RESUMEN
Importance: Neonatal seizures pose a significant challenge in critical care, and continuous video electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring holds promise for early detection of seizures. However, large-scale data on the incidence of neonatal seizures and monitoring systems in China are lacking. Objectives: To determine the incidence of neonatal seizures in infants with high risk in China. Design, Setting, and Participants: A large, cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted from January 2017 to December 2018 in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of 7 tertiary medical centers in China. Neonates with high risk were included, and cEEG monitoring was conducted. Data were collected between January 1, 2017, and January 31, 2020. The data were analyzed between January 2021 and January 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The incidence of neonatal seizures, categorized by etiology, and seizure burden. Results: A total of 20â¯310 neonates with high risk were included (10â¯495 [51.7%] male; mean [SD] postmenstrual age, 37.7 [3.7] weeks), and seizures were observed in 3423 infants (16.9%). The highest proportion of seizures was attributed to acute neonatal encephalopathy (1448 [42.3%]). The incidence of seizures decreased with postmenstrual age and birth weight, with the highest occurrence observed in neonates with postmenstrual age of less than 28 weeks (237 of 879 [27.0%]) or birth weight of less than 1.0 kg (269 of 914 [29.4%]). Preterm infants had a higher proportion of moderate and severe seizure burdens compared with full-term infants (moderate severity: 248 of 1199 [20.7%] vs 454 of 2224 [20.4%]), but no significant differences were observed in etiology. Seizure burden was highest with genetic syndromes (49 of 188 [26.1%]), central nervous system malformations (33 of 127 [26.0%]), and inborn errors of metabolism (27 of 113 [23.9%]). During hospitalization, 7.8% of neonates with seizures died (267 neonates), with 81.3% of these cases having a moderate or severe seizure burden (217 neonates). Mortality was generally higher in preterm vs full-term infants (98 of 1199 [8.2%] vs 169 of 2224 [7.6%]) and increased with the severity of seizure burden (217 of 267 neonates with moderate or severe burden [81.3%]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of neonatal seizures underscores the substantial burden seizures pose to high-risk infants with brain injury in China, particularly those who are born prematurely or who have congenital conditions.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas , Epilepsia , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Peso al Nacer , Incidencia , Convulsiones/diagnóstico , Convulsiones/epidemiología , Convulsiones/etiología , Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones , ElectroencefalografíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Approximately 40% of adults and 30% of children with Myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) experience a relapsing course, but the optimal relapse prevention therapy remains unclear. A meta- analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy of azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX), maintenance intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and tocilizumab (TCZ) in prevention of attacks in MOGAD. METHODS: English and Chinese-language articles published from January 2010 to May 2022 were searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and China Science and Technology Journal Database (CQVIP). Studies with fewer than three cases were excluded. Meta-analysis of the relapse-free rate, the change of annualized relapse rate (ARR)and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores before and after treatment, and an age subgroup analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 41 studies were included. Three were prospective cohort studies, one was an ambispective cohort study, and 37 were retrospective cohort studies or case series. Eleven, eighteen, eighteen, eight, and two studies were included in the meta-analysis for relapse-free probability after AZA, MMF, RTX, IVIG, and TCZ therapy, respectively. The proportions of patients without relapse after AZA, MMF, RTX, IVIG, and TCZ were 65% [95% confidence interval (CI):49%-82%]), 73% (95%CI:62%-84%), 66% (95%CI:55%-77%), 79% (95%CI:66%-91%), and 93% (95%CI:54%-100%), respectively. The relapse-free rate did not significantly differ between the children and adults treated with each medication. Six, nine, ten, and three studies were included in the meta-analysis for the change of ARR before and after AZA, MMF, RTX, and IVIG therapy, respectively. ARR was significantly decreased after AZA, MMF, RTX, and IVIG therapy with a mean reduction of 1.58 (95%CI: [-2.29--0.87]), 1.32 (95%CI: [-1.57--1.07]), 1.01 (95%CI: [-1.34--0.67]), and 1.84 (95%CI: [-2.66--1.02]), respectively. The change in ARR did not significantly differ between children and adults. CONCLUSIONS: AZA, MMF, RTX, maintenance IVIG, and TCZ all reduce the risk of relapse in both pediatric and adult patients with MOGAD. The literatures included in the meta-analysis were mainly retrospective studies, so large randomized prospective clinical trials are needed to compare the efficacy of different treatments.
Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores , Neuromielitis Óptica , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Glicoproteína Mielina-Oligodendrócito , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Prevención Secundaria , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Neuromielitis Óptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Ácido MicofenólicoRESUMEN
This narrative review is an introduction for health professionals on how to conduct and report clinical research on six categories: treatment, diagnosis/differential diagnosis, prognosis, etiology, screening, and prevention. The importance of beginning with an appropriate clinical question and the exploration of how appropriate it is through a literature search are explained. There are three methodological directives that can assist clinicians in conducting their studies from a methodological perspective: (1) how to conduct an original study or a systematic review, (2) how to report an original study or a systematic review, and (3) how to assess the quality or risk of bias for a previous relevant original study or systematic review. This methodological overview article would provide readers with the key points and resources regarding how to perform high-quality research on the six main clinical categories.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Diagnóstico , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Terapéutica/métodos , Investigación Biomédica/normas , Causalidad , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Pronóstico , Revisiones Sistemáticas como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This document represents the first evidence-based guidelines to describe best practices in nutrition therapy in critically ill children (> 1 month and < 18 years), who are expected to require a length of stay more than 2 or 3 days in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit admitting medical patients domain. METHODS: A total of 25,673 articles were scanned for relevance. After careful review, 88 studies appeared to answer the pre-identified questions for the guidelines. We used the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation criteria to adjust the evidence grade based on the quality of design and execution of each study. RESULTS: The guidelines emphasise the importance of nutritional assessment, particularly the detection of malnourished patients. Indirect calorimetry (IC) is recommended to estimate energy expenditure and there is a creative value in energy expenditure, 50 kcal/kg/day for children aged 1-8 years during acute phase if IC is unfeasible. Enteral nutrition (EN) and early enteral nutrition remain the preferred routes for nutrient delivery. A minimum protein intake of 1.5 g/kg/day is suggested for this patient population. The role of supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN) has been highlighted in patients with low nutritional risk, and a delayed approach appears to be beneficial in this group of patients. Immune-enhancing cannot be currently recommended neither in EN nor PN. CONCLUSION: Overall, the pediatric critically ill population is heterogeneous, and an individualized nutrition support with the aim of improving clinical outcomes is necessary and important.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Necesidades Nutricionales , Apoyo Nutricional/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , China , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Metabolismo Energético , Nutrición Enteral/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Masculino , Estado Nutricional , Nutrición Parenteral/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No evidence can be found in the medical literature about the efficacy of alternating acetaminophen and ibuprofen treatment in children with refractory fever. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the effect of alternating acetaminophen and ibuprofen therapy on distress and refractory fever compared with acetaminophen or ibuprofen as monotherapy in febrile children. METHODS: A total of 474 febrile children with axillary temperature ≥38.5 °C and fever history ≤3 days in a tertiary hospital were randomly assigned to receive either (1) alternating acetaminophen and ibuprofen (acetaminophen 10 mg/kg per dose with shortest interval of 4 h and ibuprofen 10 mg/kg per dose with shortest interval of 6 h and the shortest interval between acetaminophen and ibuprofen ≥2 h; n = 158), (2) acetaminophen monotherapy (10 mg/kg per dose with shortest interval of 4 h; n = 158), or (3) ibuprofen monotherapy (10 mg/kg per dose with shortest interval of 6 h; n = 158). The mean Non-Communicating Children's Pain Checklist (NCCPC) score was measured every 4 h, and axillary temperatures were measured every 2 h. RESULTS: In total, 471 children were included in an intention-to-treat analysis. No significant clinical or statistical difference was found in mean NCCPC score or temperature during the 24-h treatment period in all febrile children across the three groups. Although the proportion of children with refractory fever for 4 h and 6 h was significantly lower in the alternating group than in the monotherapy groups (4 h: 11.54% vs. 26.58% vs. 21.66%, respectively [p = 0.003]; 6 h: 3.85% vs. 10.13% vs. 17.83%, respectively [p < 0.001]), the mean NCCPC score of children with refractory fever for 4 or 6 h was not lower than those in either of the monotherapy groups. The number of patients who developed persistent high body temperature was consistent across all study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Alternating acetaminophen and ibuprofen can reduce the proportion of children with refractory fever, but if one cycle of alternating therapy cannot reduce febrile distress as defined by NCCPC score, two or more cycles of alternating therapy may have minimal to no clinical efficacy in some cases. The trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as ChiCTR-TRC-13003440 and the WHO Registry Network as U1111-1146-6714.