RESUMEN
Background: Carpal tunnel release is among the most frequently conducted upper extremity procedures. While it typically provides patients with improved sensation, decreased pain, and improved function, a small percentage of cases require revision due to failed initial surgery. Consequently, adoption of endoscopic techniques for carpal tunnel revision procedures is beginning to be explored. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of postoperative clinical visits and patient-reported outcome measures for four patients who had undergone five endoscopic revision carpal tunnel release procedures (one patient had bilateral disease). All five cases had symptoms consistent with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. Results: One hundred percent (5 of 5) of cases resulted in patients reporting symptom improvement. Postoperative clinical visits and improved patient-reported outcome measures (QuickDash, PROMIS Upper Extremity, VAS Pain, PSEQ, PHQ, and Surgery Satisfaction) scores from baseline to 6 weeks demonstrated successful postoperative function and symptom resolution. Five of five cases resulted in patients resuming normal activities without restrictions within 1-5 weeks, with an average of 3.4 weeks. Conclusions: Preliminary findings suggest the endoscopic revision procedure may be safe and effective for patients with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, extending the indications to include scars proximal to the wrist crease. Moreover, this minimally invasive procedure facilitates a transition back to normal activities and avoids incisions on weight-bearing surfaces of the palm. Adopting endoscopic revision may reduce the need for prolonged postoperative care and physical therapy. However, due to the limited sample size of five patients, further investigation with larger cohorts is warranted to confirm these observations.
RESUMEN
Remote monitoring of patient activity following total knee arthroplasty has grown in popularity over the past decade. Recent technological advances have allowed for implantation of accelerometry devices within the tibial stem for remote monitoring of mobility postoperatively. Remote monitoring is suggested to allow for intervention in the case of events that may occur outside of regular follow-up appointments or traditional patient questionnaires. This report details the ability of an implanted tibial sensor to continuously collect objective mobility data allowing the orthopaedic surgeon to intervene beyond the standard 90-day episode of care.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many total knee replacement (TKR) patients need to have a contralateral knee replacement. Biomechanical differences between first and second replaced limbs of bilateral TKR have not been examined during stair negotiation. Additionally, it is unknown whether hip and ankle biomechanics of bilateral patients are altered. We examined hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics of first and second replaced limbs bilateral patients, as well as replaced and non-replaced limbs of unilateral patients, during stair ascent and descent. METHODS: Eleven bilateral TKR patients (70.09 ± 5.41 years, 1.71 ± 0.08 m, 91.78 ± 13.00 kg) and 15 unilateral TKR patients (64.93 ± 5.11 years, 1.75 ± 0.09 m, 89.18 ± 17.55 kg) were recruited. Patients performed three to five trials of stair ascent and descent. The second step, during ascent, was the step of interest when analyzing each limb. A 2 × 2 (limb × group) analysis of variance was performed to determine differences between limbs and groups. RESULTS: During ascent, bilateral patients exhibited decreased peak loading-response knee extension (KEM) and push-off plantarflexion moments. Unilateral replaced limb KEM was lower than non-replaced limbs. During descent, bilateral patients descended the staircase significantly slower, had lower peak loading-response vertical ground reaction force and KEM, and push-off KEM. Bilateral patients had higher peak loading-response hip extension and push-off plantarflexion moments, and increased knee adduction ROM, compared with unilateral TKA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral patients exhibited similar hip, knee, and ankle joint moments between first and second replaced limbs. Substantial differences in hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics during stair negotiation in bilateral patients compared with unilateral patients may indicate a more complex adaptation strategy present in these patients.