RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: TransInguinal PrePeritoneal (TIPP) inguinal hernia repair (IHR) combines an open anterior approach with a preperitoneal position of the mesh. Advantages include reduced chronic postoperative inguinal pain, low recurrence rates and quick recovery. Critics have expressed concerns that recurrent IHR after TIPP could be difficult and with an increased risk of complications due to the formation of scar tissue in both the anterior and posterior anatomical inguinal planes. This study reports feasibility and outcomes of recurrent IHR after TIPP repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent recurrent IHR after TIPP between January 2013 and January 2015 in a single hernia-dedicated teaching hospital were included. Exclusion criteria were femoral hernia, incarcerated hernia and reasons for unreliable follow-up. Electronic medical records were assessed retrospectively to register surgical outcomes and complications. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients underwent surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernia after TIPP. Twenty patients were treated with a "re-TIPP when possible" strategy; resulting in 13 successful re-TIPPs and 7 conversions to Lichtenstein repair. Eleven patients underwent a primary Lichtenstein's repair, the remaining two patients underwent recurrent IHR using other techniques (TransREctus sheath PrePeritoneal and TransAbdominal PrePeritoneal repair). Mean time of surgery was 44.7 min (standard deviation 16.7). There was one patient (3.0%) with a re-recurrent inguinal hernia during follow-up. Other minor complications included urinary tract infection. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that after TIPP it is feasible and safe to perform re-surgery for recurrent inguinal hernia with an anterior approach again. For these recurrences, a Lichtenstein repair can be performed, or a "re-TIPP if possible" strategy can be applied by experienced TIPP surgeons, tailored to the intraoperative findings. Whether a re-TIPP has advantages over Lichtenstein should be evaluated in a prospective manner.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Factibilidad , Hernia Inguinal/complicaciones , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Oligopéptidos , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hernia recurrence rates after incisional hernia repair vary between 8.7 and 32%, depending on multiple factors such as patient characteristics, the use of meshes, surgical technique and the degree of experience of the treating surgeon. Recurrent hernias are considered complex wall hernias, and 20% of all incisional hernia repairs involve a recurrent hernia. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes after recurrent incisional hernia repair, in association with surgical technique and body-mass index (BMI). METHODS: All patients who had incisional hernia repair between 2013 and 2018 were included. Primary outcome was rate of recurrent incisional hernia after initial hernia repair. Secondary outcomes were complication rate and recurrence rate in association with BMI. RESULTS: A number of 269 patients were included, of which 75 patients (27.9%) with a recurrent incisional hernia. Recurrent hernia repair was performed in 49 patients, 83.7% underwent open repair. Complication rate for recurrent hernia repair was higher than for the initial incisional hernia repair. Of the 49 patients with recurrent hernia repair, patients with a BMI above 30 had higher complication and recurrence rates compared to patients with BMI below 30. Especially infectious complications were more common in patients with a higher BMI: 23.1% vs. 0% wound infections. CONCLUSION: The results from this study show that complication and recurrence rates are increased after recurrent incisional hernia repair, which are further increased by obesity. Only a limited amount of literature is available on this topic, further larger multicenter studies are necessary, until then a patient-specific surgical approach based on the surgeon's expertise is recommended.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Hernia Incisional , Laparoscopía , Índice de Masa Corporal , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Recurrencia , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To model the effect of time since injury on longitudinal respiratory function measures in spinal cord injured-individuals and to investigate the effect of patient characteristics. SETTING: A total of 173 people who sustained a spinal cord injury between 1966 and April 2013 and who had previously participated in research or who underwent clinically indicated outpatient respiratory function tests at the Austin Hospital in Melbourne, Australia, were included in the study. At least two measurements over time were available for analysis in 59 patients. METHODS: Longitudinal data analysis was performed using generalised linear regression models to determine changes in respiratory function following spinal cord injury from immediately post injury to many years later. Secondly, we explored whether injury severity, age, gender and body mass index (BMI) at injury altered the time-dependent change in respiratory function. RESULTS: The generalised linear regression model showed no significant change (P=0.276) in respiratory function measured in (forced) vital capacity ((F)VC) after the spinal cord injury. However, significant (P<0.05) differences in respiratory function over time were found when categorising age and BMI. CONCLUSION: This clinical cohort with long-term, repeated measurements of respiratory function showed no significant overall change in respiratory function over 23 years. However, a decline in respiratory function over time was observed in subgroups of individuals older than 30 years at the onset of injury and in those with a BMI>30 kg m(-2).
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Respiratorios/etiología , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Australia , Índice de Masa Corporal , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Modelos Lineales , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Respiratorios/diagnóstico , Capacidad Vital/fisiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of a previously described Dutch clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcome in routine clinical practice. SETTING: Adult (⩾18 years) patients who were admitted to the Austin Hospital with a traumatic spinal cord injury between January 2006 and August 2014. METHODS: Data from medical records were extracted to determine the score of the Dutch clinical ambulation prediction rule proposed by van Middendorp et al. in 2011. A receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve was generated to investigate the performance of the prediction rule. Univariate analyses were performed to investigate which factors significantly influence ambulation after a traumatic spinal cord injury. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve (AUC) obtained during the current study (0.939, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.892, 0.986)) was not significantly different from the AUC from the original Dutch clinical prediction model (0.956, 95% CI (0.936, 0.976)). Factors that were found to have a significant influence on ambulation outcome were time spent in the ICU, number of days hospitalised and injury severity. Age at injury initially showed a significant influence on ambulation however, this effect was not apparent after inclusion of the 24 patients who died due to the trauma (and therefore did not walk after their injuries). CONCLUSION: The Dutch ambulation prediction rule performed similarly in routine clinical practice as in the original, controlled study environment in which it was developed. The potential effect of survival bias in the original model requires further investigation.