RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous reports on the treatment of sacral and ischial pressure injuries have not provided clear algorithms for surgical therapies. The objective of this study was to establish a reconstruction algorithm to guide the selection of an ideal free-style perforator flap that can be tailored to the defect in question. METHODS: We used 23 perforator flaps to reconstruct 14 sacral and 8 ischial defects in 22 patients over 5 years. A reconstruction algorithm system was developed based on the anatomical features of the perforator vessels (diameter, D; pulsatility [++â¼+++], P) and their position in the skin island (DPD) (ie, D+P+DPD). A perforator-based propeller flap was applied as the first-line choice; if this plan was not feasible, we applied an altered V-Y advancement model or another second-choice technique. RESULTS: All flaps survived, and only 1 patient experienced partial wound dehiscence, which healed by secondary intention. After an average follow-up period of 11.2 months, no patient experienced recurrence or infection. CONCLUSIONS: Free-style perforator flap selection is determined by pressure injury and the desired advantage of a specific approach. The use of free-style perforator-based propeller flaps allows a surgeon to transfer healthy tissue into the defect, shifts the suture line away from the bony prominence, and preserves additional future donor sites. In cases where unexpected variations are encountered, the V-Y advancement model or another technique can be used. The simplified surgical algorithm (D+P+DPD) can provide versatility and reliability, achieve a durable, natural esthetic outcome, and minimize injuries to future donor sites.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Isquion , Colgajo Perforante , Úlcera por Presión , Humanos , Colgajo Perforante/irrigación sanguínea , Úlcera por Presión/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Sacro/cirugía , Sacro/lesionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Posterior heel defect coverage is challenging because of the paucity of suitable flaps. The traditional local stepladder V-Y advancement flap is recommended only for small defects because of the lack of an axial pedicle. This study reports our experience of using the perforator-based stepladder V-Y advancement flaps in a larger posterior heel defect repair. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with posterior heel defects were treated with modified perforator-based stepladder V-Y advancement flaps in the Achilles tendon area for 11 years. Sixteen males and six females aged 3-74 years underwent surgery. The defect size, perforator characteristics, flap size, flap movement, sural nerve, lesser saphenous vein, deep fascia, flap survival, and outcome quality were analyzed. RESULTS: The perforators were found to predominate within two 2-cm intervals: 0-2 cm and 4-6 cm proximal to the tip of the lateral malleolus. Twenty-one perforator-based flaps healed uneventfully, and only one developed tip necrosis on the lower edge, which healed by secondary intention. The maximum distance of distal movement was 5.0 cm for the modified flap in contrast to 2.5 cm for the traditional flap. All flaps allowed adequate and durable reconstruction to be achieved, with excellent contouring after 2-28 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The perforator-based stepladder V-Y advancement flap resulted in good outcomes for larger posterior heel defects compared with conventional transfer methods. The flap is a reliable, well-vascularized, sensate, and pliable local flap option that uses similar tissue from adjacent skin for defect repair and creates an internal gliding surface for the Achilles tendon.