RESUMEN

Dr. Scheffer Chuei-Goong Tseng is widely recognized as a pioneer in the development and application of cryopreserved amniotic membrane therapy. Dr. Tseng has completely revolutionized the management of ocular and various diseases through the success in the study of regenerative medicine, specifically through the human amniotic membrane. He has turned innovative scientific discoveries into products that contribute to many medical fields, including ophthalmology, orthopedics, oral and maxillofacial surgery, dermatology, and wound care. This review article explores Dr. Tseng's background, career, and significant contributions to regenerative medicine, with a particular focus on the impact of cryopreserved amniotic membrane technology.

RESUMEN

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR-T therapies) are a type of advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) that belong to a new generation of personalised cancer immunotherapies. This paper compares the approval, availability and financing of CAR-T cell therapies in ten countries. It also examines the implementation of this type of ATMP within the health care system, describing the organizational elements of CAR-T therapy delivery and the challenges of ensuring equitable access to all those in need, taking a more systems-oriented view. It finds that the availability of CAR-T therapies varies across countries, reflecting the heterogeneity in the organization and financing of specialised care, particularly oncology care. Countries have been cautious in designing reimbursement models for CAR-T cell therapies, establishing limited managed entry arrangements under public payers, either based on outcomes or as an evidence development scheme to allow for the study of real-world therapeutic efficacy. The delivery model of CAR-T therapies is concentrated around existing experienced cancer centres and highlights the need for high networking and referral capacity. Some countries have transparent and systematic eligibility criteria to help ensure more equitable access to therapies. Overall, as with other pharmaceuticals, there is limited transparency in pricing, eligibility criteria and budgeting decisions in this therapeutic area.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Specific studies on the impact of ulcerative colitis (UC) and bowel urgency (BU) on disability and quality of life (QoL) of patients on advanced therapies are missing. METHODS: Clinical and therapeutic management data were collected by Gastroenterologists from adult patients with UC treated with advanced therapies. Patients reported outcomes on QoL were collected using patient-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: Forty-one sites enrolled 293 patients. Median age was 42.0 years, median disease duration was 6.0 years. 38.9 % had active disease (partial Mayo score>1). Median treatment duration was 16.9 months. 166 (57.0 %) patients had BU [median UNRS=2] and 78.3 % had fecal incontinence [median Wexner score=8.0]. Moderate to severe disability (IBD-Disk score≥40) was reported in 37.8 % patients. BU patients had a higher Wexner score [10.0 vs 5.2, p < 0.0001] and moderate to severe disability rate (53.7% vs 16.9 %, p < 0.0001), lower QoL and work productivity than those in BU remission: mean EQ-5D-5 L utility [0.846 vs 0.943, p < 0.0001], VAS for self-rated health [66.2 vs 82.1, p < 0.0001], and overall work impairment [35.7% vs 11.3 %, p < 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: The burden of moderate to severe UC, especially in patients with BU, is high. These findings highlight that BU control remains an unmet medical need in UC patients and underscore the need for new innovative treatments.

RESUMEN

The prevalence and incidence of wounds is predicted to rise due to an ageing population, that is also likely to have an increasing number of comorbidities (Dowsett et al, 2017). This trend will invariably result in increased costs to the NHS. The estimated annual cost of wound management in 2017/2018 was £8.3 billion. The cost of managing 70% of wounds which healed was £2.7 billion while it cost £5.6 billion managing only 30% of unhealed wounds (Guest et al, 2020). In view of these figures, it is important that health professionals (HPs) recognise wounds that are not progressing to healing at an early stage and implement all available treatment modalities to ensure that the wound does not become non-healing or stalled. Therefore, this article defines non-healing wounds, how to identify wounds at risk of becoming non-healing and the timely implementation of advanced treatment modalities, such as single use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The huge development that Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (AMTPs) have experienced in recent years, both commercial and research, represent a challenge for Hospital Pharmacy at all levels. The aim of this article is to describe the implementation of an Advanced Therapies Unit (AUT) and the process of preparation of the AMTPs according to the "good manufacturing practices" (GMP), as well as the results obtained in a tertiary hospital, as an example of the challenges posed by MTA's academic production. The AUT meets the requirements established in the GMP by guaranteeing that the medicines produced therein are of the quality required for the use for which they are intended, and also provides support to various research groups involved in the development of AMTPs. The AUT is composed of a highly qualified multidisciplinary team, qualified and trained in GMP, and is authorized for the preparation of five types of AMTPs consisting of allogeneic virus-specific T cells (VST) with various viral specificities. A circuit has been established in collaboration between the UTA and the Pharmacy Service with the Hematology Service for the assessment of the clinical indication, the request and preparation of VST, which allows the treatment of patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants who present viral reactivations resistant or refractory to standard treatment, or who cannot tolerate it due to toxicity. Preliminary results from these AMTPs suggest that VSTs are an effective and safe alternative. Academic AMTPs have special interest in orphan indications or in the absence of alternative treatments, and their production through the "hospital exemption" can favor early access in the initial phases of development and at a lower cost. It is essential to promote the training of hospital pharmacists in GMP and their participation in collaboration with other clinicians and researchers to develop AMTPs that meet all logistical and regulatory requirements.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The huge development that advanced therapy medicinal products (AMTPs) have experienced in recent years, both commercial and research, represent a challenge for hospital pharmacy at all levels. The aim of this article is to describe the implementation of an advanced therapies unit (AUT) and the process of preparation of the AMTPs according to the "good manufacturing practices" (GMP), as well as the results obtained in a tertiary hospital, as an example of the challenges posed by MTA's academic production. The AUT meets the requirements established in the GMP by guaranteeing that the medicines produced therein are of the quality required for the use for which they are intended, and also provides support to various research groups involved in the development of AMTPs. The AUT is composed of a highly qualified multidisciplinary team, qualified and trained in GMP, and is authorized for the preparation of 5 types of AMTPs consisting of allogeneic virus-specific T cells (VST) with various viral specificities. A circuit has been established in collaboration between the UTA and the pharmacy service with the hematology service for the assessment of the clinical indication, the request, and preparation of VST, which allows the treatment of patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants who present viral reactivations resistant or refractory to standard treatment, or who cannot tolerate it due to toxicity. Preliminary results from these AMTPs suggest that VSTs are an effective and safe alternative. Academic AMTPs have special interest in orphan indications or in the absence of alternative treatments, and their production through the "hospital exemption" can favor early access in the initial phases of development and at a lower cost. It is essential to promote the training of hospital pharmacists in GMP and their participation in collaboration with other clinicians and researchers to develop AMTPs that meet all logistical and regulatory requirements.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: With the recent increase in number of drugs for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it has become important to select treatments acceptable to patients. Endoscopy and biomarkers from blood and stool samples are used to evaluate IBD disease activity. This study aimed to clarify the acceptability of usage of advanced therapy and examination methods in patients through an internet-based survey. Methods: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease were asked via the internet to participate in a survey on the acceptability of nine therapies and three examination methods. The respondents rated acceptability on a scale of 1-10 and specified the most preferred option. Results: Responses were obtained from 388 patients with ulcerative colitis and 82 with Crohn's disease; 14.5% and 11.5% of the patients underwent intravenous infusions and subcutaneous injections, respectively. Once-daily oral administration had the highest acceptability score, which was significantly different from other administration usages (p < 0.0001), regardless of prior treatment history. Oral administration was preferred by 88.9% of patients. The ranking of examination methods from most to least acceptable was blood tests > endoscopy > stool tests, with significant differences among all groups (p < 0.0001). Blood testing (76%) and stool testing (4.5%) were the most and least preferred methods, respectively. Conclusions: The most acceptable usage of advanced therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease was once-daily oral administration. Treatments that are effective, safe, and acceptable to patients should be selected, and examination methods acceptable to patients should be used.

RESUMEN

This article discusses the rationale for and the current data on the efficacy and safety of combined advanced targeted therapy (CATT) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab in the United States. METHODS: Claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to identify adult patients with UC initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab (index date) after 10/21/2019. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. All-cause and UC-related HRU (number of inpatient admissions, inpatient days, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits) were described during the post-index period, and Poisson regression models were used to evaluate associations between index therapy and HRU outcomes. Analyses were performed separately among advanced therapy-naïve or advanced therapy-experienced patients. RESULTS: A total of 444 (ustekinumab) and 1,917 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-naïve patients, and 647 (ustekinumab) and 1,152 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-experienced patients were identified. In advanced therapy-naïve patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient days (rate ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.84 [1.15, 3.58]; p = 0.004), emergency department visits (1.39 [1.01, 2.17]; p = 0.044), and outpatient visits (1.81 [1.61, 2.04]; p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. In advanced therapy-experienced patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient admissions (1.47 [1.06, 2.12]; p = 0.012), inpatient days (2.18 (1.44, 3.71); p < 0.001), and outpatient visits (1.50 (1.19, 1.82); p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. Results were similar when all-cause HRU was examined. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with UC with and without advanced therapy experience, higher rates of all-cause and UC-related HRU were observed among those treated with vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Persistence on advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a useful real-world treatment performance measure. This study compared real-world persistence during the maintenance phase among advanced therapy-naïve and -experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab. METHODS: Claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to select adult patients with UC treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab based on the agent first initiated (index date) after 10/21/2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance cohorts on baseline characteristics. Persistence on the index agent (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, while on monotherapy, and persistence on the US labeled dose were described and compared during the 12-month period post-index using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes were analyzed separately among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients. RESULTS: At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-naïve patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 371) had higher persistence on the index agent [83.8% vs. 57.6%, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 3.09 (2.29-4.16); p < 0.001), persistence while corticosteroid-free [2.00 (1.63-2.45); p < 0.001], persistence while on monotherapy [2.67 (2.07-3.44); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.21 (2.76-6.44); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 1726). At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-experienced patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 693) had higher persistence on the index agent [78.1% vs. 59.2%, 2.44 (1.82-3.26); p < 0.001], persistence while corticosteroid-free [1.24 (1.01-1.54); p = 0.0447], persistence while on monotherapy [2.53 (2.00-3.21); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.77 (3.09-7.35); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 254). CONCLUSION: This claims-based analysis demonstrated significantly higher treatment persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free, persistence while on monotherapy, and persistence on the labeled dose, among both advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab compared to adalimumab.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The discovery of inhibitors for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) has significantly improved type 2 diabetes management. Large-scale clinical studies have shown that both SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RA enhance cardiovascular health. Benefits include reduced cardiovascular disease risk, lower mortality, fewer heart failure hospitalizations (SGLT2 inhibitors), and stroke prevention (GLP-1 RA). Additionally, these drugs slow chronic kidney disease progression. This comprehensive treatment targets vascular events. Despite differences, both drug classes are crucial. GLP-1 RA mainly reduce stroke risk, while SGLT2 inhibitors alleviate heart failure. Our findings, based on a literature review, will address the renal and cardiac effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RA in both diabetics and non-diabetics, highlighting their combined benefits for heart conditions.

RESUMEN

Mesenchymal stromal stem cells (MSCs) possess a remarkable potential for numerous clinical applications due to their unique properties including self-renewal, immunomodulation, paracrine actions and multilineage differentiation. However, the translation of MSC-based Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) into the clinic has frequently met with inconsistent outcomes. One of the suspected reasons for this issue is the inherent and extensive variability that exists among such ATMPs, which makes the interpretation of their clinical efficacy difficult to assess, as well as to compare the results of various studies. This variability stems from numerous reasons including differences in tissue sources, donor attributes, variances in manufacturing protocols, as well as modes of administration. MSCs can be isolated from various tissues including bone marrow, umbilical cord, adipose tissue and others, each with its unique phenotypic and functional characteristics. While MSCs from different sources do share common features, they also exhibit distinct gene expression profiles and functional properites. Donor-specific factors such as age, sex, body mass index, and underlying health conditions can influence MSC phenotype, morphology, differentiation potential and function. Moreover, variations in preparation of MSC products introduces additional heterogeneity as a result of cell culture media composition, presence or absence of added growth factors, use of different serum supplements and culturing techniques. Once MSC products are formulated, storage protocols play a pivotal role in its efficacy. Factors that affect cell viability include cell concentration, delivery solution and importantly, post-thawing protocols where applicable. Ensuing, differences in administration protocols can critically affect the distribution and functionallity of administered cells. As MSC-based therapies continue to advance through numerous clinical trials, implication of strategies to reduce product heterogeneity is imperative. Central to addressing these challenges is the need for precise prediction of clinical responses, which require well-defined MSC populations and harmonized assessment of their specific functions. By addressing these issues by meaningful approaches, such as, e.g., MSC pooling, the field can overcome barriers to advance towards more consistent and effective MSC-based therapies.

RESUMEN

The global burden of cancer and the limitations of conventional therapies highlight the potential of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) in reshaping cancer treatment paradigms. In this review, we have investigated the mechanism of CRISPR, an adaptive immune system in bacteria that enables highly precise gene editing at the molecular level. This versatile tool demonstrates its efficacy in human cancer therapy through gene knockout, metabolic disruption, base editing, screening, and immunotherapy enhancement without affecting normal bodily domains. Despite its superiority over other nucleases like zinc-finger nucleases and transcription activator-like effector nucleases, hurdles such as off-target effects, inefficient delivery of the system to target cells, the emergence of escapers, and the ethical debate surrounding genome editing are discussed. In this article, we have reviewed the promising approaches of CRISPR-Cas9 in cancer treatment while exploring the underlying mechanism, advantages, and associated challenges.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Health technology assessment (HTA) of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), such as high-cost and one-time cell and gene therapies, is particularly challenging. Outcomes-based agreements (OBAs) are a potential solution to mitigate the risks while providing access to patients but are not widely used across Europe. This study aimed to develop policy recommendations to support the acceptability and implementation of OBAs in Europe. METHODS: A policy sandbox approach was used to engage with stakeholders and explore how HTA organizations can support reimbursement decisions regarding OBAs for ATMPs. A panel of 38 experts from across the European region was convened in 2 workshops, representing payers, HTA organizations, patients, registries, and an industry trade body. RESULTS: Policy recommendations were developed to support the appropriate consideration of OBAs for reimbursing highly uncertain technologies, such as ATMPs. If a positive HTA recommendation cannot be made at the proposed price, then a simple price discount reflecting the uncertainty is preferred over complex solutions such as OBAs. If an OBA is pursued, it should be designed collaboratively with all stakeholders to understand data collection feasibility and minimize burden to patients and providers. Payers are encouraged to approach OBAs as a tool for informed decision making, including a readiness to make negative reimbursement decisions based on unfavorable evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The study presents a policy framework for using OBAs in reimbursement decisions. OBAs must be carefully designed, focusing on appropriateness and the burden of implementation. The relevant authorities should be committed to making decisions in light of the resulting evidence.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Cell therapy has been increasingly considered to treat diseases, but it has been proven difficult to manufacture the same product at multiple manufacturing sites. Thus, for a wider implementation an alternative is to have one manufacturing site with a wide distribution to clinical sites. To ensure administration of a good quality cell therapy product with maintained functional characteristics, several obstacles must be overcome, which includes for example transfer of knowledge, protocols and procedures, site assessment, transportation and preparation of the product. Methods: As the preparatory work for a clinical trial in India using fetal mesenchymal stem cells (fMSCs) developed and manufactured in Sweden, we performed a site assessment of the receiving clinical site, transferred methods, developed procedures and provided training of operators for handling of the cell therapy product. We further developed a Pharmacy Manual to cover the management of the product, from ordering it from the manufacturer, through transport, reconstitution, testing and administration at the clinical site. Lastly, the effect of long-distance transport on survival and function of, as well as the correct handling of the cell therapy product, was evaluated according to the pre-determined and approved Product Specification. Results: Four batches of cryopreserved human fetal liver-derived fMSCs manufactured according to Good Manufacturing Practice and tested according to predetermined release criteria in Sweden, were certified and transported in a dry shipper at -150 °C to the clinical site in India. The transport was temperature monitored and took three-seven days to complete. The thawed and reconstituted cells showed more than 80% viability up to 3 h post-thawing, the cell recovery was more than 94%, the cells displayed the same surface protein expression pattern, differentiated into bone, had stable chromosomes and were sterile, which conformed with the data from the manufacturing site in Sweden. Conclusions: Our study shows the feasibility of transferring necessary knowledge and technology to be able to carry out a clinical trial with a cell therapy product in distant country. It also shows that it is possible to transport a cryopreserved cell therapy product over long distances and borders with retained quality. This extends the use of cryopreserved cell therapy products in the future.

RESUMEN

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) remains a significant global health challenge with approximately 38 million people currently having the virus worldwide. Despite advances in treatment development, the virus persists in the human population and still leads to new infections. The virus has a powerful ability to mutate and hide from the human immune system in reservoirs of the body. Current standard treatment with antiretroviral therapy effectively controls viral replication but requires lifelong adherence and does not eradicate the virus. This review explores the potential of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products as novel therapeutic approaches to HIV, including cell therapy, immunisation strategies and gene therapy. Cell therapy, particularly chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, shows promise in preclinical studies for targeting and eliminating HIV-infected cells. Immunisation therapies, such as broadly neutralising antibodies are being investigated to control viral replication and reduce reservoirs. Despite setbacks in recent trials, vaccines remain a promising avenue for HIV therapy development. Gene therapy using technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 aims to modify cells to resist HIV infection or eliminate infected cells. Challenges such as off-target effects, delivery efficiency and ethical considerations persist in gene therapy for HIV. Future directions require further research to assess the safety and efficacy of emerging therapies in clinical trials. Combined approaches may be necessary to achieve complete elimination of the HIV reservoir. Overall, advanced therapies offer new hope for advancing HIV treatment and moving closer to a cure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with BRCA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have an aggressive disease course. This study aimed to describe real-world treatment patterns among patients with BRCA-positive mCRPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: De-identified electronic health record data from the Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine Inc. Metastatic Prostate Cancer Clinico-Genomic Database (January 01, 2011 to June 30, 2022) were used to select patients with BRCA-positive mCRPC initiating first-line (1L) therapy with an oncologist-defined advanced line of therapy (LOT) or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy. Treatment sequences and reasons for censoring were described in 1L, and among patients who initiated a second-line (2L) therapy. RESULTS: A total of 98 treated patients with BRCA-positive mCRPC were identified. The top 3 treatment regimens in 1L, overall, were ADT monotherapy (19%), enzalutamide (14%), and olaparib (13%). The main reason for censoring patients with ADT monotherapy was death (52.6%). Among 79 patients treated with an advanced LOT in 1L, 43.0% (n = 34) did not initiate a 2L therapy, of which, 29.4% died. In patients who initiated a 2L (n = 45), the most common 1L to 2L treatment sequence was olaparib to docetaxel (11.1%). The most prescribed 2L therapies were docetaxel (22.2%), olaparib (20.0%), abiraterone acetate (13.3%), and enzalutamide (11.1%). From 1L initiation, the median time-to-next-treatment was 6.2 months. CONCLUSION: Among patients with BRCA-positive mCRPC, ADT monotherapy, enzalutamide, and olaparib were most commonly used. Prognosis of BRCA-positive patients was poor, with most patients failing initial therapy resulting in a switch to a new therapy or death. These findings highlight the need for earlier and more effective treatments for patients with BRCA-positive mCRPC.

RESUMEN

Despite significant advances in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the last two decades, remission remains elusive and there is no cure. Evidence from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) confirming enhanced response and outcome from earlier treatment intervention suggests the plausibility of the window of opportunity in the pathogenesis of RA. Yet, data are lacking in PsA. Although treatment response may be enhanced in shorter disease duration, it is unknown how this early intervention may impact long-term outcomes. Furthermore, it remains to be demonstrated whether there is a best treatment strategy and time of intervention. Crucially, the main hurdle when aiming for early treatment intervention is the ability to achieve a timely diagnosis that highlights the need to focus research efforts on characterizing the very early disease stages including the transition to PsA in the at-risk psoriasis population.

RESUMEN

This chapter introduces the increasing significance of mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC) production in regenerative medicine and cellular therapeutics, outlines the growing interest in MSCs for various medical applications, and highlights their potential in advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) and the advancements in cell culture technologies that have facilitated large-scale MSC production under Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), ensuring safety and efficacy. This chapter describes an optimized upstream protocol for laboratory-scale MSC production from different tissue sources. This protocol, conducted in flasks, controls critical parameters and lays the foundation for downstream processing to generate ATMPs. This comprehensive approach underscores the potential of MSCs in clinical applications and the importance of tailored production processes.

RESUMEN

Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-based advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are being tried in a vast range of clinical applications. These cells can be isolated from different donor tissues by using several methods, or they can even be derived from induced pluripotent stem cells or embryonic stem cells. However, ATMP heterogeneity may impact product identity and potency, and, consequently, clinical trial outcomes. In this review, we discuss these topics and the need to establish minimal criteria regarding the manufacturing of MSCs so that these innovative therapeutics may be better positioned to contribute to the advancement of regenerative medicine.

Asunto(s)