RESUMEN
Latinx young adults' experiences of discrimination are associated with high levels of depressive symptoms and examining protective factors that buffer the negative consequences of discrimination is important. In a sample of 195 Latina college students, predominately of Mexican origin, we examined associations between perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms, and how sisters' dyadic coping behaviors and familism values moderated this association. We conducted hierarchical regression analyses to test our study hypotheses. We found that Latina college students who were older sisters reported more conflictual and antagonistic sibling relationships, or who perceived higher levels of discrimination also reported the most depressive symptoms, which supports prior research. Importantly, Latina college students who strongly endorsed supportive, obligatory, and referent familism values reported fewer depressive symptoms. Supportive familism values weakened the association between perceived discrimination and Latina college students' depressive symptoms but strengthened associations between sisters' negative dyadic coping behaviors and depressive symptoms. Furthermore, sisters' negative dyadic coping behaviors strengthened the positive association between perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms. Our findings highlight the importance of familism values for Latinx young adults' well-being, as well as the harmful effects of perceived discrimination, particularly in the context of sisters' negative dyadic coping behaviors.
Asunto(s)
Depresión , Hermanos , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Femenino , Discriminación Percibida , Adaptación Psicológica , Hispánicos o Latinos , EstudiantesRESUMEN
Prior research indicates that couples who cope with chronic illness from a relational "we" orientation experience more positive outcomes than couples that cope individually; however, little prior research identifies clinical processes that promote reciprocity or how societal gender processes are involved. This grounded theory analysis of 25 videotaped therapy sessions with six heterosexual couples coping with chronic liver disease (LD) used a feminist-informed relational lens to focus on the clinical processes involved in shifting from an individual to a relational orientation. Findings identified three contextual barriers to attaining a "we orientation": (a) autonomy discourse, (b) illness-related power, and (c) gendered power. Analysis detailed therapist actions that decreased the impact of barriers to reciprocity and fostered relational coping. Clinical implications attend to complex intersections among gender, caregiving, and contextual barriers to reciprocity.
Investigaciones anteriores indican que las parejas que hacen frente a una enfermedad crónica desde una orientación relacional basada en el "nosotros" tienen resultados más positivos que las parejas que la enfrentan individualmente; sin embargo, existen escasas investigaciones previas que identifiquen los procesos clínicos que promueven la reciprocidad o la manera en la que están implicados los procesos de género social. Este análisis de teoría fundamentada de 25 sesiones de terapia videograbadas con seis parejas heterosexuales que enfrentan una enfermedad hepática crónica utilizó una óptica relacional fundamentada en el feminismo para centrarse en los procesos clínicos relacionados con el paso de una orientación individual a una relacional. Los hallazgos identificaron tres obstáculos contextuales para lograr una "orientación basada en el nosotros": (a) el discurso de autonomía, (b) el poder relacionado con la enfermedad, y (c) el poder asociado al género. El análisis detalló las medidas del terapeuta que redujeron el efecto de los obstáculos para la reciprocidad y fomentaron el afrontamiento relacional. Las implicancias clínicas tratan de las intersecciones complejas entre el género, el cuidado y los obstáculos contextuales para la reciprocidad.