RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: While bone literature abounds with correlations of mechanical stiffness to mineralization, such correlations are reported without relating the findings to specific intracortical locations. This study reports on mapping of stiffness and mineralization distributions in ring-shaped cortical bone samples sliced from mid-diaphyseal bovine femur. Stiffness and mineralization measurements were conducted at points across the intracortical thickness along radial lines emanating from the inner (endosteal) surface to the outer (periosteal) surface. Measurements were taken along approximately 4 mm distance of cortical bone thickness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three experimental techniques were employed: Vickers microhardness (HV), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy, and computed tomography (CT). Stiffness values were extracted from the Vickers microhardness tests. Elemental mineralization values (calcium %wt. and phosphorus %wt.) were determined from EDX data. All measurements were repeated on three different femur bones taken from different bovines (collected fresh from butcher). RESULTS: The study plots stiffness values and elemental mineralization (calcium %wt. and phosphorus %wt.) versus cortical thickness. Both stiffness and Ca %wt. and P %wt. are found to track and to linearly increase when plotted along the radial distance. The stiffness and mineralization trends collected from Vickers and EDX measurements were verified by employing the CT number (Hounsfield units, HU) via CT scans of the same bone samples. Data fitting via statistical methods revealed that all correlations were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Starting from endosteal to periosteal surfaces of mid-diaphyseal bovine femur, it was found that stiffness, mineralization, and HU values all exhibit increasing and correlating trends.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal immunosuppressive regimen in kidney transplant recipients, delivering maximum efficacy with minimal toxicity, is unknown. METHODS: The Amsterdam, LEiden, GROningen trial is a randomized, multicenter, investigator-driven, noninferiority, open-label trial in 305 kidney transplant recipients, in which 2 immunosuppression minimization strategies-one consisting of early steroid withdrawal, the other of tacrolimus minimization 6 months after transplantation-were compared with standard immunosuppression with basiliximab, corticosteroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolic acid. The primary endpoint was kidney function. Secondary endpoints included death, primary nonfunction, graft failure, rejection, discontinuation of study medication, and a combined endpoint of treatment failure. An interim analysis was scheduled at 6 months, that is, just before tacrolimus minimization. RESULTS: This interim analysis revealed no significant differences in Modification of Diet in Renal Disease between the early steroid withdrawal group and the standard immunosuppression groups (43.2 mL/min per 1.73 m2 vs 45.0 mL/min per 1.73 m2, P = 0.408). There were also no significant differences in the secondary endpoints of death (1.0% vs 1.5%; P = 0.737), primary nonfunction (4.1% vs 1.5%, P = 0.159), graft failure (3.1% vs 1.5%, P = 0.370), rejection (18.6% vs 13.6%, P = 0.289), and discontinuation of study medication (19.6% vs 12.6%, P = 0.348). Treatment failure, defined as a composite endpoint of these individual secondary endpoints, was more common in the early steroid withdrawal group (P = 0.027), but this group had fewer serious adverse events and a more favorable cardiovascular risk profile. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these interim results, early steroid withdrawal is a safe short-term immunosuppressive strategy. Long-term outcomes, including a comparison with tacrolimus minimization after 6 months, will be reported in the final 2-year analysis.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based dentistry (EBD) can help provide the best treatment option for every patient, however, its implementation in restorative dentistry is very limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing the barriers preventing the implementation of EBD among dental undergraduate and graduate students in Montreal, and explore possible solutions to overcome these barriers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted by means of a paper format self-administrated questionnaire distributed among dental students. The survey assessed the barriers and potential solutions for implementation of an evidence-based practice. RESULTS: Sixty-one students completed the questionnaire. Forty-one percent of respondents found evidence-based literature to be the most reliable source of information for restorative treatment planning, however, only 16% used it. They considered that finding reliable information was difficult and they sometimes encountered conflicting information when consulting different sources. Dental students had positive attitudes towards the need for better access to evidence-based literature to assist learning and decision making in restorative treatment planning and to improve treatment outcomes. Even for dentists trained in EBD, online searching takes too much time, and even though it can provide information of better quality than personal intuition, it might not be enough to identify the best available evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Even though dental students are aware of the importance of EBD in restorative dentistry they rarely apply the concept, mainly due to time constraints. For this reason, implementation of EBD would probably require faster access to evidence-based knowledge.

Asunto(s)