RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is below 40%, but this data is not available for Brazil. We hypothesize that a high number of HCPs are not immune to pertussis in Brazil. Main objective was to determine the seroprevalence of anti-pertussis toxin (anti-PT IgG) among HCPs. Secondary objectives were to evaluate Tdap vaccination coverage, to assess predictive factors associated with anti-PT IgG, and to estimate the decay of anti-PT IgG and time to Tdap vaccination. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional serological study in 352 HCPs who worked at São Paulo Hospital - Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) in 2020, approved by UNIFESP Ethics Committee. Data collected included sociodemographics, knowledge about Tdap, and vaccination status. Anti-PT IgG were quantified by ELISA: <10 IU/mL seronegative and ≥ 10-1000 IU/mL seropositive. Titers ≥ 10-50 IU/mL were classified low positivity, indicating no recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination; >50 IU/mL high positivity, indicating recent B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination, and > 100 IU/mL as acute B. pertussis infection or Tdap vaccination in the previous year. Comparisons were done by Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression, and Pearsons correlation, at 5% p-level. RESULTS: 331/352 HCPs were not aware the Brazilian National Immunization Program recommends Tdap for all HCPs and pregnant women. 68/339 HCPs received Tdap (mean 3.1 ± 2.0 years). 55/352 were seronegative for pertussis, all unvaccinated. 56/271 with no history of Tdap vaccination had high positivity. The probability of anti-PT IgG > 50 IU/mL was 11.5 times higher in Tdap vaccinated HCPs than in non-vaccinated (p < 0.001). There was a weak but significant correlation between anti-PT IgG and interval of Tdap vaccination (r = 0.404; p = 0.001). Anti-PT IgG dropped 5 IU/mL/year (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Better education of HCPs on needs and benefits of Tdap vaccination is critical. Goals must be to improve HCPs vaccination coverage.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular , Difteria , Tétanos , Tos Ferina , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Cobertura de Vacunación , Brasil/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Vacunación , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , Difteria/prevención & control , Inmunoglobulina G , Tétanos/prevención & control , Atención a la SaludRESUMEN
Abstract Objective: To assess the protective effect of exclusive breastfeeding and the effectiveness of maternal vaccination in reducing pertussis-like illness. Method: This was a case-control study conducted in sentinel hospitals for pertussis in Recife between July 2016 and July 2018. Cases included children aged under six months with symptoms compatible with pertussis (pertussis-like illness). Controls included children aged under six months, living in the metropolitan region of Recife with no diagnosis of pertussis-like illness and matched by the same hospital and birth date. Results: Seventy-three cases and 194 controls were included. The diagnosis of pertussis-like illness was predominantly clinical (97,2%). Amongst the main symptoms, paroxysmal cough was observed in 95.89% of cases and vomiting in 53.4%. There were 29 hospitalized cases and no deaths. Out of the 73 cases, 47 were born to mothers vaccinated against pertussis during pregnancy, and the mothers of 144 of the 194 controls had been vaccinated. The protective effect of breastfeeding was of 74% (95% CI;38%, 89%). Children younger than six months, who were exclusively breastfed and with mothers vaccinated against pertussis during pregnancy were 5 times less likely to develop pertussis-like illness, corresponding to a protection of 79% (95% CI;31%, 94%). The effectiveness of maternal vaccination against pertussis-like illness in children under six months was low (27%) and not statistically significant (CI 95%; −34% a 60%). Conclusions: Exclusive breastfeeding protects children under six months from pertussis-like illness and may be enhanced when associated with maternal vaccination. These strategies should be encouraged because they also protect against pertussis-like illnesses.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Lactante , Niño , Lactancia Materna , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Vacunación , MadresRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the protective effect of exclusive breastfeeding and the effectiveness of maternal vaccination in reducing pertussis-like illness. METHOD: This was a case-control study conducted in sentinel hospitals for pertussis in Recife between July 2016 and July 2018. Cases included children aged under six months with symptoms compatible with pertussis (pertussis-like illness). Controls included children aged under six months, living in the metropolitan region of Recife with no diagnosis of pertussis-like illness and matched by the same hospital and birth date. RESULTS: Seventy-three cases and 194 controls were included. The diagnosis of pertussis-like illness was predominantly clinical (97,2%). Amongst the main symptoms, paroxysmal cough was observed in 95.89% of cases and vomiting in 53.4%. There were 29 hospitalized cases and no deaths. Out of the 73 cases, 47 were born to mothers vaccinated against pertussis during pregnancy, and the mothers of 144 of the 194 controls had been vaccinated. The protective effect of breastfeeding was of 74% (95% CI;38%, 89%). Children younger than six months, who were exclusively breastfed and with mothers vaccinated against pertussis during pregnancy were 5 times less likely to develop pertussis-like illness, corresponding to a protection of 79% (95% CI;31%, 94%). The effectiveness of maternal vaccination against pertussis-like illness in children under six months was low (27%) and not statistically significant (CI 95%; -34% a 60%). CONCLUSIONS: Exclusive breastfeeding protects children under six months from pertussis-like illness and may be enhanced when associated with maternal vaccination. These strategies should be encouraged because they also protect against pertussis-like illnesses.
Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Tos Ferina , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Madres , Embarazo , Vacunación , Tos Ferina/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Objetivo. La inmunización es una de las intervenciones más importantes para prevenir la morbimortalidad en la población mundial. No obstante, aún persisten brechas para alcanzar coberturas ideales de vacunación. Además, las múltiples dosis y vacunas dificultan alcanzar las metas mínimas establecidas. Por ello, se desarrollan vacunas combinadas y fraccionadas para reducir el número de inyecciones, errores programáticos, reactogenicidad y mejorar la adherencia. En tres días distintos, durante 9 horas, se reunieron 6 médicos pediatras expertos en vacunas en el Perú siguiendo el método RAND/UCLA, con el objeto de elaborar un consenso de opinión y actualización de la vacuna combinada hexavalente [DTaP+Haemophilus influenzae tipo b (Hib)+Hepatitis B (HVB)+antipolio inactivada (IPV)] y su eventual uso en el Programa ampliado de inmunizaciones (PAI). Las recomendaciones del consenso son: reemplazar las vacunas, antipolio oral (OPV) por IPV, pertussis de células enteras por vacunas acelulares y DTP de los 4 años por dTap entre los 4 y 6 años; usar la vacuna hexavalente para la serie primaria (2, 4 y 6 meses); usar 4 dosis de vacuna contra Hib (2, 4, 6 y 18 meses); incorporar la vacuna hexavalente en el PAI; no usar la IPV fraccionada (fIPV) y administrar solo 4 dosis de IPV.
Objetive. Immunization is one of the most important interventions to prevent morbidity and mortality in the world population. However, gaps persist to achieve ideal vaccination coverage. In addition, the multiple vaccines and necessary doses make it difficult to reach the minimum established goals. On this scenario, combined and fractionated vaccines are being developed with the aim of reducing the injections number, programmatic errors, reactogenicity and improving adherence. On three different days, for 9 hours, 6 pediatricians experts in vaccines in Peru met following the RAND/UCLA method in order to develop a consensus opinion and update of the combined hexavalent vaccine [DTaP+Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)+Hepatitis B (HVB)+Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV)] and its eventual use in the Extended Immunization Program (EPI). The consensus recommendation are: replace the vaccines, Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) by IPV, pertussis of whole cells by acellular vaccines and DTP of 4 years old by dTap between 4 and 6 years old; use the hexavalent vaccine for the primary series (2, 4 and 6 months); use 4 doses of Hib vaccine (2, 4, 6 and 18 months); incorporate the hexavalent vaccine in the EPI; do not use fractionated IPV (fIPV) and only administer 4 doses of IPV.
RESUMEN
The resurgence of pertussis in the world and in our country has questioned the effectiveness of cellular and acellular vaccines. The reason why pertussis has not been controlled or eliminated after 70 years of implementation of the vaccination is probably multifactorial. This article, on the basis of questions and answers, describes the benefits and limitations of both cellular and acellular vaccines and suggests new strategies of vaccination in childhood. It is a fact that the currently applied vaccination does not eliminate the circulation of Bordetella pertussis in the community. Perhaps the introduction of vaccines with live B. pertussis, inhalation, will be able to eliminate the disease around the world.
El resurgimiento de la coqueluche en el mundo y en nuestro país ha puesto en tela de juicio la eficacia de las vacunas celulares y acelulares. Las razones de por qué la coqueluche no es controlada ni eliminada después de 70 años de implementación de la vacunación son diversas y probablemente multifactoriales. En este artículo, en base a preguntas y respuestas, se describen las bondades y limitaciones de tanto vacunas celulares como acelulares y queda sugerida una mejor forma de administrar ambas en la infancia. Es un hecho que la vacunación actualmente aplicada no elimina la circulación de Bordetella pertussis en la comunidad. Tal vez la introducción de vacunas con B. pertussis viva, inhalatoria, sea capaz de eliminar la enfermedad de la humanidad.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Bordetella pertussis/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina/administración & dosificación , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Chile , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina/efectos adversos , Vacunación , Vacunas Acelulares/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Acelulares/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (dTpa) vaccine, Boostrix™, is indicated for booster vaccination of children, adolescents and adults. The original prefilled disposable dTpa syringe presentation was recently replaced by another prefilled-syringe presentation with latex-free tip-caps and plunger-stoppers. 671 healthy adolescents aged 10-15 years who had previously received 5 or 6 previous DT(P)/dT(pa) vaccine doses, were randomized (1:1) to receive dTpa booster, injected using the new (dTpa-new) or previous syringe (dTpa-previous) presentations. Immunogenicity was assessed before and 1-month post-booster vaccination; safety/reactogenicity were assessed during 31-days post-vaccination. Non-inferiority of dTpa-new versus dTpa-previous was demonstrated for all antigens (ULs 95% CIs for GMC ratios ranged between 1.03-1.13). 1-month post-booster, immune responses were in similar ranges for all antigens with both syringe presentations. dTpa delivered using either syringe presentation was well-tolerated. These clinical results complement the technical data and support the use of the new syringe presentation to deliver the dTpa vaccine.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Jeringas , Adolescente , Anticuerpos/análisis , Antígenos/análisis , Niño , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria , Masculino , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , VacunaciónRESUMEN
Objective: to discuss the current PAHO recommendation that does not support the substitution of traditional cellular DTP vaccine by acellular DTP, and the role of mutations, in humans, as the main cause of rare adverse events, such as epileptic-like convulsions, triggered by pertussis vaccine. Data review: the main components related to toxic effects of cellular pertussis vaccines are the lipopolysaccharide of bacterial cell wall and pertussis toxin. The removal of part of lipopolysaccharide layer has allowed the creation of a safer cellular pertussis vaccine, with costs comparable to the traditional cellular vaccine, and which may be a substitute for the acellular vaccine. Conclusion: The new methodology introduced by Instituto Butantan allows for the development of a new safer pertussis vaccine with low LPS content (Plow), and the use of the lipopolysaccharide obtained in the process in the production of monophosphoryl lipid A. This component has shown potent adjuvant effect when administered together with influenza inactivated vaccine, making possible to reduce the antigen dose, enhancing the production capacity and lowering costs.
Objetivo: Discutir as recomendações da WHO-OPAS que não consideram indicada a substituição da vacina DTP celular clássica pela DTP acelular e o papel de mutações, em humanos, como principal causa dos raros eventos de convulsões epileptiformes desencadeadas pela vacina pertussis. Revisão dos dados: Os principais componentes relacionados aos efeitos tóxicos da vacina pertussis celular são o lipopolissacarídio da parede celular da bactéria e a toxina pertussis. A remoção de parte da camada lipopolissacarídica permitiu a criação de uma vacina pertussis celular, mais segura e de custo comparável ao da vacina celular tradicional, podendo substituir a vacina pertussis acelular. Conclusão: A nova vacina pertussis, com baixo teor de LPS (Plow) desenvolvida pelo Instituto Butantan, além de oferecer uma vacina mais segura, permite o aproveitamento do lipopolissacarídeo para a produção de monofosforil lipídeo A. Esse componente mostrou-se potente como adjuvante e altamente eficiente quando administrado com a vacina de influenza, levando à possibilidade de se reduzir a dose de antígeno, aumentando a capacidade de produção e redução dos custos.