RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine potential changes in quality of care associated with a recent financing system implementation in Italy: in 1995, hospital financing reform implemented in Italy included the introduction of a DRG-based hospital financing system with the goals of controlling the growth of hospital costs and making hospitals more accountable for their productivity. DATA SOURCES: Hospital discharge abstract data from 1993 through 1996 for all hospitals (N=32) in the Friuli-Venezia-Giulia region of Italy. Regional population data were used to calculate rates. STUDY DESIGN: Changes between 1993 and 1996 in hospital admissions, length of stay, mortality rates, severity of illness, and readmission rates were studied for nine common medical and surgical conditions: appendicitis, diabetes mellitus, colorectal cancer, cholecystitis, bronchitis/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bacterial pneumonia, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and hip fracture. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The total number of ordinary hospital admissions decreased from 244,581 to 204,054 between 1993 and 1996, a population-based decrease of 17.3 percent (p<.001). The mean length of stay decreased from 9.1 days to 8.8 days, resulting in a 21.1 percent decrease in hospital bed days (p<.001). Day hospital use increased sevenfold from 16,871 encounters in 1993 to 108,517 encounters in 1996. The largest decrease in hospital admissions among study conditions was a 41 percent decrease for diabetes (from 2.25 per 1,000 in 1993 to 1.31 in 1996, p<.001). For eight of the nine conditions, severity of illness increased. Differences between severity-adjusted expected and observed in-hospital mortality rates were small. CONCLUSIONS: Observed trends showed a decrease in ordinary hospital admissions, an increase in day hospital admissions, and a greater severity of illness among hospitalized patients. There was little or no change in mortality and readmission rates. Administrative data can be used to track changes in patterns of care and to identify potential quality problems deserving further review.
Asunto(s)
Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Administración Financiera de Hospitales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Crafting a payment mechanism for hospitals that provides for the legitimate operating needs of efficient institutions is an enduring health policy dilemma. The Prospective Payment System used by Medicare and some other payers in the US has been criticized for not adjusting for differences in severity of illness within diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). Previous studies have examined the relationship between profitability and severity of illness at the hospital level. This study examines the relationships between severity of illness and cost, revenue, and profit at the patient level. Two measures of severity (disease stage and number of unrelated diseases) were significant predictors of cost per case, and often had better predictive power than DRGs. In most instances, payers did not compensate adequately for severity so that higher values for the severity variables resulted in financial losses for the hospital.
Asunto(s)
Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios/economía , Renta , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Contabilidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Colecistitis/economía , Enfermedad Coronaria/economía , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/clasificación , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Hospitales con más de 500 Camas , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalización/economía , Medicare , Philadelphia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether geographical areas with relatively low overall hospitalization rates have higher population-based rates of admission of patients with advanced stages of disease. METHODS: Age- and sex-standardized hospital admission rate were calculated for the residents of the 80 Local Health Units in Lombardia, Italy. Using the Disease Staging classification, advanced stage admissions were identified for six common medical and surgical conditions, which it was presumed would reflect untimely hospital admission. Standardized rates of advanced stage admissions were compared in areas with overall high hospitalization rates (high-use areas). RESULTS: Hospitalization at advanced stages of disease in the low-use areas were significantly higher for the six conditions combined (55.9 vs 43.0 per 100,000; P = 0.005), and for external hernia, appendicitis and uterine fibroma, but not for bacterial pneumonia, diverticular disease and peptic ulcer. For the six study conditions combined, residents of overall low-use area were 30% more likely to be admitted with advanced stages of disease. CONCLUSION: Low overall hospitalization rates were found to be associated with greater severity of illness at hospitalization and potentially avoidable morbidity for some conditions. Policies aimed at curbing unnecessary hospital admission should consider preserving access for appropriate treatment.
Asunto(s)
Morbilidad , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Enfermedad Aguda/clasificación , Áreas de Influencia de Salud , Enfermedad Crónica/clasificación , Recolección de Datos , Geografía , Hospitales Privados/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Públicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The authors (within 24 hours of the order) administered a telephone questionnaire to physicians prescribing benzodiazepines to patients over age 65 admitted to a tertiary care university hospital (N = 81 consecutive medical and surgical admissions). Data were obtained from 50 physicians. Prescriptions were most commonly written for preoperative relaxation (26%), pain (14%), nausea (12%), to aid intubation (12%), or facilitate a medical test (10%). Dosages were chosen on the basis of subjective experience (32%), lowest effective dose (28%), considerations of age/sex/weight (16%), and drug manual recommendations (8%). Ten percent of patients were prescribed a benzodiazepine before hospitalization, and their dosages were tapered (6%) or maintained (4%). There is considerable variation in physicians rationale for benzodiazepine prescriptions to hospitalized elderly patients. Benzodiazepines are used to treat symptoms rather than disorders. Age is infrequently considered in dosing judgments despite the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic changes known to be associated with aging.
Asunto(s)
Anciano , Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Pacientes Internos , Médicos/psicología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Benzodiazepinas , Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Motivación , Selección de Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Sedative-hypnotic medications are often used to treat anxiety and sleep disorders, although they may not be used appropriately. Relationships between hospital length of stay (LOS), costs, and levels of sedative-hypnotic use were examined. Charts of 856 elderly patients were reviewed for sedative hypnotic use and categorized into three groups: those whose use exceeded Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) guidelines, those who used sedative-hypnotic medications but did not exceed HCFA guidelines, and those who did not receive any sedative-hypnotic medications. Patients whose sedative-hypnotic use exceeded guidelines had longer LOS (21.5 exceeding guidelines vs. 12.3 within guidelines vs. 6.7 no use, p < or = .001) and higher costs ($29,245 exceeding guidelines vs. $15,219 within guidelines vs. $7,516 no use, p < = or .001.) Even after controlling for severity of illness and comorbid conditions, differences in LOS and costs persisted. This study indicates that sedative-hypnotic medications are frequently prescribed to elderly patients, often in doses exceeding proposed guidelines, and are associated with longer hospital stays and higher hospital costs.
Asunto(s)
Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Costos de Hospital , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Tiempo de Internación , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Femenino , Hospitales con más de 500 Camas , Hospitales Universitarios/economía , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Philadelphia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between sedative-hypnotic (S/H) utilization, severity of illness, length of stay, and hospital costs among older patients admitted to a tertiary care university hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective review of computerized hospital and pharmacy data bases. SUBJECTS: A total of 856 older consecutive medical and surgical admissions from November 1993 to March 1994. MEASUREMENTS: Sedative/hypnotic utilization in accord with the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) guidelines for S/H use in nursing homes. Jefferson Disease Staging to estimate severity of illness. Hospital records to obtain demographic characteristics, length of stay, and hospital costs. RESULTS: Patients whose S/H use exceeded HCFA guide lines, compared with those within the guidelines and those receiving no drugs, had longer lengths of stay (21.5 days vs 12.3 days vs 6.7 days, P < .001), increased hospital costs ($29,245 vs $15,219 vs $7,516, P < .001). and greater severity of illness (245.8 vs 189.5 vs 148.5, P < .001). S/H use exceeding and within HCFA guidelines were associated with increased length of stay (both P < .0001) and hospital costs (both P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Older hospitalized patients receiving S/H have greater severity of illness, longer lengths of stay, and higher hospital costs compared with other patients. S/H use, and, in particular, S/H use exceeding the HCFA guidelines, are associated with increased hospital stay and cost.
Asunto(s)
Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Philadelphia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Many studies have compared different countries' health care systems at the macro level. Less has been done to analyze care provided for patients with specific diseases and to compare physician attitudes concerning factors that influence patient care. This study compares severity of illness and length of hospital stay for patients admitted for diabetes mellitus, cholecystitis, or appendicitis at three teaching hospitals in Italy, Japan, and the United States. Physicians caring for patients with these diseases were surveyed to assess their opinions of the adequacy of resources available at their hospital, perceived administrative pressures concerning resource use, and interactions with patients and their families that relate to admission and discharge decisions. The severity of the patient mix was consistently higher in the U.S. hospital than in the Italian or Japanese hospitals. Controlling for diagnosis, severity of illness, surgery, age, and presence of co-morbid conditions, the U.S. hospital consistently had the shortest stays and the Japanese hospital the longest. Japanese physicians were more likely than U.S. or Italian physicians to report insufficient resources, such as nurses, to provide quality care, but less likely to report administrative pressures interfering with patient care. Differences in hospital utilization may reflect variation in clinical practices, availability of resources, barriers to access to care, organizational differences at the national and hospital level, and patient and family preferences.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/psicología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Apendicitis/cirugía , Colecistitis/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Italia , Japón , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
In rural areas, it is important to clarify our understanding of how primary care and specialty mental health professionals organize care for those with mental disorders, and the role that linkages between specialty mental health and primary health care providers can play in the effectiveness of such care. Although these are issues that must be generally addressed, in rural areas fewer institutional and individual providers per capita accentuate problems of health care organization and delivery. This paper reports findings from an exploratory study of service use in two primary care sites in a rural, group-model HMO (Site A enrollment = 2,625; Site B = 6,019). We found that patients in the primary care site who had weaker mental health consultative linkages, higher rurality, and less availability of mental health specialty care used more mental health services by primary care providers (RR = 5.19 (3.78,6.61)), received more ambulatory care from joint mental health/ primary care providers (RR = 1.68 (1.02,2.78)), and had more mental health hospital utilization (adjusted OR = 1.84 (0.54,6.23)). These findings point to the need for further study of primary care providers and their linkage relationships in rural areas, in this large and currently often underserved population.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Sistemas Prepagos de Salud/organización & administración , Trastornos Mentales/rehabilitación , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Predicción , Sistemas Prepagos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Servicios de Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Gender-based differences in hospital use may result from biological differences or may suggest problems of access to health services and quality of care. We hypothesized that there should be no difference in hospital care between men and women, given the same diagnosis. Hospitalizations were characterized by severity of illness, as this may indicate the timeliness of hospital care. Hospitalizations may be too late (with higher severity of illness) resulting in long stays and high costs, or too early (with lower severity of illness) resulting in care that could be given in alternative treatment settings. Three abdominal conditions were examined which could be misdiagnosed or confused with other diseases involving the female reproductive system: appendicitis, diverticulitis, and cholecystitis. The National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) was used for analysis. Disease staging was used to assign a severity of illness indicator, ranging from stage 1 (conditions with no complications) to stage 3 (multiple site involvement, poor prognosis). For each disease, the percentage of discharges and the age-adjusted discharge rate per 1000 population was examined by stage of illness and gender. For appendectomy, there was a significantly greater percentage of men at stage 1 (lower severity) compared to women (73% versus 67%). For diverticular disease, women had higher proportions of stage 2/3 discharges than men for both medical and surgical hospitalizations. For cholecystitis, women had a greater percentage of hospitalizations at stage 1 than men, notably for surgical treatment (63% compared with 38%), although more men were admitted at stage 2 for both medical and surgical treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)