RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The knee joint assessment to detect anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after trauma involves clinical examination and radiography. The gold standard method is doing arthroscopy. We did this study seeking to evaluate the effectiveness of other non-invasive diagnostic methods, including the Anterior Drawer test, Lachman test and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting ACL tears after trauma, compared to the reference standard method (the arthroscopy). METHODOLOGY: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Orthopaedic Department of the Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, for six months. A total of 86 participants with knee injuries fulfilling the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Mechanism of injury, side of injury and body weight were recorded. The Anterior Drawer test and Lachman test for ACL injury were performed by orthopaedic surgeons with at least five years of post-fellowship experience in orthopaedic surgery. Sensitivities, specificities and accuracy of the clinical tests and MRI were calculated. RESULTS: The statistical analysis revealed that the mean age of participants was 35.73 (SD 12.7) years, with a range from 18 to 55 years. Among the participants, 67 (77.91%) were male and 19 (22.09%) were female. The side of injury was predominantly right in 50 (58.14%) and left in 36 (41.86%) participants. Road traffic accidents (RTAs) were the leading cause of knee injury, accounting for 63.95% (55) of cases, followed by sports injuries at 23.26% (20). Regarding diagnostic accuracy, MRI showed a sensitivity of 98.57%, specificity of 87.50% and diagnostic accuracy of 96.51% in detecting ACL tears. The Lachman test demonstrated a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 87.5% and diagnostic accuracy of 89.53% compared to arthroscopy. Similarly, the anterior Drawer test exhibited a sensitivity of 88.57%, specificity of 87.50% and diagnostic accuracy of 88.37% against the gold standard of arthroscopy. These findings underscore the effectiveness of these diagnostic modalities in identifying ACL injuries. CONCLUSIONS: All three tests (MRI, Lachman test and anterior Drawer test) can be used for the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury with optimal results.

RESUMEN

Introduction: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a commonly affected knee ligament prone to frequent injuries. Henceforth, we aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of lever sign test in Acute and chronic ACL injuries. Method: At the institution's initial outpatient visit, 150 consecutive patients (92 males and 58 females) were evaluated. Total 108 patients had injury in their right leg, whereas 42 had injury in their left leg. Based on time since injury, the patients were divided into Acute and chronic groups. Clinical examinations (lachman's test and lelli's test) of all patients were confirmed with arthroscopic findings and compared between the two groups. Results: In the acute ACL injury, the lever test had a kappa value 0.704. The accuracy and sensitivity of the Lachman, anterior drawer, pivot shift, and lever tests were calculated. We found that the lever test had the highest accuracy and sensitivity (85.48 %, 91.18 %) than the rest. In the chronic ACL injury, the kappa value for the results of the Lachman test evaluation was 0.723. The chronic ACL injuries accuracy and sensitivity values for the Lachman (86.36 %, 91.67 %), anterior drawer (76.14 %, 81.25 %), pivot shift (55.68 %, 58.49 %), and lever tests were determined. Conclusion: The lever sign test is more accurate and reliable in the acute ACL injuries, while the Lachman test is more accurate and reliable in the chronic ACL injuries.

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Repeated ankle sprains can lead to injuries, including those of the anterior talofibular ligament; however, the extent to which these ligament injuries are associated with symptoms of chronic ankle instability remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of anterior talofibular ligament injury and ankle anterior displacement on symptoms of chronic ankle instability. DESIGN: Case-Control Study. SETTING: A university laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 426 college students completed a questionnaire survey on the history of ankle sprain. Thirty-four (24 males, 10 females; age = 20.6 ± 0.5 years), 49 (38 males, 11 females; age = 20.2 ± 1.2 years), and 39 (24 males, 15 females; age = 20.1 ± 1.1 years) participants were enrolled in the healthy, coper, and chronic ankle instability groups, respectively. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One examiner measured the anterior talofibular ligament delineation using ultrasound and anterior ankle displacement using a capacitance-type sensor device. The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool was applied to assess pain and perceived instability. RESULTS: The anterior talofibular ligament was normal significantly more frequently in healthy participants and abnormal significantly more frequently in patients with chronic ankle instability (p < 0.001). Anterior ankle displacement was significantly greater in the coper and chronic ankle instability groups than in healthy individuals (p < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed between the coper and chronic ankle instability groups. There was no significant correlation between the anterior ankle displacement and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool scores (p = 0.709) in participants with previous ankle sprains. CONCLUSION: Observation of an abnormal anterior talofibular ligament on ultrasonography is associated with anterior displacement of the ankle joint. However, it is assumed that the influence of anterior ankle displacement due to damage to the anterior talofibular ligament on the pain and perceived instability in chronic ankle instability is small.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the variability in the measurements of stress sonography of the ankle and determine the effects of examiner experience on the measurements. METHODS: Twenty examiners (10 experienced and 10 beginners) were included in the study. Each examiner performed stress ultrasonography on a patient with a chronic anterior talofibular ligament injury and a patient with an intact ligament using the reverse anterior drawer method. Changes in ligament length before versus after stress were determined. The same 20 examiners performed ultrasonography on two other patients with an injured or intact ATFL using the anterior drawer method. The length change values and variance were compared between the groups using t-tests and F-tests. RESULTS: Using the reverse anterior drawer method, the change in the anterior talofibular ligament length was 3.3 mm (range, 2.2-4.8 mm) in the experienced group and 2.7 mm (0.0-4.1 mm) in the beginner group for the ligament injured patient. The length changes for the patient with intact anterior talofibular ligament were 0.5 mm (0.1-0.9 mm) and 0.4 mm (-0.1-1.5 mm) in the experienced and beginner groups, respectively. There were no significant intergroup differences in measurement amount (P = 0.37) or variance (P = 0.72). Similarly, using the anterior drawer method, no significant differences between the groups were found in measurement amount or variance. CONCLUSION: The quantitative evaluation of stress sonography of the ankle was variable regardless of examiner experience or stress method, particularly in patients with an anterior talofibular ligament injury. The amount of variability appeared to be unacceptably large for clinical application. Our study results highlight the need for technical standardization.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In quantitative ankle stress sonography, different examiners use different techniques, which may cause measurement variability. This study aimed to clarify whether standardizing stress sonography techniques reduces variability in the quantitative measurement of anterior talofibular ligament length change. METHODS: Fourteen examiners with a mean ultrasound experience of 8.7 years participated in this study. Each examiner performed stress ultrasonography of the ankle using their preferred method on one patient with an intact anterior talofibular ligament (Patient 1) and on two patients with chronic ankle instability (Patient 2 and 3). Changes in the ligament length between the resting and stressed positions were determined. A consensus meeting was then conducted to standardize the sonographic technique, which was used by the examiners during a repeat stress sonography on the same patients. The variance and measured values were compared between the preferred and standardized techniques using F-tests and paired t-tests, respectively. RESULTS: At a consensus meeting, a sonographic technique in which the examiner pushed the lower leg posteriorly against the fixed foot was adopted as the standardized technique. In Patient 1, the change in the anterior talofibular ligament length was 0.4 (range, -2.3-1.3) mm and 0.6 (-0.6-1.7) mm using the preferred and standardized techniques, respectively, with no significant difference in the variance (P = 0.51) or the measured value (P = 0.52). The length changes in Patient 2 were 2.0 (0.3-4.4) mm and 1.7 (-0.9-3.8) mm using the preferred and standardized techniques, respectively. In Patient 3, the length changes were 1.4 (-2.7-7.1) mm and 0.7 (-2.0-2.3) mm. There were no significant differences between the techniques in either patient group. CONCLUSION: Variability in the quantitative measurement of ankle stress sonography was not reduced despite the standardization of the technique among examiners. Hence, comparing the measured values between different examiners should be avoided.

RESUMEN

Lateral ankle ligament sprains and syndesmotic injuries are two different entities. However, they may be combined under the same spectrum depending on the arch of violence during the injury. Currently, the clinical examination has a limited value in the differential diagnosis between an acute anterior talofibular ligament rupture and a syndesmotic high ankle sprain. However, its use is indispensable for raising a high index of suspicion for detecting these injuries. Based on the mechanism of injury, clinical examination plays an essential role in guiding further imaging and early diagnosis of low/high ankle instability.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The manual traditional anterior drawer test (ADT) is essential for deciding the treatment for chronic ankle instability, but it has been shown to have a comparatively low reproducibility and accuracy, especially in less experienced hands. To clarify the inter-examiner reproducibility, we compared the actual distance of anterior translation between junior and senior examiners in ADT. We also evaluated the diagnostic abilities of traditional ADT, and a novel modified ADT (supported ADT). METHODS: Thirty ankles were included in this study, and ankle instability was defined using stress radiography. All subjects underwent two methods of manual ADT by junior and senior examiners, and ankle instability was judged in a blinded fashion. The anterior drawer distance was calculated from the lengthening measured using a capacitance-type sensor device. RESULTS: The degree of anterior translation determined by the junior examiner was significantly lower than that determined by the senior examiner when traditional ADT was performed (3.3 vs. 4.5 mm, P = 0.016), but there was no significant difference in anterior translation between the two examiners when supported ADT was performed (4.6 vs. 4.1 mm, P = 0.168). The inter-examiner reliability of supported ADT was higher than that of traditional ADT. For the junior examiner, the diagnostic accuracy of supported ADT was higher than that of traditional ADT (sensitivity, 0.40 vs. 0.80; specificity, 0.75 vs. 0.80). CONCLUSION: Supported ADT may have the advantage of being a simple manual test of ankle instability with less error between examiners.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To measure the additional effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on functional outcome of anterior cruciate ligament tear managed by augmenting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with PRP. METHODS: The present study was conducted on patients with ACL tear admitted in the department of orthopaedics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow wherein a total of 70 subjects were assigned into two groups of 35 patients each randomly, viz Group 1 in which the patients were treated by quadruple hamstring graft alone and Group 2 in which the patients were treated with augmented hamstring graft with PRP. The standardized anterior drawer test, Lachman's test, Lysholm knee score were quantified both preoperatively and postoperatively at different follow-ups and also tibial tunnel widening was measured postoperatively at different follow-ups. RESULT: The present study had 70 patients with ACL tears. The mean age of patients in non-PRP groups was 29.71 ±2.99 years while that in the PRP group was 28.34±4.32 years. On comparing the improvement in grades at pre-op, immediate postop, 6 weeks, and 3 months follow-ups, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The tibial tunnel widening also showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In our study, it was found that both the groups showed improvements in grades of anterior drawer test and Lachman's test postoperatively but the difference between both the groups was not significant. Similarly, while comparing the improvements in Lysholm knee score and tibial tunnel widening among both the groups, the difference was not significant. Follow up of 3 months was a limiting factor in our study. This technique needs further clinical evaluation to assess the long-term results.

RESUMEN

This study was conducted to measured talar displacement using ultrasound during an anterior drawer test (ADT) with a Telos device. Five adults (3 men and 2 women; 8 ankles; mean age: 23.2 y) with a history of ankle sprain and eight adults (5 men and 3 women; 16 ankles; mean age: 22.1 y) without a history of ankle sprain were recruited into a history of ankle sprain (HAS) and a control group, respectively. Talar displacement was observed in response to load forces applied by a Telos device during the ultrasound stress imaging test. The ultrasound probe was placed 5 mm inside from the center of the Achilles tendon on the posterior ankle along the direction of the major axis. The inter-rater reliability for the present method was classified as good and excellent (ICC(2,2) = 0.858 and 0.957 at 120 N and 150 N, respectively) in the control group and excellent (ICC(2,2) = 0.940 and 0.905 at 120 N and 150 N, respectively) in the HAS group, according to specific intraclass correlation coefficient values. We found that talar displacement during the ADT was lower in the HAS group than in the control group. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that the quantitative ultrasound-based ADT using a Telos device was superior to the X-ray-based test in detecting reduced ankle joint mobility during the ADT (area under the curve of 0.905 and 0.726 at a force of 150 N using ultrasound-based and X-ray-based tests, respectively). Further investigation is needed; nevertheless, this preliminary study suggests that the ultrasound-based quantitative ADT using a Telos device might detect talar displacement more sensitively than the conventional stress X-ray.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: A quasi-experimental. BACKGROUND: The talar tilt test and the anterior drawer test are clinically used to evaluate the length of the anterotalofibular (ATFL) and calcaneofibular (CFL) ligaments. Based on the current literature, there is no clear diagnostic utility or preference for either test. This study investigated ligament lengthening during these special tests and compared the talar tilt test to the long axis distraction test for the CFL length. METHODS: A convenience sample of 47 healthy subjects were recruited for this study. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging (MSK US) was used to measure the length of the ATFL and CFL during the talar tilt and anterior drawer tests. Additionally, CFL lengthening during the talar tilt was compared to the long axis distraction test. OUTCOMES: A significant difference was found (p < .001) in ATFL length between the talar tilt and anterior drawer test. This indicates that the talar tilt test is preferred to maximally lengthen the ATFL. There was a significant difference in CFL length (p < .001) between the talar tilt test and the long axis distraction test. DISCUSSION: The results of this study identified that the talar tilt test resulted in more ATFL lengthening than the anterior drawer test and thus is the preferred test to assess ligament length. Additionally, both the long axis distraction test and the talar tilt test cause lengthening of the CFL. Therefore, the long axis distraction test can be used as a differentiation test to determine if either the ATFL or the CFL is the structure with increased laxity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of the "lever sign test" to diagnose ACL rupture and to compare this test to the two most commonly used, the Lachman and anterior drawer test. METHOD: This prospective study was performed in the ED of the Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (Brussels, Belgium) from March 2017 to May 2019. 52 patients were included undergoing knee trauma, within 8 days, with an initial radiograph excluding a fracture (except Segond fracture or tibial spine fracture). On clinical investigation, patients showed a positive lever sign test and/or a positive Lachman test and/or a positive anterior drawer test. Exclusion criteria were a complete rupture of the knee extensor mechanism and patellar dislocation. All the physicians involved in this study were residents in training. An MRI was performed within 3 weeks for all included patients after the clinical examination. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were investigated for all three tests with MRI used as our reference standard. RESULTS: Forty out of 52 patients suffered an ACL rupture (77%) and 12 did not (23%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the lever sign test were respectively 92.5%, 25% 82% and 50%. Those of the Lachman test were 54%, 54.5%, 81% and 25%, and those of the anterior drawer test were 56%, 82%, 90.5% and 37.5%. Twelve out of 40 ACL ruptures (30%) were diagnosed exclusively with a positive lever sign test. CONCLUSION: When investigating acute ACL ruptures (< 8 days) in the ED, the lever sign test offers a sensitivity of 92.5%, far superior to that of other well-known clinical tests. The lever sign test is relatively pain-free, easy to perform and its visual interpretation requires less experience. Positive lever sign test at the ED should lead to an MRI to combine high clinical sensitivity with high MRI specificity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Although there have been multiple clinical studies evaluating the accuracy of physical examination tests used to diagnose anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, there are no data to date evaluating the accuracy of these tests in diagnosing re-injury after prior ACL reconstruction. We compared the sensitivity of three clinical tests - Lachman, anterior drawer, and pivot shift - in diagnosing initial ACL tears versus graft re-tears following a prior ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Twenty consecutive adult patients who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction and 20 consecutive adult patients who had undergone revision ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon at a tertiary care center from November 2011 to December 2017 were included in this study. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the Lachman test was 95.0% in diagnosing ACL tears in patients with native ACL versus 85.0% in patients with prior ACL reconstruction with allograft or autograft. The sensitivity of the anterior drawer test was 80.0% in patients with native ACL compared to 77.8% in patients with prior ACL reconstructions. The sensitivity of the pivot shift test could not be accurately assessed because pain and swelling prevented the physician from performing this test in most patients on their initial presentation to the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a clinician may need to have a lower threshold to perform advanced imaging or diagnostic arthroscopic evaluation in a patient with prior ACL reconstruction with a suspected re-injury even if the physical examination tests are not immediately positive.

RESUMEN

Despite extensive research on ankle instability a consensual and clear objective definition for pathological mechanical lateral ankle instability is yet to be determined. This systematic review aimed to summarize current available arthrometric devices, measuring methods and lateral ankle laxity outcomes in patients with chronic ankle instability that underwent objective arthrometric stress measurement. Sixty-eight studies comprising a total of 3,235 ankles with chronic ankle instability were included. Studies reported a wide range of arthrometric devices, testing position and procedures, and measuring methods. For the anterior drawer test, the average mean differences between injured and uninjured ankles ranged from -0.9 to 4.1 mm, and total translation in the injured ankle from 3.2 to 21.0 mm. Most common pathological threshold was ≥4 mm or ≥10 mm unilaterally and ≥3 mm bilaterally. For the talar tilt test, the average mean differences between injured and uninjured ankles ranged from 0.0° to 8.0°, and total tilt from injured ankle from 3.3 to 60.2°. Most common pathological threshold was ≥ 10° unilaterally and ≥ 6° mm bilaterally. It was found high heterogeneity in the scientific literature regarding the arthrometric devices, use of concomitant imaging and measuring methods of arthrometer-assisted anterior drawer and talar tilt tests which led to variable laxity outcomes in individuals with chronic ankle instability. Future studies should focus on standardizing the testing and measuring methods for an objective definition of mechanical ankle instability.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to utilize a modified anterior drawer test (MADT) to detect the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures and investigate its accuracy compares with three traditional tests. METHODS: Four hundred patients were prospectively enrolled between January 2015 and September 2017 preoperatively to undergo knee arthroscopic surgeries. The MADT, anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and pivot shift test were used in the outpatient clinical setting and were compared statistically for their accuracy in terms of ACL ruptures, with arthroscopic findings as the gold standard. RESULTS: The prevalence of ACL ruptures in this study was 37.0%. The MADT demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.89) and accuracy (0.92) among the four tests and had comparable specificity (0.94) and a positive predictive value (0.90) compared with the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and pivot shift test. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of MADT was 122.92, with other test values of no more than 55.45. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the MADT was 0.92 ± 0.01, with a significant difference compared with that for the anterior drawer test (z = 17.00, p < 0.001), Lachman test (z = 9.66, p = 0.002), and pivot shift test (z = 16.39, p < 0.001). The interobserver reproducibility of the MADT was good, with a kappa coefficient of 0.86. When diagnosing partial tears of ACL, the MADT was significantly more sensitive than the anterior drawer test (p < 0.001), Lachman test (p = 0.026), and pivot shift test (p = 0.013). The MADT showed similar sensitivity in detecting anteromedial and posterolateral bundle tears (p = 0.113) and no difference in diagnosing acute and chronic ACL ruptures (χ2 = 1.682, p = 0.195). CONCLUSIONS: The MADT is also an alternative diagnostic test to detect ACL tear, which is equally superior to the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and pivot shifting test. It could improve the diagnosis of ACL ruptures combined with other clinical information including injury history, clinical examination, and radiological findings. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II/observational diagnostic studies TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. ChiCTR1900022945 /retrospectively registered.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Approximately 72% of patients with an ankle sprain report residual symptoms 6 to 18 months later. Although 44% of patients return to activity in less than 24 hours after experiencing a sprain, residual symptoms should be evaluated in the long term to determine if deficits exist. These residual symptoms may be due to the quality of ligament tissue and motion after injury. OBJECTIVE: To compare mechanical laxity of the talocrural joint and dorsiflexion range of motion (DFROM) over time (24 to 72 hours, 2 to 4 weeks, and 6 months) after an acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Athletic training research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 108 volunteers were recruited. Fifty-five participants had an acute LAS and 53 participants were control individuals without a history of LAS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mechanical laxity (talofibular interval and anterior talofibular ligament length) was measured in inversion (INV) and via the anterior drawer test. The weight-bearing lunge test was conducted and DFROM was measured. The data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance, independent-samples t tests, and 1-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Of the 55 LASs, 21 (38%) were grade I, 27 (49%) were grade II, and 7 (13%) were grade III. Increases were noted in DFROM over time, between 24 and 72 hours, at 2 to 4 weeks, and at 6 months (P < .05). The DFROM was less in participants with grade III than grade I LASs (P = .004) at 24 to 72 hours; INV length was greater at 24 to 72 hours than at 2 to 4 weeks (P = .023) and at 6 months (P = .035) than at 24 to 72 hours. The anterior drawer length (P = .001) and INV talofibular interval (P = .004) were greater in the LAS group than in the control group at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in range of motion and laxity were evident among grades at various time points and may indicate different clinical responses after an LAS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Manual evaluation is an important method for assessing ankle instability, but it is not quantitative. Capacitance-type sensors can be used to measure the distance on the basis of the capacitance value. We applied the sensor to the noninvasive device for measuring ankle instability and showed its utility. METHODS: First, 5 ankles embalmed by Thiel's method were used in an experiment using a cadaver. The capacitance-type sensor was fixed alongside the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) of a specially made brace, and the anterior drawer test was performed. The test had been performed for the intact ankle, with the ATFL transected and with both the ATFL and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) transected. The anterior drawer distance was calculated by the sensor. Intra- and interinvestigator reliability were also analyzed.Next, as a clinical study, a brace with a sensor was fitted to 22 ankles of 20 patients with a history of ankle sprain. An anterior drawer test at a load of 150 N was conducted using a Telos stress device. The anterior drawer distances measured by the sensor and based on radiographic images were then compared. RESULTS: The mean anterior drawer distances were 3.7 ± 1.0 mm for the intact cadavers, 6.1 ± 1.6 mm with the ATFL transected (P < .001), and 7.9 ± 1.8 mm with the ATFL and CFL transected (P < .001). The intrainvestigator intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were 0.862 to 0.939, and the interinvestigator ICC was 0.815. In the experiments on patients, the mean anterior drawer distance measured by the sensor was 2.9 ± 0.9 mm, and it was 2.7 ± 0.9 mm for the radiographic images. The correlation coefficient between the sensor and the radiographic images was 0.843. CONCLUSION: We quantitatively evaluated anterior drawer laxity using a capacitance-type sensor and found it had high reproducibility and strongly correlated with stress radiography measurements in patients with ankle instability. Capacitance-type sensors can be used for the safe, simple, and accurate evaluation of ankle instability.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To diagnose chronic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) injury, three different physical examinations were compared: the anterior drawer test (ADT), the anterolateral drawer test (ALDT), and the reverse anterolateral drawer test (RALDT). METHODS: A total of 72 ankles from potential ATFL-injured patients and the normal population were included and examined using the ADT, ALDT, and RALDT by two examiners without knowing the injury histories of any of the participants. Ultrasound examination was then applied as the gold standard to divide the ankles into the ATFL-injured group and the control group. The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), false negative rate (FNR), false positive rate (FPR), accuracy, κ value, and p value of the two examiners' diagnoses were calculated to assess the diagnostic ability of each examination. RESULTS: There were 38 ankles in the injured group and 34 ankles in the control group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of gender, age, body mass index (BMI), and included ankles. In the ADT and ALDT groups, the specificity reached one, while the sensitivity was relatively low (0.053 and 0.477 for the junior examiner and 0.395 and 0.500 for the senior examiner). In the RALDT, both the sensitivity and specificity were greater than 85% (0.868 and 0.912 for the senior examiner and 0.921 and 0.882 for the junior examiner). The κ value of the RALDT (0.639) was higher than that of the ALDT (0.528) and the ADT (0.196), whereas all the p values were less than 0.05. CONCLUSION: The ADT and ALDT are valuable physical tests to assess ATFL injuries. Compared with the traditional ADT and ALDT, however, the RALDT is more sensitive and accurate in diagnosing chronic ATFL injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II (diagnostic).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Knee laxity in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is often assessed through physical examination using the Lachman, pivot shift, and anterior drawer tests. The degree of laxity noted on these examinations may influence treatment decisions and prognosis. HYPOTHESIS: Increased preoperative knee laxity is associated with increased risk of revision ACL reconstruction, increased risk of contralateral ACL reconstruction, and poorer patient-reported outcomes at 6 years postoperatively. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: 2333 patients who underwent primary isolated ACL reconstruction without additional ligament injury were identified. Patients reported by the operating surgeons to have an International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grade D Lachman, anterior drawer, or pivot shift examination were classified as having a high-grade laxity. Multiple logistic regression models were used to evaluate whether having high-grade preoperative laxity was predictive of increased odds of undergoing subsequent revision or contralateral ACL reconstruction within 6 years of the index procedure, controlling for patient age, sex, body mass index, Marx activity level, sport, graft type, medial meniscal treatment, and lateral meniscal treatment. Multiple linear regression modeling was used to evaluate whether having high-grade preoperative laxity was predictive of poorer IKDC or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Knee-Related Quality of Life (KOOS-QOL) scores at 6 years postoperatively, after controlling for baseline score, patient age, ethnicity, sex, body mass index, marital status, smoking status, sport participation, competition level, Marx activity rating score, graft type, and articular cartilage and meniscal status. RESULTS: In total, 743 of 2325 patients (32.0%) were noted to have high-grade laxity on at least 1 physical examination test. High-grade Lachman was noted in 334 patients (14.4%), high-grade pivot shift was noted in 617 patients (26.5%), and high-grade anterior drawer was noted in 233 patients (10.0%). Six-year revision and contralateral ACL reconstruction data were available for 2129 patients (91.6%). High-grade prereconstruction Lachman was associated with significantly increased odds of ACL graft revision (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.10-2.80, P = .02) and contralateral ACL reconstruction (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.69; P = .019). High-grade prereconstruction pivot shift was associated with significantly increased odds of ACL graft revision (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.19-2.54, P = .002) but not with significantly increased odds of contralateral ACL reconstruction (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.89-1.87; P = .16). High-grade prereconstruction laxity was associated with statistically significantly lower 6-year IKDC (ß = -2.26, P = .003), KOOS-QOL (ß = -2.67, P = .015), and Marx activity scores (ß = -0.54, P = .020), but these differences did not approach clinically relevant differences in patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: High-grade preoperative knee laxity is predictive of increased odds of revision ACL reconstruction and contralateral ACL reconstruction 6 years after ACL reconstruction. Poorer patient-reported outcome scores in the high-grade laxity group were also noted, but the difference did not reach a level of clinical relevance.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increased postoperative rotatory knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may be associated with an increased risk of osteoarthritis and inferior subjective outcome, although long-term studies are lacking. In terms of anteroposterior knee laxity, this association has not yet been established. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to investigate whether postoperative knee laxity is associated with inferior long-term outcome in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. The hypothesis was that increased laxity would cause an inferior long-term clinical and radiographic outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 193 patients underwent ACL reconstruction and were examined at both 2 and 16 years postoperatively. At the 2-year follow-up, knee laxity was tested by use of the Lachman test, the anterior drawer test, the pivot-shift test, and the KT-1000 arthrometer. Outcome variables examined at the 16-year follow-up involved a radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis, patient-reported outcome measurements, and the single-legged hop test. RESULTS: At the long-term follow-up, 147 (76%) patients were examined. The mean follow-up period for the included patients was 16.4 ± 1.2 years. A negative Lachman test at 2 years resulted in a superior International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (76.3 ± 19.4 vs 67.8 ± 19.3, P < .05) and Lysholm score (85.2 ± 11.9 vs 76.9 ± 17.8, P < .05) at the 16-year follow-up. Correspondingly, a negative anterior drawer test at 2 years was associated with a superior IKDC score (75.3 ± 18.7 vs 62.9 ± 20.2, P < .05) and Lysholm score (84.1 ± 12.1 vs 72.6 ± 20.2, P < .05) at 16 years. A negative pivot-shift test resulted in a superior IKDC score (74.5 ± 18.8 vs 46.9 ± 17.8, P < .05), a superior Lysholm score (83.3 ± 13.4 vs 58.9 ± 23.0, P < .05), and an increased level of activity (Tegner activity scale, median [range]: 4 [1-10] vs 3 [0-5], P < .05). Osteoarthritis was overrepresented in patients with positive manual knee laxity tests, but the difference was not statistically significant. The KT-1000 arthrometer result was not correlated with any outcome variables assessed in this study. CONCLUSION: Increased manual anteroposterior and rotatory knee laxity 2 years after ACL reconstruction is associated with an inferior long-term subjective outcome.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Commonly used clinical tests for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture detection exhibit several limitations, thus requiring more precise clinical PCL tests. The lateral-anterior drawer (LAD) test has been proposed as a manually applied testing alternative but not yet been evaluated in vivo. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Fifteen patients presenting with an MRI-confirmed acute or chronic unilateral PCL rupture and 15 subjects with no prior knee injury in their medical history will be included in this prospective single-blinded cross-sectional cohort study. Three examiners with different lengths of working experience (range 1-30 years), blinded to MRI outcomes and patient history, will use the LAD test on both knees of each participant to test for PCL integrity. Examiners will independently document the PCL status of each knee on a blank case report form. Fleiss-Kappa values will be calculated to investigate whether the LAD test shows clinically significant interrater and intrarater reliability. Furthermore, LAD test outcomes will be compared with MRI which serves as reference standard to check for concurrent validity. Moreover, LAD test accuracy with respect to tester experience will be evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in agreement with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (2013). Ethical permission (EK16-081-0616) to conduct this study was obtained from the review board of the city of Vienna on 1 September 2016. All personal and research data will be used in accordance with the Austrian Federal Data Protection Act and will be anonymised before publication in relevant international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATIONNUMBER: DRKS00013268; Pre-results.

Asunto(s)