Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine ; (12): 1272-1276, 2023.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-1035949

RESUMEN

Ubiquitin-specific protease 11 (USP11) is a family member of deubiquitylases (DUBs). It mediates substrates de-ubiquitination to inhibit their ubiquitin-proteasome degradation and participates in cell cycle process, DNA damage repair, cell death, autophagy, signal transduction, immune inflammatory response, cerebral cortex development, and other physiological processes. Studies show that USP11 also plays an important role in central nervous system diseases. This article starts with the structure and functions of USP11 to systematically review the mechanism of USP11 in central nervous system diseases and provide new ideas for USP11 as a therapeutic target.

2.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 553-556, 2008.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-399247

RESUMEN

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), retrograde ureterolithotripsy(URSL) and percutaneous ureterolithotripsy(PCL) in the treatment of proximal ureteral calculi. Methods A total of 397 patients with proximal ureteral calculi treated by ESWL,URSL or PCL ftom September 2001 to December 2005 were retrospectively analyzed. Results Among 397 patients,83 patients with a mean stone size of 1.23 cm were treated by ESW L.Of then.13 patients transferred to URSL or ureterolithotomy and the stone-free rate of ESWL 1 month later was 65.7%(46/70).TWO hundred and thirteen patients with a mean stone size of 1.21 cm were treated by URSL and 101 patients with a mean stone size of 1.50 cm were treated by PCL.The stone-free rate of URSL and PCL 1 month after the treatment was 88.2%(172/195)and 96.9%(95/98),respectively.Eighteen patients in URSL group and 3 patients in PCL group trans-ferred to ureterolithotomy.ESWL had a statistically lower stone-free rate than that of URSL and PCL (P<0.001),both in patients with stone size≤1 cm and>1 cm.For patients with stone size>1 cm,PCL achieved a higher stone-free rate than URSL(P=0.005).PCL also had a higher stone-free rate than URSL in treating patients with stone size≤1 cm but there was no statistical difference between them. Conclusions ESWL can still be used as first-line treatment choice for proximal ureteral stones less than 1cm.For patients with proximal ureteral stones larger than 1cm.URSL and PCL are more proper treatment modalities since they can achieve higher stone-free rate and have acceptable low complications.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA