RESUMEN

Events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine have increased people's awareness of mental health issues. Psychological trauma impacts patients in the acute care setting through physical and mental health presentations. Trauma is a public health issue crossing all socioeconomic groups and is related to social determinants of health. Trauma-informed care (TIC) is an evidence-based approach to providing care. TIC is within the scope of nursing practice and improves outcomes for patients. However, there is a lack of standard terms or practices within healthcare. Additionally, there is superficial acknowledgment of the need for TIC at the local or national level regarding policy. Nurses need to adopt TIC into practice and advocate for policy change to improve the health and lives of those seeking care.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is increased interest in implementing structured clinical handover frameworks to improve clinical handover processes. Research postulates that structured clinical handover frameworks increase the quality of handovers; yet inconsistencies enacting these frameworks exist which has a potential to jeopardise the quality of communication during handovers thereby defeating the purpose of these frameworks. AIM: This scoping review aims to analyse and synthesise what is currently known of the nurses' experiences and perceptions in implementing structured clinical handover frameworks and identify knowledge gaps in relation to this topic area. DESIGN: A scoping review guided by the PRISMA-ScR checklist. METHODS: A systematic search of five electronic databases was undertaken to identify peer-reviewed primary research studies which met the predetermined eligibility criteria. In total, 301 studies were imported into COVIDENCE, screened and assessed for eligibility resulting in 23 studies remaining. From the eligible studies, data was extracted, collated, appraised, summarised and interpreted. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINHAL, ProQuest, EMCARE, Web of Science and Informit. RESULTS: Twenty three studies were included in this review which yielded the following major themes: (1) quality and completeness of information transfer; (2) interprofessional collaboration; (3) challenges impacting the experience of implementing the structured clinical handover frameworks and (4) perceived impacts on quality, patient safety and health outcomes. CONCLUSION: There are key benefits and issues experienced and perceived by nurses implementing structured clinical handover frameworks and this review identifies opportunities for further improvements. Future research should explore the perceived associations with patient outcomes. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review highlights the importance of structured clinical handover frameworks, the nurses' experiences in implementing these frameworks and strategies to improve the effectiveness of these frameworks. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: No Patient or Public Contributions as this study is a review of published primary evidence.

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate the professional dementia experts' understanding of a dementia-friendly hospital to identify its characteristics. DESIGN: We used a qualitative design embedded in a case study. A total of 16 semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with 17 professional dementia experts. Using inductive content analysis, the interviews were analysed in a participatory manner involving a group of researchers and dementia experts. RESULTS: We identified six characteristics of dementia-friendly hospitals: Proud to be dementia-friendly-That's what we want; Seeing the human being-Taking care of everyone; Having everyone on board-It's a collective task; Being professional-It takes more than being nice and kind; Rethinking the 'running' system-We have to change, not them; and Being part of the community-Thinking beyond the hospital. CONCLUSION: The concept of a dementia-friendly hospital seems complex and requires a rethinking of the traditional hospital. For a conceptualisation, the involvement of people with dementia and their relatives is important to gain a comprehensive understanding. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: A dementia-friendly hospital is characterised by professional care that comprises a safe, familiar and supportive environment, is prepared but also flexible, has everyone on board, and sees the human being. To become dementia-friendly, individual interventions such as training courses can be a starting point. However, an overall concept is required that also includes components that contribute to successful implementation and a welcoming culture of people with dementia. IMPACT: Our findings on the perspective of professional dementia experts contribute to the conceptualisation of dementia-friendly hospitals. REPORTING METHOD: We reported our study according to the COREQ checklist. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The investigation of the perspective of professional dementia experts is one part of a larger study. In this overall DEMfriendlyHospital study, we interviewed professional dementia experts, people with dementia and their relatives and also involved them in a participatory manner in various stages of the research process.

RESUMEN

Introduction: With the increase of global population, there has been an increased demand for acute care services both locally and globally. In the absence of an acute care competency-based curriculum in South Africa, this study sought to identify the core competencies required by undergraduate medical students to safely manage adult patients within an acute care setting in a South African hospital environment. Methodology: The modified Delphi study comprised of three rounds. The traditional Delphi method, which uses the same participants across various rounds, was modified by using different stakeholders across the three rounds. Emergency Medicine (EM) specialist trainees (registrars) generated competencies in round one, which were provided to a multi-disciplinary team with expertise in undergraduate curriculum development in round two, using a 5-point Likert scale for rating their agreement-disagreement. Round three entailed inviting the round one contributors to anonymously comment, via online survey, on the competencies generated in round two. Results: A total of 34 EM registrars participated during round one and 7 curriculum development experts participated during round two. A total of 120 competencies were identified from the 3-round Delphi study; of these 103 (85.8%) were reached by "Strong Agreement"; 16 (13.3%) reached by "Agreement"; and 1 (0.8%) was undecided. Discussion: The results of the modified Delphi study contributed to developing a comprehensive list of undergraduate acute care clinical competencies set in a South African context. The value of engaging with medical practitioners at the forefront of delivering acute care in a South African healthcare environment who are exposed on a daily basis to the healthcare needs of society, became evident. The findings of this study highlight and reinforce the importance of contextual relevance during the curriculum development process. Conclusion: The modified Delphi method, based on three iterative rounds and feedback from experts, was effective in reaching consensus on the competencies required by undergraduate medical students to manage acute care adult patients safely within a South African hospital environment.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation has potential to improve outcomes in value-based care models. We examined the associations between receipt of prehabilitation (physical therapy [PT] services within 30 days preoperatively) and postoperative healthcare utilization in a national cohort of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the 5% fee-for-service claims from the Medicare Limited Data Set to identify unilateral elective inpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures (n = 25,509) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures (n = 40,091) from January 1, 2016 to September 30, 2021. Associations between prehabilitation and postoperative healthcare utilization were analyzed in mixed-effects generalized linear models adjusting for patient-level and hospital-level factors. We report adjusted odds ratios (OR) or % differences. RESULTS: Prehabilitation (13.1% THA, 13.1% TKA) was not significantly associated with institutional post-acute care discharge, 30-day emergency department visits, or 90-day readmissions. For TKA, prehabilitation was significantly associated with decreased odds of an extended hospital length of stay (OR = 0.86, P = 0.02) and reduced length of stay in an institutional post-acute care facility (-5.71%, P = 0.004). In both THA and TKA, prehabilitation was associated with decreased use of 90-day home health physical and/or occupational therapy (THA: OR = 0.82, P = 0.001; TKA: OR = 0.67, P < 0.001). In contrast, prehabilitation in both cohorts was associated with increased odds of receiving any 90-day outpatient PT (THA: OR = 2.08, P < 0.001; TKA: OR = 2.48, P < 0.001) and an increased number of 90-day outpatient PT visits (THA: +4.04%, P = 0.01; TKA: +5.21%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation was associated with some decreases in postoperative healthcare utilization, particularly for TKA. Associations of preoperative physical therapy with increased postoperative outpatient physical therapy may reflect variation in referral patterns or patient access. These results highlight the importance of continued research into the impact of prehabilitation on healthcare utilization, patient outcomes, and episode costs. Additionally, further research should identify which patients would benefit the most from prehabilitation to increase the value of care.

RESUMEN

Background: An Addiction Medicine Unit (AMU) represents a promising approach to enhancing hospital care for individuals who use substances, but there is limited research to understand patients' perspectives on AMUs. Therefore, the study objectives involved exploring patients' experiences with the AMU. Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 patients to gather their perspectives about the AMU. The AMU offers specialized inpatient addiction support, integrating medical and psychosocial interventions while facilitating connections to community supports to stabilize patients and manage addiction-related issues using a harm reduction philosophy. Results: Factors identified by patients that lead to positive experiences with the AMU included: efficient access to high-quality acute medical care, specialized addiction care, and additional support for non-medical needs. Patients emphasized the benefits of having peer support workers on staff, the overall positive interactions with staff, and how different these experiences were from their hospital admissions outside of the AMU. Factors identified by patients that should be considered in an AMU included: the ease of access to substances, negative interactions with other patients, and self-stigma/internalized discrimination. Also, the patient perspective reflected varied views on harm reduction. Patients' perception of the impact of an AMU overall reflected that the AMU is an effective way to deliver comprehensive treatment, to address the needs of PWUS, both medical and substance-use-related issues. They identified that the unit's intentional harm reduction philosophy facilitated access to care and positive patient-staff interactions, emphasizing the unit's progress in reducing fear and judgment and rebuilding trust in the healthcare system. Conclusion: The introduction of a new AMU in a Northern urban acute care hospital in Ontario has yielded positive patient experiences. The AMU model shows potential to re-establish trust between patients and providers, but ongoing efforts are needed to address underlying stigma to be more effective.

RESUMEN

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a complex family nursing intervention (SAFIR©) designed to support families of patients with acquired brain injuries during the early phase of hospitalization, using a one-group pre- and post-test design with a one-month follow-up. Family members participated in four family meetings. Quantitative data were collected using an intervention protocol checklist and questionnaires. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, written open-ended questions, and note-taking. Feasibility outcomes revealed a family recruitment rate of 15.4% and a retention rate of 100%. Protocol adherence ranged from 94% in Phase 1 to 78% in Phase 3. Our results indicated that the intervention was meaningful and suitable for family members (n=7), healthcare provider (n=1), and nursing managers (n=6). From a sustainability perspective, our findings suggest the need to formally involve the entire inter-professional team in the intervention. Further evaluation of the intervention is warranted through a large-scale experimental.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to explore nurses' experiences with ad-hoc patient education (AHPE) in an acute inpatient setting. METHODS: We conducted nine focus groups with 34 nurses. Data was analysed using thematic analysis and the social-ecological model (SEM). FINDINGS: We identified two main themes. 1) characteristics of AHPE: the complexity, contents, and timing of AHPE, as well as features of successful AHPE. The central phenomenon was the subconscious and incidental nature of AHPE. This negatively impacts charting and recognition of patient education as a core nursing responsibility. 2) requirements for successful AHPE, using the SEM: a) interpersonal level: nurses' own expertise, personality traits, and attitude; b) intrapersonal level: relationship building, communication at eye-level, and recognising patients' receptivity and education needs; c) institutional level: environmental factors (time, space, and clear responsibilities within care teams) and the charting system; d) social level: recognition and appreciation for the value of patient education. CONCLUSION: AHPE often occurs subconciously and unreflected. Patient education can positively impact patient outcomes; however, this requires a complex interaction of factors on multiple systemic levels. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Awareness raising for AHPE, its value for patients and society, and its proper charting is needed on multiple levels to ensure patient safety and the peace of mind of care teams.

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate the perceptions of family members (FMs) of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and nurses on empowering support and its implementation during the acute phase within Finnish neurosurgical and neurological care in hospital settings, focusing on identifying similarities and differences in their viewpoints. DESIGN: Participatory qualitative descriptive study. METHODS: Data were collected from seven FMs and 11 nurses using the World Café method in November 2019. An abductive approach was employed for data analysis, combining deductive interpretation within the conceptual framework of empowering support and inductive content analysis. RESULTS: Four main themes were identified: (1) FMs' diverse information and guidance needs of TBI, treatment and its impact on family life, (2) support based on empowering FMs in participation, competence and decision-making, (3) empowering FMs through collaborative nursing practices and interprofessional support, and (4) internal and external hospital support enhancing and promoting the empowerment of FMs. CONCLUSION: The perceptions of FMs and nurses regarding empowering support were largely consistent, yet diverged in its implementation in nursing practice. Nurses play a crucial role in fostering the empowerment of FMs; however, further research is needed to explore the impact of organisational and community factors on the implementation of empowering support. IMPACT: Our study contributes to advancing nursing practices by underscoring the necessity for a paradigm shift towards a family-centred approach. Furthermore, it emphasises the urgency for standardising nursing practices to ensure equitable access to empowering support for FMs, applicable across various care settings for patients with TBI. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This review is part of a larger research project in which FMs of patients with TBI and nurses were involved in designing the project. REPORTING METHOD: This study was reported using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Checklist for qualitative studies.

RESUMEN

Background: Unprofessional behaviour in healthcare systems can negatively impact staff well-being, patient safety and organisational costs. Unprofessional behaviour encompasses a range of behaviours, including incivility, microaggressions, harassment and bullying. Despite efforts to combat unprofessional behaviour in healthcare settings, it remains prevalent. Interventions to reduce unprofessional behaviour in health care have been conducted - but how and why they may work is unclear. Given the complexity of the issue, a realist review methodology is an ideal approach to examining unprofessional behaviour in healthcare systems. Aim: To improve context-specific understanding of how, why and in what circumstances unprofessional behaviours between staff in acute healthcare settings occur and evidence of strategies implemented to mitigate, manage and prevent them. Methods: Realist synthesis methodology consistent with realist and meta-narrative evidence syntheses: evolving standards reporting guidelines. Data sources: Literature sources for building initial theories were identified from the original proposal and from informal searches of various websites. For theory refinement, we conducted systematic and purposive searches for peer-reviewed literature on databases such as EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and MEDLINE databases as well as for grey literature. Searches were conducted iteratively from November 2021 to December 2022. Results: Initial theory-building drew on 38 sources. Searches resulted in 2878 titles and abstracts. In total, 148 sources were included in the review. Terminology and definitions used for unprofessional behaviours were inconsistent. This may present issues for policy and practice when trying to identify and address unprofessional behaviour. Contributors of unprofessional behaviour can be categorised into four areas: (1) workplace disempowerment, (2) organisational uncertainty, confusion and stress, (3) (lack of) social cohesion and (4) enablement of harmful cultures that tolerate unprofessional behaviours. Those at most risk of experiencing unprofessional behaviour are staff from a minoritised background. We identified 42 interventions in the literature to address unprofessional behaviour. These spanned five types: (1) single session (i.e. one-off), (2) multiple sessions, (3) single or multiple sessions combined with other actions (e.g. training session plus a code of conduct), (4) professional accountability and reporting interventions and (5) structured culture-change interventions. We identified 42 reports of interventions, with none conducted in the United Kingdom. Of these, 29 interventions were evaluated, with the majority (n = 23) reporting some measure of effectiveness. Interventions drew on 13 types of behaviour-change strategy designed to, for example: change social norms, improve awareness of unprofessional behaviour, or redesign the workplace. Interventions were impacted by 12 key dynamics, including focusing on individuals, lack of trust in management and non-existent logic models. Conclusions: Workplace disempowerment and organisational barriers are primary contributors to unprofessional behaviour. However, interventions predominantly focus on individual education or training without addressing systemic, organisational issues. Effectiveness of interventions to improve staff well-being or patient safety is uncertain. We provide 12 key dynamics and 15 implementation principles to guide organisations. Future work: Interventions need to: (1) be tested in a United Kingdom context, (2) draw on behavioural science principles and (3) target systemic, organisational issues. Limitations: This review focuses on interpersonal staff-to-staff unprofessional behaviour, in acute healthcare settings only and does not include non-intervention literature outside the United Kingdom or outside of health care. Study registration: This study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO CRD42021255490. The record is available from: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021255490. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131606) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 25. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

For this study, we asked: how, why and in what situations can unprofessional behaviour between healthcare staff working in acute care (usually hospitals) be reduced, managed and prevented? We wanted to research how people understand unprofessional behaviour, explore the circumstances leading to unprofessional behaviour and understand how existing approaches to addressing unprofessional behaviour worked (or did not work) across staff groups and acute healthcare organisations. We used a literature review method called a 'realist review', which differs from other review methods. A realist review focuses on understanding not only if interventions work but how and why they work, and for whom. This allowed us to analyse a wider range of relevant international literature ­ not only academic papers. We found 148 sources, which were relevant either because they described unprofessional behaviour or because they provided information on how to address unprofessional behaviour. Definitions of unprofessional behaviour varied, making it difficult to settle on one description. For example, unprofessional behaviour may involve incivility, bullying, harassment and/or microaggressions. We examined what might contribute to unprofessional behaviour and identified factors including uncertainty in the working environment. We found no United Kingdom-based interventions and only one from the United States of America that sought to reduce unprofessional behaviour towards minority groups. Strategies often tried to encourage staff to speak up, provide ways to report unprofessional behaviour or set social standards of behaviour. We also identified factors that may make it challenging for organisations to successfully select, implement and evaluate an intervention to address unprofessional behaviour. We recommend a system-wide approach to addressing unprofessional behaviour, including assessing the context and then implementing multiple approaches over a long time (rather than just once), because they are likely to have greater impact on changing culture. We are producing an implementation guide to support this process. Interventions need to enhance staff ability to feel safe at work, work effectively and support those more likely to experience unprofessional behaviour.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background and Purpose: This study adapted the Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire to measure the organizational climate of nurse practitioners in acute care settings and validated the Nurse Practitioner Acute Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire (NP-ACOCQ). Methods: We used a three-phase instrument adaptation design. In phase 1, experts assessed face and content validity. In phase 2, pilot testing enabled item analysis and preliminary reliability testing. In phase 3, field testing supported exploratory factor analysis. Results: The NP-ACOCQ had a three-factor structure representing subscales. The subscales had Cronbach's alphas of 0.87, 0.90, and 0.94. The subscales, Institutional Visibility, Interprofessional Relationships, and Organizational Autonomy each had between 5 and 13 items. Conclusions: The NP-ACOCQ is a valid and reliable measure to assess organizational factors determining the acute care nurse practitioner work environment.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable adjunct to traditional imaging and physical exam. Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioners (AGACNPs) serve as primary providers for acutely ill patients across the country, yet there is limited literature to describe the AGACNP experience with POCUS training and clinical application. PURPOSE: This integrative review was to describe barriers to learning and performing POCUS that AGACNP's experience, identify necessary components of a successful POCUS curriculum, and synthesize evidence to propose solutions. METHOD: CINAHL, PubMed, and Ovid databases were systematically searched for publications. Two reviewers completed the quality appraisal of the 12 articles identified during the literature search. RESULTS: Common barriers include: formal training; access to ultrasound machines; quality assurance; time to perform exams; inability to use findings in documentation/decision making. Low confidence may be an underrepresented barrier. Successful training programs include an introductory class with mixed didactic and hands-on training, training with live models, direct supervision and image review by experts, and longitudinal training. CONCLUSION: Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioners are capable of learning and incorporating POCUS use into clinical practice. Broad solutions can be instituted to remove barriers, but more research is needed to describe necessary components of a successful POCUS training program.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Older adults were critically vulnerable to disruptions in health care during the COVID-19 pandemic, but it is not known if changes in ED utilization varied based on patient characteristics. Using a cohort of older Veterans, we examined changes in ED visit rates based on four characteristics of interest: age, race, area deprivation index, and frailty. Methods: Participants were aged ≥65, with ≥2 visits in primary or geriatric clinics between 02/02/2018-05/07/2019. An adjusted negative binomial regression model was constructed for each characteristic. We report mean counts of all ED visits by quarter for subgroups separately, and report rate ratios to compare ED visits in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic to the year before. Results: Patients with complete case data numbered 38,871. During the first two quarters, all subgroups had decreased ED visits, with more variation in the third and fourth quarters. The very highly frail, who had the highest mean estimated count of ED visits per person through both pre-COVID and COVID periods, also had a significant decrease in their ED visits during multiple quarters of the pandemic to a greater degree than other frailty subgroups. Conclusion: Stratifying older adults by frailty identified patient subgroups with the greatest variation in ED visits during COVID. Very highly frail patients warrant special attention to understand how variation in ED utilization affects patient outcomes.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between postpartum depression (PPD) screening results in pediatric primary care and subsequent infant preventive and acute care utilization. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 5,341 infants born in 2021 whose mothers were screened for PPD at a well-child visit during the first 6 months. Logistic regression was used to examine that association between a positive PPD screen and 1) adherence to the 12-month well-child visit, and 2) any acute care visits (urgent care or emergency department visits) from 6-15 months. The association between PPD screen and number of acute care visits was examined with negative binomial logistic regression. RESULTS: The incidence of positive PPD screens was 15.6% in the first 6 months. There was no significant difference in 12-month well-child visit adherence based on PPD screening (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77 to 1.06; p-value: 0.206). The odds of having any acute care visit were higher among infants whose mothers screened positive for PPD (aOR: 1.2; 95% CI: 1.0 to 1.3; p-value: 0.009). There was a significant difference in the incidence rate of acute care visits based on PPD screening results (incidence rate ratio: 1.1; 95% CI: 1.0 to 1.2; p-value: 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Screening positive for PPD was associated with subsequent acute care utilization but not 12-month preventive care. Primary care providers may need to proactively follow-up after acute care visits to ensure both infant health and maternal needs are met, connecting mothers to resources as needed.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare outcomes between cholecystectomy on index versus delayed admission for acute cholangitis. METHODS: The 2011-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify adult patients admitted for acute cholangitis who underwent cholecystectomy. Study cohorts were defined based on timing of surgery. Multivariable regressions and Royston-Parmar time-adjusted analysis were used to evaluate the association of cholecystectomy timing and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 65,753 patients, 82.0 â€‹% received surgery on Index and 18.0 â€‹% on Delayed admissions. Following adjustment, Delayed operation was associated with significantly increased odds of mortality (AOR 1.67 [95 â€‹% CI 1.10-2.54]), complications (1.25 [1.13-1.40]), repair of bile duct injury (1.66 [1.15-2.41]), conversion to open (1.69 [1.48-1.93]), and 30-day readmission (3.52 [3.21-3.86]). The Delayed cohort experienced a +$14,200 increment in hospitalization costs relative to Index. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholangitis is significantly associated with adverse postoperative outcomes, suggesting that index cholecystectomy may be safe to perform.

RESUMEN

Background Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is more common in the hospital population and has an estimated annual incidence of 67 per 100,000. Surgery is a risk factor for DVT and has been proven to cause morbidity and mortality in the postoperative period. The correlation between the frequency of DVT and major surgical procedures has been demonstrated. However, few studies have been conducted on the relationship between emergency surgeries and the incidence of DVT. Our study aims to determine the prevalence of postoperative DVT in patients undergoing emergency laparotomies. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted over 18 months, from January 2021 to July 2022. Patients who underwent emergency exploratory laparotomies were included in this study. Duplex ultrasonography was done preoperatively to exclude patients with DVT. A serial duplex ultrasound was performed to detect DVT until the seventh postoperative day. All the clinicopathological and surgical information of patients relevant to this study was collected and analyzed. Results Out of 146 patients, one developed DVT in the postoperative period. The patient who experienced DVT had no other known risk factors; however, his age of 60 was a risk factor for DVT. So, the reported prevalence of DVT in our study population was just 0.68% of emergency exploratory laparotomy patients. Conclusion Our study reports DVT in only one case out of 146 patients who underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy without routine pharmacological prophylaxis. We might, therefore, conclude that emergency exploratory laparotomy may be a separate risk factor for the emergence of DVT. More prospective studies with large sample sizes should be done to evaluate the prevalence of DVT in emergency exploratory laparotomies.

RESUMEN

Purpose: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is the most widely prescribed antifibrinolytic for active bleeding or to prevent surgical bleeding. Despite numerous large multi-center randomized trials involving thousands of patients being conducted, TXA remains underutilized in indications where it has demonstrated efficacy and a lack of harmful effects. This narrative review aims to provide basic concepts about fibrinolysis and TXA's mode of action and is focused on the most recent and important trials evaluating this drug in different hemorrhagic situations. Methods: We selected every low bias RCT, and we highlighted their strengths and limitations throughout this review. Principal findings: While TXA appears to have a favorable benefit-risk ratio in most situations (trauma, obstetrics, at-risk for bleeding surgeries) evidence of benefit is lacking in certain medical settings (SAH, digestive bleeding). Conclusion: Although in some situations the drug's effect on significant outcomes is modest, its favorable safety profile allows it to be recommended for trauma patients, in obstetrics, and in scheduled surgeries at risk of bleeding. However, it cannot be recommended in cases of spontaneous intracranial bleeding, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), or gastrointestinal bleeding.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate disparities in admissions to highly rated skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) between Medicare beneficiaries with and without opioid use disorder (OUD). DESIGN: Nationwide, retrospective observational cohort. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries aged ≥18 years admitted to SNFs following hospitalization during 2016-2020 (n = 30,922 with OUD and n = 137,454 without OUD). METHODS: Data used were 100% Medicare inpatient claims, nursing home administrative databases, and Nursing Home Compare. We identified hospitalized patients with and without OUD and matched them on age, sex, Part D low-income subsidy (LIS), and residential county. We compared the overall and component (quality, staffing, and health inspections) star ratings of SNFs that beneficiaries entered. Beneficiary-level regression models were conducted adjusting for race and ethnicity, Medicare-Medicaid dual status, comorbidity score, hospital length of stay, and state and year fixed effects. RESULTS: The overall study sample had a mean (SD) age of 71.4 (11.4) years, 63.9% were female, and 57.4% had LIS. Among beneficiaries with OUD, 50.3% entered SNFs with above-average (4 or 5) overall rating compared with 51.3% among those without OUD. Distributions of above-average ratings among beneficiaries with and without OUD were as follows: 63.9% vs 62.2% for quality, 32.8% vs 34.9% for health inspections, and 46.2% vs 45.0% for staffing, respectively. Adjusted regression models indicated that beneficiaries with OUD were less likely to be admitted to facilities with above-average overall (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87-0.92), health inspection (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.93), and staffing (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.89-0.94) ratings compared with beneficiaries without OUD, whereas quality (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.01) ratings did not differ. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Despite mixed results on component ratings, our findings suggest a concerning disparity in the overall quality of SNFs admitting Medicare beneficiaries with OUD. Enhancing equitable access to high-quality SNF care for individuals with OUD is imperative amid rising demand and legal protections under the American Disabilities Act.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There is a growing body of literature that shows geographic social vulnerability, which seeks to measure the resiliency of a community to withstand unforeseen disasters, may be associated with negative outcomes after traumatic injury. For motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) specifically, it is unknown how the resources of a patient's home environment may interact with resources of the environment where the crash occurred. METHODS: We merged publicly available crash data from the state of Michigan with the Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement dataset. A social vulnerability index (SVI) score was calculated for each ZIP code and was then cross-referenced between the location of the MVC (Crash-SVI) and the patient's home address (Home-SVI). SVI was divided into quintiles, with higher numbers indicating greater vulnerability. Adjusted logistic regression models using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator for feature selection and regularization were performed sequentially using patient, vehicular, and environmental variables to identify associations between Home-SVI and Crash-SVI, with mortality and injury severity score (ISS) greater than 15 (ISS15). RESULTS: Between January 2020 and December 2022, a total of 14,706 patients were identified. Most MVCs (75.3% of all patients) occurred in the second through fourth quintiles of SVI. In all cases, Crash-SVI occurred most frequently within the same quintile as the patient's Home-SVI. Average crash speed limits showed a significant negative association with increasing SVI. On adjusted logistic regression, there were significantly increased odds of mortality for the fifth quintile of Home-SVI in comparison to the first quintile when adjusted for patient factors; but this lost significance after the addition of vehicular or environmental variables. In contrast, there were decreased odds of ISS15 for the highest quintiles of Crash-SVI in all logistic regression models. CONCLUSIONS: Geographic social vulnerability markers were associated with lower MVC-associated injury severity, perhaps in part because of the association with lower speed limit in these areas.