RESUMEN

Ramie (Boehmeria nivea L.) is a highly valued fiber crop. Its yield is often limited by lack of available phosphate (Pi) in the soil, but the underlying molecular mechanisms of ramie's response to Pi deficiency remain largely unknown. To investigate how ramie adapts to low Pi stress, we selected a low Pi-tolerant variety (H-5) and a low Pi-sensitive variety (XYL), and conducted a biochemical and transcriptomic analysis on roots and leaves of both varieties. After subjecting the plants to Pi-deficient and Pi-sufficient conditions for 15 days, we found that H-5 exhibited higher dry weight, longer root systems, and higher levels of Pi, galactolipids, and organic acids when subjected to Pi deprivation, compared to XYL. Transcriptomic analysis further revealed that Pi-responsive genes involved in lipid metabolism, Pi transport, organic acid synthesis, and acid phosphatase activities were more induced in the tolerant variety H-5. Furthermore, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) identified five hub genes, including phosphate transporter, SPX domain-containing protein and sulfoquinovosyl transferase, which played key roles in low Pi tolerance in ramie. The present study will broaden our comprehension of the differences and molecular mechanisms of different ramie cultivars in response to Pi starvation, and lay a foundation for future agronomic improvements in ramie and other fiber crops.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine decisional conflict and identify its predictors in Chinese pregnant women who were making decisions about further prenatal testing after receiving a screening result of high-risk for Down syndrome. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted from September 2020 to July 2021 in Guangzhou, China. Two-hundred and sixty pregnant women receiving a screening result of high-risk for Down syndrome completed a questionnaire comprising the Decisional Conflict Scale, Self-rating Anxiety Scale, and Social Support Rating Scale. RESULTS: The mean decisional conflict score was 28.8 ± 13.6, representing a moderate level. Advanced age (≥35 years), having a religious belief, not knowing about non-invasive or invasive prenatal testing, choosing NIPT for further prenatal testing, high levels of anxiety, and low levels of social support were significant predictors of decisional conflict, explaining 28.4% of its variance (F = 18.115, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results highlighted the necessity of assessing patients' decisional conflict and providing adequate interventions along the prenatal care trajectory. The results also showed that providing good support has an essential value for women by relieving their decisional conflict.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of anxiety symptoms and the associations between social support and anxiety symptoms among Chinese pregnant women receiving a high-risk screening result for Down syndrome. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Guangzhou, China, from September 2020 to July 2021 among 260 Chinese pregnant women receiving a high-risk screening result for Down syndrome. Measures included the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Social Support Rating Scale. RESULTS: The prevalence of anxiety symptoms (SAS ≥50) was 30.8%. Advanced age (≥35 years), education ≤ high school, pregnancy following in vitro fertilization, and low level of social support were predictors of anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that early routine screening for anxiety symptoms should be carried out among Chinese pregnant women receiving a high-risk screening result for Down syndrome. The importance of social support and the role it can play in decreasing anxiety should be discussed with patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Women with high-risk pregnancies are often required to make choices about further prenatal testing for Down syndrome, but the decisional conflict they face is poorly understood. This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Mandarin version of the decisional conflict scale (M-DCS) in Chinese women with high-risk pregnancies making choices about further prenatal testing for Down syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A methodological study was conducted to determine the psychometric properties of the M-DCS, specially, reliability and content, construct, and concurrent validity. The convenience sample comprised 240 pregnant women with high risk for Down syndrome attending the out-patient clinic of the study hospital in Guangzhou, China. RESULTS: The five-factor model of M-DCS was supported by confirmatory factor analysis with a satisfactory fit to the data (RMSEA <0.08, RMR <0.05, GFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI all >0.90, except AGFI=0.88 PNFI = 0.76). The internal consistency of the M-DCS was high, with Cronbach's α of 0.94. CONCLUSION: The reliability and validity (content, construct, and concurrent) of the M-DCS were all demonstrated as good. This instrument is an important tool for researchers and health-care providers working with women with high-risk pregnancies who need to make choices about further prenatal testing for Down syndrome.