Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 22(2): e242-e252, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34462207

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Basal-like Breast Cancer (BLBC) represents an important molecular subtype of breast cancer characterized by an aggressive behavior, molecular pathology poorly understood and a limited treatment. OBJECTIVE: We aim to search for molecular differences between non-BLBC and BLBC tumors in order to propose possible diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers using databases. Metodology: Microarray processed data were downloaded from GEO database considering non-BLBC and BLBC. Enrichment analysis was evaluated using GO consortium and Ingenuity, protein-protein interaction, gene Ontology and co-expression analysis using STRING. Gene expression data was extracted using TCGA, METABRIC and Breast Cancer Gene-Expression Miner v4.2 databases. The Survival was evaluated using The Kaplan-Meier plotter. RESULTS: Were identified 58 upregulated and 58 downregulated genes enriched in signaling pathways like PDGF, Angiogenesis, Integrin and WNT. AGR2 and AGR3 expression were reduced in BLBC in relation to non-BLBC tumors, patients aged ≤51 years, and with negativity of ER, PR and HER-2 and nodal status. Low expression of AGR2 and AGR3 were associated with worse OS and RFS for all breast cancer cases. But according to the molecular stratification, low AGR2 conferred worst OS in luminal A, worst RFS in BLBC and good OS and RFS in luminal B. High AGR3 conferred worse OS and RFS in BLBC, but low AGR3 attributed worse OS in luminal A. CONCLUSION: AGR2 and AGR3 expression were able to differentiate non-BLBC from BLBC. Downregulation of AGR2 and AGR3 was associated with BLBC clinical phenotype. Furthermore, both genes behave different when considering prognosis and molecular stratification.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma Basocelular/metabolismo , Proteínas Portadoras/metabolismo , Mucoproteínas/metabolismo , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Proteínas Oncogénicas/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Basocelular/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Pronóstico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo
2.
J Clin Med ; 10(22)2021 Nov 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34830497

RESUMEN

Although gastroschisis is often diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound, there is still a gap in the literature about which prenatal ultrasound markers can predict complex gastroschisis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the ultrasound markers that characterize complex gastroschisis. A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the guidelines of PRISMA. The protocol was registered (PROSPERO ID CRD42020211685). Meta-analysis was displayed graphically on Forest plots, which estimate prevalence rates and risk ratios, with 95% confidence intervals, using STATA version 15.0. The combined prevalence of intestinal complications in fetuses with complex gastroschisis was 27.0%, with a higher prevalence of atresia (about 48%), followed by necrosis (about 25%). The prevalence of deaths in newborns with complex gastroschisis was 15.0%. The predictive ultrasound markers for complex gastroschisis were intraabdominal bowel dilatation (IABD) (RR 3.01, 95% CI 2.22 to 4.07; I2 = 15.7%), extra-abdominal bowel dilatation (EABD) (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.39; I2 = 77.1%), and polyhydramnios (RR 3.81, 95% CI 2.09 to 6.95; I2 = 0.0%). This review identified that IABD, EABD, and polyhydramnios were considered predictive ultrasound markers for complex gastroschisis. However, evidence regarding gestational age at the time of diagnosis is needed.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA