RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: For precise and minimally invasive treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine, the lifting segment is minimized, anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) was refined and improved. In addition, the development of appropriate surgical procedures for the ossification of each segment was rarely reported. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of hybrid anterior controlled antedisplacement fusion (Hybrid ACAF) with laminoplasty for multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). METHODS: Between May 2018 and May 2021, 70 patients with multilevel OPLL were divided into a hybrid ACAF group and a laminoplasty group according to surgical methods. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and recovery rate (JOARR), (VAS, NDI) score and C2-C7 Cobb angle, the sagittal vertical axis of the neck (SVA), and complications (cerebrospinal fluid leakage, C5 paralysis, etc.) were compared between the two groups by t test or non-parametric test. RESULTS: The operation time of hybrid ACAF was longer. C5 paralysis and axial pain were more common in the laminoplasty group, while dysphagia and hoarseness were more common in the hybrid ACAF group. At the last follow-up, the hybrid ACAF group had better recovery and maintenance of cervical lordosis and sagittal plane balance and a higher JOA score and recovery rate than the laminoplasty group. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid ACAF can reduce the number of vertebral bodies and expand the decompression range, which is safe, effective, and tailored to local conditions. Compared with laminoplasty, hybrid ACAF is a precise alternative for patients with OPLL.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy poses significant challenges in selecting optimal surgical approaches, warranting a comprehensive understanding of their biomechanical impacts. Given the lack of consensus regarding the most effective technique, this study aims to fill this critical knowledge gap by rigorously assessing and comparing the biomechanical properties of three distinct surgical interventions, including anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF), anterior cervical corpectomy decompression and fusion (ACCF), and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The study offers pivotal insights to enhance treatment precision and patient outcomes. METHODS: The construction of the cervical spine model involved a detailed process using CT data, specialized software (Mimics, Geomagic Studio, and Hypermesh) and material properties obtained from prior studies. Surgical instruments were modeled (titanium mesh, anterior cervical plate, interbody cage, and self-tapping screws) to simulate three surgical approaches: ACAF, ACCF, and ACDF, each with specific procedures replicating clinical protocols. A 75-N follower load with 2 Nm was applied to simulate biomechanical effects. RESULTS: The range of motion decreased more after surgery for ACAF and ACDF than for ACCF, especially in flexion and lateral bending. ACCF have higher stress peaks in the fixation system than those of ACAF and ACDF, especially in flexion. The maximum von Mises stresses of the bone-screw interfaces at C3 of ACCF were higher than those of ACAF and ACDF. The maximum von Mises stresses of the bone-screw interfaces at C6 of ACDF were much higher than those of ACAF and ACCF. The maximum von Mises stresses of the grafts of ACCF and ACAF were much higher than those of ACDF. The maximum von Mises stresses of the endplate of ACCF were much higher than those of ACAF and ACDF. CONCLUSION: The ACAF and ACDF models demonstrated superior cervical reconstruction stability over the ACCF model. ACAF exhibited lower risks of internal fixation failure and cage subsidence compared to ACCF, making it a promising approach. However, while ACAF revealed improved stability over ACCF, higher rates of subsidence and internal fixation failure persisted compared to ACDF, suggesting the need for further exploration of ACAF's long-term efficacy and potential improvements in clinical outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) surgery for cervical OPLL is commonly used in clinical practice and has shown promising results. Nonetheless, precise slotting and lifting are the most critical procedures in ACAF surgery to avoid several unique and dangerous problems, such as residual ossification and incomplete lifting. C-arm intraoperative imaging can help with traditional cervical surgery but not with the precise slotting and lifting operation in ACAF surgery. METHODS: Fifty-five patients admitted to our department with cervical OPLL were retrospectively enrolled. Given the selection of intraoperative imaging technique, patients were divided into the C-arm group and O-arm group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Oswestry Disability Index score, visual analog scale score, slotting grade, lifting grade, and complications were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, all patients acquired satisfactory improvement of neurologic function. Patients in the O-arm group, on the other hand, had a better neurologic state 6 months after surgery and at the final follow-up than those in the C-arm group. Furthermore, slotting and lifting grade were considerably higher in the O-arm group than in the C-arm group. No severe complications were encountered in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: O-arm assisted ACAF can achieve accurate slotting and lifting, which might effectively reduce the occurrence of complications and is worthy of clinical application.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: With the innovation and development of cervical spine surgical procedures, there is currently a lack of new and reliable data on cervical anatomical landmarks. The purpose of this study is to measure the CT data of the cervical vertebrae of healthy volunteers, so as to make up for the missing part of the measured value of cervical vertebra bone markers, and provide data support for the safety and accuracy of anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) surgery. METHODS: From January 2019 to January 2020, the cervical computed tomography (CT) scan image data of volunteers in Changhai Hospital and Zhabei Hospital were randomly selected. The radiological parameters included three parameters were measured in the upper lamina plane. a: the distance from the anterior edge of the vertebral body to the anterior edge of the bilateral uncinate joint; c1: the sagittal diameter of the vertebral body; and d: the distance between the anterior edge of the uncinate joint. Three parameters were measured in the pedicle plane. b: the vertical distance from the anterior edge of the vertebral body to the junction line between the two lateral processes; c2: the sagittal diameter of the vertebral body; e: the transverse diameter of the vertebral body; and f: the sagittal diameter of the vertebral canal. The correlation ratios were calculated: a/c1, b/c2, a/f, b/f, d/e. The data between the two groups were compared by independent sample t-test. RESULTS: Finally, 51 patients were included in this study, 18 males and 33 females, with an average age of 47.9 years (21-72 years). The maximum values of seven parameters measured were all at C7. The minimum b value was at C5, and the minimum f value was at C4. The minimum values of the other five parameters were all at C3, and there was an increasing relationship from C3 to C7 (P < 0.05). There was significant difference between male and female with regard to c1, c2, e and d values (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between men and women regard to the ratio of related parameters (a/c1, b/c2, a/f, b/f, d/e). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical consideration of this area is useful to estimate amount of vertebral body resection when performing the bony cut made in ACAF surgery; however, pre-operative examinations with appropriate radiographic analysis are also recommended.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The traditional anterior approach for multilevel severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is demanding and risky. Recently, a novel surgical procedure-anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF)-was introduced by the authors to deal with these problems and achieve better clinical outcomes. However, to the authors' knowledge, the immediate and long-term biomechanical stability obtained after this procedure has never been evaluated. Therefore, the authors compared the postoperative biomechanical stability of ACAF with those of more traditional approaches: anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). METHODS: To determine and assess pre- and postsurgical range of motion (ROM) (2 Nm torque) in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation in the cervical spine, the authors collected cervical areas (C1-T1) from 18 cadaveric spines. The cyclic fatigue loading test was set up with a 3-Nm cycled load (2 Hz, 3000 cycles). All samples used in this study were randomly divided into three groups according to surgical procedures: ACDF, ACAF, and ACCF. The spines were tested under the following conditions: 1) intact state flexibility test; 2) postoperative model (ACDF, ACAF, ACCF) flexibility test; 3) cyclic loading (n = 3000); and 4) fatigue model flexibility test. RESULTS: After operations were performed on the cadaveric spines, the segmental and total postoperative ROM values in all directions showed significant reductions for all groups. Then, the ROMs tended to increase during the fatigue test. No significant crossover effect was detected between evaluation time and operation method. Therefore, segmental and total ROM change trends were parallel among the three groups. However, the postoperative and fatigue ROMs in the ACCF group tended to be larger in all directions. No significant differences between these ROMs were detected in the ACDF and ACAF groups. CONCLUSIONS: This in vitro biomechanical study demonstrated that the biomechanical stability levels for ACAF and ACDF were similar and were both significantly greater than that of ACCF. The clinical superiority of ACAF combined with our current results showed that this procedure is likely to be an acceptable alternative method for multilevel cervical OPLL treatment.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) is a novel surgical technique for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) but the surgical learning curve for this technique has not been previously characterized. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to quantify a surgeon's learning curve for ACAF and the effect of surgeon experience on postoperative outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study of a single institution and single surgeon experience with ACAF surgery. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 70 consecutive patients with OPLL undergoing ACAF surgery by a single, non-ACAF trained surgeon between 2017 and 2020 were analyzed. OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes (blood loss, operative time, errors of surgical procedure, length of hospital stay, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system, and surgical complications) were assessed. METHODS: We prospectively reviewed the first 70 ACAF procedures between 2017 and 2020 performed by a single, non-ACAF trained surgeon. The function relationship between the operative time and case number was fitted using a locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) plot. Spearman's correlation analysis was performed to determine factors affecting the operative time. The operative time-related learning curve for ACAF was established and difficulty of each procedure was assessed using a cumulative sum (CUSUM) model. The association between the specific errors of surgical procedures and surgeon experience was further analyzed. A modified CUSUM model was also used to establish the surgical procedure-related learning curve, and thus whether these two learning curves matched with each other was observed. Postoperative outcomes in relation to surgeon experience was compared using a Wilcoxon rank sum test and Chi-squared test. RESULTS: Operative time presented a specific pattern of fewer patient-dependent changes as the case number increased. Spearman's correlation analysis showed the operative time was more affected by the case number (r=-0.73) than the complexity of condition and number of levels hoisted. The operative time-related CUSUM model identified the early (first 29 cases) and late phase (late 41 cases) of the learning process, which was also confirmed by a modified CUSUM model based on surgical procedure. The critical point of the CUSUM model for bilateral osteotomies was at case number 29, and time reduction after the early phase was approximately 34 minutes. Length of hospital stay and blood loss were less during the late phase than during the early phase (p<.05). Although no significant difference was observed in postoperative JOA scores between two phases, patients in the late phase obtained higher recovery rates of neurologic function than those in the early phase (p<.01). There was significant difference in the number of specific errors between the two phases (p=.02). There were no significant differences in overall complication rates between two phases, but a higher incidence of certain complications caused by specific errors was observed in the early phase (p=.02), including CSF leakage, C5 palsy and incomplete decompression. CONCLUSIONS: We described, for the first time, a detailed learning curve for ACAF surgery. About 29 cases were needed to achieve mastery of ACAF. Once mastered, the surgeon could deal with various OPLL presentations in a universal way regardless of condition complexity and number of surgical levels. Bilateral osteotomies were the most difficult part of ACAF and produced the greatest reduction in time after mastery. We found a close association between specific errors of surgical procedure for ACAF and surgeon experience. Furthermore, certain complications caused by these errors should be on the alert during the early phase of learning ACAF, including CSF leakage, C5 palsy and incomplete decompression.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To achieve the anatomical evaluation of spinal nerve and cervical intervertebral foramina in anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) surgery, a novel surgical technique with the wider decompression, through a cadaveric and radiologic study. METHODS: Radiographic data of consecutive 47 patients (21 by ACAF and 26 by anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion [ACCF]) who have accepted surgery for treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament(OPLL) and stenosis from March 2017 to March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and compared between an ACAF group and ACCF group. Three postoperative radiographic parameters were evaluated: the decompression width and the satisfaction rate of decompression at the entrance zone of intervertebral foramina on computed tomography (CT), and the transverse diameter of spinal cord in the decompression levels on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the anatomic study, three fresh cadaveric spines (death within 3 months) undergoing ACAF surgery were also studied. Four anatomic parameters were evaluated: the width of groove, the distance between the bilateral origins of ventral rootlets, the length of ventral rootlet from their origin to the intervertebral foramina, the descending angle of ventral rootlet. RESULTS: The groove created in ACAF surgery included the bilateral origins of ventral rootlets. The rootlets tended to be vertical from the rostral to the caudal direction as their takeoff points from the central thecal sac became higher and farther away from their corresponding intervertebral foramina gradually. No differences were identified between left and right in terms of the length of ventral rootlet from the origin to the intervertebral foramina and the descending angle of ventral rootlet. The decompression width was significantly greater in ACAF group (19.2 ± 1.2 vs 14.7 ± 1.2, 21.3 ± 2.2 vs 15.4 ± 0.9, 21.5 ± 2.1 vs 15.7 ± 1.0, 21.9 ± 1.6 vs 15.9 ± 0.8, from C3 to C6 ). The satisfactory rate of decompression at the entrance zone of intervertebral foramina tended to be better in the left side in ACAF group (significant differences were identified in the left side at C3/4 , C4/5 , C6/7 level, and in the right side at C4/5 level when compared with ACCF). And decompression width was significantly greater than the transverse diameter of spinal cord in ACAF group. Comparatively, there existed no significant difference in the ACCF group besides the C5 level. CONCLUSION: ACAF can decompress the entrance zone of intervertebral foramina effectively and its decompression width includes the origins and massive running part of bilateral ventral rootlets. Due to its wider decompression range, ACAF can be used as a revision strategy for the patients with failed ACCF.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In treating patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (COPLL), a novel surgery technique - anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) suggested promising clinical benefits in recent exploratory studies. METHODS: This is a multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, active controlled trial that will compare the clinical benefits of ACAF versus conventional posterior laminoplasty (LAMP) in severe COPLL patients. A total of 164 patients will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either ACAF or LAMP group. The primary efficacy measure is cervical- Japanese Orthopaedic Association (C-JOA) recovery rate at 12 months post operation, which is to be derived by Hirabayashi's method from JOA data (range, 0 [worst] to 17 [normal condition]). Other important secondary efficacy endpoints include visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (range, 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe]), 10-item neck disability index (NDI, a total range of 0 to 50 points, the highest index the worst) and 6-level Nurick disability grade (range, 0 [mild] to 5 [severe]). Safety endpoints including adverse events, perioperative complications, and adverse events of special interest will also be assessed in this study. Full analysis set for baseline and efficacy data analyses according to the intention-to-treat principle will be established as the primary analysis population. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be used to analyze the C-JOA recovery rate, with random stratification factors (if appropriate) and the treatment group as fixed factors, and the baseline level of C-JOA score as covariate. DISCUSSION: This study is designed to demonstrate the clinical benefits of ACAF as compared to conventional LAMP in COPLL patients. It will provide clinical evidence that the novel surgery technique - ACAF might be more favorable in treating patients with severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. (Words: 290). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04968028 .

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the literature and systematically evaluate outcomes for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament interventions including anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF), laminoplasty (LP), and laminectomy with fusion (LF). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 to March 2021. Patient demographic data, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, cervical lordosis and overall complications were analyzed. RESULTS: We evaluated 30 studies involving 2038 patients. Patients undergoing ACCF had improved Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores compared with patients undergoing LP (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-1.85) and LF (WMD 1.21, 95% CI 0.17-2.24). Patients with ACAF had better cervical lordosis compared with patients with ACCF (WMD 7.00, 95% CI 0.72-13.27), LP (WMD 10.27, 95% CI 4.64-15.90), and LF (WMD 8.98, 95% CI 2.48-15.47). Additionally, ACAF (odds ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.84) and LP (odds ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.28-0.90) had a lower incidence of complications compared with ACCF. CONCLUSIONS: Japanese Orthopaedic Association score outcomes indicated that ACCF was superior to LP and LF. ACAF had the largest cervical lordosis among all procedures. ACCF showed a higher incidence of overall complications compared with ACAF and LP.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical outcomes of anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion (ACAF), a new surgical technique, with laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) based on a 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Clinical data of 53 patients (21 by ACAF and 32 by laminoplasty) who have accepted surgery for treatment of cervical myelopathy caused by multilevel severe OPLL (occupying rate ≥ 50%) from March 2015 to March 2017 were retrospectively reviewed and compared between ACAF group and laminoplasty group. Operative time, blood loss, and complications of the two groups were recorded. Radiographic parameters were evaluated pre- and postoperatively: cervical lordosis on X-ray, space available for the cord (SAC) and the occupying ratio (OR) on computed tomography (CT), and the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the spinal cord at the narrowest level and the spinal cord curvature on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring was used to evaluate neurologic recovery. Statistical analysis was conducted to analyze the differences between two groups. The Mann-Whitney U test and chi square test were used to compare categorical variables. unpaired t test was used to compare continuous data. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for at least 24 months. The operative time was longer in ACAF group (286.5 vs 178.2 min, P < 0.05). The blood loss showed no significant difference (291.6 vs 318.3 mL, P > 0.05). Less complications were observed in ACAF group than in laminoplasty group (one case [4.7%] of C5 palsy and one case [4.7%] of cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] leakage in ACAF group; four cases [12.5%] of C5 palsy, two cases [6.3%] of CSF leakage, and four cases [12.5%] of axial symptoms in laminoplasty group). The mean JOA score at last follow-up (14.6 vs 12.8, P < 0.05) and the improvement rate (IR) (63.8% vs 47.8%, P < 0.05) in ACAF group were superior to those in laminoplasty group significantly. The postoperative OR (16.7% vs 40.9%, P < 0.05), SAC (150.8 vs 110.5 mm2 , P < 0.05), AP spinal cord diameter (5.5 vs 4.2 mm, P < 0.05), and cervical lordosis (12.7° vs 4.7°, P < 0.05) were improved more considerably in ACAF group, with significant differences between two groups. Notably, the spinal cord on MRI showed a better curvature in ACAF group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that ACAF is considered superior to laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel severe OPLL as anterior direct decompression and better curvature of the spinal cord led to satisfactory neurologic outcomes and low complication rate.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) is a novel surgical technique for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Its prognostic factors for decompression have not been well studied. Additionally, no detailed radiological standard has been set for hoisting the vertebrae-OPLL complex (VOC) in ACAF. PURPOSE: To identify the possible prognostic factors for decompression outcomes after ACAF for cervical OPLL, to determine the critical value of radiological parameters for predicting good outcomes, and to establish a radiological standard for hoisting the VOC in ACAF. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective multicenter study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 121 consecutive patients with OPLL who underwent ACAF at a point between January 2017 and June 2018 at any one of seven facilities and were monitored for at least 1 year afterward were enrolled in a multicenter study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, recovery rate (RR) of neurologic function, and surgical complications were used to determine the effectiveness of ACAF. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups according to their RR for neurologic function. Patients with an RR of ≥50% and an RR of <50% were designated as having good and poor decompression outcomes, respectively. The relationship between various possible prognostic factors and decompression outcomes was assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of the radiological parameters for prediction of good decompression outcomes. Next, the patients were redivided into three groups according to the cutoff value of the selected radiological parameter (postoperative anteroposterior canal diameter [APD] ratio). Patients with postoperative APD ratios of ≤80.7%, 80.7%-100%, and ≥100% were defined as members of the incomplete, optimal, and excessive antedisplacement groups, respectively. Differences in decompression outcomes among the three groups were compared to verify the reliability of the postoperative APD ratio and assess the necessity of excessive antedisplacement. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients' age at surgery (odds ratio [OR]=1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.08-1.29; p<.01) and postoperative APD ratio (OR=0.83; 95% CI=0.77-0.90; p<.01) were independently associated with decompression outcomes. The optimal cutoff point of the postoperative APD ratio was calculated at 80.7%, with 86.2% sensitivity and 73.5% specificity. There were no significant differences in the postoperative JOA scores and RRs between the excessive antedisplacement group and optimal antedisplacement group (p>.05). However, a lower incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leakage and screw slippage was observed in the optimal antedisplacement group (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' age at surgery and their postoperative APD ratio are the two prognostic factors of decompression outcomes after ACAF. The postoperative APD ratio is also the most accurate radiological parameter for predicting good outcomes. Our findings suggest that it is essential for neurologic recovery to restore the spinal canal to more than 80.7% of its original size (postoperative APD ratio >80.7%), and restoration to less than its original size (postoperative APD ratio <100%) will help reduce the incidence of surgical complications. This may serve as a valuable reference for establishment of a radiological standard for hoisting the VOC in ACAF.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The anterior decompression technique, including vertebral body sliding osteotomy1 and anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion (ACAF),2 treats ossified posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) without actual excision of the OPLL.3 The fundamental strategy is to separate the mid-portion of the vertebral body along with the OPLL using bilateral anterior osteotomies followed by controllable antedisplacement. These techniques restore the space of the spinal canal anteriorly by anterior translation of the OPLL, avoiding excision and dural manipulation.4 We illustrate the case of a patient who had failed laminoplasty and the surgical decision making for ACAF. We discuss the other surgical options regarding patient selection, present preoperative and postoperative imaging, to demonstrate the efficacy of ACAF and show strategies of ACAF to make it a safe and effective procedure. We demonstrate our technique of ACAF using the intraoperative microscope and models in this video to illustrate the steps of ACAF. A written consent to the procedure was obtained from the patient.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes of spinal cord angle between anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) and posterior laminectomy in treating severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with cervical OPLL were enrolled. Patients in this study were divided into group A and group P. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was utilized to evaluate the neurological function. Radiological assessments included the spinal cord angle, Cobb angle, and area of the spinal cord. Surgery-related complications were also recorded. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, patients in group A had better recovery of local and whole cord angle, and the area of the cord than those in group P (all p < 0.05). A strong correlation between the change of local cord angle and the recovery of the spinal cord area was observed (r = - 0.867, p < 0.05). In addition, patients in group P had worse Cobb angle (9.15° ± 1.10°) than in group A (18.58° ± 0.73°) (p < 0.05). The final mean JOA score and its improvement rate were better in the group A than in group P (p < 0.05). During the follow-up, 15.15% patients in group P experienced surgery-related complications and 7.89% in group A. CONCLUSION: This present study revealed that ACAF can achieve better recovery of the expansion of the spinal cord, spinal cord alignment, and Cobb angle, with better postoperative JOA score and less complications, compared with posterior laminectomy in treating severe cervical OPLL. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We have introduced a novel surgery technique named anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. As reported, the satisfactory postoperative outcome can be attributed to the larger decompression width. However, it may associate with high prevalence of vertebral artery injury (VAI) theoretically. Thus, assessment of the vulnerability of vertebral artery in ACAF is of great importance. METHODS: Computed tomographic scan data of 28 patients were retrospectively studied. Seven radiographic parameters were evaluated: uncinate process (UP) tips distance, transverse foramen (TF)-UP tips distance, TF-LWL (the ipsilateral limited wedging line) distance, the limited distance of lateral decompression, the maximum oblique angle of LWL, TF-LWG (the lateral wall of groove) distance, and width of groove. Eleven fresh cadaveric spines undergoing ACAF surgery were also studied. Two anatomic parameters were evaluated: width of groove and LWG-TF distance. RESULTS: The UP tips distance increased from C3 to C6 and tended to be larger in males. The UP tip-TF distance and LWL-TF distance were smallest at C4, but both were larger than 2 mm. Maximum oblique angle decreased from C3 to C6. Postoperatively, both radiographic and cadaveric measurements showed the width of groove was larger than UP tips distance, but LWG-TF distance was larger than 2 mm in all levels. CONCLUSION: UP can be used as anatomical landmarks to avoid VAI during ACAF surgery. Radiographic and cadaveric measurements verified the safety of ACAF surgery, even for those cases with wedging and lateral slotting.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively review the cases with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) treated with anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF). Patients with postoperative remaining ossification mass (PROM) are analyzed to figure out the causes and preventions of this problem. METHODS: A total of 115 patients were included. PROM was identified as remaining OPLL existed in the spinal canal other than included in the vertebral-OPLL complex on postoperative computed tomography. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system was used to evaluate the neurologic status. Surgery-related complications such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and spinal cord or nerve injury were all recorded. The patients with the PROM group and those without the PROM group were compared. RESULTS: There were 14 patients with wide-base OPLL (12.2%) and 10 patients (8.7%) with PROM among the 115 patients with OPLL. The 10 patients with PROM were all with wide-base OPLL. The average improvement rate of Japanese Orthopaedic Association score in patients without PROM was significantly larger than that in patients with PROM (69.5 ± 22.6% vs. 36.7 ± 22.0, P < 0.01). Incidence rate of postoperative CSF leakage and neural deterioration were significantly higher in patients with PROM than that in patients without PROM (CSF leakage, 40.0% vs. 5.9%; neural deterioration, 50.0% vs. 3.0%). No other complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of PROM might cause complications and poor neural function recovery in patients treated with ACAF. Surgical techniques should be noted to avoid PROM in ACAF surgery.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the change of spinal cord displacements and the occurrence of C5 palsy between anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) (group A) and single open-door laminoplasty (group L). METHODS: From January 2016 to December 2017, a total of 80 patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) were enrolled. All patients underwent computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The types and extent of OPLL, spinal cord rotation, deviation angle, and distance between the vertebral arteries line and spinal cord (DVS) were measured. Patients with postoperative C5 palsy were recorded. Neurologic function was evaluated by Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. RESULTS: Three days after surgery, patients in group A had better recovery (6.7° ± 2.4°) of spinal cord rotation than group L (3.1° ± 0.8°; P < 0.05). Deviation angle showed similar changes to spinal cord rotation. At the final follow-up, patients in group A had decreased DVS (11.0 ± 0.7 mm), whereas patients in group L had increased DVS (15.1 ± 0.8 mm) compared with preoperation (P < 0.05). Five patients (1 in group A and 4 in group L) developed postoperative C5 palsy (P > 0.05). Patients in group A had a higher JOA score at the final follow-up than those in group L (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ACAF could achieve in situ decompression in terms of spinal cord rotation, deviation angle, and spinal cord shift with better clinical outcomes and relatively lower incidence of C5 palsy compared with single open-door laminoplasty.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anterior or posterior decompression has been widely used to treat patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). However, when OPLL extends to the C2 level, the complex anatomic structures around the C2 vertebral body and postoperative destabilization or kyphosis would make it difficult to perform anterior or posterior surgery. This study proposed a novel technique named "shelter technique" to deal with C2 OPLL. METHODS: Sixteen patients with cervical OPLL involving the C2 segment were included. The OPLL below C2 was dealt with anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion, including diskectomy of involved levels, resection of the anterior vertebral bodies, installation of the intervertebral cages and anterior cervical plate, isolation of the vertebrae-OPLL complex (VOC), and the final hoisting of the VOC. When dealing with C2 OPLL, the posterior portion of the C2 vertebral body was resected to create the shelter based on the thickness of the C2 OPLL, which could provide space for further antedisplacement of the ossified mass behind the C2 vertebra. Finally, OPLL behind C2 was moved forward together with the antedisplacement of VOC below C2. RESULTS: Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scan showed sufficient decompression of the spinal cord, including the C2 segment, and the shelter provided enough space for the antedisplacement of the ossified mass behind the C2 segment. At the final follow-up of 1 year, neurologic function of all patients recovered significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The shelter technique can be relatively effective and safe for patients with OPLL involving the C2 segment. However, further studies with more cases and longer follow-up will be required to reveal the surgical value of the technique.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) as a revision surgery after posterior decompression surgery (PDS) in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). METHODS: From June 2016 to May 2017, 15 patients (7 men; 8 women) had undergone ACAF as revision after PDS. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was used to evaluate the pre- and postoperative neurological function. The kappa line and complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: The 15 patients were followed up for 15.1 ± 1.8 months (range, 12-18). The mean interval between the initial PDS and revision ACAF was 40.3 ± 11.3 months (range, 24-62). The JOA score improved from 8.9 ± 1.6 (range, 5-11) before revision ACAF to 13.9 ± 1.6 (range, 11-16) at the final follow-up evaluation (P < 0.05). The JOA recovery rate was 61.9% ± 15.8% (range, 37.5%-90.9%). The kappa line of 7 patients improved from negative values to positive values after ACAF. Five complications (33.3%) developed in 5 patients. No instrument failure or neurological deterioration was observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: In the present study, the outcomes of ACAF for revision surgery for OPLL were satisfactory. ACAF could improve neurological function significantly and is an alternative surgical procedure for revision of PDS for OPLL.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlates with the outcomes of anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). METHODS: A total of 53 patients with OPLL who had undergone ACAF were enrolled. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale, visual analog scale, and neck disability index were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. The area of CSF space and spinal cord on T2-weighted MRI, the occupying rate of the CSF space and spinal cord, and the postoperative MRI score of the CSF space were measured. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the JOA score improvement rate (IR). The relationship between the postoperative MRI score and the JOA score IR was analyzed. RESULTS: The patients in group A experienced better recovery compared with those in group B regarding the JOA, visual analog scale, and neck disability index score at the final follow-up visit. On both axial and sagittal T2-weighed MRI, patients in group A experienced lower improvement of the area of the spinal cord than in group B (P > 0.05). However, the mean improvement in the CSF space in group A was better than that in group B (62.86 ± 30.05 mm2 vs. -6.36 ± 24.58 mm2; P < 0.05), with a greater occupying rate of CSF space in group A at the final visit. A strong correlation was noted between the JOA score IR and postoperative CSF space score (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ACAF could provide good decompression of the spinal cord and neurological improvement. Also, recovery of the CSF space correlated closely with the surgical ACAF outcomes for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the effect of quantitative enlargement of spinal canal by anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). METHODS: Forty-three patients with OPLL who underwent ACAF were enrolled. According to the use of a curvature ruler (CR), patients were divided into group A (CR used, n = 21) and group B (CR not used, n = 22). The average follow-up was 9.5 months. The occupation rate (OR) of the spinal canal and the curvature of the cervical plate were recorded. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were analyzed, and the recovery rate (RR) was calculated. Surgical complications were also investigated. RESULTS: The OR of the spinal canal in group A decreased from 66.7% ± 12.8% to 19.1% ± 10.9% after surgery (P < 0.05). In group B, the preoperative and postoperative OR was 63.9% ± 11.7% and 21.2% ± 8.7%, respectively (P < 0.05). Patients in group A had higher agreement of the curvature of the cervical plate between preoperative planning and postoperative measurement. The RR of JOA scores in group A was 73.7% ± 19.7%, higher than in group B (70.9% ± 7.3%, P > 0.05). Further comparison between the 2 groups, excluding those patients with OR <50%, showed that both JOA score and RR in group A were higher than in group B at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative enlargement of the spinal canal by ACAF may provide a positive and favorable effect on enlarging the spinal canal and achieving better neurologic recovery for the treatment of cervical OPLL with myelopathy. CR can facilitate the achievement of better and more quantitative spinal canal enlargement.

Asunto(s)