RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Salbutamol and hyoscine butylbromide (HBB) are commonly used bronchodilators in horses with severe asthma (SA). OBJECTIVE: To compare the bronchodilation potency, duration, and adverse effects of salbutamol and HBB in SA. ANIMALS: Six horses in exacerbation of SA. METHODS: The effects of inhaled salbutamol (1000 µg) and HBB (150 mg, IV) were compared in a randomized, blinded, crossover experiment. Lung function, intestinal borborygmi and heart rate were assessed before and sequentially until 180 minutes after drug administration, and analyzed with 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA and Dunnett's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: Both treatments caused a similar improvement in lung function. Pulmonary resistance and reactance returned to baseline values within 30 minutes after HBB administration, whereas salbutamol improved reactance until 180 minutes (mean improvement at 180 minutes of 0.040 Kpa/L/s, 95% CI = 0.004 to 0.076; P = .02 for salbutamol and of 0.009 Kpa/L/s, 95% CI = -0.028 to 0.045; P = .98 for HBB for the resistance at 3 Hz and of 0.040 Kpa/L/s, 95% CI = 0.007 to 0.074; P = .01 for salbutamol and of 0.009 Kpa/L/s, 95% CI = -0.024 to 0.042; P = .97 for HBB for the reactance at 7 Hz). From 5 to 30 minutes after HBB administration, the heart rate accelerated (mean increase of 3.3 beats per minute, 95% CI = -6.6 to 13.1; P = .92 for salbutamol, and of 13.0 beats per minute, 95% CI = 3.6 to 22.4; P = .002 for HBB at 30 minutes) and the gut sounds decreased (mean reduction of 1.3, 95% CI = -0.1 to 2.8; P = .09 for salbutamol and of 2.8 for the gastrointestinal auscultation score, 95% CI = 1.4 to 4.3; P < .0001 for HBB at 30 minutes). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Both drugs have a similar bronchodilator potency but with a longer duration for salbutamol. Gastrointestinal and cardiovascular effects were noted only with HBB, suggesting the preferential use of salbutamol to relieve bronchoconstriction in horses with asthma.
Asunto(s)
Albuterol , Asma , Broncodilatadores , Bromuro de Butilescopolamonio , Estudios Cruzados , Enfermedades de los Caballos , Animales , Caballos , Albuterol/uso terapéutico , Albuterol/farmacología , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Broncodilatadores/farmacología , Bromuro de Butilescopolamonio/uso terapéutico , Bromuro de Butilescopolamonio/farmacología , Masculino , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Administración por InhalaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Aerosolized medications are increasingly being used to treat respiratory diseases in dogs. No previous studies assessing respiratory tract deposition of radiolabeled aerosols have been performed in conscious dogs. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Assess respiratory tract deposition of radiolabeled, inhalant corticosteroid (fluticasone propionate labeled with 99m Tc) delivered from a nebulizer and metered dose inhaler (MDI) to healthy dogs. ANIMALS: Ten healthy Foxhounds. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, cross-over pilot study. Initial inhalation method (nebulizer or MDI) was randomly assigned. Treatments were crossed over after a 7-day washout period. Treatments initially were performed using sedation. Dogs were imaged using 2-dimensional planar scintigraphy, with respiratory tract deposition quantified by manual region-of-interest analysis. Deposition calculated as percentage of delivered dose. Six of 10 dogs were randomly selected and reassessed without sedation. RESULTS: Inhalation method had significant effect on respiratory tract deposition (P = 0.027). Higher deposition was achieved by nebulization with mean deposition of 4.2% (standard deviation [SD], 1.4%; range, 1.9-6.1%); whereas MDI treatment achieved a mean of 2.3% (SD, 1.4%; range, 0.2-4.2%). Nebulization achieved higher respiratory tract deposition than MDI in 7 of 10 dogs. No statistical difference (P = 0.68) was found between mean respiratory tract deposition achieved in dogs when unsedated (3.8%; SD, 1.5%) or sedated (3.6%; SD, 1.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Study confirms respiratory tract deposition of inhalant medications delivered from a nebulizer and MDI in healthy dogs, breathing tidally with and without sedation. Respiratory tract deposition in these dogs was low compared to reported deposition in adult humans, but similar to reported deposition in children.
Asunto(s)
Perros , Fluticasona/administración & dosificación , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Acepromazina/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles , Animales , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Cintigrafía/veterinaria , TecnecioRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In the 'placebo arm' of a recent study, we found that aerosol saline (sham treatment) produced substantial relief of laboratory-induced dyspnea (Breathing discomfort-BD) in nearly half the subjects. The sham intervention included a physiological change, and instructions to subjects could have produced expectation of dyspnea relief. In the present study, we attempted to discover whether the response to sham aerosol was driven by behavioral or physiological aspects of the intervention. METHODS: Dyspnea (air hunger) was evoked by constraining tidal volume during graded hypercapnia. We measured [Formula: see text] versus BD relationship before and after aerosol saline. To minimize subjects' expectations of dyspnea relief, participants were clearly instructed that we would only deliver saline aerosol. In Protocol 1, we delivered aerosol saline with a ventilator (mimicking our prior study); in Protocol 2, we delivered aerosol without a ventilator. RESULTS: Administration of aerosol saline had little effect on BD in this group of subjects with one exception: one subject experienced appreciable reduction in BD in Protocol 1. This treatment effect was less in Protocol 2. The two most likely explanations are (a) that procedures surrounding ventilator administration of aerosol produced a psychological placebo treatment effect even though the subject knew a drug was not given; (b) there were behavioral changes in breathing undetected by our measurements of respiratory flow and volume that altered the subjects comfort. CONCLUSION: When the expectation of treatment effect is minimized, a significant reduction in dyspnea in response to saline placebo is uncommon but not impossible.
Asunto(s)
Disnea/tratamiento farmacológico , Cloruro de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Aerosoles/uso terapéutico , Disnea/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Efecto Placebo , Cloruro de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Ventiladores MecánicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The (R)-enantiomer of racemic albuterol (levalbuterol) has bronchodilatory properties whereas the (S)-enantiomer causes adverse effects in human airways, animal models, and isolated equine bronchi. Levalbuterol is commercially available and improves pulmonary function of asthmatic patients with a longer duration of effect than albuterol. OBJECTIVE: To determine the dose at which inhaled levalbuterol produces maximal bronchodilatory effect (EDmax) and determine its duration of action in recurrent airway obstruction (RAO)-affected horses in comparison to racemic albuterol. ANIMALS: Nine horses with inducible and reversible RAO. METHODS: Randomized, crossover trial. Horses were challenged with moldy hay to induce airway obstruction. Horses were treated with nebulized albuterol or levalbuterol chosen randomly. Pulmonary function testing (PFT) was measured before and for up to 3 hours after bronchodilatation challenge. Maximum change in transpulmonary pressure (DPmax ) was measured to assess the dose effect and duration of action of each drug. After a 24 hours washout period, the bronchodilatation challenge was repeated with the second bronchodilator. RESULTS: The duration of effect was 60 minutes for albuterol and 120 minutes for levalbuterol. The dose of bronchodilator EDmax was not significantly different between albuterol and levalbuterol (EDmax = 125.0 [125-125 µg] and EDmax = 188 [125-188 µg] respectively; P = .068). The magnitude of bronchodilatation was not significantly different between the 2 treatments (61.1 and 59.9% decrease in DPmax for albuterol and levalbuterol respectively; P = .86). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Levalbuterol is as effective a bronchodilator as albuterol; although levalbuterol lasts twice as long as albuterol, its duration of action is still too short to make it practical for RAO treatment.