RESUMEN
The dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) is one of the most popular miniaturized extraction procedures. In this paper, the degree of dispersion and dispersion stability were studied with the aim to assess the correlations of these parameters with efficiency for the selected analytical application. The dependence between the degree of dispersion (cloudy state quality) and its stability obtained by various emulsification procedures, such as solvent-assisted emulsification (using various dispersive solvents) and mechanical emulsification (using auxiliary energies), is investigated and discussed. It was found out that the degree of dispersion depends on the type of emulsification procedure and decreases in the series: solvent-assisted (SA-) = ultrasound-assisted (UA-) > air-assisted (AA-) > vortex-assisted (VA-) emulsification. The emulsion stability depends on the degree of dispersion and there were 1810 and 2070 s for the most effective emulsification procedures, such us solvent-assisted and ultrasound-assisted emulsification, respectively. A comparison between the sensitivity of the analytical methods (using spectrophotometric determination of the anionic surfactants) and the degree of dispersion have been made. The sensitivity of the methods was ranked as follows: DLLME > UA-LLME > VA-LLME > AA-LLME.
RESUMEN
A novel headspace single-drop microextraction method (HS-SDME) for determination of sulfite in the form of sulfur dioxide was developed. An optical probe was used as the droplet holder in the HS-SDME procedure, and the analytical signal (absorbance) was monitored online during the extraction process. The method is based on the conversion of sulfite to volatile sulfur dioxide by acidification of the analyzed solution. The liberated SO2 was absorbed by 25 µL of an aqueous mixed reagent solution placed on the optical probe tip and containing Fe(III), 1,10-phenantroline, and an acetic buffer solution of pH 5.6. During the extraction process, Fe(III) reduces to Fe(II) and the Fe(II) formed then reacts with 1,10-phenantroline to form a colored complex. Absorbance was measured at 510 nm. The calibration plot was linear in the range 0.032-0.320 mg L-1 of sulfite (as SO2), with a correlation coefficient of 0.9989. The limit of detection (LOD), calculated as three times the standard deviation of the blank test (n = 10), was found to be 8 µg L-1. The method was applied for analysis of real food samples, such as wine, jam, and juice.
RESUMEN
A novel vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction (VA-LLME) for determination of iodide was developed. The method includes the oxidation of iodide with iodate in the presence of hydrochloric acid followed by VA-LLME of the ion-pair formed between ICl2(-) and Astra Phloxine reagent (AP) and subsequent absorbance measurement at 555nm. The appropriate experimental conditions were investigated and found to be: 5mL of sample, 0.27molL(-)(1) HCl, 0.027mmolL(-1) KIO3 as the oxidation agent, 250µL of extraction mixture containing amyl acetate as the extraction solvent and carbon tetrachloride as the auxiliary solvent (1:1, v/v), 0.04mmolL(-1) AP reagent, vortex time: 20s at 3000rpm, centrifugation: 4min at 3000rpm. The calibration plot was linear in the range 16.9-169µg L(-1) of iodide, with a correlation coefficient (R(2)) of 0.996, and the relative standard deviation ranged from 1.9 to 5.7%. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 1.75 and 6.01µgL(-)(1) of iodide, respectively. The suggested procedure was applied for determination of iodide in real mineral water samples.