RESUMEN
Introduction Dental crowding is one of the most common types of malocclusions. It can be treated with or without extraction, depending on the severity of the crowding. Extraction-based orthodontic treatments are the preferred treatment option in cases of severe crowding, but they take longer than non-extraction cases. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the dentoalveolar changes following the orthodontic treatment of severely crowded maxillary anterior teeth in adults using self-ligating brackets alone or combined with flapless piezocision. Materials and methods The participants in this study were 63 patients (46 females and 17 males; mean age SD: 19.71 ± 2.74 years) who attended the Department of Orthodontics at the University of Damascus from January 2020 to December 2021. The participants were divided into three groups at random: Group (1): traditional brackets group, Group (2): self-ligating brackets group; and Group (3): self-ligating brackets with flapless piezocision group. Little's Irregularity Index (LII) was measured at five assessment times: before the onset of orthodontic treatment (T0), after one month (T1), after two months (T2), after three months (T3), and at the end of the leveling and alignment phase (T4). The intercanine width (lingual), the intercanine width (cusp), and the canine rotation angle were measured at two assessment times: before the onset of orthodontic treatment (T0) and at the end of the leveling and alignment phase (T4). Results The three studied groups had statistically significant differences in terms of LII during the first three months, and the most significant improvement of LII was in the self-ligating brackets with the piezocision group (P < 0.001). In addition, the intercanine width (cusp) at the end of the leveling and aligning phase revealed greater mean values in both self-ligating brackets groups compared to the traditional brackets group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Otherwise, no statistically significant differences were found at the end of the leveling and aligning phase in the intercanine width (lingual) or the canine rotation angle between the three studied groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Using self-ligating brackets with flapless piezocision revealed more significant results concerning LII as compared to other groups. Thus, combining these two acceleration methods could get more effective results in aligning severely crowded teeth. Self-ligating brackets, whether used alone or with flapless piezocision, resulted in greater intercanine width at the cusp level. The type of brackets (traditional or self-ligating) did not affect the canine rotation angle.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The lengthy period of time required is one of the main reasons patients refuse orthodontic treatment. In addition, treatment may have negative effects on periodontal tissues. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the overall time needed for leveling and alignment and the periodontal indices in adult patients with severe crowding. Patients were treated using either self-ligating brackets associated with flapless corticotomy (SLBs + FC group), self-ligating brackets alone (SLBs group), or conventional brackets (CBs group) alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 57 adult patients (10 male patients, 47 female patients) referred to the Department of Orthodontics, the University of Damascus Dental School from August 2018 to March 2019, were enrolled in this trial. The patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups: CBs (mean age: 19.62 ± 2.42 years), SLBs (mean age: 19.98 ± 2.84 years), or SLBs + FC (mean age: 20.67 ± 2.59 years). The overall alignment time for the upper anterior teeth was calculated. The following periodontal parameters were measured at 5 assessment times: plaque index, gingival index, papillary bleeding index, and probing depth. RESULTS: The average leveling and alignment time was 81.89 ± 9.49 days, 123 ± 10.69 days, and 165.25 ± 13.05 days for the SLBs + FC group, the SLBs group, and the CBs group, respectively. A significant reduction in the overall alignment duration was found in the SLBs + FC group by 50%, and in the SLBs group by 25%, compared to the control group, with a statistically significant difference among the 3 groups (P < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences in the periodontal indices (except probing depth) after 1 month, with values greater in the SLBs + FC group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using self-ligating brackets in combination with flapless corticotomy may be effective in accelerating upper dental decrowding in adult patients, with a reduction of 50% of the normal treatment time using traditional brackets. Using self-ligating brackets alone reduced treatment time by 25%. The adjunctive flapless corticotomy did not cause clinically negative effects on the periodontal tissues.
Asunto(s)
Maloclusión , Soportes Ortodóncicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Índice de Placa Dental , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Maloclusión/cirugía , Diseño de Aparato Ortodóncico , Soportes Ortodóncicos/efectos adversos , Índice Periodontal , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Europe has been experiencing a flow of refugees and asylum seekers driven by conflicts or poverty. Their oral health is often neglected despite its clear impact on quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To explore the status of oral health among refugees and asylum seekers groups by examining the available literature and to determine which evidence exists regarding the problems they face in terms of oral health. METHODS: The current paper followed PRISMA guidelines. A scoping review methodology was followed to retrieve 2911 records from five databases and grey literature. Twelve articles met the following inclusion criteria: experimental research concentrated on the oral and dental health of refugees and/or asylum seekers between 1995 and 2020 in English. Analysis was both descriptive and thematic, whilst a critical appraisal was applied using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). RESULTS: Seven studies (58,3%) were quantitative, while five studies (41,6%) were qualitative. In general, the quality of most of the studies (83.3%) was good. Limited access to oral health care services was shown with a higher prevalence of oral diseases compared to the native populations of the host countries. Approaches to improve oral health have been implemented in some studies and have shown positive outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Oral health care strategies should consider the oral health problems facing refugees in Europe, and oral health promotion campaigns are essential to give adequate guidance on how to access oral health care in the host countries.