RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Numerous digestive system adverse events (dsAEs) have been observed during the use of anti-obesity medications (AOMs), leading to concerns about the safety of these medications. However, most current studies are limited to the association of one class of drugs with specific digestive disorders, and there is no cascading analysis of AOMs in the digestive system. This study aims to use data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for a stratified analysis of the reported associations between AOMs and dsAEs. METHODS: We analyzed adverse event reports submitted to FAERS between January 2015 and December 2023 related to obesity treatment. It is important to note that FAERS data cannot establish causality or incidence rates. Pharmacovigilance (PV) signals were detected by disproportionate analyses through proportionate reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratios (ROR), and information components (IC) to detect dsAEs associated with AOMs. Reporting rates, severity, and response outcomes of digestive adverse events were compared across AOMs by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 34,396 adverse events (AEs) related to obesity treatment, 8844 dsAEs were analyzed. Comparing with semaglutide and liraglutide, tirzepatide exhibited fewer reported dsAEs while semaglutide and liraglutide showed a high correlation with non-lethal pancreatitis reports. Bupropion-naltrexone (31.65%) reported the highest number of dsAEs, and a PV signal was detected in mouth and lips AEs (ROR = 2.97, 95% CI: 2.42-3.6). Orlistat (ROR = 3.30, 95% CI: 3.08-3.55) exhibited the highest association with gastrointestinal AEs compared to other AOMs. PV signal for hepatobiliary AEs (ROR = 6.13, 95% CI: 3.45-10.88) with phentermine-topiramate still needs further clarification. CONCLUSIONS: Tirzepatide may be considered for patients with a history of digestive system disease or an elevated risk of pancreatitis based on the pattern of reported dsAEs. Caution is needed for the orofacial AEs when using bupropion-naltrexone. Orlistat has a higher reporting rate of gastrointestinal AEs, but these events are typically less severe. Phentermine-topiramate's association with liver impairment requires further clinical investigation. This article provides insights into the reported associations between AOMs and dsAEs, which may aid clinicians in making more informed decisions about individualizing medication and managing potential adverse events.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Adiposity, synonymous with obesity, is prevalent among both children and adults with type 1 diabetes in China. Recent literature underscored the patho-physiological and socioeconomic factors associated with adiposity, and consistently highlighted its impact on cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic diseases among Chinese individuals with type 1 diabetes. Addressing and managing adiposity in individuals with type 1 diabetes are complicated and entail comprehensive approaches including lifestyle modifications, cognitive-behavioral therapy, insulin dose titration, and other diabetes treatment medications. The condition calls for coordination among policymakers, researchers, clinicians, and patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been established as a significant risk factor for osteoarthritis. Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) have demonstrated efficacy in weight management. However, potential impact on osteoarthritis risk remains uncertain. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used Kythera data from NOV2022 to JULY2024. Patients with obesity using AOMs were identified through diagnosis and prescription claims for tirzepatide, semaglutide, or liraglutide between 1NOV2023 and 31JAN2024, with a 6-month follow-up to assess OA risk. OA risk, analyzed using Cox regression and propensity score matching, controlled for comorbidities and sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: There were 39,394 patients living with obesity using AOM (23,933 semaglutide 12,854 tirzepatide, 2,607 liraglutide) and 72,405 without AOM use. The adjusted osteoarthritis risk was 27% % lower in AOM users than in non-users (hazard ratio (HR) = 073, 95% CI (0.67-0.79), p < 0.01). Among AOMs, tirzepatide was associated with a significantly lower osteoarthritis (OA) risk compared to semaglutide (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.50-0.65, p < 0.0001). Liraglutide was linked to a significantly higher OA risk vs tirzepatide (HR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.23-2.15, p = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: AOM use was associated with a significantly lower risk of OA and may be an effective obesity management intervention.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: This Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) details assessment and management of the child with overweight or obesity. The term "child" is defined as the child between 2 and 12 years of age. Because children are in a continual state of development during this age range, we will specify when our discussion applies to subsets within this age range. For the purposes of this CPS, we will use the following definitions: overweight in the child is a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 85th and <95th percentile, obesity in the child is a BMI ≥95th percentile, and severe obesity is a BMI ≥120% of the 95th percentile. Methods: The information and clinical guidance in this OMA Clinical Practice Statement are based on scientific evidence, supported by medical literature, and derived from the clinical perspectives of the authors. Results: This OMA Clinical Practice Statement provides an overview of prevalence of disease in this population, reviews precocious puberty in the child with obesity, discusses the current and evolving landscape of the use of anti-obesity medications in children in this age range, discusses the child with obesity and special health care needs, and reviews hypothalamic obesity in the child. Conclusions: This OMA Clinical Practice Statement on the child with obesity is an evidence based review of the literature and an overview of current recommendations. This CPS is intended to provide a roadmap to the improvement of the health of children with obesity, especially those with metabolic, physiological, psychological complications and/or special healthcare needs. This CPS addresses treatment recommendations and is designed to help the clinician with clinical decision making.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) block estrogen synthesis and are used as long-term adjuvant treatment for breast cancer in postmenopausal women. AI use can be associated with weight gain that can lead to increased cardiometabolic risk. The response to anti-obesity medications (AOM) in patients using AI has yet to be studied. We sought to investigate weight loss outcomes of AOM in patients taking AI for breast cancer treatment. METHODS: This is a matched retrospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors on AI using AOM (AOM/AI group). We compared their weight loss outcomes with a group of female patients with obesity, without a history of breast cancer or AI use, on AOM (AOM group). The primary endpoint was total body weight loss percentage (TBWL %) at the last follow-up. We performed mixed linear regression models, including diabetes status at baseline, to assess associations between use of AOM with/without AI with total body weight loss percentage (TBWL%). RESULTS: We included 124 patients: 62 in the AOM/AI group (63.6 ± 10 years, body mass index [BMI] 34.3 ± 7.1 kg/m2) and 62 in the AOM group (62.8 ± 9.9 years, BMI 34.6 ± 6.5 kg/m2). The mean time of follow up was 9.3 ± 3.5 months, with no differences among the two groups. The AOM/AI group had a lower TBWL% compared to the AOM group at the last follow-up -5.3 ± 5.0 vs. -8.2 ± 6.3 (p = 0.005). The results remained significant after adjusting for diabetes status (p = 0.0002). At 12 months, the AOM/AI group had a lower TBWL% compared to the AOM group 6.4 ± 0.8% vs. 9.8 ± 0.9% (p = 0.04). The percentage of patients achieving ≥ 5%, ≥ 10%, and ≥ 15% of weight loss at 12 months was greater in the AOM compared to the AOM/AI group. Although the weight loss response was suboptimal, patients in the AOM/AI group had improvement in fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: The use of AI in breast cancer survivors is associated with less weight loss response to AOM compared to patients without breast cancer history and who do not take AI. Studies are needed to assess the mechanisms behind the differential weight loss response to AOM in women taking AI.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Patient engagement is essential to achieve long-term goals in obesity management. It is crucial to identify patients' perspectives, misperceptions and unmet educational needs on obesity etiology and treatments, to establish a correct therapeutic alliance between healthcare providers and patients. Methods: Objective: This study, promoted by the regional section of the Italian Obesity Society (SIO Lazio), explores attitudes towards obesity, self-awareness, misperceptions of weight loss strategies, experiences of weight stigma and educational needs of patients living with overweight or obesity. Design and subject: We conducted an anonymous survey among patients who accessed an Obesity Management Centers across the Lazio region of Italy for the first time, from October 2023 to April 2024. Approach: The survey consisted of 27 closed-ended questions grouped into 4 sections: (1) sociodemographic factors and self-reported anthropometric measures; (2) self-awareness and attitudes towards obesity and weight loss strategies; (3) experiences of obesity-related stigma; (4) knowledge and perceptions of obesity treatment options. Results: A total of 300 patients (67.9% women, aged 49.1 ± 14.4 years) returned completed surveys. Despite the self-reported BMI 35.3 ± 7.0 kg/m2 with three out of four (75.3%) of participants having a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, only 49% correctly identified themselves as affected by obesity. Almost one-third of the patients believed that obesity does not imply a genetic predisposition (31.9%) and that it is always secondary to psychological or behavioral disorders (29.7%). Interestingly, 66.7% of the patients declared themselves as completely responsible for their own condition and 39.4% considered obesity always treatable by means of lifestyle interventions. Stigma and weight discrimination in healthcare settings were reported by a substantial portion of patients (31.9%). A perception of inadequate support from the National Healthcare System emerged in most of the interviews (61.9%). Most patients (72.1%) felt they were not sufficiently informed about anti-obesity medications and a relevant part of their knowledge was derived from healthcare providers (57.7%) and social networks (19.1%). Weight loss medications were considered useful (63.2%) or necessary (18.4%) by the majority of patients, but only 60.1% would accept without any hesitation a pharmacologic treatment. The main reasons for refusal of pharmacological treatments were the belief that lifestyle intervention is a sufficient treatment (46.9%), the fear of adverse effects (28.1%) and feeling defeated (12.5%). Similarly, for most of participants bariatric surgery is useful (73.3%) or necessary (13.6%). Conclusion: Despite advancements in obesity research, this study underscores the need to improve patient education and public awareness to optimize the management and treatment of obesity. Addressing misconceptions, stigma, and gaps in knowledge are critical steps towards improving patient outcomes and fostering a supportive healthcare environment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The three types of evidence-based treatment options for adults with overweight and obesity - behavioral weight management, anti-obesity medications (AOM), and bariatric surgery - are underutilized in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system. Our objective in this manuscript is to describe the study protocol for an adequately powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a behavioral intervention: TOTAL (Teaching Obesity Treatment Options to Adult Learners) to increase patient uptake of obesity treatment. METHODS: In this multi-site, parallel, RCT, eligible Veterans with a body mass index [BMI] ≥ 27 who had not received obesity treatment within the past 12 months were randomly assigned to TOTAL or usual care. TOTAL involves watching an 18-min video that highlights obesity health risks, pros/cons of all three evidence-based obesity treatments, and expected treatment outcomes. It also includes motivational sessions delivered via televideo at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the video (target n = 494 participants). The primary outcome is initiation of behavioral weight management treatment within 18 months of randomization. Secondary outcomes include sustained behavioral weight management treatment, initiation of AOM, bariatric surgery referral, and weight change across 18 months. CONCLUSION: TOTAL, which seeks to increase delivery of weight management treatment within the largest integrated health system in the U.S., combines patient education with motivational interviewing components. If efficacious in this trial, further evaluation of intervention effectiveness and implementation throughout the VHA and other healthcare systems would be warranted.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores characterizing candidates for obesity treatments including pharmacotherapy, endoscopic bariatric therapies, and metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS), focusing on established clinical parameters for diagnosing obesity beyond body mass index alone. RECENT FINDINGS: Existing literature primarily provides rates for fat mass percentage (i.e., a marker for adiposity quantity), waist circumference (i.e., a marker for adiposity distribution), and C-reactive protein levels (i.e., a marker for adiposity functionality) among obesity treatment candidates. Limited data on abnormal values and sex-based differentiation exist. The literature indicates high central-tendency measures for fat mass percentage and waist circumference, while C-reactive protein levels vary. Data on the Edmonton Obesity Staging System (i.e., a marker for adiposity-related disease severity) is predominantly available for MBS candidates. Future studies in obesity interventions should improve screening and diagnosis of obesity by incorporating sex-specific considerations and providing abnormal value rates for measurements to enhance understanding of patients' characteristics.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The challenge of addressing obesity persists in healthcare, necessitating nuanced approaches and personalized strategies. This study aims to evaluate the effects of diverse therapeutic interventions on anthropometric and biochemical parameters in individuals with overweight and obesity within a real-world clinical context. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 192 patients (141 females, 51 males) aged 18 to 75, with a BMI ranging from 25 to 30 (14.1%) and BMI ≥ 30 (85.9%), observed over a 12-month period at our Endocrinology Unit. Treatment cohorts comprised individuals following different regimens: Mediterranean Diet (MD), with an approximate daily intake of 1500 kcal for women and 1800 kcal for men (71% patients); Ketogenic Diet (KD), utilizing the VLCKD protocol characterized by a highly hypocaloric dietary regimen < 800 kcal/day (14% patients); metformin, administered using the oral formulation (5% patients); pharmacological intervention with GLP1-RA administered via subcutaneous injection with incremental dosage (10% patients). Supply constraints limited the efficacy of Liraglutide, whereas Semaglutide was excluded from comparisons due to its unavailability for obesity without diabetes. Blood tests were conducted to assess lipid profile, glycemic profile, and anthropometric parameters, including BMI, waist circumference, and waist-to-height ratio. RESULTS: Significant BMI changes were observed from baseline to 6 months across MD, KD, and Liraglutide groups (p < 0.05). KD exhibited notable reductions in waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio within the initial quarter (p < 0.05), with a significant triglyceride decrease after 6 months (p < 0.05), indicating its efficacy over MD. Liraglutide demonstrated a substantial reduction in HbA1c levels in the first quarter (p < 0.05). During the first three months, the ANOVA test on fasting blood glucose showed a statistically significant impact of the time variable (p < 0.05) rather than the specific treatments themselves (Liraglutide and KD), suggesting that adherence during the early stages of therapy may be more critical than treatment choice. CONCLUSIONS: Positive outcomes from targeted interventions, whether pharmacological or dietary should encourage the exploration of innovative, long-term strategies that include personalized treatment alternation. The absence of standardized protocols underscores the importance of careful and tailored planning in managing obesity as a chronic condition.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Obesity continues to be a significant public health challenge. While weight loss medications have been studied and available for several years, the newest generation of highly effective anti-obesity medications (AOMs) will shift how behavioral science professionals approach obesity treatment and research. With the unique skill set of behavioral science professionals, this commentary suggests ways to integrate behavioral science into the rapidly evolving landscape of AOM use to accelerate better obesity care and generate new lines of research. The goal of this commentary is to stimulate discussion and encourage responsive and relevant action to improve population health.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Obesity is a challenging chronic disease process that continues to affect a large percentage of the population at large. With the advent of new therapeutic options and interventions and a deeper scientific understanding of obesity as a complex illness, there is hope in curtailing this evolving pandemic. In this article, we present key medical information to engage and empower nutrition-focused providers to manage obesity and its nutrition complications. The topics summarized here were presented during the 2023 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Preconference Physician Course and include pathophysiology and hormonal regulation of obesity, multidisciplinary care planning and nutrition risk stratification of patients, and common approaches to treatment, including lifestyle modifications, antiobesity medications, and procedures from the perspective of the nutrition specialist.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: With newer anti-obesity medications (AOMs) being introduced at a rapid pace, it is prudent to make a concise and updated clinical practice document that may help busy clinicians in daily clinical practice. A group of metabolic physicians, diabetologists, endocrinologists, and bariatric surgeons assembled during the Integrated Diabetes and Endocrine Academy 2023 Congress (IDEACON, July 2023, Kolkata, India) to compile an update of pharmacotherapeutic options for managing people with obesity in India. AREAS COVERED: After an extensive review of the literature by experts in different domains, this update provides all available information on the management of obesity, with a special emphasis on both currently available and soon-to-be-available AOMs, in people with obesity. EXPERT OPINION: Several newer AOMs have been shown to reduce body weight significantly, thus poised to make a paradigm shift in the management of obesity. While the tolerability and key adverse events associated with these AOMs appear to be acceptable in randomized controlled trials, pharmacovigilance is vital in real-world settings, given the absence of sufficiently long-term studies. The easy availability and affordability of these drugs is another area of concern, especially in developing countries like India.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: This Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) details special considerations for the management of the adolescent with obesity. The information in this CPS is based on scientific evidence, supported by medical literature, and derived from the clinical experiences of members of the OMA. Methods: The scientific information and clinical guidance in this CPS are based on scientific evidence, supported by the medical literature, and derived from the clinical perspectives of the authors. Results: This OMA Clinical Practice Statement addresses special considerations in the management and treatment of adolescents with overweight and obesity. Conclusions: This OMA Clinical Practice Statement on the adolescent with obesity is an overview of current recommendations. These recommendations provide a roadmap to the improvement of the health of adolescents with obesity, especially those with metabolic, physiological, and psychological complications. This CPS also addresses treatment recommendations and is designed to help the provider with clinical decision making.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This survey of international experts in obesity management was conducted to achieve consensus on standardized definitions and to identify areas of consensus and non-consensus in metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) to assist in an algorithm of clinical practice guidelines for the management of obesity. METHODS: A three-round Delphi survey with 136 statements was conducted by 43 experts in obesity management comprising 26 bariatric surgeons, 4 endoscopists, 8 endocrinologists, 2 nutritionists, 2 counsellors, an internist, and a pediatrician spanning six continents over a 2-day meeting in Hamburg, Germany. To reduce bias, voting was unanimous, and the statements were neither favorable nor unfavorable to the issue voted or evenly balanced between favorable and unfavorable. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% inter-voter agreement. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on all 15 essential definitional and reporting statements, including initial suboptimal clinical response, baseline weight, recurrent weight gain, conversion, and revision surgery. Consensus was reached on 95/121 statements on the type of surgical procedures favoring Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty. Moderate consensus was reached for sleeve gastrectomy single-anastomosis duodenoileostomy and none on the role of intra-gastric balloons. Consensus was reached for MBS in patients > 65 and < 18 years old, with a BMI > 50 kg/m2, and with various obesity-related complications such as type 2 diabetes, liver, and kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: In this survey of 43 multi-disciplinary experts, consensus was reached on standardized definitions and reporting standards applicable to the whole medical community. An algorithm for treating patients with obesity was explored utilizing a thoughtful multimodal approach.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) with obesity is increasingly common, prompting effective clinical interventions to induce weight loss in this population. We present 3 patients with T1DM and obesity prescribed a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) and pramlintide. Case 1: A 32-year-old male with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who lost -20.9 kg (-16.1% of total body weight [TBW]) over 10 months on semaglutide and pramlintide. Case 2: A 68-year-old female with diabetic retinopathy, coronary artery disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism, and depression/anxiety initially treated with topiramate, losing -8.4 kg, but experiencing weight plateau. After adding dulaglutide and pramlintide, she lost an additional -12.8 kg (-14.0% TBW) over 7 months, with total weight loss of -21.2 kg (-23.1% TBW). Case 3: A 49-year-old female with hypertension, hypothyroidism, and depression who lost -14.6 kg (-17.9% TBW) over 6 months on semaglutide and pramlintide. No significant side effects were experienced. All patients reported decreased insulin requirements on pramlintide, and hemoglobin A1c levels remained constant or decreased throughout the treatment period. Pramlintide and GLP-1RA resulted in excellent weight loss in our patients with obesity and T1DM. This combination may have a synergistic effect on the gut-brain axis. More research is required to substantiate these findings.

RESUMEN

Obesity is a heterogeneous disease and there is wide patient-to-patient variability in response to all anti-obesity treatments including lifestyle modifications, anti-obesity medications (AOMs), devices, and bariatric surgery. To effectively treat obesity, practitioners must be knowledgeable about all of these treatment modalities including on-label and off-label AOMs. Care should be individualized to the patient taking into consideration their unique challenges with weight loss, their goals, the presence of comorbidities, medication contraindications, and drug-drug interactions. There is currently no way to know which AOM will be most effective for a patient without trial and error; therefore, prescribe AOMs in sequence and consider combination therapy for optimal results. This article reviews the efficacy, safety, prescribing information, and other considerations for all of the currently available AOMs.

Asunto(s)