RESUMEN
Despite their necessity and relevance, studies examining the professional self-image of nurses and instruments to measure this professional self-image in the homecare setting are scarce. This study highlights both the positive self-image of home nurses and the existence of a delicate balance between the large degree of autonomy that home nurses have and the need to feel supported in their professional role and responsibility. The practice environment, including time pressure, workload, and insufficient support, needs to be addressed to keep it from having a negative impact on the professional self-image of home nurses in the long-term.
Asunto(s)
Enfermería en Salud Comunitaria , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Personal de Enfermería/psicología , Autoimagen , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Bélgica , Estudios Transversales , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of the implementation of a patient and family education programme for pressure ulcer prevention in an organisation for home care nursing on guideline adherence and on prevalence and severity of pressure ulcers and to examine the determining factors for the application of measures for pressure ulcer prevention. BACKGROUND: Quality improvement programmes in pressure ulcer prevention are not always successful. DESIGN: Implementation study using a pretest-post-test design. Data were collected in three probability samples. The first post-test data collection was held after six months, the second after 18 months. METHOD: Statistical analysis was used, comparing the pretest sample and the second post-test sample. RESULTS: After 18 months, the proportion of subjects with adherent measures had increased from 10·4-13·9%, the proportion of subjects with non-adherent measures decreased from 45·7-36·0%, the proportion of subjects without pressure ulcer prevention increased from 43·9-50·1% (p<0·0001, Chi-square test). Sub-analysis revealed that a positive change in guideline adherence was observed principally in the group at risk. Better process-of-care indicators were associated by lower pressure ulcer prevalence and less severe skin lesions. The nurses' judgement of a patient risk status was the most important factor for applying preventive measures. Furthermore, application of pressure ulcer prevention was determined by higher age (from the age category of 70-79 years), higher dependency for the activities of daily living, higher than baseline mobility score and the presence of a pressure ulcer. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline adherence in pressure ulcer prevention changed significantly after implementation of the education programme. There might have been inconsistencies in the nurses' risk judgement. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Quality of pressure ulcer prevention improved, but several items for improvement remain. Adaptation of risk assessment procedures is needed.
Asunto(s)
Guías como Asunto , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Úlcera por Presión/enfermeríaRESUMEN
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the pressure ulcer prevalence in home nursing patients and to evaluate guideline adherence of measures for the prevention of pressure ulcers and the participation of informal carers in pressure ulcer prevention. BACKGROUND: Since 2002, the Belgian Guideline for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers was published on the Internet, but no information was available on guideline adherence in home care. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of pressure ulcer prevalence and guideline adherence was performed in a cluster randomized sample of 2779 clients of nine regional nursing departments in Flanders, Belgium. The Belgian Guideline for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers was the reference standard for the evaluation of the guideline adherence. RESULTS: There were 744 subjects at risk for developing pressure ulcers. The overall prevalence of pressure ulcers for the total sample population was 6.8%. The age-, sex- and risk-standardized prevalence per regional department varied between 4.9% and 9.1%. Of the 744 subjects at risk, 33 (4.4%) received preventive measures, which were in adherence to the Belgian Guideline for Prevention of Pressure Ulcers, 482 persons (64.8%) were administered measures, which did not adhere to the Belgian Guideline for Prevention of Pressure Ulcers and in 229 subjects (30.8%) at risk for developing pressure ulcers, prevention was lacking. For subjects with at least one pressure ulcer, the proportions were: 4.8% adherence, 76.6% no adherence and 18.6% no prevention. A proportion of 22.2% of the patients at risk and their informal carers were informed and motivated by the home care nurse to participate in the pressure ulcer prevention and their actual participation in the prevention was 21.4% of all risk cases. CONCLUSIONS: The adherence of nurses and clients to the guideline for pressure ulcer prevention was low. RELEVANCE TO THE CLINICAL PRACTICE: The study demonstrates a detailed evaluation of guideline adherence to pressure ulcer prevention in an individual patient situation, with special attention for materials and measures, which are not adequate and not recommended by the Belgian Guideline for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Actividades Cotidianas , Bélgica/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Recolección de Datos , Humanos , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
AIM: To gain insight into the core interventions in home nursing. METHODS: In this descriptive, quantitative, cross-sectional study two questionnaires, based on the nursing interventions classification, were used to collect data from 501 nurses working in an organization for home nursing in Belgium. Response rate was 88%. RESULTS: The self-care assistance, (im)mobility and (psycho)social interventions are the most frequently performed interventions in home nursing, but they are performed and can only be interpreted in combination with other, more technical interventions. Therefore, these interventions can be considered the core interventions in home nursing.