RESUMEN

Finger arthroplasty is commonly used to treat pain in the finger joints due to osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Despite the procedure having existed for a relatively long time, it is still unknown which characteristics influence implant survival. The Dutch Arthroplasty Registry (LROI) is one of the 4 registries worldwide registering finger arthroplasties. This study aimed to investigate impact factors for implant survival regarding finger joint arthroplasty and assess registration completeness using the national healthcare claims database to compare. A total of 951 primary arthroplasties and 84 revision arthroplasties of the finger joints were registered. A higher likelihood of primary and revision surgery was found in female patients. The third and fourth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints were the most frequently operated in primary surgery; however, the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints were the most frequently revised joints. Silicone implants were used in most cases and evenly throughout all digits. Suboptimal registration completeness was shown for plastic surgeons with just 35.5%-37.4% of all surgeries registered. Although orthopedic surgeons do not perform most surgeries on the hand, they registered 76.5%-78.2% of surgeries. No statistical analyses were justified, considering the low completeness and limited follow-up. Female gender and PIP joint disease are possible risk factors for primary arthroplasty. MCP arthroplasties showed higher revision rates. However, participation rates and, therefore, data completeness were not optimal. To optimize participation, improving ease of registration should be explored. Furthermore, we urge readers who deal with joint implants to register their surgeries in the LROI database because only optimal registration completeness leads to high-quality data.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The number of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing globally, including Japan. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association has been conducting a registry of joint replacement surgery, but there may be a gap between the reported numbers of THA in the registry and the actual number. This study aimed to investigate the exact number of THA and assess the trends in Japan using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB). METHODS: We downloaded data from 2014 to 2019 from the NDB Open Data. Data on primary THA were extracted, and we calculated the annual number and number for each 10-year age group and sex. We also compared the number and trends between elderly and non-elderly groups. RESULTS: During the study period, number of THAs increased by approximately 20,000, showing a continuous upward trend. The highest number of THAs were performed on patients in their 60s, except for the years 2014 and 2019. Comparison of the numbers in 2014 and 2019 by age group showed an increase in the number in patients in their 90s (by 2.05 times). There were significantly a greater number of elderly patients (P < 0.001). The number of THAs performed was higher in women than in men (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The number of THAs in Japan increased substantially from 2014 to 2019, despite a decrease in population. Significantly higher number of THAs were performed on elderly patients in Japan, which might be due to an aging society. The NDB data is highly valuable for epidemiological research in Japan, as it might enable the early detection of issues occurring during THA, facilitating their prompt integration into daily clinical practice.

RESUMEN

Purpose: Arthroplasty registers can provide feedback information on the results of arthroplasties performed by a certain institution or surgeon. The use of real-world data to achieve real-world evidence can help evaluate the performance of the implants used and help counsel our patients. The main objective of our study was to determine the survivorship of the total knee implant we are currently using. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients who received a total knee arthroplasty from January 2009 to December 2020 in our hospital was conducted, using data from the Catalan arthroplasty registry and the Catalan health service database. Demographic and surgical data were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models with the R Project software (p < 0.05). Results: A total of 1336 total knee arthroplasties were included in the study, of which 992 were women. The causes for revision included aseptic loosening (17), infection (29), instability (13), patellar implantation (13), arthrofibrosis (5) and quadriceps tendon rupture (1).The cumulative risk for revision at 5 years using the Kaplan-Meier method was 6.0% and at 10 years 6.5%. Considering gender, this risk was 7.0% and 7.5% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, in women and 3.3% in men, both at 5 and 10 years (p = 0.009). A higher risk for revision in women was seen, which is considered statistically significant (p = 0.012). Conclusion: Our survivorship results are comparable to those published in the literature, but with a higher revision risk in women that is only statistically significant for the whole group of reoperations and for patellar implantation, but not for the rest of the diagnoses. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the potential advantage of all-polyethylene tibial components, modular metal-backed component use predominates the market in the United States for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This is partially driven by concerns about the associated revision risk due to the lack of modularity with all-polyethylene components. This study utilized the American Joint Replacement Registry to compare the associated risk of all-cause revision and revision for infection for all-polyethylene versus modular metal-backed tibial components. METHODS: An analysis of primary TKA cases in patients aged 65 years and older was performed with American Joint Replacement Registry data linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data from 2012 to 2019. Analyses compared all-polyethylene to modular metal-backed tibial components. We identified 485,024 primary TKA cases, consisting of 479,465 (98.9%) metal-backed and 5,559 (1.1%) all-polyethylene. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses created hazard ratios (HRs) to evaluate the association of design and the risk of all-cause revision while adjusting for sex, age, and the competing risk of mortality. Event-free survival curves evaluate time to revision. RESULTS: The all-polyethylene tibia group demonstrated a decreased risk for all-cause revision (HR = 0.37; 95% confidence interval: 0.24 to 0.55; P < .0001) and revision for infection (HR = 0.41; 95% confidence interval: 0.22 to 0.77, P < .0001). Event-free survival curves demonstrated a decreased risk of all-cause revision that persisted across time points until 8 years post-TKA. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, all-polyethylene tibial component use for TKA remains low compared to modular metal-backed designs. A decreased associated risk for revision should ease concerns about the use of all-polyethylene components in patients aged 65 years or older, and future investigations should investigate the potential cost and value savings associated with expanded use in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aims of the present study were (1) to evaluate the survival of patellofemoral joint (PFJ) arthroplasty in a large cohort of patients using data obtained from an Italian regional arthroplasty registry and (2) to collect clinical outcomes of a subgroup of patients, with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. The hypotheses were that PFJ arthroplasty is a procedure that had good survival and clinical outcomes, not inferior to those reported in the literature for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: The Register of Orthopaedic Prosthetic Implants (RIPO) of Emilia-Romagna (ER) (Italy) database was searched for the inclusion of all PFJ arthroplasties implanted between 2003 and 2019. PFJ arthroplasties were excluded if they were implanted in patients who lived outside of the ER. The survival information was extrapolated from the RIPO considering the partial or total revision of the implant as failure; moreover, a subgroup of patients was contacted and interviewed by telephone to collect clinical outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data. The survival curve was calculated and plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 126 arthroplasties in 114 patients were included in the final analysis (mean age at surgery 60.1 ± 11.5 years old). The main causes of patellofemoral arthroplasty were primary osteoarthritis (88%) and posttraumatic arthritis (7%). The survival was 90.4 ± 30.6 and 78.8 ± 51.5 at 5 and 10 years of follow-up, respectively. At the latest follow-up, 23 implants failed (18.3%). The main cause of revision was osteoarthrosis progression (34.8%). A total of 44 patients were contacted by telephone to collect clinical outcomes: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, functional Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score and Oxford Knee Score. These patients reported good to excellent scores at a medium follow-up of 10.3 ± 4.7 years. CONCLUSIONS: The PFJ showed good survival and clinical outcomes and could be considered a valuable option for patients affected by isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Four joint arthroplasty registries (JARs) levels exist based on the recorded data type. Level I JARs are national registries that record primary data. Hospital or institutional JARs (Level II-IV) document further data (patient-reported outcomes, demographic, radiographic). A worldwide list of Level II-IV JARs must be created to effectively assess and categorize these data. METHODS: Our study is a systematic scoping review that followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 648 studies. Based on their publications, the study aimed to map the existing Level II-IV JARs worldwide. The secondary aim was to record their lifetime, publications' number and frequency and recognise differences with national JARs. RESULTS: One hundred five Level II-IV JARs were identified. Forty-eight hospital-based, 45 institutional, and 12 regional JARs. Fifty JARs were found in America, 39 in Europe, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and one in Africa. They have published 485 cohorts, 91 case-series, 49 case-control, nine cross-sectional studies, eight registry protocols and six randomized trials. Most cohort studies were retrospective. Twenty-three per cent of papers studied patient-reported outcomes, 21.45% surgical complications, 13.73% postoperative clinical and 5.25% radiographic outcomes, and 11.88% were survival analyses. Forty-four JARs have published only one paper. Level I JARs primarily publish implant revision risk annual reports, while Level IV JARs collect comprehensive data to conduct retrospective cohort studies. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study mapping all Level II-IV JARs worldwide. Most JARs are found in Europe and America, reporting on retrospective cohorts, but only a few report on studies systematically.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Periprosthetic fractures, such as acromial and spine fractures, are known complications following implantation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The entity of greater tuberosity fractures (GTF) has rarely been studied in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of postoperative greater tuberosity fractures after RTSA compared to a matched control group. The main findings of this study are that a GTF after RTSA is associated with worse clinical outcome scores (mean absolute CS 50 ± 19 (p = 0.032); SSV 63% ± 26 (p = 0.022); mean force 1 kg ± 2 kg (p = 0.044)) compared with the control group (mean absolute CS 62 ± 21; SSV 77% ± 29; mean force 2 kg ± 2 kg). In terms of postoperative range of motion, the fracture group was significantly worse in terms of external rotation (17° ± 19° vs. 30° ± 19° (p = 0.029)). Internal rotation, flexion, as well as abduction of the shoulder appear to be unaffected (internal rotation GTF 4 ± 2, control group 5 ± 3 (p = 0.138); flexion GTF 102° ± 28°, control group 114° ± 27° (p = 0.160); abduction GTF 109° ± 42°, control group 120° ± 39° (p = 0.317)).

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are among the most common fractures in Germany and are often treated by hemiarthroplasty (HA). The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of aseptic revisions after cemented and uncemented HA for the treatment of FNF. Secondly, the rate of pulmonary embolism was investigated. METHODS: Data collection for this study was performed using the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD). HAs after FNF were divided into subgroups stratified by stem fixation (cemented vs uncemented) and paired according to age, sex, BMI, and the Elixhauser score using Mahalanobis distance matching. RESULTS: Examination of 18,180 matched cases showed a significantly increased rate of aseptic revisions in uncemented HA (p < 0.0001). After 1 month 2.5% of HAs with uncemented stems required an aseptic revision, while 1.5% were reported in cemented HA. After 1 and 3 years' follow-up 3.9% and 4.5% of uncemented HA and 2.2% and 2.5% of cemented HA needed aseptic revision surgery. In particular, the proportion of periprosthetic fractures was increased in cementless implanted HA (p < 0.0001). During in-patient stays, pulmonary emboli occurred more frequently after cemented HA [0.81% vs 0.53% in cementless HA (OR: 1.53; p = 0.057)]. CONCLUSION: For uncemented hemiarthroplasties a statistically significantly increased rate of aseptic revisions and periprosthetic fractures was evident within a time period of 5 years after implantation. During the in-hospital stay, patients with cemented HA experienced an increased rate of pulmonary embolism, but without statistically significant results. Based on the present results, with knowledge of prevention measurements and correct cementation technique, cemented HA should be preferred when using HA in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. TRAIL REGISTRATION: The study design of the German Arthroplasty Registry was approved by the University of Kiel (ID: D 473/11). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Prognostic.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Existing evidence estimates a twofold risk of venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) if tourniquet is applied during total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). However, this estimate relies on multiple trials with a low number of patients analyzing VTEs as a secondary outcome. We hypothesized that tourniquet-use increases the risk of symptomatic VTE within 90 days of contemporary primary TKA and aimed to use the extensive Danish healthcare registries to quantify this risk. METHODS: Prospectively collected registry data from Danish patients receiving primary TKAs between 2014 and 2018 were included in the study. Patients were divided by tourniquet-use during surgery. By merging information from four nationwide registries, the study included 44 baseline characteristics with the potential to confound the association between tourniquet-use and VTE. Incidence rate and odds ratios were used to compare the risk of VTE within 90 days of surgery. RESULTS: 19,804 patients of whom 10,111 (51%) were operated with tourniquet and 9693 (49%) without were included. The mean age (SD) was 70 (9) in both groups and 62% were females in the tourniquet group compared with 61% in the no tourniquet group. The groups were similarly comparable across all other baseline characteristics except type of post-operative thromboprophylaxis, type of anaesthesia, implant fixation, and year of surgery. The 90-days incidence of VTE was 0.77% (95% CI 0.60-0.94) in the tourniquet group compared with 1.10% (95% CI 0.90-1.31) in the no tourniquet group. Following adjustment for the unbalanced confounders, the odds ratio for VTE was 0.77 (95% CI 0.54-1.10) associated with tourniquet-use. CONCLUSION: In contemporary TKAs the rate of VTE within 90 days is low and not significant altered by tourniquet-use. Thus, tourniquet can safely be applied during primary TKA-surgery without jeopardizing the risk of postoperative VTE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-prospective cohort study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to investigate differences in survivorship between medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) by analyzing the data of an Italian regional registry. The hypothesis was that, according to recent literature, lateral implants have comparable survivorship with regard to the medial implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Register of Orthopaedic Prosthetic Implants (RIPO) of Emilia-Romagna (Italy) database was searched for all UKAs between July 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019. For both cohorts, subject demographics and reasons for revision were presented as a percentage of the total cohort. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed using revision of any component as the endpoint and survival times of unrevised UKAs taken as the last observation date (December 31, 2019, or date of death). RESULTS: Patients living outside the region and symmetrical implants (which do not allow the compartment operated to be traced) were excluded. 5571 UKAs implanted on 5172 patients (5215 medial UKAs and 356 lateral UKAs) were included in the study. The survivorship analysis revealed 13 failures out of 356 lateral UKAs (3.7%) at a mean follow-up of 6.3 years and 495 failures out of 5215 medial UKAs (9.5%) at a mean follow-up of 6.7 years. The medial UKAs had a significantly higher risk of failure, with a Hazard Ratio of 2.6 (CI 95% 1.6-4.8; p < 0.001), adjusted for age, gender, weight, and mobility of the insert. Both the groups revealed a good survival rate, with 95.2% of lateral implants and 87.5% of medial implants still in situ at 10 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral UKA is a safe procedure showing longer survivorship than medial UKAs (95.2% and 87.5% at 10 years, respectively) in the present study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, therapeutic study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of revision for distal femoral arthroplasty (DFA) performed as a primary procedure for native knee fractures using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry (AOANJRR). METHODS: Data from the AOANJRR were obtained for DFA performed as primary procedures for native knee fractures from 1 September 1999 to 31 December 2020. Pathological fractures and revision for failed internal fixation were excluded. The five prostheses identified were the Global Modular Arthroplasty System, the Modular Arthroplasty System, the Modular Universal Tumour And Revision System, the Orthopaedic Salvage System, and the Segmental System. Patient demographic data (age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade) were obtained, where available. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival were used to determine the rate of revision, and the reasons for revision and mortality data were examined. RESULTS: The AOANJRR identified 153 primary DFAs performed for native knee fractures in 151 patients during the study period, with 63.3% of these (n = 97) performed within the last five years. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (interquartile range 0.8 to 4.4). The patient population was 84.8% female (n = 128), with a mean age of 76.1 years (SD 11.9). The cumulative percent revision rate at three years was 10%. The most common reason for revision was loosening, followed by infection. Patient survival at one year was 87.5%, decreasing to 72.8% at three years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The use of DFA to treat native knee fractures is increasing, with 63.3% of cases performed within the last five years. While long-term data are not available, the results of this study suggest that DFA may be a reasonable option for elderly patients with native knee fractures where fixation is not feasible, or for whom prolonged non-weightbearing may be detrimental. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):894-901.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patella resurfacing remains controversial in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).The aim of this study was to investigate if there was a difference in revision rate and reason for revision within 8 years after single brand primary cemented TKA with or without patella resurfacing, using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. METHODS: All primary TKA surgeries with a posterior stabilized cemented primary NexGen®, between 2010 and 2013 with diagnosis osteoarthritis were analyzed (n = 5911). Multivariate cox regression analyses were performed to analyze differences in revision rate between TKA with or without patella component, and was adjusted for age and previous surgery. RESULTS: Of 5911 TKA surgeries, 4795 were performed without patella resurfacing (81.1%) and 1116 with patella resurfacing (18.9%). There was a significant difference in patellar problems as reason for revision between patients after primary TKA with patella resurfacing (9.3%) and without patella resurfacing (29.9%) (p = 0.01). This was mostly caused by patellar pain (28.0%). There was no significant difference in cumulative revision rate within between TKA with patella resurfacing and without patella resurfacing. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, 30% of patients who need revision surgery after TKA using NexGen® PS without patella resurfacing the reason for revision is patella related problems, compared to 9% after TKA NexGen® PS with patella resurfacing. There was no difference in cumulative incidence of revision after primary surgery of all TKA's using NexGen® PS with or without patella. To reduce the probability of reoperation for patella related problems, our data suggest the patella should be resurface during primary TKA.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mixing and matching components from different manufacturers in total hip arthroplasty is a frequently used off-label praxis. The clinical consequences of this procedure have not been studied in detail. METHODS: 860 patients with matched and 1067 patients with mixed primary total hip replacement (THR) components carried out between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2004, were selected from our Institution registry. The analysis endpoint was set at 1 January 2016. THRs with poorly performing components were excluded from study groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for both groups were calculated and compared using the Log-Rank test and the demographic data using the chi-square test. Correlations between demographic data and revisions were calculated using bivariate correlation. RESULTS: 28 revisions were carried out in the matched group and 67 in the mixed group. The 14-year overall survival probability was significantly better in the former (96.0%) than in the mixed group (92.7%) (p = 0.002). Survival, free of aseptic and septic failures, was statistically, significantly higher in the matched group (p = 0.026 and p = 0.007, respectively).The survival of the mixed subgroup with heads and stems from the same manufacturer did not differ statistically from that of the matched group (p = 0.079). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the results listed in the National Joint Registry and the New Zealand Joint Registry, the survival probability in our study was, statistically, significantly higher in total hip replacements using components of the same manufacturer. Importantly, mixing and matching the components of different manufacturers led to similar survival providing the head and the stem were from the same manufacturer.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of total ankle replacement (TAR) regarding revision rates by comparing clinical studies of the last decade to data displayed in arthroplasty registers. The secondary aim was to evaluate whether dependent clinical studies show a superior outcome to independent publications. Additionally, revision rates of mobile bearing implants (MB-TARs) were compared to those of fixed bearing implants (FB-TARs). METHODS: Clinical studies on TARs between 2010 and 2020 were systematically reviewed, with the endpoint being a revision for any reason. The parameter "revision rate per 100 observed component years (CYs)" was calculated for each publication. The pooled revision rate for clinical studies was compared to the data reported in arthroplasty registers. In a second step, revision rates were subdivided and analyzed for independent and dependent publications and for FB-TARs and MB-TARs. RESULTS: A total of 43 publications met the inclusion criteria comprising 5806 TARs. A revision rate of 1.8 per 100 observed CYs was calculated, corresponding to a 7-year revision rate of 12.6%. The 3 arthroplasty registers included showed revision rates ranging from 8.2% to 12.3% after 7 years. No significant difference between dependent and independent publications nor between FB-TARs and MB-TARs was detected. CONCLUSION: Revision rates of clinical studies and arthroplasty registers are comparable. Surgeons can compare their own revision rates with those from this study. Dependent studies do not seem to be biased, and no superiority for one bearing type can be described. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of level III studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The discipline of orthopedics and trauma surgery strives for constant improvement of the quality of results in arthroplasty; however, in order to enable targeted alterations to the establish standard operating procedures, dedicated documentation of the current quality of results is necessary. This can be achieved by so-called external quality assurance, evaluation of routine data of healthcare providers, analysis of clinical studies and the consultation of registry data. To achieve further improvement of the quality of results, legislature has been passed setting requirements for minimum quantities and by the specialist society (German Society for Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery, DGOOC) the adherence to certain process and structural guidelines within the framework of the certification system EndoCert®. A valid score for risk adjustment for assessment of the level of difficulty of orthopedic surgical interventions is so far lacking. As a future direction, the application of risk stratification concerning patient-specific anatomy should be developed. Through the combination of dedicated certification systems, the recording and evaluation of external inpatient quality assurance data, further quality assurance through routinely collected data and the development of adequate minimum quantity regulations, sustainable improvement of the quality of results can be achieved.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Short-stemmed total hip arthroplasty (THA) is well established and gaining popularity in Germany. The perception that short stems may predispose to primary instability in the femur has resulted in a more thorough follow-up of younger patient cohorts than the typical uncemented THA population. To address this issue, an evidence-based approach is presented for a retrospective mid-term survival analysis of a large registry-based cohort in primary cementless THA comparing short stems with a matched group of conventional stems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Propensity score matching (PSM, see Infobox 1) was used on 131,580 primary cementless THAs fulfilling the inclusion criteria performed between November 2012 and September 2019 and the cumulative probability of revision (CPR) of short and conventional stems for any reason, for reasons excluding prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and due to PJI were compared. RESULTS: After PSM at 1:1 balanced groups of 17,526 short stems and of 17,526 conventional stems were achieved demonstrating no significant difference for CPR for any reason and for reasons excluding PJI. Matched CPR for any reason was 2.9% (95% confidence interval, CI, 2.4-3.5%) 5 years after primary THA in the short stem and 3.1% (95% CI 2.7-3.4%) in the conventional stem group. The CPR excluding PJI was 2.2% (95% CI 1.7-2.7%) vs. 2.1% (95% CI 1.8-2.4%). In contrast, the incidence of PJI was statistically significant lower for short stems. CONCLUSION: For the considered period, there was no statistically significant survival difference in uncemented THA between comparison groups but a lower incidence for PJI in short-stem THA. Further analyses of registry data are required to rule out range of indications and late mechanical failure of short stems.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most frequent and devastating causes of short-term revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In vitro evidence suggests ceramic surfaces demonstrate resistance to biofilm, but the clinical effect of bearing surface modifications on the risk of PJI remains unclear. This premier registry-based study examines the influence of ceramic bearing surface coatings on the outcome in cemented primary TKA. METHODS: In total, 117,660 cemented primary TKAs in patients with primary osteoarthritis recorded in the German arthroplasty registry since 2012 were followed up for a maximum of 3 years. The primary endpoint was risk of revision for PJI on ceramic coated and uncoated cobalt-chromium-molybdenum femoral components. Propensity score matching for age, gender, obesity, diabetes mellitus, depression and Elixhauser comorbidity index, and substratification on common design twins with and without coating was performed. RESULTS: In total, 4637 TKAs (85.1% female) with a ceramic-coated femoral component were identified, 42 had been revised for PJI and 122 for other reasons at 3 years. No survival advantage due to the risk of revision for PJI could be determined for ceramic-coated components. Revision for all other reasons demonstrated a significant higher rate for TKAs with ceramic-coated components. However, the results of this were confounded by a strong prevalence (20.7% vs 0.3%) of metal sensitivity in the ceramic-coated group. CONCLUSION: No evidence of reduced risk for PJI due to ceramic-coated implants in cemented primary TKA was found. Further analysis for revision reasons other than PJI is required.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to analyse long-term unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) focusing on survivorship, causes of failure and revision strategy. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of data from a regional arthroplasty registry for cases performed between 2000 and 2017. A total of 6453 UKAs were identified and the following information was analysed: demographic data, diagnosis leading to primary implant, survivorship, complication rate, causes of failure, revision strategies. UKA registry data were compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) registry data of 54,012 prostheses, which were implanted in the same time period. RESULTS: 6453 UKAs were included in the study: the vast majority of them (84.4%) were implanted due to primary osteoarthritis followed by deformity (7.1%) and necrosis of the condyle (5.1%). When compared to TKA, UKA showed lower perioperative complication rate (0.3% compared to 0.6%) but higher revision rate (18.2% at 15 years, compared to 6.2% for TKA). No correlation was found between diagnosis leading to primary implant and prosthesis survival. The most frequent cause of failure was total aseptic loosening (37.4%), followed by pain without loosening (19.8%). Of the 620 UKAs requiring revision, 485 were revised with a TKA and 61 of them required a re-revision; on the other hand, of the 35 cases where another UKA was implanted, 16 required a re-revision. CONCLUSION: UKA is associated with fewer perioperative complications but higher revision rates when compared to TKA. Its survivorship is not affected by the diagnosis leading to primary implant. Revision surgery of a failed UKA should be performed implanting a TKA, which is associated with a lower re-revision rate when compared to another UKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, therapeutic study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Institutional arthroplasty registries are very popular nowadays; however, very few efforts have been made in order to standardize the information to be collected, thus limiting the possibility of inter-institutional data interpretation. This manuscript reports the results of a single-country consensus designed to define the minimum standardized dataset to be recorded within an institutional arthroplasty registry. METHODS: A national consensus was carried out among all members of the Colombian Society of Hip and Knee Surgeons using the Delphi method. Eleven questions and answers comprising every potential domain of an institutional registry of hip and knee arthroplasty were defined. According to the methodology, anonymous voting and multiple discussion rounds were performed. Three levels of agreement were defined: Strong consensus: equal to or greater than 80%, weak consensus between 70 and 79.9%, and no consensus below 70%. RESULTS: All of the questions reached consensus level. The minimum dataset was defined to include demographic and clinical information, intraoperative and implant details, follow-up and early complications, implant survival, and functional outcome scores, as well as the validation model to assess information quality within the database. Currently, this dataset is being implemented voluntarily by the members of our national society. DISCUSSION: A national consensus is a feasible method to build homogeneous arthroplasty registries. We recommend such an exercise since it establishes the basis to compare and add data between institutions and the joint analysis of said information in a national registry.

Asunto(s)