RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Adequate staging of early rectal neoplasms is essential for organ-preserving treatments, but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) frequently overestimates the stage of those lesions. We aimed to compare the ability of magnifying chromoendoscopy and MRI to select patients with early rectal neoplasms for local excision. METHODS: This retrospective study in a tertiary Western cancer center included consecutive patients evaluated by magnifying chromoendoscopy and MRI who underwent en bloc resection of nonpedunculated sessile polyps larger than 20 mm, laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) [Formula: see text] 20 mm, or depressed-type lesions of any size (Paris 0-IIc). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of magnifying chromoendoscopy and MRI to determine which lesions were amenable to local excision (i.e., [Formula: see text] T1sm1) were calculated. RESULTS: Specificity of magnifying chromoendoscopy was 97.3% (95% CI 92.2-99.4), and accuracy was 92.7% (95% CI 86.7-96.6) for predicting invasion deeper than T1sm1 (not amenable to local excision). MRI had lower specificity (60.5%, 95% CI 43.4-76.0) and lower accuracy (58.3%, 95% CI 43.2-72.4). Magnifying chromoendoscopy incorrectly predicted invasion depth in 10.7% of the cases in which the MRI was correct, while magnifying chromoendoscopy provided a correct diagnosis in 90% of the cases in which the MRI was incorrect (p = 0.001). Overstaging occurred in 33.3% of the cases in which magnifying chromoendoscopy was incorrect and 75% of the cases in which MRI was incorrect. CONCLUSION: Magnifying chromoendoscopy is reliable for predicting invasion depth in early rectal neoplasms and selecting patients for local excision.
Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Colonoscopía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although meshes reduce abdominal hernia recurrence, they increase the risk of inflammatory complications. This study aimed to compare the early and late postoperative inflammation and collagen deposition responses induced by three meshes. METHODS: Rats were allocated into three groups. In group I, a polypropylene (PP) mesh was implanted in the abdominal wall. In groups II and III, PP + polyglactin (PP + PG) and PP + titanium (PP + TI) meshes were employed, respectively. On the seventh (7th) postoperative day, collagen deposition and inflammation were evaluated, and immunohistochemistry was performed on abdominal wall biopsies. These data were compared with those obtained on the fortieth (40th) postoperative day in a previous study. RESULTS: The early inflammatory responses were the same in all groups. With time, it decreased in group I (p = 0.047) and increased in group II (p = 0.003). Group I exhibited early elevated VEGF (p < 0.001), COX2 (p < 0.001), and collagen (p = 0.023) levels, and group II exhibited the most severe inflammatory tissue response. On the 40th postoperative day, the VEGF (p < 0.001) and collagen (p < 0.005) were reduced as compared with the 7th postoperative day in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Belatedly, the inflammatory reaction decreased in PP mesh group and increased in PP + PG mesh group. The PP mesh induced early great elevations in VEGF, COX2 and collagen levels, whereas the PP + PG mesh caused severe tissue inflammation with small elevation in these levels. PP + TI mesh induced inflammatory response levels between the others. In conclusion, the inflammatory response depends on the mesh density and also the mesh material with clinical implications.