RESUMEN
UNLABELLED: In clinical practice, diagnosis and follow-up of hypertension is based on blood pressure (BP) as measured by auscultatory method. BP is usually measured using a stethoscope to auscultate the Korotkoff sounds and mercury or an aneroid sphygmomanometer. However due to the lack of regulatory rules, the devices are rarely checked making the quality of the measures doubtful. OBJECTIVE: To compare BP measured following the WHO recommendations, using 2 different devices: the mercury or aneroid sphygmomanometer used by the physician and a SECURUS manometer that has been calibrated just before the implementation of the study. METHOD: The study was performed with 1694 French general practitioners. Every physician included 2 ambulatory patients: a newly diagnosed non-treated hypertensive patient and a treated hypertensive patient. The physician was asked to include the first patient of each category attending his office. BP was measured sequentially with the 2 devices in a random order. Collected data were socio-demographic parameters, cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension related diseases, drug treatment for hypertension and BP levels. RESULTS: Mean BPs differ by less than 1 mmHg between the 2 devices. However 10% of the treated hypertensive patients are not classified as having normalised BP values (BP < 140/90 mmHg) or high BP values, in the same way by the 2 devices. Mean absolute difference between the 2 devices is > 5 mmHg in 22% and 13% of the physicians for SBP and DBP respectively. CONCLUSION: This pilot study emphasises the need of BP measurements of good quality in clinical practice, because of the possible impact on the care of the patients and the related costs. Regulatory rules on the control of the devices might improve the quality of BP measurements.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Anciano , Calibración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Control de Calidad , EsfigmomanometrosRESUMEN
In recent years, studies have shown that parameters derived from the arterial pressure wave other than systolic and diastolic blood pressure provide important information on cardiovascular status. Among these parameters, pulse pressure, arterial stiffness and heart rate have emerged as independent markers of cardiovascular risk in different populations. Although a number of studies have used casual measurements of these parameters in a clinic setting, others have focused on their assessment under ambulatory conditions. The pulse pressure represents the amplitude of the pressure wave signal (systolic minus diastolic blood pressure), higher pulse pressure values having been reported in patients possessing cardiovascular risk factors. Close associations between a high pulse pressure and several surrogate end-points have been described. Furthermore, epidemiological studies have shown that a high pulse pressure is an independent predictor of hard end-points in several populations. Arterial stiffness represents one of the major haemodynamic factors determining pulse pressure. Pulse wave velocity, measured from the initial upstroke of the pressure wave, constitutes an established index of arterial stiffness. Studies have reported stiffer arteries in patients with cardiovascular pathology even at an early stage of disease. Close correlations between arterial stiffness and several surrogate markers have been reported, and arterial stiffness and its changes have recently been shown to be an independent predictor of hard end-points in patients with a high cardiovascular risk. Methods to evaluate arterial stiffness under ambulatory conditions are emerging. Heart rate represents the frequency of the cyclical strain of the arterial wall, clinical studies having shown that ambulatory heart rate is correlated to several surrogate markers. A few epidemiological studies have analysed the value of ambulatory heart rate as an independent predictor of hard end-points, but their positive findings need to be confirmed. The analysis of the pressure wave thus allows the determination of several haemodynamic indices other than systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Pulse pressure, arterial stiffness and heart rate constitute other outcomes that may be useful as additional factors in risk assessment for future therapeutic decision-making.