Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 848: 157694, 2022 Nov 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35907546

RESUMEN

In environments with similar physical parameters, thermal comfort and sensation feelings may differ indoors and outdoors. How indoor and outdoor thermal perception differ from each other remains unclear. This study compared and discussed 29,536 field survey data, including 19,191 sets of indoor data, and 10,345 sets of outdoor data, covering five Köppen climate zones during transitional seasons and summer. Indoor data points were collected from two databases: the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort II and the SCATs (Smart Controls and Thermal Comfort), while outdoor data points were collected from the RUROS database (Rediscovering the Urban Realm and Open Spaces) and five individual projects executed in Singapore, Hong Kong, Guangzhou, Changsha, and Tianjin. The concepts of neutral rate (NR) and comfort rate (CR) were developed to help categorize "neutral" and "comfort" across different studies. The results of this study show that people are less sensitive to changes in thermal environment outdoors than indoors. Moreover, thermal comfort cannot be simply treated as thermal neutral, particularly for outdoor spaces. Compared with MM (mixed-mode) and NV (naturally ventilated) spaces, outdoor space does not have the highest NR, but its CR is much higher, with a wide range of SET* (Standard Effective Temperature) corresponding to CR over 80 %, from 15.5 °C to 23.4 °C. In the Cfa (humid subtropical) climate zone, significantly higher CR are recorded for outdoor spaces, although the NR are similar or even lower than those of indoors. Natural thermal resources in the outdoor thermal environment may hold the key to extending indoor comfort ranges.


Asunto(s)
Clima , Sensación Térmica , Hong Kong , Humanos , Aprendizaje , Estaciones del Año
2.
Sci Total Environ ; 705: 135764, 2020 Feb 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31806315

RESUMEN

Urban trees are widely promoted as a solution to cool the urban environment because of shading and evaporative cooling provided by tree canopies. The extent to which the cooling benefits are realized is dependent not just on the genetically determined traits of trees, but also by their interactions with the atmospheric and edaphic conditions in urban areas, for which there is currently a paucity of information. We conducted a field experiment to compare whole-tree transpiration (Et) of tropical urban species from seasonally dry forest (SDF) (Tabebuia rosea, Lagerstroemia speciosa, Delonix regia, Caesalpinia ferrea, Dalbergia sissoo, Samanea saman) and aseasonal evergreen forest (AEF) (Peltophorum pterocarpum, Sindora wallichii). We examined the dependence of Et on atmospheric conditions (solar radiation (Rn) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD)), as well as on soil moisture level (θv). Daily Et differences between species were large but not statistically significant overall: 2000-3200 g m-2 (leaf area) under sunny conditions and 980-2000 g m-2 under cloudy conditions. The led to a daily latent heat flux (LE) of 770 W m-2 between the species with the highest (2136 W m-2) and lowest (1369 W m-2) daily Et. SDF species had higher daily Et than AEF species, but the difference was only significant under cloudy condition. Rn had a slightly stronger role in influencing transpiration compared to VPD, and species responses to drought stress differed marginally between the two groups. We assessed if two plant functional traits, wood density (ρw) and leaf stomatal conductance (gs), could be used to predict Et. Only gs was shown to be moderately correlated with Et, but more studies are needed to assess this given the limited number of species used in the study.


Asunto(s)
Transpiración de Plantas , Árboles , Bosques , Hojas de la Planta , Presión de Vapor , Agua
3.
Int J Biometeorol ; 57(6): 895-907, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23250734

RESUMEN

This paper presents the comparative analysis between the findings from two field surveys of human thermal conditions in outdoor urban spaces during the summer season. The first survey was carried out from August 2010 to May 2011 in Singapore and the second survey was carried out from June 2010 to August 2010 in Changsha, China. The physiologically equivalent temperature (PET) was utilized as the thermal index to assess the thermal conditions. Differences were found between the two city respondents in terms of thermal sensation, humidity sensation, and wind speed sensation. No big difference was found between the two city respondents regarding the sun sensation. The two city respondents had similar neutral PET of 28.1 °C for Singapore and 27.9 °C for Changsha, respectively. However, Singapore respondents were more sensitive to PET change than Changsha respondents and the acceptable PET range for Changsha respondents was wider than that for Singapore respondents. Besides, the two city respondents had different thermal expectations with the preferred PET of 25.2 °C and 22.1 °C for Singapore and Changsha, respectively. The results also reveal that Changsha respondents were more tolerant than Singapore respondents under hot conditions. Finally, two regression models were proposed for Singapore and Changsha to predict the human thermal sensation in a given outdoor thermal environment.


Asunto(s)
Temperatura Corporal/fisiología , Estaciones del Año , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , China/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Singapur/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA