RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with a neuroendocrine tumour (NET) frequently have physical and psychosocial complaints. Aim of this study is to determine whether a web-based, personalised information and support system (WINS) reduces distress and/or improves patients' perception of and satisfaction with information received. METHODS: Patients with NET, stratified for those newly diagnosed (< 6 months, n = 28) and with a longer history of disease (n = 74), were randomised between standard care (n = 49) and intervention, consisting of access to WINS (n = 53). Primary outcome was change of distress and satisfaction with perceived information measured with the distress thermometer and problem list and the QoL questionnaire (QLQ)-INFO25. The intervention group also completed a questionnaire based on the technical acceptance model (TAM). RESULTS: We observed no difference in distress slope and slope of median global score on perceived information and satisfaction between the intervention and control group. Interestingly, 55% of patients wished to receive more information at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of NET patients, access to WINS did not improve indicators for distress, perception of information and satisfaction with information received, more than standard care only. Despite the need for more information, the WINS does not have added value to the information and care provided by health care professionals. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02472678 ). Registered 6th Jan 2015. Retrospectively registered 1st May 2017.
Asunto(s)
Difusión de la Información/métodos , Internet , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/psicología , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/terapia , Proyectos Piloto , Medicina de Precisión/normas , Sistemas de Apoyo Psicosocial , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/dietoterapia , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Dieta , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/sangre , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Vitaminas/sangreRESUMEN
Background: Assessment of clinical benefit of systemic treatments of rare diseases including gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) is challenging. Recently several tools have been developed to grade the clinical benefit of cancer drugs. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) has developed the ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has developed and revised the ASCO framework consisting of the Net Health Benefit (NHB) score juxtaposed against the costs of the treatment. In this review, we graded systemic treatments for GEP-NET patients with both frameworks. Methods: The electronic databases (PubMed and EMBASE) were searched for papers reporting comparative trials, conducted in adult GEP-NET patients in the English language. Papers were assessed according to the ESMO-MCBS and the NHB part of the ASCO revised Framework (NHB-ASCO-F) by four independent assessors, and discrepancies were discussed. Results: The search yielded 32 trials of which 6 were eligible for grading with the ESMO-MCBS resulting in scores of 2 or 3. Eight trials were eligible for grading with the NHB-ASCO-F, resulting in scores between 37.6 and 57.4. Trials that were not primary assessable by the tools were analysed separately. Consensus between assessors was reached in 68% of trials with the ESMO-MCBS and in 23% of trials with the NHB-ASCO-F. Conclusion: The currently used systemic treatments for GEP-NET patients had low scores according to the NHB-ASCO-F and none could be graded as meaningful clinical beneficial according to the ESMO-MCBS. Despite the low incidence, the heterogeneous patient population and relatively long natural course of NET, future studies on new treatment modalities should aim for high clinical benefit outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Intestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Five patients with adult-onset metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) underwent allo-SCT. Conditioning was reduced in intensity and grafts were obtained from voluntary unrelated donors. All but one graft were depleted of T-lymphocytes. Patient age at transplantation varied from 18 to 29 (median, 27) years. Two patients rejected their graft and MLD progressed. The recipient of the unmanipulated graft converted to complete donor chimerism with normalization of arylsulphatase A (ARSA) levels. Despite ARSA normalization, he deteriorated. Another patient was a mixed chimera. Following escalated doses of donor lymphocyte infusions he converted to complete donor chimerism. His levels of ARSA correlated positively with the percentage of donor cells and MLD was not progressive. The fifth patient died after 35 days from complications associated with GVHD. We conclude that results of allo-SCT in symptomatic MLD patients are poor. However, allo-SCT may stop progression of MLD in selected patients.