RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Because of the relative rarity of breast cancer in males, data have not been sufficient to support a definitive analysis of pertinent prognostic factors. Remarkably, no studies of male patients with breast cancer have presented survival information based on the number of histologically positive axillary nodes, the most sensitive single indicator of prognosis in women with breast cancer. METHODS: In this study, the clinical course of breast cancer was documented for 335 male patients registered from 1965 through 1986. For patients to be eligible, diagnoses had to be made within 3 months of registration and the patients had to have histologic confirmation and receive part or all of their initial treatment at 1 of 11 cancer centers participating in the International Patient Data Exchange System. RESULTS: The survival rate at 10 years was 84% for patients with histologically negative nodes, 44% for those with one to three positive nodes, and 14% for the group with four or more histologically positive nodes. The survival rates at 5 years were 90%, 73%, and 55%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, the risk of death due to breast cancer for a patient with four or more histologically positive nodes was 6.75 times that of a patient with negative nodes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the authors indicate the following: (1) The number of histologically positive axillary nodes and, to a lesser degree, tumor diameter are significant prognostic factors for breast cancer in male patients. (2) The prognosis of breast cancer is the same in male and female patients when compared on the basis of the number of histologically positive nodes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Invasividad Neoplásica , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Factores Sexuales , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
This investigation was undertaken to assess the apparent poor survival of older patients with Hodgkin's disease. The clinical course of Hodgkin's disease in 136 patients, 60 to 79 years of age, was compared with that of 223 patients, 40 to 59 years of age. The patients registered from November 1977 through December 1983 had not been previously treated, and were treated at eight cancer centers. When the prognosis of all patients was examined by age, a definite change in the pattern of survival first appeared in the 60- to 69-year-old cohort. The entire older group (60 to 79 years) experienced twice the risk of dying from Hodgkin's disease and four times the risk of dying from other causes than did the younger group. In both groups, stage of disease was the strongest factor in predicting adjusted survival. Delay in treatment and advanced stage at presentation were not characteristic of Hodgkin's disease in older patients as has been postulated. Older patients responded to therapy with a similar complete remission rate (84% v 88% in the younger group, P = .24). From this study, we conclude that (1) Hodgkin's disease in the older adult does not have a different natural history, its major risk factors are similar to those known in other age groups, and thus should be amenable to existing therapeutic approaches; and (2) the prognosis of older patients with Hodgkin's disease has been obscured in previous studies by the inclusion of deaths due to other causes in survival estimates.