 6.9 mm may indicate both a torn TAL and need for surgical management. Since then, the ROS has become ubiquitous in the spine literature about atlas injuries. However, in the decades since the original paper by Spence et al., modern research efforts and imaging advancements have revealed that the ROS is inaccurate on both fronts: it neither accurately predicts a TAL injury nor does it inform surgical decision-making. The purpose of this review was to delineate the history of the ROS, demonstrate its limitations, present findings in the existing literature on ROS and LMD thresholds, and discuss the current landscape of management techniques for TAL injuries, including parameters such as the atlantodental interval and type of injury according to the Dickman classification system and AO Spine upper cervical injury classification system. The ROS was revolutionary for initially investigating and later propelling the biomechanical and clinical understanding of atlas fractures and TAL injuries; however, it is time to retire its legacy as a rule.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Atlas (C1) fractures are commonly rated according to the Gehweiler classification, but literature on its reliability is scarce. In addition, evaluation of fracture stability and choosing the most appropriate treatment regime for C1-injuries are challenging. This study aimed to investigate the interobserver reliability of the Gehweiler classification and to identify whether evaluation of fracture stability as well as the treatment of C1-fractures are consistent among spine surgeons. METHODS: Computed tomography images of 34 C1-fractures and case-specific information were presented to six experienced spine surgeons. C1-fractures were graded according to the Gehweiler classification, and the suggested treatment regime was recorded in a questionnaire. For data analyses, SPSS was used, and interobserver reliability was calculated using Fleiss' kappa (κ) statistics. RESULTS: We observed a moderate reliability for the Gehweiler classification (κ = 0.50), the evaluation of fracture stability (κ = 0.50), and whether a surgical or non-surgical therapy was indicated (κ = 0.53). Type 1, 2, 3a, and 5 fractures were rated stable and treated non-surgically. Type 3b fractures were rated unstable in 86.7% of cases and treated by surgery in 90% of cases. Atlas osteosynthesis was most frequently recommended (65.4%). Overall, 25.8% of type 4 fractures were rated unstable, and surgery was favoured in 25.8%. CONCLUSION: We found a moderate reliability for the Gehweiler classification and for the evaluation of fracture stability. In particular, diverging treatment strategies for type 3b fractures emphasise the necessity of further clinical and biomechanical investigations to determine the optimal treatment of unstable C1-fractures.

Asunto(s)

Fracturas Óseas , Cirujanos , Humanos , Internet , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios

RESUMEN

C1 fractures with an intact transverse ligament are usually treated conservatively. Patients who present with a progressive diastasis of bone fragments and a progressive articular subluxation mainly attributed to progressive lengthening of the transverse ligament (TAL) fibers can be treated with a C1 "C-clamp" fusion. A 75-year-old male who sustained a motor vehicle accident was neurologically intact. A computed tomography (CT) imaging demonstrated a Jefferson's type-C1 fracture with a slight lateral displacement of the C1 left lateral mass (LM) and a rotatory subluxation on the right. MRI showed an intact TAL and demonstrated an isolated rupture of the left alar ligament. Conservative treatment was chosen. Radiographic follow-up showed, at 3 months, progressive lateral mass displacement, most likely due to elongation of the TAL fibers; this was also associated with a persistent mechanical neck pain. For this reason, we performed a posterior reduction and internal fixation in a C-clamp fashion by placement of C1 lateral mass screws and posterior compression sparing the C1-2 joint. Using navigation, a 3.5-mm screw was inserted into the LM bilaterally. The screw heads were then connected with a rod and compression was applied before tightening. Postoperative CT scan demonstrated a satisfying reduction and further imaging will be made during the follow-up. The patient had a considerable relief of neck pain. Simple lateral mass fixation with C-clamp technique is a reasonable option in case of isolated C1 fractures in patients who have failed conservative management while preserving the range of motion (ROM) at the atlanto-axial joint. The link to the video can be found at: https://youtu.be/x8bsVwzCt_M .

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atlas fracture occurs in 3%-13% of all cervical spinal injuries and is often associated with other injuries. The factors associated with concomitant transverse ligament disruption and vertebral artery injury remain underexamined. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 97 consecutive cases of atlas fractures. We analyzed demographic and clinic characteristics, including mechanism of injury, fracture type, and associated injuries. We identified factors independently associated with vertebral artery injury and/or transverse ligament disruption. RESULTS: On multivariable analysis, vertebral artery injury was independently, positively associated with injury to the transverse ligament (odds ratio [OR], 8.51 [1.17, 61.72], P = 0.034), associated facial injury (OR, 7.78 [1.05, 57.50]; P = 0.045), intoxication at presentation (OR, 51.42 [1.10, 2408.82]; P = 0.045), and negatively associated with type 3 fractures (OR, 0.081 [0.0081, 0.814]; P = 0.033). There was a trend toward a positive association with a violence mechanism of injury (OR, 33.47 [0.75, 1487.89]; P = 0.070). Transverse ligament injury was independently associated with other injuries to the spine (OR, 13.07362 [2.43, 70.28]; P = 0.003), atlantodental interval (OR, 2.63 [1.02, 6.75]; P = 0.045), lateral mass displacement (OR, 1.78 [1.32, 2.39]; P < 0.001), and male sex (OR, 7.07 [1.47, 34.06]; P = 0.015). There was a trend toward a positive association with injury to the vertebral artery (OR, 5.13 [0.96, 27.35]; P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with atlas fractures, vertebral artery injury and transverse ligament disruption are associated with each other. Mechanism of injury, fracture type, and intoxication at the time of injury were associated with vertebral artery injury, and atlantodental interval and lateral mass displacement are associated with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed injury to the transverse ligament.

Asunto(s)

Intoxicación Alcohólica/epidemiología , Atlas Cervical/lesiones , Traumatismos Faciales/epidemiología , Ligamentos/lesiones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Arteria Vertebral/lesiones , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Atlas Cervical/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Buceo/lesiones , Femenino , Humanos , Ligamentos/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Vertebrales/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Arteria Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen

RESUMEN

A man was found lying dead next to a ladder, with only a laceration surrounded by an abrasion visible upon external examination. No skull fractures were palpable. A CT scan and MRI showed a Jefferson fracture of the atlas, associated to a posterior displacement of the skull, a fracture of the dens of the axis, and fractures of the bodies of C5 and C6. Jefferson fractures typically result from a blow to the apex of the skull. In such cases, forensic pathologists should suspect the existence of a Jefferson fracture, particularly when no severe injuries are visible externally.

Asunto(s)

Traumatismos del Cuello , Fracturas Craneales , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Masculino , Fracturas Craneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: C1-ring osteosynthesis is a valid alternative to posterior C1-C2 or C0-C2 fusion to preserve important C1-C2 motion in the treatment of unstable atlas fractures. Nevertheless, the fixation instruments used in current studies for transoral anterior C1-ring osteosynthesis were not suitable for anterior anatomy of the atlas or did not have reduction mechanism. We therefore present this report to investigate preliminary clinical effects of transoral anterior C1-ring osteosynthesis using a laminoplasty plate in unstable atlas fractures. METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2017, 13 patients with unstable atlas fractures were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with transoral anterior C1-ring osteosynthesis using a laminoplasty plate. Pre- and postoperative images were obtained to assess reduction of the fracture, internal fixation placement, and bone union. Neurological function, range of motion, and pain levels were evaluated clinically on follow-up. RESULTS: The surgeries were successfully performed in all cases. The average follow-up duration was 16.6 ± 4.4 months (range 12-24 months). One patient suffered screw loosening after operation and underwent replacement operation subsequently. Satisfactory clinical outcomes were achieved in all patients with ideal fracture reduction, reliable plate placement, well-preserved range of motion, and neck pain alleviation. All patients achieved bone union of fractures without loss of reduction or implant failure or C1-C2 instability during the follow-up. No vascular or neurological complication was noted during the operation and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Transoral anterior C1-ring osteosynthesis using a laminoplasty plate is a effective surgical treatment for unstable atlas fractures. This technique has a ingenious reduction mechanism, and can provide satisfactory bone union and preservation of C1-C2 motion.

Asunto(s)

Atlas Cervical , Laminoplastia , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Atlas Cervical/diagnóstico por imagen , Atlas Cervical/lesiones , Atlas Cervical/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the progress in treatment of unstable atlas fracture, the existing problems, and the research direction. METHODS: Related literature at home and abroad was reviewed. The stability evaluation of atlas fracture and treatment methods were introduced, and the selection of surgical approach and fixation instruments in treatment of unstable atlas fracture were summarized and analyzed. RESULTS: At present, atlas fractures are considered as unstable fractures except single anterior arch fractures with complete transverse ligament or simple posterior arch fractures. The treatment of unstable atlas fracture has been developed from nonsurgical treatment and traditional fusion surgery to single-segment fixation. Nonsurgical treatment is less effective, while traditional fusion surgery has a disadvantage of limited the motion of the upper cervical spine. Single-segment fixation can not only restore and fix the fracture, but also preserve the upper cervical motion function. Single-segment fixation approaches include posterior and transoral approaches, and the fixation instruments are being constantly improved, mainly including screw-rod system, screw-plate system, and plate system. CONCLUSION: For unstable atlas fracture, single-segment fixation is an ideal surgical method, and has more advantages when compared with nonsurgical treatment and traditional fusion surgery. Single-segment fixation via transoral approach is more direct for atlas anterior arch fracture reduction, but there is a high risk of infection; and single-segment fixation via posterior approach is less effective for the reduction of atlas anterior arch fracture. Therefore, a better reduction method should be explored.

Asunto(s)

Atlas Cervical , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Placas Óseas , Tornillos Óseos , Atlas Cervical/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/normas , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Humanos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

Craniovertebral junction (CVJ) trauma is a challenging clinical condition. Being a highly mobile functional unit at the junction of the skull and the vertebral column, traumatic events in this area may produce devastating neurological complications and death. Additionally, many of the CVJ traumatic injuries can be left undiagnosed or even raise difficult treatment dilemmas. We present a literature review in the format of recommendations on the diagnosis and management of different scenarios for upper cervical trauma and produce recommendations, which can be applicable to various areas of the globe.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of a C1:C2 ratio in a cohort of patients with atlas fractures. Second, we aimed to consider the utility of the C1:C2 ratio with regard to diagnosis of transverse ligament (TL) injury. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis. METHODS: Patients with atlas fractures in the Waikato region between 2008 and 2010 were identified retrospectively through clinical coding and collated radiology trauma database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The maximal width of C1 and C2 was measured using the first-taken trauma radiograph series. Combined overhang of lateral masses (△mm) and a C1:C2 ratio was then calculated. Final ratio and atlanto-dens interval (ADI) were measured at the last clinical follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients with full radiographic records were included. Of these, five patients (21%) had TL injuries confirmed on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. No patient with a ratio 1.15 had an intact TL, whereas a ratio of >1.10 captured 80% of TL injuries. The ratio (P < 0.001) and delta values (P < 0.001) were statistically significantly different between TL-injured and TL-intact cohorts. Two patients in the TL injury group demonstrated increased ADI on final follow-up with a ratio of >1.10. CONCLUSIONS: A C1:C2 ratio >1.10 on plain radiographs showed a sensitivity of 80% in detecting atlas fractures with associated TL injury. All patients with a ratio of ≥1.15 had TL rupture subsequently confirmed by an advanced modality. A ratio calculation on radiographs is a potentially useful method of describing atlas lateral mass displacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.