Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Patient Educ Couns ; 59(1): 1-12, 2005 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16198213

RESUMEN

Systematic, computerized search in Medline, the Cochrane Library, Eric, PsychINFO and Embase files, 1980-2003, selecting descriptions of prospective intervention trials with good methodological design, testing effects of social support interventions on health outcomes in primary and outpatient care for type 2 diabetes. Six controlled trials were reviewed. They defined, modified, and measured social support in various ways, and scored outcomes with varying measures. Gender differences and the right amount of support seem important. Promising new forms of social support: group consultations (better HbA1c and lifestyle), Internet or telephone-based peer support (improved perceived support, increased physical activity, respectively), and social support groups (improved knowledge and psychosocial functioning). No improved diabetes control by classic forms of support, e.g. from spouse (but weight loss in women) and family and friends (no differences). It is tentatively concluded that this review supports the hypothesis that specific social support interventions affect patient self-care and diabetes outcomes. New forms of social support may be discussed and incorporated in the work of diabetes teams, and offered to patients as new possibilities to help them adjust to a life with (type 2) diabetes and make information-based decisions. Only in the group consultations study, diabetes control was protected. More well-designed research testing the effects of specific social support interventions on patient self-care, lifestyle adaptations, and outcomes of diabetes care, is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Apoyo Social , Consejo , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Relaciones Interpersonales , Masculino , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Autocuidado , Esposos/psicología
2.
Patient Educ Couns ; 51(1): 17-28, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12915276

RESUMEN

A systematic review of the research literature using Medline, Embase, Psyclit/Psycinfo and the Cochrane Library files 1980 through 2001, identified only eight publications based on well-designed studies involving randomised controlled trials (RCTs)--testing the effects of modification of provider-patient interaction and provider consulting style on patient diabetes self-care and diabetes outcomes, in general practice or hospital outpatient settings. Review of these publications leads to the tentative conclusion that focusing on patient behaviour--directly enhancing patient participation i.e. by assistant-guided patient preparation for visits to doctors, empowering group education, group consultations, or automated telephone management--is more effective than focusing on provider behaviour to change their consulting style into a more patient-centred one. The latter proves hard to sustain, needs intensive support, and is not very effective in improving patient self-care and health outcomes when executed alone. Patient behaviour focused interventions show good efficacy and efficiency, and improve patient self-care and diabetes outcomes. More well-designed intervention studies focusing on enhancing patient participation in primary and hospital outpatient diabetes care are needed.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Personal de Salud , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Autocuidado , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA