RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Upper limb masses are one of the most common presentations in the outpatient setting. However, there is a paucity of information in the literature regarding the epidemiology of upper-extremity masses in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to determine the differential diagnoses and clinical characteristics in children aged ≤18 years presenting with upper limb masses. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients aged ≤18 years managed at our institution over a 5-year period was performed. We obtained information on patient demographics, clinical features, radiological investigations, intraoperative features, and histology. We also evaluated the correlation between the clinical and histopathological diagnoses in patients who underwent surgery. RESULTS: There were 141 upper limb masses in our series. The mean age at presentation was 12 years (SD, 5 years). The most common presenting complaints were asymptomatic swelling, pain, and paresthesia. The majority (128; 91%) of tumors were benign; there were 5 locally aggressive tumors and 6 malignant tumors. The dominant hand was involved in 60 patients. Of 140 patients, 43 (31%) patients had surgery. The procedures included incisional biopsy, excisional biopsy, wide resection, and reconstruction. One patient required a below elbow amputation for an osteosarcoma. CONCLUSIONS: Ten percent of cases represented malignant or locally aggressive disease. We have used our observations to develop a clinical algorithm that can assist clinicians in evaluating and managing children and adolescents presenting with upper-extremity masses. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Osteosarcoma , Adolescente , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Niño , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Osteosarcoma/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Extremidad Superior/patología , Extremidad Superior/cirugíaRESUMEN
Free flap tissue transfer has become the gold standard for reconstruction of composite head and neck defects. We sought to investigate the efficacy and morbidity of these procedures in the elderly. We retrospectively reviewed 245 head and neck free flap procedures (234 patients). Patients were stratified by age group (≥ or <65 years). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the following primary outcomes - free flap survival, postoperative medical and surgical complications and 30-day mortality. We found that free flap success and surgical complication rates were similar between the two age groups. Overall flap success and perioperative mortality rates were 94.3% and 2.1% respectively. Medical complications were significantly more common in the elderly group (p <0.001) and this correlated with comorbidity (OR = 2.81, p = 0.044) and advanced tumour stage (OR = 10.20, p= 0.029). Age was not independently associated with poor outcomes in our cohort. We then performed a systematic review of similar case-control studies worldwide and compared their findings with our results. We conclude that advanced age does not preclude free flap success in head and neck reconstruction. Rather, the presence of comorbidity appears to predict the development of medical complications postoperatively. Elderly patients with low comorbidity scores may be offered free flap reconstruction with less reservation.