RESUMEN
Decreasing malaria transmission warrants the search for highly sensitive point-of-care diagnostics, especially in resource-limited settings. The direct-on-blood PCR nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay (db-PCR-NALFIA) is a simplified PCR-based technique with a lateral flow readout that does not require sample preparation. Two duplex db-PCR-NALFIAs were developed: a pan-Plasmodium/Plasmodium falciparum (pan/P. falciparum) and a pan-Plasmodium/Plasmodium vivax (pan/P. vivax) assay. Confirmed positive samples (n = 61) and negative controls (n = 40) were used for laboratory validations. A prospective field evaluation of the pan/P. falciparum assay was performed in Kenya (n = 300). In the laboratory validation, sensitivity and specificity of the pan/P. falciparum assay were 100% (95% CI, 94.1%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 91.2%-100%), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of the pan/P. vivax assay were 100% (95% CI, 94.1%-100%) and 97.5% (95% CI, 86.8%-99.9%), respectively. In Kenya, sensitivity of the pan/P. falciparum db-PCR-NALFIA was 97.2% (95% CI, 93.0%-99.2%) and specificity was 74.2% (95% CI, 67.0%-81.0%) compared with reference standard microscopy. When using real-time quantitative PCR as a reference standard, sensitivity was 84.5% (95% CI, 78.7%-89.3%) and specificity was 85.4% (95% CI, 77.1%-91.6%). Db-PCR-NALFIA is a sensitive, specific, and easy method for the detection and species differentiation of Plasmodium. This test is especially of interest for malaria control or elimination programs in low-transmission settings that require accurate detection of low parasite densities.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoensayo/métodos , Ácidos Nucleicos/genética , Plasmodium/aislamiento & purificación , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Humanos , Indicadores y Reactivos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estándares de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Molecular tools are very sensitive and specific and could be an alternative for the diagnosis of malaria. The complexity and need for expensive equipment may hamper implementation and, therefore, simplifications to current protocols are warranted. METHODS: A PCR detecting the different Plasmodium species and differentiating between Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax was developed and combined with a nucleic acid lateral flow immuno-assay (PCR-NALFIA) for amplicon detection. The assay was thoroughly evaluated for the analytical sensitivity and specificity in the laboratory, the robustness and reproducibility in a ring trial and accuracy and predictive value in a field trial. RESULTS: The analytical sensitivity and specificity were 0.978 (95% CI: 0.932-0.994) and 0.980 (95% CI: 0.924-0.997), respectively, and were slightly less sensitive for the detection of P. vivax than for P. falciparum. The reproducibility tested in three laboratories was very good (k = 0.83). This evaluation showed that the PCR machine used could influence the results. Accuracy was evaluated in Thailand and compared to expert microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). The overall and P. falciparum-specific sensitivity and specificity was good ranging from 0.86-1 and 0.95-0.98 respectively, compared to microscopy. Plasmodium vivax detection was better than the sensitivity of RDT, but slightly less than microscopy performed in this study. CONCLUSION: PCR-NALFIA is a sensitive, specific and robust assay able to identify Plasmodium species with good accuracy. Extensive testing including a ring trial can identify possible bottlenecks before implementation and is therefore essential to perform in additon to other evaluations.
Asunto(s)
Malaria Falciparum/diagnóstico , Malaria Vivax/diagnóstico , Plasmodium falciparum/clasificación , Plasmodium falciparum/aislamiento & purificación , Plasmodium vivax/clasificación , Plasmodium vivax/aislamiento & purificación , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Malaria Vivax/parasitología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Parasitología/métodos , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Plasmodium falciparum/inmunología , Plasmodium vivax/genética , Plasmodium vivax/inmunología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tailandia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are promoted for the diagnosis of malaria in many countries. The question arises whether laboratories where the current method of diagnosis is microscopy should also switch to RDT. This problem was studied in Kassala, Sudan where the issue of switching to RDT is under discussion. METHODS: Two hundred and three blood samples were collected from febrile patients suspected of having malaria. These were subsequently analysed with microscopy, RDT (SD Bioline P.f/P.v) and PCR for the detection and identification of Plasmodium parasites. RESULTS: Malaria parasites were detected in 36 blood samples when examined microscopically, 54 (26.6%) samples were found positive for malaria parasites by RDT, and 44 samples were positive by PCR. Further analysis showed that the RDT used in our study resulted in a relatively high number of false positive samples. When microscopy was compared with PCR, an agreement of 96.1% and k = 0.88 (sensitivity 85.7% and specificity 100%) was found. However, when RDT was compared with PCR, an agreement of only 81.2 and k = 0.48 (sensitivity 69% and specificity 84%) was found. CONCLUSION: PCR has proven to be one of the most specific and sensitive diagnostic methods, particularly for malaria cases with low parasitaemia. However, this technique has limitations in its routine use under resource-limited conditions, such as our study location. At present, based on these results, microscopy remains the best option for routine diagnosis of malaria in Kassala, eastern Sudan.