RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Although subject recruitment is one of the most critical aspects of human subject research, there is a lack of studies prospectively examining the recruitment preferences of adults for research involving children. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of adults accompanying patients at an otolaryngology clinic in a pediatric medical center. Anonymous questionnaires were distributed in English and Spanish to one adult for every patient. Questions assessed the respondent's preferences for research recruitment including contact method preferences, contact preferences for medical profession type, and whether they would expect a child to receive a small gift for participating in a research study. Fisher's exact tests were used to assess the association between the primary predictor, language, and each outcome. RESULTS: 566 surveys were collected. 505 (89.1%) were completed in English and 61 (10.7%) were completed in Spanish. Spanish-speaking respondents were more likely to prefer talking to a doctor (76.7%) than English-speaking respondents (40.1%, p < 0.05). Spanish-speaking respondents were more likely to prefer talking over the phone (48.3%) than English-speaking respondents (17.3%, p < 0.05). Spanish-speaking respondents were more likely to prefer communicating via text messaging (41.7%) than English-speaking respondents (16.3%, p < 0.05). English-speaking respondents were more likely to prefer communicating through the patient portal of an electronic health record (EHR) (19%) than Spanish-speaking respondents(3.3%, p < 0.05). Mothers were more likely to prefer talking to a nurse/physician's assistant (20%) than fathers (10%, p < 0.05). Mothers were more likely to prefer talking to research staff (20%) than fathers (9%, p < 0.05). Mothers were more likely to prefer communication via text-message (22%) than fathers (6%, p < 0.05). Spanish-speaking respondents were more likely to prefer pediatric patients receiving a small monetary gift for participating in clinical research (70%) than English-speaking respondents (30%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was a significant association between preference for recruitment method and primary language spoken by the respondent. Further inquiry is required to understand these differences between English and Spanish speakers.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Padres , Selección de Paciente , Adulto , Niño , Comunicación , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Experimentación Humana , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Teléfono , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the outcomes of pediatric tracheostomy as influenced by demographics and comorbidities. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective national database review. SETTING: Fifty-two children's hospitals across the United States. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Hospitalization records from Pediatric Health Information System database dated 2010 to 2018 with patients younger than 18 years and procedure codes for tracheostomy were extracted. The primary outcome was total length of stay. The secondary outcomes were 30-day readmission, mortality, and posttracheostomy length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 14,155 children were included in the analysis. The median total length of stay was 77 days and increased from 59 to 103 days between 2010 and 2018 (P < .001). The median posttracheostomy length of stay was 34 days and also increased from 27 to 49 days (P < .001). On multivariate regression analyses, the total and posttracheostomy lengths of stay were significantly increased in children younger than 1 year, patients of black race, hospitals in the non-West regions, those discharged to home, and those with comorbidities. Socioeconomic indicators such as insurance type and estimated household income were associated with no difference or small effect sizes. Regions and comorbidities were associated with differences in 30-day readmission (overall 26%), while in-hospital mortality was primarily associated with age and comorbidities (overall 8.6%). CONCLUSION: Pediatric tracheostomy requires substantial health care resources with length of stay escalating over recent years. Age, race, region, discharge destination, and comorbidities were associated with differences in length of stay.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Traqueostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Traqueostomía/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hispanics are the largest minority population in the United States (18%). They represent a heterogeneous and growing population. Cancer is the leading cause of death among Hispanics, yet few studies have described cancer mortality burden by specific Hispanic group nationwide. METHODS: Cancer-related deaths from U.S. death certificates for the years 2003-2012 were analyzed for decedents identifying as Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, and Central or South American. We calculated descriptive statistics, including potential years of lives lost (PYLL), age-adjusted rates, standardized mortality ratios, and fitted JoinPoint regression models, to evaluate annual trends by Hispanic group, using non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) as the reference population. RESULTS: We identified 287,218 cancer-related deaths among Hispanics and 4,570,559 among NHWs. Mortality trends were heterogeneous across Hispanic groups. Female NHWs and male Puerto Ricans had the greatest rates of adjusted PYLL per 1,000 (NHWs, 19.6; Puerto Ricans, 16.5). Liver cancer was ranked among the top 5 cancer-related deaths for every Hispanic group, but not for NHWs. Stomach cancer mortality was twice as high for most Hispanic groups when compared with NHWs and especially high for Mexicans [male standardized mortality ratio (SMR), 2.07; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.01-2.13; female SMR, 2.62; 95% CI, 2.53-2.71]. CONCLUSIONS: We observed marked heterogeneity in cancer mortality across Hispanic groups. Several cancers affect Hispanics disproportionately compared with NHWs. Screening programs in Hispanics should be considered for stomach and liver cancer. IMPACT: Disaggregated analysis of Hispanics is needed to fully understand cancer burden among the diverse Hispanic population and is critical for cancer prevention and control efforts.