RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Sorafenib has been extensively used for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and Chinese herbal medicine has also been used to manage advanced HCC. The present work evaluates the effectiveness and safety of Jiedu (JD) Granule, a compound of traditional Chinese herbal medicine, side-by-side with sorafenib for the treatment of advance HCC. METHODS: Patients with advanced HCC receiving treatment with JD Granule or sorafenib were enrolled from December 2014 to March 2018. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to control for possible selection bias from the study group allocation process. RESULTS: Of the 325 patients included, 161 received JD Granule and 164 received sorafenib. No significant differences were found in OS or PFS among patients receiving JD Granule compared to sorafenib (P > 0.05). Median OS of the two study groups was 6.83 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.83-9.47) in the group receiving JD Granule and 8 months (95% CI: 6.67-9.80) in the group receiving sorafenib, with half-, 1- and 2-year survival rates of 53.6%, 31.2% and 13.2% vs 60.1%, 35.5% and 14.2%, respectively. Even after PSM, the median survival time did not differ between the JD Granule group (9.03 months; 95% CI: 6.37-14.2) and the sorafenib group (7.93 months; 95% CI: 6.5-9.97), with comparable half-, 1- and 2-year survival rates. The most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (13.7%) and fatigue (5.6%) in the JD Granule group, and hand-foot skin reaction (46.3%) and diarrhea (36.6%) in the sorafenib group. The JD Granule was more cost-effective than sorafenib treatment for advanced HCC. CONCLUSION: Compared to sorafenib, JD Granule was more cost-effective and caused fewer AEs for the treatment of Chinese patients with advanced HCC.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Uterine sarcoma (US) is a highly malignant cancer with poor prognosis and high mortality. This study focused on the identification of a RNA-Seq expression signature for prognosis prediction in uterine sarcoma. METHODS: We obtained RNA-Seq expression profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas database, and differentially expressed genes were identified between US tissues and normal tissues. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and LASSO Cox model were performed to identify and construct the prognostic gene signature. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic, Kaplan-Meier curve and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to assess the prognostic capacity of the six-gene signature. The nomogram was developed including prognostic signature and independent clinical factors to predict the overall survival (OS) of US patients. The functional enrichment and somatic mutation analysis were also analyzed by bioinformatics to understand the molecular mechanisms. RESULTS: This study identified a prognostic signature based on 6 genes: FGF23, TLX2, TIFAB, RNF223, HIST1H3A and AADACL4. In the training group, the median OS in the high- and low-risk groups was 19.6 vs 88.1 months (HR, 0.1412, 95% CI: 0.03295 - 0.6054; P = 0.002), respectively. In the testing group, the median OS in the high- and low-risk groups were 30 vs NR (not reach) months (HR, <0.0001, 95% CI: 0 - inf; P = 0.03). In all of patients, the low-risk group showed significant better survival compared with the high-risk group in OS, PFI, DSS and DFI. The nomogram based on the gene signature and radiation therapy was developed and successfully predicted the OS of US patients. The patients in the high-risk group displayed distinct mutation signatures comparing to patients in the low-risk group. Functional enrichment analysis indicated that the signature can play a vital role in cancer-related biological processes. CONCLUSION: Our study established a novel 6-gene signature and nomogram which could improve prognosis prediction in patients with US.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with different Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of PLR on HCC prognosis. Five electronic databases were searched for clinical trials focusing on the role of PLR in the prognosis of HCC. A total of 297 potential studies were initially identified, and 9 studies comprising 2449 patients were finally enrolled to evaluate the association between the pretreatment PLR and clinical outcomes of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event occurrence in patients with HCC in different BCLC stages. An elevated pretreatment PLR indicated unfavorable worse OS (HR = 1.73; 95% CI: (1.46, 2.04); P < 0.00001) and DFS (HR = 1.30; 95% CI: (1.06, 1.60); P = 0.01). Subgroup analysis indicated that high PLR indicated poor OS among BCLC-B/C patients without heterogeneity, while PLR in BCLC-A patients indicated high statistical heterogeneity with I2 value of 78%. As for the correlation between PLR and event occurrence, high PLR was related to poor clinical event occurrence only among BCLC-C patients, though obvious heterogeneity was observed in all different BCLC stages. In conclusion, PLR may be a significant biomarker in the prognosis of HCC in different BCLC stages.