RESUMEN
We investigated the performance of blood and chocolate agar as alternatives to Middlebrook 7H11 agar for testing the susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first-and second-line drugs by the Etest method. A total of 39 strains of M. tuberculosis including 22 multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis strains and 17 susceptible strains were tested. In conclusion, our results showed that chocolate agar gave insufficient growth, needing up to 21 days of incubation, while results on blood agar were comparable to those on Middlebrook 7H11 agar and can be further explored as an alternative for Etest-based susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis.
Asunto(s)
Antituberculosos/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efectos de los fármacos , Agar , Medios de Cultivo , Humanos , Tuberculosis/microbiologíaRESUMEN
The objectives of this study were to examine the predictive value of method-specific vancomycin (VAN) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results on treatment outcomes of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. VAN MIC values for MRSA strains were determined using Etest, VITEK-1, MicroScan (MScan) and broth microdilution (BMD), with additional screening for heterogeneous glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (hGISA) phenotype. Patients' charts were reviewed for outcome correlation. Performance characteristics of method-specific VAN MICs in predicting outcome were compared. Most (76%) of the 92 strains tested caused pneumonia or bacteraemia. The majority of strains tested (>70%) had a VAN MIC >1mg/L by Etest or MScan compared with 41% by Vitek and 7% by BMD. Agreement between test methods for high versus low MICs (>1mg/L vs. < or = 1mg/L) ranged from 36% to 71%. High versus low VAN MICs by Etest differentiated response of invasive strains to VAN. Performance characteristics (sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value) were: Etest, 55/81/89/38%; and Vitek, 56/62/81/32/%, respectively. Eight strains (9%) demonstrated a hGISA phenotype; more yielded high MICs by Etest, MScan and Vitek than BMD (87%, 87% and 75% vs. 50%). In conclusion, VAN MIC testing methods produce highly variable results. The Etest method appears to be relatively more reliable in predicting treatment response and yielded higher MICs for strains with a hGISA phenotype.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Vancomicina/farmacología , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenotipo , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (GISA) and, in particular, heterogeneous GISA (hGISA) are difficult to detect by standard MIC methods, and thus, an accurate detection method for clinical practice and surveillances is needed. Two prototype Etest strips designed for hGISA/GISA resistance detection (GRD) were evaluated using a worldwide collection of hGISA/GISA strains covering the five major clonal lineages. A total of 150 strains comprising 15 GISA and 60 hGISA strains (defined by population analysis profiles-area under the curve [PAP-AUC]), 70 glycopeptide-susceptible S. aureus (GSSA) strains, and 5 S. aureus ATCC reference strains were tested. For standardized Etest vancomycin (VA) MIC testing, the modified Etest macromethod with VA and teicoplanin (TP) strips tested with a heavier inoculum using brain heart infusion agar (BHI) and two glycopeptide screening agar plates (6 microg/ml VA/BHI and 5 microg/ml Mueller-Hinton agar [MHA]) were tested in parallel with the two new Etest GRD strips: a VA 32 (0.5-microg/ml)-TP 32 (0.5-microg/ml) double-sided gradient (E-VA/TP) with one prototype overlaid with a nutrient (E-VA/TP+S) to enhance the growth of hGISA. The Etest GRD strips were tested with a standard 0.5-McFarland standard inoculum using MHA and MHA plus 5% blood (MHB) and were read at 18 to 24 and 48 h. The interpretive MIC cutoffs used for the new Etest GRD strips at 24 and 48 h were as follows: for GISA, TP or VA, >or=8, and a standard VA MIC of >or=6; for hGISA, TP or VA, >or=8, and a standard VA MIC of Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología
, Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos
, Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos
, Teicoplanina/farmacología
, Vancomicina/farmacología
, Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana
, Tiras Reactivas
, Sensibilidad y Especificidad
, Resistencia a la Vancomicina