RESUMEN
Osseointegrated craniofacial implants have improved retention and patients' perceptions of implant-retained nasal prostheses; however, the determination of the available bone sites for implant placement post-rhinectomy is difficult. This case report describes the use of cone beam computed tomography scanning and computer-assisted virtual planning in conjunction with digital photographs for rehabilitation of a facial defect with an implant-retained silicon nasal prosthesis. Two implants were planned in the anatomical area with adequate bone volume to achieve favorable cosmetic outcomes and accessibility for hygiene maintenance. The implant-retained nasal prosthesis resulted in a meaningful improvement in the esthetics without the need for plastic surgery. In such cases, the post-rhinectomy reconstruction surgery should be limited to preparation of the surgical defect area for an implant-retained prosthesis. Silicone prostheses are reliable alternatives to surgery and should be considered in selected cases.
Asunto(s)
Prótesis Maxilofacial , Nariz/cirugía , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Prótesis e Implantes , Implantación de Prótesis , Interfaz Usuario-Computador , Anciano , Carcinoma Basocelular/rehabilitación , Carcinoma Basocelular/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Estética Dental , Cara/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Nasales/rehabilitación , Neoplasias Nasales/cirugía , Oseointegración , Diseño de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , SiliconasRESUMEN
One of the considerable challenges for screw-retained multi-unit implant prosthesis is achieving a passive fit of the prosthesis' superstructure to the implants. This passive fit is supposed to be one of the most vital requirements for the maintenance of the osseointegration. On the other hand, the misfit of the implant supported superstructure may lead to unfavourable complications, which can be mechanical or biological in nature. The manifestations of these complications may range from fracture of various components in the implant system, pain, marginal bone loss, and even loss of osseointegration. Thus, minimizing the misfit and optimizing the passive fit should be a prerequisite for implant survival and success. The purpose of this article is to present and summarize some aspects of the passive fit achieving and improving methods. The literature review was performed through Science Direct, Pubmed, and Google database. They were searched in English using the following combinations of keywords: passive fit, implant misfit and framework misfit. Articles were selected on the basis of whether they had sufficient information related to framework misfit's related factors, passive fit and its achievement techniques, marginal bone changes relation with the misfit, implant impression techniques and splinting concept. The related references were selected in order to emphasize the importance of the passive fit achievement and the misfit minimizing. Despite the fact that the literature presents considerable information regarding the framework's misfit, there was not consistency in literature on a specified number or even a range to be the acceptable level of misfit. On the other hand, a review of the literature revealed that the complete passive fit still remains a tricky goal to be achieved by the prosthodontist.
RESUMEN
Retrieval of cement-retained implant prostheses can be more demanding than retrieval of screw-retained prostheses. This case report describes a simple and predictable procedure to locate the abutment screw access openings of cementretained implant-supported crowns in cases of fractured ceramic veneer. A conventional periapical radiography image was captured using a digital camera, transferred to a computer, and manipulated using Microsoft Word document software to estimate the location of the abutment screw access.