RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that compared with daily soap and water bathing, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate bathing every other day for up to 28 days decreases the risk of hospital-acquired catheter-associated urinary tract infection, ventilator-associated pneumonia, incisional surgical site infection, and primary bloodstream infection in surgical ICU patients. DESIGN: This was a single-center, pragmatic, randomized trial. Patients and clinicians were aware of treatment-group assignment; investigators who determined outcomes were blinded. SETTING: Twenty-four-bed surgical ICU at a quaternary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adults admitted to the surgical ICU from July 2012 to May 2013 with an anticipated surgical ICU stay for 48 hours or more were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to bathing with 2% chlorhexidine every other day alternating with soap and water every other day (treatment arm) or to bathing with soap and water daily (control arm). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of catheter-associated urinary tract infection, ventilator-associated pneumonia, incisional surgical site infection, and primary bloodstream infection. Of 350 patients randomized, 24 were excluded due to prior enrollment in this trial and one withdrew consent. Therefore, 325 were analyzed (164 soap and water versus 161 chlorhexidine). Patients acquired 53 infections. Compared with soap and water bathing, chlorhexidine bathing every other day decreased the risk of acquiring infections (hazard ratio = 0.555; 95% CI, 0.309-0.997; p = 0.049). For patients bathed with soap and water versus chlorhexidine, counts of incident hospital-acquired infections were 14 versus 7 for catheter-associated urinary tract infection, 13 versus 8 for ventilator-associated pneumonia, 6 versus 3 for incisional surgical site infections, and 2 versus 0 for primary bloodstream infection; the effect was consistent across all infections. The absolute risk reduction for acquiring a hospital-acquired infection was 9.0% (95% CI, 1.5-16.4%; p = 0.019). Incidences of adverse skin occurrences were similar (18.9% soap and water vs 18.6% chlorhexidine; p = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with soap and water, chlorhexidine bathing every other day decreased the risk of acquiring infections by 44.5% in surgical ICU patients.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Baños/métodos , Clorhexidina/análogos & derivados , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Comorbilidad , Cumarinas , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Isocumarinas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Factores de TiempoAsunto(s)
Administración Hospitalaria , Tamizaje Masivo/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Sepsis/economía , Sepsis/mortalidad , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Sistemas de Información , Capacitación en Servicio , Liderazgo , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/economía , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/mortalidad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To establish a baseline for the incidence of sepsis by severity and presence on admission in acute care hospital settings before implementation of a broad sepsis screening and response initiative. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using hospital discharge abstracts of 5672 patients, aged 18 years and above, with sepsis-associated stays between February 2012 and January 2013 at an academic medical center and 5 community hospitals in Texas. RESULTS: Sepsis was present on admission in almost 85% of cases and acquired in-hospital in the remainder. The overall inpatient death rate was 17.2%, but was higher in hospital-acquired sepsis (38.6%, medical; 29.2%, surgical) and Stages 2 (17.6%) and 3 (36.4%) compared with Stage 1 (5.9%). Patients treated at the academic medical center had a higher death rate (22.5% vs. 15.1%, P<0.001) and were more costly ($68,050±184,541 vs. $19,498±31,506, P<0.001) versus community hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Greater emphasis is needed on public awareness of sepsis and the detection of sepsis in the prehospitalization and early hospitalization period. Hospital characteristics and case mix should be accounted for in cross-hospital comparisons of sepsis outcomes and costs.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/epidemiología , Centros Médicos Académicos/economía , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitales Comunitarios/economía , Hospitales Comunitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/economía , Sepsis/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to determine whether stress myocardial perfusion (SPECT) optimized with stress-only (SO) imaging is comparable to cardiac CT angiography (CTA) for evaluating patients with acute chest pain (ACP). METHODS: This was a prospective randomized observational study in 598 ACP patients who underwent CTA versus SPECT. The primary endpoint was length of hospital stay, and secondary endpoints were test feasibility, time to diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy, radiation exposure, and overall cost. Median follow-up was 6.5 mo, with a 3.8% cardiac event rate defined as death or an acute coronary syndrome. RESULTS: Of 2,994 patients screened, 1,703 (56.9%) were not candidates for CTA because of prior cardiac disease (41%) or imaging contraindications (16%). Time to diagnosis (8.1 ± 8.5 vs. 9.4 ± 7.4 h) and length of hospital stay (19.7 ± 27.8 vs. 23.5 ± 34.4 h) were significantly shorter with CTA than with SPECT (P = 0.002). However, time to diagnosis (7.0 ± 6.2 vs. 6.8 ± 5.9 h, P = 0.20), length of stay (15.5 ± 17.2 vs. 16.7 ± 15.3 h, P = 0.36), and hospital costs ($4,242 ± $3,871 vs. $4,364 ± 1781, P = 0.86) were comparable with CTA versus SO SPECT, respectively. SO was also superior to conventional SPECT regarding all of the above metrics and significantly reduced radiation exposure (5.5 ± 4.4 vs. 12.5 ± 2.7 mSv, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Stress SPECT when optimized with SO imaging is similar to CTA in time to diagnosis, length of hospital stay, and cost, with improved prognostic accuracy and less radiation exposure. Our results emphasize the importance of SO imaging, particularly in low-intermediate-risk emergency room patients who are a population likely to have a normal test result.
Asunto(s)
Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico por imagen , Corazón/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/mortalidad , Anciano , Dolor en el Pecho/economía , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Longevidad , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética/economía , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen de Perfusión Miocárdica/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único/economía , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a leading cause of death, but evidence suggests that early recognition and prompt intervention can save lives. In 2005 Houston Methodist Hospital prioritized sepsis detection and management in its ICU. In late 2007, because of marginal effects on sepsis death rates, the focus shifted to designing a program that would be readily used by nurses and ensure early recognition of patients showing signs suspicious for sepsis, as well as the institution of prompt, evidence-based interventions to diagnose and treat it. METHODS: The intervention had four components: organizational commitment and data-based leadership; development and integration of an early sepsis screening tool into the electronic health record; creation of screening and response protocols; and education and training of nurses. Twice-daily screening of patients on targeted units was conducted by bedside nurses; nurse practitioners initiated definitive treatment as indicated. Evaluation focused on extent of implementation, trends in inpatient mortality, and, for Medicare beneficiaries, a before-after (2008-2011) comparison of outcomes and costs. A federal grant in 2012 enabled expansion of the program. RESULTS: By year 3 (2011) 33% of inpatients were screened (56,190 screens in 9,718 unique patients), up from 10% in year 1 (2009). Inpatient sepsis-associated death rates decreased from 29.7% in the preimplementation period (2006-2008) to 21.1% after implementation (2009-2014). Death rates and hospital costs for Medicare beneficiaries decreased from preimplementation levels without a compensatory increase in discharges to postacute care. CONCLUSION: This program has been associated with lower inpatient death rates and costs. Further testing of the robustness and exportability of the program is under way.
Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Evaluación en Enfermería , Sepsis/economía , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/enfermería , Ahorro de Costo , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Innovación Organizacional , Objetivos Organizacionales , Seguridad del Paciente , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Texas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The hypothesis that spondylolysis (SL) and/or isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) cause low back pain (LBP) is widely accepted representing surgical indication in symptomatic cases. If SL/IS cause LBP, individuals with these conditions should be more prone to LBP than those without SL/IS. Therefore, the goal of the study was to assess whether the published primary data demonstrate an association between SL/IS and LBP in the general adult population. METHODS: Systematic review of published observational studies to identify any association between SL/IS and LBP in adults. The methodological quality of the cohort and case-control studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria (one cohort, seven case-control, seven cross-sectional). Neither the cohort study nor the two highest-quality case-control studies detected an association between SL/IS and LBP; the same is true for the remaining studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is no strong or consistent association between SL/IS and LBP in epidemiological studies of the general adult population that would support a hypothesis of causation. It is possible that SL/IS coexist with LBP, and observed effects of surgery and other treatment modalities are primarily due to benign natural history and nonspecific treatment effects. We conclude that traditional surgical practice for the adult general population, in which SL/IS is assumed to be the cause of non-radicular LBP whenever the two coexist, should be reconsidered in light of epidemiological data accumulated in recent decades.
Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/etiología , Espondilolistesis/complicaciones , Espondilólisis/complicaciones , Adulto , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares , Masculino , Estudios Observacionales como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As national quality initiatives are increasing requirements for individual physician data, our department of surgery initiated a surgeon-specific reporting (SSR) program to assess the value of personal knowledge on individual performance quality. We sought to evaluate the use of SSR as a tool to enable surgeons to assess and improve their clinical performance, and to identify barriers to use of their reports. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative research design involving semistructured interviews of surgeons who received performance reports derived from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP), and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) core measures and hospital administrative data. Transcripts were analyzed by the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Twenty-four of 39 surgeons (61.5%) who received their SSRs agreed to be interviewed and 23 were interviewed. About half (11 of 23) demonstrated comprehension of the data validity, accuracy, or complexity. Of these, 6 took steps to validate data or improve performance. Most respondents believed SSR would lead to performance improvement through knowledge of personal outcomes and peer comparison; however, they perceived SSR had limitations, such as small sample size and potential coding errors, and could lead to unintended consequences, such as inaccurate interpretation by others and surgeons' aversion to selecting high-risk patients. Respondents also suggested logistical improvements to reporting methods, such as report format and definitions of metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon-specific reporting has the potential to empower surgeons to improve their practice; however, more surgeons need efficient guidelines to understand the metrics. Our findings can be used to guide development of more SSR programs. Whether SSR programs lead to improvements in surgical outcomes is a matter for future research.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Cirugía General , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many published accounts of clinical trials report no differences between the treatment arms, while being underpowered to find differences. This study determined how the authors of these reports interpreted their findings. STUDY DESIGN: We examined 54 reports of surgical trials chosen randomly from a database of 110 influential trials conducted in 2008. Seven that reported having adequate statistical power (ß ≥ 0.9) were excluded from further analysis, as were the 32 that reported significant differences between the treatment arms. We examined the remaining 15 to see whether the authors interpreted their negative findings appropriately. Appropriate interpretations discussed the lack of power and/or called for larger studies. RESULTS: Three of the 7 trials that did not report an a priori power calculation offered inappropriate interpretations, as did 3 of the 8 trials that reported an a priori power < 0.90. However, we examined only a modest number of trial reports from 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Negative findings in underpowered trials were often interpreted as showing the equivalence of the treatment arms with no discussion of the issue of being underpowered. This may lead clinicians to accept new treatments that have not been validated.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos de Investigación/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/ética , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/éticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Regulatory and professional bodies issue an ever-increasing number of guidance documents on the ethics and methods of clinical trials, but the quality of clinical trials of invasive therapeutic procedures continues to be a concern. We interviewed aspiring and accomplished surgical trialists to understand how they use guidance documents and other resources in their work. METHODS: We performed a qualitative research study involving semistructured interviews of a diverse sample of 15 surgical trialists. RESULTS: Professional development as a surgical trialist was haphazard, inefficient, and marked by avoidable mistakes. Four types of resources played constructive roles: formal education; written materials on clinical trials; experience with actual trials; and interpersonal interactions with peers, experts, collaborators, and mentors. Recommendations for improvement centered on education, mentoring, networking, participating in trials, and facilitation by department chairs. CONCLUSIONS: The haphazard and unstructured nature of the current system is adding unnecessarily to the numerous challenges faced by surgical trialists.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Investigadores/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Adulto , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/normas , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/tendencias , Educación Médica Continua , Femenino , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , Entrevistas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Mentores , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación CualitativaAsunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/ética , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Humanos , Informe de Investigación/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/ética , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/métodosRESUMEN
Utilizing a sorted compendium of international clinical trial standards, investigators identified 15 conflicts among ethical and methodological guidance. Analysis distinguishes interpretational issues, lack of clarity, and contradiction as factors to be addressed if international trial guidance is to be improved.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/normas , Internacionalidad , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/ética , Humanos , Selección de Paciente/ética , Terapias en InvestigaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: If trials of therapeutic interventions are to serve society's interests, they must be of high methodological quality and must satisfy moral commitments to human subjects. The authors set out to develop a clinical-trials compendium in which standards for the ethical treatment of human subjects are integrated with standards for research methods. METHODS: The authors rank-ordered the world's nations and chose the 31 with >700 active trials as of 24 July 2008. Governmental and other authoritative entities of the 31 countries were searched, and 1004 English-language documents containing ethical and/or methodological standards for clinical trials were identified. The authors extracted standards from 144 of those: 50 designated as 'core', 39 addressing trials of invasive procedures and a 5% sample (N=55) of the remainder. As the integrating framework for the standards we developed a coherent taxonomy encompassing all elements of a trial's stages. FINDINGS: Review of the 144 documents yielded nearly 15â000 discrete standards. After duplicates were removed, 5903 substantive standards remained, distributed in the taxonomy as follows: initiation, 1401 standards, 8 divisions; design, 1869 standards, 16 divisions; conduct, 1473 standards, 8 divisions; analysing and reporting results, 997 standards, four divisions; and post-trial standards, 168 standards, 5 divisions. CONCLUSIONS: The overwhelming number of source documents and standards uncovered in this study was not anticipated beforehand and confirms the extraordinary complexity of the clinical trials enterprise. This taxonomy of multinational ethical and methodological standards may help trialists and overseers improve the quality of clinical trials, particularly given the globalisation of clinical research.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/ética , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/ética , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Investigación Biomédica/normas , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/normas , Quimioterapia/ética , Quimioterapia/normas , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/normas , Cooperación InternacionalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop a preliminary version of a post-doctor visit self-assessment tool that patients with hypertension can use to evaluate their communication behaviors. High-quality communication between patient and doctor may have a positive effect on blood pressure control in hypertensive patients. Patients' communicative behaviors such as asking questions influence those of doctors, but most existing measurement tools assess doctors' behaviors rather than patients'. METHODS: The tool is intended for use by African American or Caucasian American adults with hypertension, regardless of literacy level. The project included theory-based development of the item pool, usability testing (8 individuals), and cognitive response testing (13 additional individuals). MAIN RESULTS: After multiple iterations, the preliminary version includes 138 items in 7 theory-based domains. CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The self-assessment tool is ready for testing of item and scale reliability and validity and consequent item reduction. This tool could prove useful in trials evaluating whether patients with hypertension who learn to be better communicators are more likely to achieve blood pressure control. In addition, because it asks patients to reflect on their use of specific behaviors that can be learned, the tool might also help patients in clinical practice to assume more active roles during their medical interactions.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Participación del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Conducta , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/terapia , Masculino , Médicos , Psicometría/instrumentación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Población BlancaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to develop an interactive DVD to help African American and Caucasian American adults with hypertension learn how to become better communicators during medical interactions. Material was to be presented in several formats, including patients' narratives (stories). METHODS: To develop the narratives we recruited members of the target audience and elicited stories and story units in focus groups, interviews, and seminars. Story units were ranked-ordered based on conformance with the theory of planned behavior and narrative qualities and then melded into cohesive stories. The stories were recounted by actors on the DVD. RESULTS: 55 adults (84% women; 93% African American) participated in a focus group, interview, or seminar; transcripts yielded 120 story units. The most highly rated units were woven into 11 stories. The six highest rated stories/actor-storytellers were selected for presentation on the DVD. CONCLUSION: We achieved our goal of developing an easy-to-use, story-driven product that may teach adults how to talk effectively with their doctors about hypertension. The DVD's effectiveness should be tested in a randomized trial. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Behavioral interventions aimed at improving patients' ability to communicate during doctor visits may be useful adjuncts in the achievement of BP goals.
Asunto(s)
DC-I , Hipertensión/prevención & control , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Negro o Afroamericano , Anciano , Alabama , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Narración , Población BlancaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic health care disparities are well described in people living with HIV/AIDS, although the processes underlying observed disparities are not well elucidated. METHODS: A retrospective analysis nested in the University of Alabama at Birmingham 1917 Clinic Cohort observational HIV study evaluated patients between August 2004 and January 2007. Factors associated with appointment nonadherence, a proportion of missed outpatient visits, were evaluated. Next, the role of appointment nonadherence in explaining the relationship between African American race and virologic failure (plasma HIV RNA >50 copies/mL) was examined using a staged multivariable modeling approach. RESULTS: Among 1221 participants, a broad distribution of appointment nonadherence was observed, with 40% of patients missing at least 1 in every 4 scheduled visits. The adjusted odds of appointment nonadherence were 1.85 times higher in African American patients compared with whites [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.61 to 2.14]. Appointment nonadherence was associated with virologic failure (odds ratio = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.48 to 2.13) and partially mediated the relationship between African American race and virologic failure. African Americans had 1.56 times the adjusted odds of virologic failure (95% CI = 1.19 to 2.05), which declined to 1.30 (95% CI = 0.98 to 1.72) when controlling for appointment nonadherence, a hypothesized mediator. CONCLUSIONS: Appointment nonadherence was more common in African American patients, associated with virologic failure, and seemed to explain part of observed racial disparities in virologic failure.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Citas y Horarios , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Grupos Raciales , Adulto , Alabama , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No national data exist regarding racial/ethnic differences in the use of interventions for patients at the end of life. OBJECTIVES: To test whether among 3 cohorts of hospitalized seriously ill veterans with cancer, noncancer or dementia the use of common life-sustaining treatments differed significantly by race/ethnicity. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study during fiscal years 1991-2002. PATIENTS: Hospitalized veterans >55 years, defined clinically as at high-risk for 6-month mortality, not by decedent data. MEASUREMENTS: Utilization patterns by race/ethnicity for 5 life-sustaining therapies. Logistic regression models evaluated differences among Caucasians, African Americans and Hispanics, controlling for age, disease severity and clustering of patients within Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. RESULTS: Among 166,059 veterans, both differences and commonalities across diagnostic cohorts were found. African Americans received more or the same amount of end-of-life treatments across disease cohorts, except for less resuscitation [OR = 0.84 (0.77-0.92), p = 0.002] and mechanical ventilation [OR = 0.89 (0.85-0.94), p < or = 0.0001] in noncancer patients. Hispanics were 36% (cancer) to 55% (noncancer) to 88% (dementia) more likely to receive transfusions than Caucasians (p < 0.0001). They received similar rates as Caucasians for all other interventions in all other groups, except for 161% higher likelihood for mechanical ventilation in patients with dementia. Increased end-of-life treatments for both minority groups were most pronounced in the dementia cohort. Differences demonstrated a strong interaction with the disease cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in level of end-of-life treatments were disease specific and bidirectional for African Americans. In the absence of generally accepted, evidence-based standards for end-of-life care, these differences may or may not constitute disparities.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano , Estudios de Cohortes , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Veteranos , Población BlancaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite recent high-quality evidence for their cost-effectiveness, thiazides are underused for controlling hypertension. The goal of this study was to design and test a practice-based intervention aimed at increasing the use of thiazide-based antihypertensive regimens. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study was carried out in general medicine ambulatory practices of a large, academically-affiliated Veterans Affairs hospital. The intervention group consisted of the practitioners (13 staff and 215 trainees), nurses, and patients (3,502) of the teaching practice; non-randomized concurrent controls were the practitioners (31 providers) and patients (18,292) of the non-teaching practices. Design of the implementation intervention was based on Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations model. Over 10.5 months, intervention teams met weekly or biweekly and developed and disseminated informational materials among themselves and to trainees, patients, and administrators. These teams also reviewed summary electronic-medical-record data on thiazide use and blood pressure (BP) goal attainment. Outcome measures were the proportion of hypertensive patients prescribed a thiazide-based regimen, and the proportion of hypertensive patients attaining BP goals regardless of regimen. Thirty-three months of time-series data were available; statistical process control charts, change point analyses, and before-after analyses were used to estimate the intervention's effects. RESULTS: Baseline use of thiazides and rates of BP control were higher in the intervention group than controls. During the intervention, thiazide use and BP control increased in both groups, but changes occurred earlier in the intervention group, and primary change points were observed only in the intervention group. Overall, the pre-post intervention difference in proportion of patients prescribed thiazides was greater in intervention patients (0.091 vs. 0.058; p = 0.0092), as was the proportion achieving BP goals (0.092 vs. 0.044; p = 0.0005). At the end of the implementation period, 41.4% of intervention patients were prescribed thiazides vs. 30.6% of controls (p < 0.001); 51.6% of intervention patients had achieved BP goals vs. 44.3% of controls (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This multi-faceted intervention appears to have resulted in modest improvements in thiazide prescribing and BP control. The study also demonstrates the value of electronic medical records for implementation research, how Rogers' model can be used to design and launch an implementation strategy, and how all members of a clinical microsystem can be involved in an implementation effort.
RESUMEN
Obstructive lung diseases are associated with high rates of depression and anxiety, yet many patients are never screened or treated. This study evaluated the five-question Depression and Anxiety modules of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) Patient Questionnaire as a telephone screen in 1,632 patients with chronic breathing disorders at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston, TX. Subsequent testing of 828 patients with the Beck Depression Inventory-II and the Beck Anxiety Inventory showed that the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of the Depression and Anxiety modules of the PRIME-MD Patient Questionnaire screening were 94.6% and 49.5% (Depression); 93.7% and 32.2% (Anxiety); and 97.7%, and 36.0% (combined screen), with an overall accuracy of 80.7%. In such populations, these two modules of the PRIME-MD Patient Questionnaire may be a useful screening tool.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Determinación de la Personalidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/psicología , Veteranos/psicología , Anciano , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Hospitales de Veteranos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inventario de Personalidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Psicometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , TexasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Screening for mental illness in primary care is widely recommended, but little is known about the evaluation, treatment, and long-term management processes that follow screening. The aim of this study was to examine and describe the quality of mental health care for persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and anxiety/depressive disorders, as measured by adherence to practice guidelines. METHOD: This retrospective chart review examined data for 102 primary care and mental health care patients with COPD who were diagnosed, using Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV criteria, with major depressive disorder, dysthymia, depression not otherwise specified, generalized anxiety disorder, or anxiety not otherwise specified. Data were gathered from primary care progress notes from the year prior to enrollment in a randomized controlled trial (enrollment was from July 2002 to April 2004). We compared the care received by these patients over 1 year with that recommended by practice guidelines. Charts were abstracted using a checklist of recommended practice guidelines for diagnostic evaluation, acute treatment, and long-term management of anxiety and depressive disorders. RESULTS: Fifty (49%) of the 102 patients were recognized during the review year as having an anxiety or depressive disorder. Eighteen patients were newly assessed for depressive or anxiety disorders during the chart review year. Patients followed in primary care alone, compared with those who were comanaged by mental health care providers, were less likely to have guideline-adherent care. CONCLUSION: Depressive and anxiety disorders are recognized in about half of patients; however, guideline-supported diagnostic evaluation, acute treatment (except for medications), and long-term management rarely occur in the primary care setting. To improve the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care, the process of care delivery must be understood and changed.
RESUMEN
Although rarely studied, physician-patient interactions immediately following diagnostic tests are significant medical events because during these encounters the physician and patient often make decisions about major and sometimes invasive treatment. This investigation analyzed patterns of physician-patient communication following coronary angiography with particular attention to behaviors important to decision-making: physician information-giving, physician use of partnership-building, and active forms of patient participation (e.g., asking questions, being assertive, expressing concerns). We were particularly interested in effects related to the patient's race in light of documented evidence of racial disparities in cardiac care and outcomes. From audiotape recordings, 93 physician-patient interactions after coronary angiogram in a catheterization laboratory in a large US Veterans Affairs Medical Center were coded to measure the frequency of physicians' information-giving and partnership-building and the frequency of active patient participation. We also stratified these behaviors according to whether the behavior was prompted (e.g., physician information in response to a patient's question; a patient's opinion solicited by the doctor) or self-initiated. Several findings were noteworthy. First, these interactions were very brief and dominated by the physician. Second, although physician information-giving increased with more active patient participation, which in turn was correlated with physicians' use of partnership-building, proportionally little of the physicians' information (8%) and active patient participation (9%) was directly prompted by the other interactant. Finally, there was a tendency for physicians to self-initiate less information giving to black patients and for black patients to self-initiate less active participation than white patients. Although these differences were attenuated when other variables (e.g., the physician's training, disease severity) were included in the analysis, the pattern suggests a potential cycle of passivity where certain patients tend to receive fewer informational resources and these patients in turn do less to prompt the doctor for more.