RESUMEN

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of brilliant blue G (BBG) staining of the inner limiting membrane (ILM) on macular function. Method: Fourteen eyes of 14 patients consisting of 9 men and 5 women who underwent vitreous surgery with ILM peeling were studied. The mean age of the patients was 68.8 ± 9.14 years. Three eyes had a macular hole and eleven eyes had an epiretinal membrane. The ILM was made more visible by spraying 0.25% BBG into the vitreous cavity. The macular function was assessed by recording intraoperative focal macular electroretinograms (iFMERGs) before and after the intravitreal spraying of the BBG dye. The iFMERGs were recorded three times after core vitrectomy. The first recording was performed before the BBG injection (Phase 1, baseline), the second recording was performed after the spraying of the BBG and washing out the excess BBG (Phase 2), and the third recording was performed after the ILM peeling (Phase 3). All recordings were performed after 5 min of light-adaptation and stabilization of the intraocular conditions. The iFMERGs were recorded twice at each phase. The implicit times and amplitudes of the a- and b-wave, the PhNR, and the d-wave were measured. Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to determine the significance of differences of the findings at Phase 2 vs. Phase 1 and Phase 3 vs. Phase 1. A p value < 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant. Results: The average implicit times of the a-wave, b-wave, PhNR, and d-wave were not significantly different in Phase 1, 2, and 3. The average a-wave, b-wave, PhNR, and d-wave amplitudes at Phase 1 did not differ significantly from that at Phase 2 and at Phase 3. Conclusions: The results indicated that the intravitreal injection of BBG does not alter the physiology of the macula, and we conclude that BBG is safe. We also conclude that iFMERGs can be used to monitor the macular function safely during intraocular surgery.

RESUMEN

Vitreous temperature has been reported to vary during intraocular surgery. We measured the temperature at three intraocular sites, just posterior to the crystalline lens (BL), mid-vitreous (MV), and just anterior to the optic disc (OD), and investigated temperature changes before and after different types of surgical procedures in 78 eyes. The mean temperature at the beginning was 30.1 ± 1.70 °C in the anterior chamber, 32.4 ± 1.41 °C at the BL, 33.8 ± 0.95 °C at the MV, and 34.7 ± 0.95 °C at the OD. It was lowest at the BL, and highest at the OD. The mean temperature after cataract surgery was slightly lower especially at an anterior location. Thus, the temperature gradient became slightly flatter. The mean temperature after core vitrectomy was even lower at all sites and a gradient of the temperature was not present. The mean temperature after membrane peeling was significantly higher than that after core vitrectomy, and there was no gradient. The mean temperature after fluid/air exchange was lower at the BL and higher at the MV and at the OD. Thus, a gradient of higher temperatures at the OD appeared. The intraocular temperature distribution is different depending on the surgical procedure which can then change the temperature gradient. The temperature changes at the different intraocular sites and the gradients should be further investigated because they may affect the physiology of the retina and the recovery process.

RESUMEN

The temperature of the vitreous has been reported to vary during cataract and vitreous surgery. We measured intraocular temperature at four intraocular sites; the anterior chamber (AC), just behind the crystalline lens, mid-vitreous, and just anterior to the optic disc (OD) at the beginning of vitrectomy with a thermoprobe in 48 eyes. The temperatures were compared in three groups; eyes that underwent vitrectomy for the first time (Group V, n = 30), eyes that had previous vitrectomy and the vitreous cavity had been filled with balanced salt solution (BSS; Group A, n = 12), and eyes that had previous vitrectomy and the vitreous cavity was filled with silicone oil (Group S, n = 6). There was a gradient in the temperature in all groups, i.e., it was lowest in the AC, and it increased at points closer to the retina. The intraocular temperature was significantly correlated with the type of fluid in the vitreous cavity. The mean intraocular temperatures were not significantly different in Groups V and A, but they were significantly higher in Group S. Clinicians should be aware of the differences in the temperature at the different intraocular sites because the temperatures may affect the physiology of the retina and the recovery process.

RESUMEN

Purpose: Intravitreal injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents are widely performed, and subsequent intraocular pressure increase may cause retinal nerve fiber damage. This study aimed to determine the effects of paracentesis before intravitreal injection of an antivascular endothelial growth factor on electroretinograms. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study in a university hospital. Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients who underwent intravitreal injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents were selected for evaluation. Intraocular pressures and electroretinograms were recorded before surgery (baseline), after anterior chamber paracentesis, and after intravitreal injection. The amplitudes and latencies of the a- and b-waves, photopic negative response, and oscillatory potential were measured. Changes in each component of the electroretinograms, intraocular pressure, and relationships between these two factors were investigated. The preoperative and postoperative ocular perfusion pressure was calculated based on blood pressure. Results: The amplitudes of the b-waves were significantly smaller after intravitreal injection than at baseline (P = 0.02), while no significant change was found in the other components during surgery. There were no significant changes in the latencies of any component during surgery. The intraocular pressure was significantly lower (P < 0.001) after anterior chamber paracentesis (6.8 ± 4.3 mm Hg) compared to baseline (24.1 ± 8.1 mm Hg) or after intravitreal injection (17.1 ± 9.6 mm Hg; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Performing anterior chamber paracentesis before an intravitreal injection can prevent the intraocular pressure elevation and thus minimize the electrophysiological retinal dysfunction. Translational Relevance: Anterior chamber paracentesis before an intravitreal injection mitigates the adverse effects on retinal function.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Intravitreal injections (IVI) have become a part of daily practice for a growing number of procedures. We evaluated the retinal function by recording intraoperative photopic electroretinograms (ERGs) before an injection (T1), just after the injection (T2), and after the aspiration of the anterior chamber fluid (T3) of 19 eyes of 19 patients (mean age 70.6 years; men = 11) who received an IVI of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. The mean amplitudes of the b-wave, photopic negative responses (PhNR), and oscillatory potentials (OPs) 1 and 2 at T2 were significantly smaller than that at T1, but no significant difference was observed between T3 and T1. The mean implicit times of the a-wave and OP1, 2, and 3 at T2 and the a-wave and the OP2 at T3 were significantly longer than that at T1. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at T2 (49.32 mm Hg) was significantly higher and the IOP at T3 (8.74 mm Hg) was significantly lower than that at T1 (21.05 mm Hg). The retinal function was reduced and the IOP elevated just after the IVI. The response of each ERG component was different suggesting a different sensitivity of each type of retinal neuron to IVI.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate retinal function by intraoperative electroretinograms (ERGs) before and after core vitrectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case series. METHOD: Full-field photopic ERGs were recorded prior to the beginning and just after core vitrectomy using a sterilized contact lens electrode in 20 eyes that underwent non-complicated vitreous surgery. A light-emitted diode was embedded into the contact lens, and a stimulus of 150 ms on and 350 ms off at 2 Hz was delivered. The amplitudes and latencies of the a-, b-, and d-waves, photopic negative response (PhNR), and oscillatory potentials (OPs) were analyzed. The intraocular temperature at the mid-vitreous was measured at the beginning and just after the surgery with a thermoprobe. RESULTS: The intraocular temperature was 33.2 ± 1.3°C before and 29.4 ± 1.7°C after the vitrectomy. The amplitudes of the PhNR and OPs were significantly smaller after surgery, and the latencies of all components were prolonged after the surgery. These changes were not significantly correlated with the changes of the temperature. CONCLUSION: Retinal function is reduced just after core vitrectomy in conjunction with significant temperature reduction. The differences in the degree of alterations of each ERG component suggests different sensitivity of each type of retinal neuron.

Asunto(s)