RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To determine the effects of different intraabdominal pressure (IAP) on the ovaries in a laparoscopic rat model. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine the effects on the ovaries of different intraabdominal pressures (IAP) in laparoscopic surgery in a rat model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two post-pubertal nonpregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were divided randomly into four groups. In the control group, no intraabdominal pressure (IAP) was applied. In Group Pp10 and Group Pp15, an IAP of 10 and 15 mm Hg, respectively, were applied by carbon dioxide insufflation for 60 min, and a 30-min desufflation was carried out. In Group IPp15, a 15 mm Hg IAP was applied for 10 min, and then CO2 was desufflated for 10 min. After this ischemic preconditioning, IAP was established at 15 mm Hg for 60 min, after which CO2 was desufflated for 30 min. Erythrocyte and ovarian tissue malondialdehyde (MDA) and histopathologic damage scores were evaluated. RESULTS: In Groups Pp10 and Pp15, ovarian tissue MDA values were significantly increased compared to the control group. In Groups Pp10 and Pp15, erythrocyte MDA values were significantly increased when compared to Group IPp15 and the control group. Ovarian histopatological assesment scores were significantly higher in Group Pp15 than in Groups Pp10 and IPp15. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumoperitoneum causes injuries to abdominal organ such as the ovaries. The ischemic preconditioning method is more effective in reducing oxidative stress due to laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum than low-pressure pneumoperitoneum methods.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Uterine rupture after hysteroscopic septum resection is a rare complication, and its frequency is reported to be approximately 1-2.7%. Uterine perforation and monopolar resection during hysteroscopy are well-known risk factors for subsequent uterine rupture during pregnancy. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present a case of recurrent uterine ruptures during consecutive pregnancies in a patient who had undergone hysteroscopic septum resection for recurrent pregnancy loss. DISCUSSION: Recurrent uterine rupture due to hysteroscopic septum resection in pregnancy is a very rare condition. In the present case we noted that the first two uterine ruptures resulted from uterine contractions; however, the third rupture occurred spontaneously and earlier in gestation. As each uterine rupture occurred earlier than the rupture in the previous gestation, a history of uterine rupture during pregnancy should raise provider suspicion about the possibility of earlier uterine rupture recurrence. CONCLUSION: Uterine rupture may occur in pregnancies after hysteroscopic resection of the uterine septum. However, if a patient has a history of uterine rupture during previous pregnancies, the risk of uterine rupture may increase for earlier gestational ages in subsequent pregnancies. The patient must be informed about both the risks of uterine rupture during pregnancy after hysteroscopic septum resection and that recurrent ruptures may occur at earlier gestational weeks than during previous pregnancies.

RESUMEN

Placenta percreta is one of the life-threatening conditions in modern obstetrics. The rising caesarean section rate means rising placenta percreta rate. Treatment strategies range from a caesarean hysterectomy to leaving the placenta in situ with or without internal iliac artery ligation/uterine artery embolisation and/or methotrexate therapy. We describe a case of placenta previa percreta which we managed successfully with conservative modalities.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of 'coasting' on the outcome of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (ICSI-ET). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: IVF Centre, Ozel Ege Tup Bebek Merkezi, Izmir, Turkey. SAMPLE: Twenty-six coasted and 52 non-coasted COH and ICSI-ET patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. METHODS: Coasted patients were enrolled consecutively during the study period, and two non-coasted controls were selected from our database for each coasted patient. Coasting was decided when serum oestradiol level was > or = 4000 pg/mL. Groups were compared using chi2 and Mann-Whitney U-tests for statistical analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of oocytes collected, metaphase II (MII) oocytes and cleaving embryos, the fertilisation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Number of oocytes collected, number of MII oocytes, number of cleaving embryos, fertilisation rate and clinical pregnancy rate for the coasted and non-coasted groups were 15.5 +/- 5.2 and 14.0 +/- 7.1, 9.7 +/- 4.8 and 9.3 +/- 3.9, 6.8 +/- 3.9 and 5.8 +/- 3.1, 0.85 +/- 0.18 and 0.78 +/- 0.18, 13/26 and 24/52, respectively; these differences were not statistically significant. None of the patients in the coasted group were hospitalised for signs or findings of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Coasting does not adversely affect the number and the function of mature oocytes and the clinical pregnancy rate.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

METHODS: We investigated if mid-luteal estradiol levels could predict the outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) cycles ( n=231). Pregnant and non-pregnant women were compared regarding their peak estradiol levels on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection day, and mid-luteal estradiol levels on the 7th day following oocyte recovery. Pregnancy rates of the groups that were designed according to the "peak/mid-luteal estradiol level" and the mid-luteal estradiol levels were also compared. RESULTS: Peak and mid-luteal estradiol levels in pregnant women were higher than in non-pregnant women in all patients, although the difference between peak and mid-luteal estradiol levels were similar in pregnant and non-pregnants. Pregnant women had higher mid-luteal estradiol levels in good responders, but the peak estradiol levels of pregnant and non-pregnant women were similar. In poor responders, pregnant and non-pregnant women were similar with respect to peak and mid-luteal estradiol levels. Both in all patients and good responders, women with mid-luteal estradiol levels <200 pg/ml had lower pregnancy rates than those with >2000 pg/ml. Peak/mid-luteal estradiol ratios of pregnant and non-pregnant women were not significantly different in all patients, good responders and poor responders; although a tendency for a lower ratio in pregnants was encountered in good responders. Pregnancy rates of the groups according to the "peak/mid-luteal estradiol ratio" were similar; in all patients, good responders and poor responders. CONCLUSION: A relation between the mid-luteal estradiol level and the outcome is encountered only in good responders.

Asunto(s)