RESUMEN

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential differences in the outcomes of neonates in whom FGR was diagnosed late in pregnancy as compared to those in whom growth restriction was diagnosed after birth. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary medical center between 2017 and 2019. The study included women carrying a single infant with an estimated fetal weight below the tenth percentile in whom FGR was diagnosed during late pregnancy, after 32 gestational weeks (known late-onset FGR; study group) or only after birth (unknown FGR; control group). Data were collected by review of the electronic health records. The primary outcome measure was the rate of composite adverse neonatal outcome. Results: A total of 328 women were included, 77 (23.47%) in the known-FGR group and 251 (75.53%) in the unknown-FGR group. In the known-FGR group, an etiology for the FGR was identified in 28.57% cases, most commonly placental insufficiency (21.74%). Compared to the unknown-FGR group, the known-FGR group was characterized by significantly higher rates of elective cesarean delivery (15.58% vs. 9.96%, p < 0.001), preterm birth (18.18% vs. 3.98%, p < 0.01), and labor induction (67.53% vs. 21.51%, p < 0.01). A significantly higher proportion of neonates in the known-FGR group had a positive composite adverse outcome (38.96% vs. 15.53%, p < 0.01). For multivariate regression analysis adjusted for maternal age, gestational age at delivery, and mode of delivery, there was no difference between groups in the primary outcome (aOR 1.73, CI 0.89-3.35, p = 0.1). Every additional gestational week at delivery was a protective factor (aOR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.56-0.86, p < 0.01). Conclusions: A prenatal diagnosis of late-onset FGR is associated with higher intervention and preterm birth rates as compared to a diagnosis made after birth. Fetuses diagnosed with late-onset FGR during pregnancy should undergo specific and personalized assessment to determine the cause and severity of the growth delay and the best management strategy. This study highlights the importance of careful decision-making regarding the induction of labor in late-onset FGR.

RESUMEN

Purpose: To assess the impact of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) on longitudinal fetal growth, and the potential mediation effect of the maternal fasting plasma glucose in first trimester. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we collected pre-pregnancy BMI data and ultrasound measurements during pregnancy of 3879 singleton pregnant women who underwent antenatal examinations and delivered at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Generalized estimation equations, linear regression, and logistic regression were used to examine the association between pre-pregnancy BMI with fetal growth and adverse neonatal outcomes. Mediation analyses were also used to examine the mediating role of maternal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in first trimester. Results: A per 1 Kg/m² increase in pre-pregnancy BMI was associated with increase fetal body length Z-score (ß 0.010, 95% CI 0.001, 0.019) and fetal body weight (ß 0.017, 95% CI 0.008, 0.027). In mid pregnancy, pre-pregnancy BMI also correlated with an increase Z-score of fetal abdominal circumference, femur length (FL). Pre-pregnancy BMI was associated with an increased risk of large for gestational age and macrosomia. Mediation analysis indicated that the associations between pre-pregnancy BMI and fetal weight in mid and late pregnancy, and at birth were partially mediated by maternal FPG in first trimester (mediation proportion: 5.0%, 8.3%, 1.6%, respectively). Conclusion: Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI was associated with the longitudinal fetal growth, and the association was partly driven by maternal FPG in first trimester. The study emphasized the importance of identifying and managing mothers with higher pre-pregnancy BMI to prevent fetal overgrowth.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cervical cerclage is the only effective treatment for cervical insufficiency, effectively preventing late miscarriage and preterm birth. The effectiveness and safety of emergency cervical cerclage (ECC) as an emergency treatment when the cervix is already dilated or when there is protrusion of the fetal membranes into the vagina remain controversial, especially in pregnancies at 24-28 weeks when the fetus is viable. There is still no consensus on whether emergency cervical cerclage should be performed in such cases. PURPOSE: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of emergency cervical cerclage in singleton pregnant women at 24-28 weeks of gestation. METHODS: This study employed a single-center prospective cohort design, enrolling singleton pregnant women at 24-28 weeks of gestation with ultrasound or physical examination indicating cervical dilation or even membrane protrusion. Emergency cervical cerclage was compared with conservative treatment. The primary endpoints included a comprehensive assessment of perinatal pregnancy loss, significant neonatal morbidity, and adverse neonatal outcomes. Secondary endpoints included prolonged gestational age, preterm birth, neonatal hospitalization rate, premature rupture of membranes, and intrauterine infection/chorioamnionitis. RESULTS: From June 2021 to March 2023, a total of 133 pregnant women participated in this study, with 125 completing the trial, and were allocated to either the Emergency Cervical Cerclage (ECC) group (72 cases) or the conservative treatment group (53 cases) based on informed consent from the pregnant women. The rate of adverse neonatal outcomes was 8.33% in the ECC group and 26.42% in the conservative treatment (CT) group, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.06). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of perinatal pregnancy loss and significant neonatal morbidity. The conservative treatment group had a mean prolonged gestational age of 63.0 (23.0, 79.5) days, while the ECC group had 84.0 (72.5, 89.0) days, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). Compared with CT group, the ECC group showed a significantly reduced incidence of preterm birth before 28 weeks, 32 weeks, and 34 weeks, with statistical significance (P = 0.046, 0.007, 0.001), as well as a significantly decreased neonatal hospitalization rate (P = 0.013, 0.031). Additionally, ECC treatment did not increase the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes or intrauterine infection/chorioamnionitis, with no statistically significant differences (P = 0.406, 0.397). CONCLUSION: In singleton pregnant women with cervical insufficiency at 24-28 weeks of gestation, emergency cervical cerclage can reduce adverse neonatal pregnancy outcomes, effectively prolong gestational age, decrease preterm births before 28 weeks, 32 weeks, and 34 weeks, lower neonatal hospitalization rates, and does not increase the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes or intrauterine infection/chorioamnionitis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Gestational diabetes is characterized by hyperglycaemia diagnosed during pregnancy. Gestational and pregestational diabetes can have deleterious effects during pregnancy and perinatally. The baby's weight is frequently above average and might reach macrosomia (≥ 4 kg), which can reduce pregnancy time causing preterm births, and increase foetal-pelvic disproportion which often requires delivery by caesarean section. Foetal-pelvic disproportion due to the baby's weight can also cause foetal distress resulting in lower Apgar scores. To analyse the association between pregestational and gestational diabetes with maternal and foetal risk. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in women pregnant between 2012 and 2018 in the region of Lleida. Regression coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used. The multivariate analysis showed statistically significant associations between pregestational diabetes and: prematurity (OR 2.4); caesarean section (OR 1.4); moderate (OR 1.3), high (OR 3.3) and very high (OR 1.7) risk pregnancies; and birth weight ≥ 4000 g (macrosomia) (OR 1.7). In getational diabetes the multivariate analysis show significant association with: caesarean section (OR 1.5); moderate (OR 1.7), high (OR 1.7) and very high (OR 1.8) risk pregnancies and lower 1-minuto Apgar score (OR 1.5). Pregestational and gestational diabetes increase: pregnancy risk, caesarean sections, prematurity, low Apgar scores, and macrosomia.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Existing gestational weight gain (GWG) charts vary considerably in their choice of exclusion/inclusion criteria, and it is unclear to what extent these criteria create differences in the charts' percentile values. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to establish the impact of including/excluding pregnancies with adverse neonatal outcomes when constructing GWG charts. METHODS: This is an individual participant data analysis from 31 studies from low- and middle-income countries. We created a dataset that included all participants and a dataset restricted to those with no adverse neonatal outcomes: preterm < 37 wk, small or large for gestational age, low birth weight < 2500 g, or macrosomia > 4000 g. Quantile regression models were used to create GWG curves from 9 to 40 wk, stratified by prepregnancy BMI, in each dataset. RESULTS: The dataset without the exclusion criteria applied included 14,685 individuals with normal weight and 4831 with overweight. After removing adverse neonatal outcomes, 10,479 individuals with normal weight and 3466 individuals with overweight remained. GWG distributions at 13, 27, and 40 wk were virtually identical between the datasets with and without the exclusion criteria, except at 40 wk for normal weight and 27 wk for overweight. For the 10th and 90th percentiles, the differences between the estimated GWG were larger for overweight (∼1.5 kg) compared with normal weight (<1 kg). Removal of adverse neonatal outcomes had minimal impact on GWG trajectories of normal weight. For overweight, the percentiles estimated in the dataset without the criteria were slightly higher than those in the dataset with the criteria applied. Nevertheless, differences were <1 kg and virtually nonexistent at the end of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Removing pregnancies with adverse neonatal outcomes has little or no influence on the GWG trajectories of individuals with normal and overweight.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: The time interval between skin incision and delivery (S-D) is crucial in determining neonatal outcome; however, little is known about the influencing factors and their impact on neonatal outcomes, particularly among emergency cesarean deliveries (ECD) indicated for fetal distress. This study investigated the factors influencing S-D time and their effects on neonatal outcomes among mothers who underwent ECD for non-reassured fetal heart rate status. Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved 426 mother-infant pairs over four years. We retrieved data from the medical records, including baseline characteristics, perioperative data, and neonatal outcomes. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted odd ratios, and a 95% confidence interval, potential factors influencing S-D time and their impacts on neonatal outcomes were assessed. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Factors independently associated with longer S-D time (>8 min) were mothers who had previous CD (AOR 5.9: 95% CI 2.2-16.1), obese mothers (AOR 6.2: 95% CI 1.6-24.5), and the second stage of labor (AOR 5.3: 95% CI 2.4-11.7). Adverse neonatal outcomes, including a 5th minute Apgar score of less than 7, the need for NICU admission, and neonatal death, were significantly higher in the longer S-D time interval [47.7% vs. 8.9%; p-value 0.001], [21.9% vs. 9.1%; p-value 0.001], and [32% vs. 11.8%; p-value = 0.004], respectively. Obese mothers and the second stage of labor, but not previous CD, adversely impact neonatal outcomes. Conclusion: Longer S-D times are significantly associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Factors that prolong the time interval between skin incision and delivery may or may not necessarily be associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Considering surgical techniques that shorten the incision-delivery time and preparation for advanced neonatal care for risky subjects would help reduce detrimental neonatal consequences.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Preeclampsia affects between 2 to 8% of pregnancies worldwide and is associated with significant adverse outcomes for both mothers and their offspring. The present study aims to investigate whether there is a correlation between early age at menarche and an increased risk of developing preeclampsia and experiencing adverse neonatal outcomes. METHODS: The study involved a review of medical records of 4227 pregnant women who gave birth at The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College between January 2017 and December 2022. The collected data included demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations of preeclampsia, laboratory indicators, gestational complications, and neonatal outcomes. Pregnant women were categorized into four groups based on their age at menarche (≤ 12, 13, 14, and ≥ 15 years). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between different menarche age groups and the risk of preeclampsia and adverse neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Pregnant women who had an age at menarche of ≤ 12 years had a higher risk of preeclampsia than women who had their menarche at 13, 14, and ≥ 15 years of age, with adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for preeclampsia of 1.00 (reference), 0.78 (0.45-0.91), 0.76 (0.59-0.88), and 0.73 (0.56-0.94), respectively. The predictive efficacy of age at menarche for preeclampsia was assessed with a sensitivity and specificity of 85.2% and 76.4%, respectively, and an AUC of 0.82. Moreover, infants born to women with an age at menarche of ≤ 12 years had a higher risk of adverse neonatal outcomes, including small for gestational age, preterm birth, low birth weight, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that an early age at menarche is associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia and adverse neonatal outcomes. This information could be useful for obstetricians to identify women at risk for preeclampsia early on and implement timely interventions to reduce the incidence of preeclampsia and associated adverse neonatal outcomes.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess clinical utility of the urine Congo red dot test (CRDT) in predicting composite adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with suspected preeclampsia (PE). METHODS: CRDT result and pregnancy outcomes were prospectively documented in women with new onset or pre-existing hypertension, new or pre-existing proteinuria, PE symptoms and suspected PE-related fetal growth restriction or abnormal Doppler presenting from 20 weeks' gestation between January 2020 and December 2022. Participants and clinicians were blinded to the CRDT result and managed according to internally agreed protocols. Composite maternal outcome was defined as PE, postpartum hemorrhage, intensive care unit admission, and maternal death. Composite neonatal outcome was defined as small for gestational age, preterm birth, 5-min Apgar score < 7, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal death. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-four women out of two hundred and fifty-one (97.2%) had a negative CRDT. All seven women with positive CRDT had both adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, giving positive predictive values (PPV) of 100%. Rates of composite adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in CDRT negative women were 103/244 [42.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 36.2%-48.5%] and 170/244 (69.7%, 95% CI 63.6%-75.1%), respectively. CRDT negative predictive values (NPV) for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were, respectively, 141/244 (57.8%, 95% CI 48.6%-68.2%) and 74/244 (30.3%, 95% CI 23.8%-38.1%). CONCLUSION: CRDT had low NPV but high PPV for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with suspected PE. Its role in clinical management and triage of women with suspected PE is limited as it cannot identify those at low risk of developing adverse outcomes.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of half peak systolic velocity deceleration time (hPSV-DT) in predicting neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with preeclampsia and to compare its usefulness with the conventional umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI) approach. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted among pregnant women with preeclampsia who were admitted to the Department of Perinatology, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital between 01 September 2022 and 01 January 2023 at 28-41 weeks gestational age. 55 patients were divided into two groups: the study group with UA hPSV-DT value < 5th percentile (n = 22) and the control group with UA hPSV-DT value ≥ 5th percentile (n = 33). UA hPSV-DT calculates the time in milliseconds needed to halve the maximal velocity of the UA waveform using Doppler ultrasonography. RESULTS: Birth weight, gestational age at birth, 1st minute APGAR, 5th minute APGAR, and umbilical cord pH values were significantly lower in the anormal hPSV-DT group (p < 0.05). Additionally, the rates of admission to NICU, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), delivery time < 34 weeks, and birth weight < 2500 g were significantly more frequent in the anormal hPSV-DT group compared to the normal hPSV-DT group (p < 0.05). UA-PI > 95th percentile was detected in only 2 (8%) of 23 patients whose newborns were admitted to the NICU (p = 0.149), while hPSV-DT < 5th percentile was detected in 16 (69%) of 23 patients (p < 0.001). According to ROC analysis, the area under the curve was 0.82 (95% CI 0.06-0.28) for admission to the NICU. The best balance of sensitivity/specificity in ROC curves was 221.5 (82.6% sensitivity, 69.1% specificity, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: UA hPSV-DT was successful in predicting composite adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with preeclampsia. It is a promising novel method that is accurate, quantitative, reproducible, and easily applicable. With further studies, this method may be a primary diagnostic tool in the management of high-risk pregnancies and in determining the optimal timing of delivery.

RESUMEN

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a growing public health concern that affects many pregnancies globally. The condition is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes including gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, placental abruption, preterm birth, stillbirth, and fetal growth restriction. In the long-term, mothers and children have an increased risk of developing metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Accumulating evidence suggest that alterations in the maternal microbiome may play a role in the pathogenesis of GDM and adverse pregnancy outcomes. This review describes changes in the maternal microbiome during the physiological adaptations of pregnancy, GDM and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Findings from this review highlight the importance of understanding the link between the maternal microbiome and GDM. Furthermore, new therapeutic approaches to prevent or better manage GDM are discussed. Further research and clinical trials are necessary to fully realize the therapeutic potential of the maternal microbiome and translate these findings into clinical practice.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lithium is the preferred treatment for pregnant women with bipolar disorders (BD), as it is most effective in preventing postpartum relapse. Although it has been prescribed during pregnancy for decades, the safety for neonates and obstetric outcomes are a topic of ongoing scientific debate as previous research has yielded contradicting outcomes. Our study aims to compare (re)admission rates and reasons for admissions in neonates born to women with bipolar disorders (BD) with and without lithium exposure. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in a Dutch secondary hospital (two locations in Amsterdam). Women with BD who gave birth after a singleton pregnancy between January 2011 and March 2021 and their neonates were included. Outcomes were obtained by medical chart review of mothers and neonates and compared between neonates with and without lithium exposure. The primary outcome was admission to a neonatal ward with monitoring, preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), 5-minute Apgar scores, neonatal asphyxia, and readmission ≤ 28 days. RESULTS: We included 93 women with BD, who gave birth to 117 live-born neonates: 42 (36%) exposed and 75 (64%) non-exposed to lithium. There were no significant differences in neonatal admission with monitoring (16.7 vs. 20.0%, p = 0.844). Additionally, preterm birth (7.1 vs. 5.3%), SGA (0.0 vs. 8.0%), 5-minute Apgar scores (means 9.50 vs. 9.51), neonatal asphyxia (4.8 vs. 2.7%) and readmission (4.8 vs. 5.3%) were comparable. Overall, 18.8% of BD offspring was admitted. Women with BD had high rates of caesarean section (29.1%), gestational diabetes (12.8%) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In a sample of neonates all born to women with BD using various other psychotropic drugs, exposure to lithium was not associated with greater risk of neonatal admission to a ward with monitoring compared to non-exposure to lithium, questioning the necessity for special measures after lithium exposure. However, offspring of women with BD was admitted regularly and women with BD have high obstetric risk which require clinical and scientific attention.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and assess the risk of bias in the literature evaluating the performance of INTERGROWTH-21st estimated fetal weight (EFW) standards to predict maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse outcomes. METHODS: Searches were performed in seven electronic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, Lilacs, Scielo and Google Scholar) using citation tools and keywords (intergrowth AND (standard OR reference OR formula OR model OR curve); all from 2014 to the last search on April 16th, 2021). We included full-text articles investigating the ability of INTERGROWTH-21st EFW standards to predict maternal, fetal or neonatal adverse outcomes in women with a singleton pregnancy who gave birth to infants with no congenital abnormalities. The study was registered on PROSPERO under the number CRD42020115462. Risk of bias was assessed with a customized instrument based on the CHARMS checklist and composed of 9 domains. Meta-analysis was performed using relative risk (RR [95%CI]) and summary ROC curves on outcomes reported by two or more methodologically homogeneous studies. RESULTS: Sixteen studies evaluating fifteen different outcomes were selected. The risk of bias was high (>50% of studies with high risk) for two domains: blindness of assessment (81.3%) and calibration assessment (93.8%). Considering all the outcomes investigated, for 95% of the results, the specificity was above 73.0%, but the sensitivity was below 64.1%. Pooled results demonstrated a higher RR of neonatal small for gestational age (6.71 [5.51-8.17]), Apgar <7 at 5 min (2.17 [1.48-3.18]), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (2.22 [1.76-2.79]) for fetuses classified <10th percentile when compared to those classified above this limit. The limitation of the study is the absence of heterogeneity exploration or publication bias investigation, whereas no outcomes were evaluated by more than five studies. CONCLUSIONS: The IG-21 EFW standard has low sensitivity and high specificity for adverse events of pregnancy. Classification <10th percentile identifies a high-risk group for developing maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse outcomes, especially neonatal small for gestational age, Apgar <7 at 5 min, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Future studies should include blind assessment of outcomes, perform calibration analysis with continuous data, and evaluate alternative cutoff points.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Information on the effect of bloody amniotic fluid during labor at term is scarce. This study assessed risk factors and adverse outcomes in labors with bloody amniotic fluid. During the six years of this study, all nulliparas in our institution, with a trial of labor, were included. Multiple pregnancies and preterm deliveries were excluded. Outcomes were compared between the bloody amniotic fluid group and the clear amniotic fluid group. Overall, 11,252 women were included. Among them, 364 (3.2%) had bloody amniotic fluid and 10,888 (96.7%) had clear amniotic fluid. Women in the bloody amniotic fluid group were characterized by shorter duration of the second stage and higher rate of cesarean section due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate. In addition, there were higher rates of low cord pH (<7.1) and NICU admissions in the bloody amniotic fluid group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, cesarean delivery, cord blood pH < 7.1, and NICU admission were independently associated with increased odds ratio for bloody amniotic fluid. Bloody amniotic fluid at term is associated with adverse outcomes and must be considered during labor.

RESUMEN

Backgrounds: It remained unclear whether isolated positive thyroid peroxidative antibodies (TPOAb) were associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The purpose of this study was to observe adverse neonatal outcomes among euthyroid pregnant women with positive TPOAb and to investigate the underlying risk factors. Methods: Euthyroid pregnant women with TPOAb positivity were enrolled and followed up in our study. Adverse neonatal outcomes such as preterm birth, low birth weight, and fetal macrosomia were observed. Clinical data in the first trimester were collected and compared between groups with or without adverse neonatal outcomes. Maternal serum soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) was also measured at the same time. Results: A total of 176 euthyroid pregnant women with TPOAb positivity were finally enrolled and analyzed in our study. Thirty-nine (22.16%) euthyroid women with TPOAb positivity were found to have adverse neonatal outcomes. Thirteen participants received assisted reproductive technology (ART) in our study, and seven participants were in the adverse neonatal outcome group. Preterm birth, low birth weight, and fetal macrosomia were the most common comorbidities. The proportion of receiving ART and the levels of sCD40L and platelet were significantly higher in the adverse neonatal outcome group (all P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that sCD40L and receiving ART were the independent risk factors for adverse neonatal outcomes. The odds ratio values of sCD40L higher than 5.625 ng/ml were 2.386 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.017 to 5.595; P = 0.046] for overall adverse neonatal outcome, 3.900 (95% CI = 1.194 to 12.738; P = 0.024) for preterm birth, and 3.149 (95% CI = 0.982 to 10.101; P = 0.054) for low birth weight. Conclusions: Approximately one of the four euthyroid women with TPOAb positivity might have adverse neonatal outcomes. Measurement of sCD40L in first trimester might have a predictive value for adverse neonatal outcomes in euthyroid pregnant women with positive TPOAb.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been widely used in the treatment of infertility, and is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, the potential pathways by which ART affects adverse neonatal outcomes are unclear. We aimed to investigate the role of pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) in the association between ART and adverse neonatal outcomes. METHODS: Adult women (aged ≥ 18 years) with a singleton pregnancy in the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Study outcomes were adverse neonatal outcomes, including premature birth, low birth weight, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Logistic regression models were utilized to investigate the association between ART, PIH, and adverse neonatal outcomes, expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The distribution-of-the-product method was used to explore whether there was a mediating effect of PIH between ART and adverse neonatal outcomes, and the 95% CI of the distribution-of-the-product did not contain 0 indicating a mediating effect. RESULTS: This study included 2,824,418 women, of whom 35,020 (1.24%) women used ART, 239,588 (8.48%) women had PIH, and 424,741 (15.04%) neonates had any adverse neonatal outcomes. The use of ART was associated with higher odds of PIH (OR = 1.42; 95%CI: 1.37-1.46) and any adverse neonatal outcomes (OR = 1.47; 95%CI: 1.43-1.51). The distribution-of-the-product was 0.31 (95%CI: 0.28-0.34), and 8.51% of the association between ART and adverse neonatal outcomes was mediated through PIH. Among different adverse neonatal outcomes, PIH mediated 29.17% of the association between ART and low birth weight, 9.37% of the association between ART and premature birth, and 12.20% of the association between ART and NICU admission. The mediating effect of PIH was found in women of different ages (< 35 years and ≥ 35 years) and parities (primipara and multipara). CONCLUSION: This study supports a mediating role for PIH in the association between ART and adverse neonatal outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms by which AR affects PIH so that interventions to reduce PIH can be developed to reduce adverse neonatal outcomes associated with ART.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adverse neonatal outcomes are one of the most common causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Empirical evidence across the world shows that induction of labor potentiates adverse neonatal outcomes. In Ethiopia, there has been limited data that compares the frequency of adverse neonatal outcomes between induced and spontaneous labor. OBJECTIVES: To compare the prevalence of adverse neonatal outcomes between induced and spontaneous labor and to determine associated factors among women who gave birth in public hospitals of Awi Zone, Northwest Ethiopia. METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted at Awi Zone public hospitals from May 1 to June 30, 2022. A simple random sampling technique was employed to select 788 (260 induced and 528 spontaneous) women. The collected data were analyzed using statistical package for social science (SPSS) software version 26. The Chi-square test and an independent t-test were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. A binary logistic regression was used to assess the association between the outcome and explanatory variables. In the bivariate analysis, a p-value ≤ 0.2 at a 95% confidence interval was used to consider the variables in the multivariate analysis. Finally, statistical significance was stated at a p-value of less than 0.05. RESULT: The adverse neonatal outcomes among women who gave birth through induced labor were 41.1%, whereas spontaneous labor was 10.3%. The odds of adverse neonatal outcomes in induced labor were nearly two times higher than in spontaneous labor (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.11-3.22). No education (AOR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.56, 6.44), chronic disease (AOR = 3.99, 95% CI: 1.87, 8.52), male involvement (AOR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.23, 4.06), preterm birth (AOR = 9.83, 95% CI: 8.74, 76.37), operative delivery (AOR = 8.60, 95% CI: 4.63, 15.90), cesarean section (AOR = 4.17, 95% CI: 1.94, 8.95), and labor complications (AOR = 5.16, 95% CI: 2.90, 9.18) were significantly associated factors with adverse neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Adverse neonatal outcomes in the study area were higher. Composite adverse neonatal outcomes were significantly higher in induced labor compared to spontaneous labor. Therefore, it is important to anticipate the possible adverse neonatal outcomes and plan management strategies while conducting every labor induction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: The incidence of neonatal mortality has declined over the past few decades, but it remains a major concern. Identifying risk factors associated with adverse outcomes may help prevent and manage neonatal morbidity and mortality. The study aimed to explore the associated antenatal risk factors among pregnant women delivering in a tertiary care hospital in South India with adverse neonatal outcomes. Material and Methods: This was a hospital-based, matched case-control study among pregnant women belonging to Puducherry and admitted for delivery. Cases were pregnant women who gave birth to adverse neonatal outcomes, while controls were pregnant women who gave birth to alive and healthy babies. Data was collected from various sources, primarily from medical records, and triangulated. Results: Adverse neonatal outcomes were ten times more if pregnant women had placental complications and seven times more for intrauterine growth restriction noted during pregnancy. Pregnant women referred from peripheral care centers had 1.6 times more risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Prior hospital admission during the present pregnancy had a protective effect in the final adjusted analysis. Conclusion: Risk factors should be routinely monitored in all health centers. Women with high-risk pregnancies should be identified earlier, and appropriate care should be provided.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Metabolic acidemia is a known risk factor for serious adverse neonatal outcomes in both preterm and term infants. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of delivery umbilical cord gas measurements with regard to serious adverse neonatal outcomes, and to determine if distinct thresholds for defining metabolic acidemia differ in their ability to predict such adverse neonatal complications. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton live-born deliveries between January 2011 and December 2019. Stratification according to gestational age at birth (≥35 and <35 weeks of gestation) was performed, and comparisons of maternal characteristics, obstetrical complications, intrapartum events, and adverse neonatal outcomes were made between neonates with metabolic acidemia and those without. Metabolic acidemia (based on delivery umbilical cord gas analyses) was defined using both American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria. The primary outcome of interest was hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy requiring whole-body hypothermia. RESULTS: A total of 91,694 neonates born at ≥35 weeks of gestation met the inclusion criteria. By American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria, 2659 (2.9%) infants had metabolic acidemia. Neonates with metabolic acidemia were at markedly increased risk for neonatal intensive care unit admission, seizures, need for respiratory support, sepsis, and neonatal death. Metabolic acidemia by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria was associated with an almost 100-fold increased risk of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy requiring whole-body hypothermia (relative risk, 92.69; 95% confidence interval, 64.42-133.35) in neonates born at ≥35 weeks of gestation. Diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, postterm deliveries, prolonged second stages, chorioamnionitis, operative vaginal deliveries, placental abruption and cesarean deliveries were associated with metabolic acidemia in neonates born ≥ 35 weeks of gestation. The highest relative risk was in those diagnosed with placental abruption (relative risk, 9.07; 95% confidence interval, 7.25-11.36). The neonatal cohort born <35 weeks of gestation had similar findings. When comparing those infants born ≥ 35 weeks of gestation with metabolic acidemia by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria vs Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria identified more neonates at risk for serious adverse neonatal outcomes. In particular, 4.9% more neonates were diagnosed with metabolic acidemia, and 16 more term neonates were identified as requiring whole-body hypothermia. Mean 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores were similar and reassuring among neonates born at ≥35 weeks of gestation with and without metabolic acidemia as defined by both American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria (8 vs 8 and 9 vs 9, respectively; P<.001). Sensitivity and specificity were 86.7% and 92.2%, respectively, with the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria, and 74.2% and 97.2% with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria. CONCLUSION: Infants with metabolic acidemia identified on cord gas collection at delivery are at considerably greater risk of serious adverse neonatal outcomes, including an almost 100-fold increased risk of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy requiring whole-body hypothermia. Use of the more sensitive Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria for defining metabolic acidemia identifies more neonates born at ≥35 weeks of gestation at risk for adverse neonatal outcomes, including hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy requiring whole-body hypothermia.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Several reports regarding the effects of thin meconium on maternal and neonatal outcomes are contradictory. This study evaluated the risk factors and obstetrical outcomes during deliveries complicated with thin meconium. This retrospective cohort study included all women with a singleton pregnancy, who underwent trial of labor >24 weeks of gestation, in a single tertiary center, over a six-year period. Obstetrical, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were compared between deliveries with thin meconium (thin meconium group) to deliveries with clear amniotic fluid (control group). Included in the study were 31,536 deliveries. Among them 1946 (6.2%) were in the thin meconium group and 29,590 (93.8%) were controls. Meconium aspiration syndrome was diagnosed in eight neonates in the thin meconium group and in none of the controls (0.41%, p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following adverse outcomes were found to be independently associated with increased odds ratio (OR) for thin meconium: intrapartum fever (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.1-1.7), instrumental delivery (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09-1.46), cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal heart rate (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.68-2.46), and respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventilation (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.19-3.56). Thin meconium was associated with adverse obstetrical, delivery, and neonatal outcomes that should receive extra neonatal care and alert the pediatrician.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically assess perinatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by maternal cardiomyopathy. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to August 25, 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational cohort, case-control, and case-cohort studies in human populations were included if they reported predefined perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with cardiomyopathy (any subtype) and an appropriate control population (either pregnant women with no known cardiac disease or pregnant women with noncardiomyopathy cardiac disease). METHODS: Of note, 2 reviewers independently assessed the articles for eligibility and risk of bias, and conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer. Data were extracted and synthesized according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. RESULTS: Here, 13 studies (representing 2,291,024 pregnancies) were eligible for inclusion. Perinatal death was more likely in neonates born to women with cardiomyopathy than in (1) neonates born to women with no cardiac disease (stillbirth: odds ratio, 20.82; 95% confidence interval, 6.68-64.95; I2 = not available; P<.00001; neonatal mortality: odds ratio, 6.75; 95% confidence interval, 3.54-12.89; I2=0%; P<.00001) and (2) neonates born to women with other forms of cardiac disease (stillbirth: odds ratio, 3.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.86-7.59; I2=0%; P=.0002; neonatal mortality: odds ratio, 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-4.21; I2=0%; P=.002). Pregnancies affected by maternal cardiomyopathy were significantly more likely to result in preterm birth (odds ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.73; I2=77%; P=.003) and small-for-gestational-age neonates (odds ratio, 2.97; 95% confidence interval, 2.38-3.70; I2=47%; P<.00001), both major causes of short- and long-term morbidities, than pregnancies affected by other forms of cardiac disease. CONCLUSION: There was an increased likelihood of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies affected by maternal cardiomyopathy compared with both pregnancies affected by noncardiomyopathy cardiac disease and pregnancies without cardiac disease. Women with cardiomyopathy who plan to get pregnant should receive detailed counseling regarding these risks and have their pregnancies managed by experienced multidisciplinary teams that can provide close fetal monitoring and neonatology expertise.

Asunto(s)