RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Outcomes and recovery of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) have been broadly examined in studies. The total recovery time can potentially be reduced by performing simultaneous, bilateral ECTR. In this study we prospectively investigated days to self-reliance. As secondary outcomes, we investigated direct postoperative recovery of hand function and pre and postoperative symptom severity after simultaneous, bilateral ECTR. METHODS: In this single-center prospective case series, we included all patients willing to participate after undergoing bilateral ECTR between December 2015 and July 2019. Every patient recorded days to self-reliance (when a patient could perform basic activities of daily living without the need for assistance from another person) and completed a preoperative and postoperative Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) evaluating postoperative hand function and pre and postoperative symptom severity. RESULTS: In total, 81 patients received simultaneous, bilateral ECTR. Median days until self-reliance was 4; mean number of days was 4.9. Concerning BCTQ scores, postoperative functional status increased significantly each day, and mean BCTQ score decreased gradually from intense difficulty to little difficulty in daily tasks over a period of 7 days. Preoperative BCTQ symptom severity showed significant improvement compared to postoperative symptoms, evolving from medium to slight symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous, bilateral ECTR offers recovery to self-reliance in 4 to 5 days with a gradual and significant increase of hand function in the following postoperative days. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/cirugía , Endoscopía , Humanos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anatomically shaped cohesive silicone breast implants are frequently used in aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. After successful results with the Style 410 prosthesis, McGhan (Natrelle, Allergan) introduced the Style 510 prosthesis. After using this novel prosthesis, the authors encountered a high number of prosthesis malrotations on self-reported follow-up. Therefore, a retrospective medical record review was performed to determine the prevalence of malrotation of the Style 510 prosthesis. METHODS: From January of 2005 to December of 2006, 73 (146 prostheses) aesthetic augmentation mammaplasty procedures were performed using Style 510 prostheses. All prostheses were placed subglandularly through an inframammary incision. The postsurgical protocol for the first 3 weeks involved wearing a nonwired compression bra, abstinence from sports activities, and abstinence from heavy labor. Standard follow-up was at 1 week, 3 months, and if necessary. RESULTS: On self-reported follow-up, 8.2 percent of all prostheses were rotated. These rotations all occurred unilaterally after a mean period of 10 months (range, 3 to 19 months). No relation to an inciting incident or prosthesis volume could be found. CONCLUSIONS: The number of rotations of the Style 510 prosthesis seen after primary aesthetic breast augmentation is high. An obvious cause of this major problem has not been found. This led the authors to discontinue using the Style 510 prosthesis for primary aesthetic mammary augmentations in their practice.