RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Supplementary feeding is defined as the provision of extra food to children or families beyond the normal ration of their home diets. The impact of food supplementation on child growth merits careful evaluation in view of the reliance of many states and non-governmental organisations on this intervention to improve child health in low and middle income countries (LMIC). This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2005. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of community-based supplementary feeding for promoting the physical growth of children under five years of age in LMIC. SEARCH METHODS: For this updated review we searched the following databases on 31 January 2011: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (1948 to January week 3, 2011), EMBASE (1980 to week 3, 2011), CINAHL (1937 to 27 January 2011), LILACS (all years), WorldCat for dissertations and theses (all years) and ClinicalTrials.gov (all years). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating supplementary feeding in comparison to a control group (no intervention or a placebo such as food with a very low number of nutrients and calories) in children from birth to five years of age in LMIC. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted and analysed the data. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight RCTs (n = 1243 children) that were at relatively high risk of bias. We found high levels of clinical heterogeneity in the participants, interventions and outcome measures across studies. Nevertheless, in order to quantify pooled effects of supplementary feeding, we decided to combine studies according to prespecified characteristics. These were the children's age (younger or older than 24 months), their nutritional status at baseline (stunted or wasted, or not stunted or wasted) and the duration of the intervention (less or more than 12 months). A statistically significant difference of effect was only found for length during the intervention in children aged less than 12 months (two studies; 795 children; mean difference 0.19 cm; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.31). Based on the summary statistic calculated for each study, the mean difference (MD) between intervention and control groups ranged from 0.48 cm (95% CI 0.07 to 0.89) to 1.3 cm (95% CI 0.03 to 2.57) after 3 and 12 months of intervention, respectively. Data on potential adverse effects were lacking. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The scarcity of available studies and their heterogeneity makes it difficult to reach any firm conclusions. The review findings suggest supplementary feeding has a negligible impact on child growth; however, the pooled results should be interpreted with great caution because the studies included in the review are clinically diverse. Future studies should address issues of research design, including sample size calculation, to detect meaningful clinical effects and adequate intervention allocation concealment. In the meantime, families and children in need should be provided appropriate feeding, health care and sanitation without waiting for new RCTs to establish a research basis for feeding children.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/dietoterapia , Países en Desarrollo , Suplementos Dietéticos , Crecimiento , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Lactante/dietoterapia , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales Infantiles , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to describe worldwide growth-faltering patterns by using the new World Health Organization (WHO) standards. METHODS: We analyzed information available from the WHO Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition, comprising data from national anthropometric surveys from 54 countries. Anthropometric data comprise weight-for-age, length/height-for-age, and weight-for-length/height z scores. The WHO regions were used to aggregate countries: Europe and Central Asia; Latin America and the Caribbean; North Africa and Middle East; South Asia; and sub-Saharan Africa. RESULTS: Sample sizes ranged from 1000 to 47 000 children. Weight for length/height starts slightly above the standard in children aged 1 to 2 months and falters slightly until 9 months of age, picking up after that age and remaining close to the standard thereafter. Weight for age starts close to the standard and falters moderately until reaching approximately -1 z at 24 months and remaining reasonably stable after that. Length/height for age also starts close to the standard and falters dramatically until 24 months, showing noticeable bumps just after 24, 36, and 48 months but otherwise increasing slightly after 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of child growth patterns in 54 countries with WHO standards shows that growth faltering in early childhood is even more pronounced than suggested by previous analyses based on the National Center for Health Statistics reference. These findings confirm the need to scale up interventions during the window of opportunity defined by pregnancy and the first 2 years of life, including prevention of low birth weight and appropriate infant feeding practices.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Crecimiento/epidemiología , Preescolar , Salud Global , Trastornos del Crecimiento/prevención & control , Humanos , Lactante , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
In April 2006 the WHO released a set of growth standards for children from birth to the age of 5 y. Prior to their release, the standards were field-tested in 4 countries. The main objective was to compare children's length/height-for-age and weight-for-length/height based on the new standards with clinician assessments of the same children. The study sampled children <5-y-old attending well-child clinics in 2 affluent populations (Argentina and Italy) and 2 less-affluent ones (Maldives and Pakistan). Length/height and weight were measured by doctors and epidemiologists who also recorded a clinical assessment of each child's length/height in relation to age and weight relative to length/height. Anthropometric indicators of nutritional status were generated based on the WHO standards. As expected, Pakistan and the Maldives had higher rates of stunting, wasting, and underweight than Italy and Argentina, and the reverse was true for overweight and obesity. Where stunting was prevalent, the children classified as short were a mean <-2 SD for height-for-age. In all sites, the children classified as thin were indeed wasted (<-2 SD for weight-for-height) and a positive association in trend was evident between weight-for-height and the line-up of groups from thin to obese. The overall concordance between clinical assessments and the WHO standards-based indicators attested to the clinical soundness of the standards.
Asunto(s)
Peso Corporal , Desarrollo Infantil , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Argentina , Preescolar , Humanos , Islas del Oceano Índico , Lactante , Italia , Desnutrición/epidemiología , PakistánRESUMEN
AIM: To assess the effect of child growth status on academic achievement and the association between child growth and academic standing. METHOD: The heights of 722 middle-school children were measured using standard procedures and height-for-age z (HAZ) scores were calculated based on an international reference. Academic performance was assessed by an adaptation of the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT3) composed of Reading, Arithmetic and Spelling. RESULTS: Children in the group with higher HAZ scores performed better than children in the group with lower HAZ scores only on the Arithmetic subtest. This finding was confirmed by a multiple regression model analysis of the data. In addition, only performance on the Arithmetic subtest was positively associated with HAZ. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that growth retardation impacts specifically on the development of arithmetic (numeracy) skills and are consistent with a three-fold model of life course influences on health including latency, cumulative and pathway effects.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Crecimiento/psicología , Discapacidades para el Aprendizaje/diagnóstico , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Logro , Adolescente , Brasil , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Discapacidades para el Aprendizaje/psicología , Masculino , Matemática , Lectura , Aprendizaje VerbalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although some segments of the population continue to suffer from undernutrition, other groups exhibit excess weight gain, resulting in the coexistence of undernutrition and obesity and leading to a dual nutritional burden. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between stunting and overweight in preschool children from Latin American and Caribbean countries. METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional data from children 0 to 5 years of age from 79 nationally representative surveys, compiled by the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition. This database defines stunting as low height-for-age and overweight as high weight-for-height. These variables were explored with the use of simple and multiple regression models. RESULTS: There were significant differences between subregions in the prevalence of stunting: the prevalence was 7.4% in the Caribbean, 11.3% in South America, and 20.4% in Central America (p < .001). In contrast, the estimated prevalence of overweight was similar between subregions. The overall prevalence rates of stunting and overweight in Latin America and the Caribbean in the year 2000 were 13.7% and 4.3%, respectively. We found an inverse relationship (r = -0.3) between the prevalence rates of overweight and stunting, overall and within subregions. South America exhibited the highest slope and intercept on the regression of overweight on stunting. CONCLUSIONS: Different subregions of Latin America and the Caribbean have different prevalence rates of childhood stunting but similar prevalence rates of overweight. There is an inverse relationship between stunting and overweight. The South American subregion had the highest increase and prevalence of overweight of the Latin American region.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/epidemiología , Trastornos del Crecimiento/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Lactante/epidemiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Estatura/fisiología , Peso Corporal/fisiología , Región del Caribe/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/diagnóstico , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Trastornos del Crecimiento/diagnóstico , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Lactante , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Lactante/diagnóstico , Recién Nacido , América Latina/epidemiología , Masculino , Obesidad/diagnóstico , Sobrepeso , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe child growth monitoring practices worldwide in preparation for the construction and application of a new international growth reference. STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire was sent to Ministries of Health in 202 countries requesting information on growth charts used in national programs, reference populations, classification systems, problems encountered, and actions taken against growth faltering. Countries also provided hard copies of charts in current use. This information was entered and analyzed in Microsoft Access. RESULTS: Responses were received from 178 (88%) countries, 154 of which included growth charts (n=806). Two thirds of the charts covered preschool age. All countries used weight-for-age, over half relying on this index alone. The reference most commonly used (68%) was the National Center for Health Statistics/World Health Organization population, with regional variations, where most European countries used local standards. Sixty-three percent of charts classified child growth on percentiles, whereas about one fifth used z scores. Problems reported were both conceptual (eg, interpreting growth trajectories) and practical (eg, lack of equipment). CONCLUSIONS: The survey demonstrates that growth charts are used universally in pediatric care. The information gathered on current use and interpretation of growth charts provides important guidance for constructing and applying the new reference.
Asunto(s)
Antropometría , Salud Global , Crecimiento , Pediatría/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Valores de Referencia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
The World Health Organization (WHO) Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS) is a community-based, multicountry project to develop new growth references for infants and young children. The design combines a longitudinal study from birth to 24 months with a cross-sectional study of children aged 18 to 71 months. The pooled sample from the six participating countries (Brazil, Ghana, India, Norway, Oman, and the United States) consists of about 8,500 children. The study subpopulations had socioeconomic conditions favorable to growth, and low mobility, with at least 20% of mothers following feeding recommendations and having access to breastfeeding support. The individual inclusion criteria were absence of health or environmental constraints on growth, adherence to MGRS feeding recommendations, absence of maternal smoking, single term birth, and absence of significant morbidity. In the longitudinal study, mothers and newborns were screened and enrolled at birth and visited at home 21 times: at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6; monthly from 2 to 12 months; and every 2 months in their second year. In addition to the data collected on anthropometry and motor development, information was gathered on socioeconomic, demographic, and environmental characteristics, perinatal factors, morbidity, and feeding practices. The prescriptive approach taken is expected to provide a single international reference that represents the best description of physiological growth for all children under five years of age and to establish the breastfed infant as the normative model for growth and development.
Asunto(s)
Desarrollo Infantil , Protección a la Infancia , Bienestar del Lactante , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Antropometría , Brasil , Niño , Desarrollo Infantil/fisiología , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Seguimiento , Ghana , Crecimiento y Desarrollo , Humanos , India , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estudios Longitudinales , Noruega , Omán , Desempeño Psicomotor , Estándares de Referencia , Proyectos de Investigación , Estados Unidos , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
The objective of the Motor Development Study was to describe the acquisition of selected gross motor milestones among affluent children growing up in different cultural settings. This study was conducted in Ghana, India, Norway, Oman, and the United States as part of the longitudinal component of the World Health Organization (WHO) Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS). Infants were followed from the age of four months until they could walk independently. Six milestones that are fundamental to acquiring self-sufficient erect locomotion and are simple to evaluate were assessed: sitting without support, hands-and-knees crawling, standing with assistance, walking with assistance, standing alone, and walking alone. The information was collected by both the children's caregivers and trained MGRS fieldworkers. The caregivers assessed and recorded the dates when the milestones were achieved for the first time according to established criteria. Using standardized procedures, the fieldworkers independently assessed the motor performance of the children and checked parental recording at home visits. To ensure standardized data collection, the sites conducted regular standardization sessions. Data collection and data quality control took place simultaneously. Data verification and cleaning were performed until all queries had been satisfactorily resolved.