Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Appl Bionics Biomech ; 2024: 9079982, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39234300

RESUMEN

Purpose: The functional status of the ankle joint is critical during dynamic movements in high-intensity sports like basketball and volleyball, particularly when performing actions such as stopping jumps. Limited ankle dorsiflexion is associated with increased injury risk and biomechanical changes during stop-jump tasks. Therefore, this study aims to investigate how restricting ankle dorsiflexion affects lower extremity biomechanics during the stop-jump phase, with a focus on the adaptive changes that occur in response to this restriction. Initially, 18 participants during stop-jumping with no wedge plate (NW), 10° wedge plate (10 W), and 20° wedge plate (20 W) using dominant leg data were collected to explore the relationship between limiting ankle mobility and lower extremity biomechanics. Following this, a musculoskeletal model was developed to simulate and calculate biomechanical data. Finally, one-dimensional parametric statistical mapping (SPM1D) was utilized to evaluate between-group variation in outcome variables using a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: As the ankle restriction angle increased, knee external rotation angles, knee extension angular velocities, hip extension angle, and angular velocity increased and were significantly different at different ankle restriction angles (p < 0.001 and p=0.001), coactivation of the peripatellar muscles (BF/RF and BF/VM) increased progressively, and patellofemoral joint contact force (PTF) increased progressively during the 3%-8% phase (p=0.015). These results highlight the influence of ankle joint restriction on lower limb kinematics and patellofemoral joint loading during the stop-jump maneuver. Conclusion: As the angle of ankle restriction increased, there was an increase in coactivation of the peripatellar muscles and an increase in PTF, possibly because a person is unable to adequately adjust their body for balance when the ankle valgus angle is restricted. The increased coactivation of the peripatellar muscles and increased patellofemoral contact force may be a compensatory response to the body's adaptation to balance adjustments.

2.
Bioengineering (Basel) ; 11(5)2024 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38790384

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Human locomotion involves the coordinated activation of a finite set of modules, known as muscle synergy, which represent the motor control strategy of the central nervous system. However, most prior studies have focused on isolated muscle activation, overlooking the modular organization of motor behavior. Therefore, to enhance comprehension of muscle coordination dynamics during multi-joint movements in chronic ankle instability (CAI), exploring muscle synergies during landing in CAI patients is imperative. METHODS: A total of 22 patients with unilateral CAI and 22 healthy participants were recruited for this research. We employed a recursive model for second-order differential equations to process electromyographic (EMG) data after filtering preprocessing, generating the muscle activation matrix, which was subsequently inputted into the non-negative matrix factorization model for extraction of the muscle synergy. Muscle synergies were classified utilizing the K-means clustering algorithm and Pearson correlation coefficients. Statistical parameter mapping (SPM) was employed for temporal modular parameter analyses. RESULTS: Four muscle synergies were identified in both the CAI and healthy groups. In Synergy 1, only the gluteus maximus showed significantly higher relative weight in CAI compared to healthy controls (p = 0.0035). Synergy 2 showed significantly higher relative weights for the vastus lateralis in the healthy group compared to CAI (p = 0.018), while in Synergy 4, CAI demonstrated significantly higher relative weights of the vastus lateralis compared to healthy controls (p = 0.030). Furthermore, in Synergy 2, the CAI group exhibited higher weights of the tibialis anterior compared to the healthy group (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggested that patients with CAI exhibit a comparable modular organizational framework to the healthy group. Investigation of amplitude adjustments within the synergy spatial module shed light on the adaptive strategies employed by the tibialis anterior and gluteus maximus muscles to optimize control strategies during landing in patients with CAI. Variances in the muscle-specific weights of the vastus lateralis across movement modules reveal novel biomechanical adaptations in CAI, offering valuable insights for refining rehabilitation protocols.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA