RESUMEN
Genome-scale metabolic models of microbial metabolism have extensively been used to guide the design of microbial cell factories, still, many of the available strain design algorithms often fail to produce a reduced list of targets for improved performance that can be implemented and validated in a step-wise manner. We present Comparative Flux Sampling Analysis (CFSA), a strain design method based on the extensive comparison of complete metabolic spaces corresponding to maximal or near-maximal growth and production phenotypes. The comparison is complemented by statistical analysis to identify reactions with altered flux that are suggested as targets for genetic interventions including up-regulations, down-regulations and gene deletions. We applied CFSA to the production of lipids by Cutaneotrichosporon oleaginosus and naringenin by Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifying engineering targets in agreement with previous studies as well as new interventions. CFSA is an easy-to-use, robust method that suggests potential metabolic engineering targets for growth-uncoupled production that can be applied to the design of microbial cell factories.
RESUMEN
Constraint-based, genome-scale metabolic models are an essential tool to guide metabolic engineering. However, they lack the detail and time dimension that kinetic models with enzyme dynamics offer. Model reduction can be used to bridge the gap between the two methods and allow for the integration of kinetic models into the Design-Built-Test-Learn cycle. Here we show that these reduced size models can be representative of the dynamics of the original model and demonstrate the automated generation and parameterisation of such models. Using these minimal models of metabolism could allow for further exploration of dynamic responses in metabolic networks.